Bellflower — 2024-03-11

A Consideration and possible action to conduct a public hearing to consider\ngranting an oil pipeline franchise to SFPP, L.P., and read by title, waive\nfurther reading, and introduce Ordinance No. 1427 – An Ordinance granting\nto SFPP, L.P. (“SFPP”) a Delaware Limited Partnership, an oil pipeline\nfranchise within the City of Bellflower.\nCEQA: The proposed ordinance is exempt from additional environmental review\nunder the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code\n§§ 21000, et seq., “CEQA”) and CEQA regulations (14 California Code of\nRegulations §§ 15000, et seq.) because the granting of the oil pipeline franchise\nfits within the definition of the Class 1 exemption, “Existing Facilities,” as defined\nin Section 15301(c) of the CEQA regulations. The proposed grant of franchise\ninvolves no or negligible alteration of existing facilities and involves no or negligible\nexpansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the determination that the\nCategorical Exemption applies. Furthermore, the proposed grant of franchise will\nnot adversely impact air quality or any other environmental area, as it will be\nsubject to applicable regulatory requirements.\nRecommendation to City Council: 1) Open the public hearing; take testimonial and\ndocumentary evidence; and after considering the evidence, read by title only,\nwaive further reading, and introduce Ordinance No. 1427; or 2) Alternatively,\ndiscuss and take other action related to this item.

B Consideration and possible action to conduct a public hearing to consider,\nread by title, waive further reading, and introduce Ordinance No. 1428 –\nAn Ordinance granting to Air Products Manufacturing, LLC (“Air Products”),\na Delaware Limited Liability Company, an oil pipeline franchise within the\nCity of Bellflower.\nCEQA: The proposed ordinance is exempt from additional environmental review\nunder the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code\n§§ 21000, et seq., “CEQA”) and CEQA regulations (14 California Code of\nRegulations §§ 15000, et seq.) because the granting of the oil pipeline franchise\nfits within the definition of the Class 1 exemption, “Existing Facilities,” as defined\nin Section 15301(c) of the CEQA regulations. The proposed grant of franchise\ninvolves no or negligible alteration of existing facilities and involves no or negligible\nexpansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the determination that the\nCategorical Exemption applies. Furthermore, the proposed grant of franchise will\nnot adversely impact air quality or any other environmental area, as it will be\nsubject to applicable regulatory requirements.\nRecommendation to City Council: 1) Open the public hearing; take testimonial and\ndocumentary evidence; and after considering the evidence, read by title only,\nwaive further reading, and introduce Ordinance No. 1428; or 2) Alternatively,\ndiscuss and take other action related to this item.\n11 PUBLIC HEARINGS – Continued

C Consideration and possible action to conduct a public hearing to consider\ngranting an oil pipeline franchise to SFPP, L.P., and read by title, waive\nfurther reading, and introduce Ordinance No. 1429 – An Ordinance granting\nto SFPP, L.P. (“SFPP”), Delaware Limited Partnership, an oil pipeline\nfranchise within the City of Bellflower.\nCEQA: The proposed ordinance is exempt from additional environmental review\nunder the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code\n§§ 21000, et seq., “CEQA”) and CEQA regulations (14 California Code of\nRegulations §§ 15000, et seq.) because the granting of the oil pipeline franchise\nfits within the definition of the Class 1 exemption, “Existing Facilities,” as defined\nin Section 15301(c) of the CEQA regulations. The proposed grant of franchise\ninvolves no or negligible alteration of existing facilities and involves no or negligible\nexpansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the determination that the\nCategorical Exemption applies. Furthermore, the proposed grant of franchise will\nnot adversely impact air quality or any other environmental area, as they will be\nsubject to applicable regulatory requirements.\nRecommendation to City Council: 1) Open the public hearing; take testimonial and\ndocumentary evidence; and after considering the evidence, read by title only,\nwaive further reading, and introduce Ordinance No. 1429; or 2) Alternatively,\ndiscuss and take other action related to this item.

A Resolution adopting the Bellflower Bail Schedule and requesting the\npresiding judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court approve the Bail\nSchedule for misdemeanor and infraction violations of the Bellflower\nMunicipal Code.\nCEQA: Adoption of this Resolution is exempt from the California Environmental\nQuality Act (“CEQA”) under CEQA Guidelines § 15601(b)(3) because it can be\nseen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Resolution may have a\nsignificant effect on the environment.\nRecommendation to City Council: 1) Consider adopting Resolution No. 24-14, a\nResolution establishing a revised and updated Bail Schedule for misdemeanor and\ninfraction violations of the Bellflower Municipal Code, and requesting the presiding\njudge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court approve the Bail Schedule for\nmisdemeanor and infraction violations of the Bellflower Municipal Code (“BMC”);\nor 2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

B Consideration and possible action to adopt Resolution No. 24-14 –

A Consideration and possible action to receive and file Warrant Register\nNo. 24-091, dated March 11, 2024.\nRecommendation to City Council: 1) Receive and file Warrant Register\nNo. 24-091; or 2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

C Consideration and possible action to authorize the City Manager to execute\nAgreement File No. 781.2, in a form approved by the City Attorney, with\nKTU&A for Parks and Recreation Design Services.\nRecommendation to City Council: 1) Authorize the City Manager to execute\nAgreement File No. 781.2; and 2) Authorize the budget amendment as detailed in\nthe Fiscal Impact Section; or 3) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related\nto this item.\n14 CONSENT CALENDAR – Continued

D Consideration and possible action to Adopt Resolution No. 24-13 – A\nResolution amending the Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 to\nprovide additional funding for the Bellflower Gateway Sign Project\n(Specifications No. 22/23-06).\nRecommendation to City Council: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 24-13; or\n2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

A CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR\n(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8)\nProperty: Assessor Parcel Nos. 7109-013-800, 7109-013-801,\n7109-013-900, 7109-013-036, and 7109-013-037\nAgency Negotiator: Ryan Smoot, City Manager\nNegotiating Party: Jonathan Dadourian, Newmark; Christopher Beck,\nNewmark\nUnder Negotiation: Price and terms of payment

B CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – INITIATION OF LITIGATION -\nGOVERNMENT CODE § 54956.9(d)(4). Number of Cases: One. (multiple\ndefendants)

C THREAT TO PUBLIC SERVICES OR FACILITIES – Government Code § 54957 -\nConsultation with: Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Office; Captain Daniel Holguin

A City Council Announcements