Coronado — 2023-07-18

a.\nLabor Negotiations\nAgency Designated Representative: Tina Friend, City Manager\nEmployee Organization(s): Self-Represented and Executive Management Employees; The\nAmerican Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Local 127; Coronado\nFirefighters Association (CFA); and Coronado Police Officers Association (CPOA)\nShare Tweet\n4.\nCONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION: QUARTERLY LITIGATION\nREPORT\nPursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1)

a.\nArthur Young, et al. v. City of Coronado\nSan Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2018-00002255-CU-EI-CTL\nShare Tweet

b.\nBrenda Bridgeford v. City of Coronado\nSan Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2018-00051939-CU-WT-CTL\nShare Tweet

c.\nEsteban Carrasco, et al. v. City of Coronado, Michael Joseph Hunter De Blieck\nSan Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2020-00011973-CU-PA-CTL\nShare Tweet

d.\nLeague of California Cities, et al. v. FCC, et al.\nUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Case No. 20-71765\nShare Tweet

e.\nCoronado Citizens for Transparent Government v. City of Coronado\n4th Dist. Court of Appeal Case No. D082360\nShare Tweet

f.\nCoronado Citizens for Transparent Government v. City of Coronado\nSan Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2021-00049694-CU-TT-CTL\nShare Tweet

g.\nHerron v. Feast & Fareway LLC and City of Coronado\nSan Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2020-00036537-CU-OR-CTL\nShare Tweet

h.\nAffordable Housing Coalition of San Diego v. Sandoval, et al.\nSacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2012-80001158-CU-WM-GDS\nShare Tweet

i.\nJames Wentworth, Jon Scurlock v. City of Coronado\nSan Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2021-00000841-CU-WM-CTL\nShare Tweet

j.\nCalifornians for Homeownership v. City of Coronado\nSan Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2021-00002339-CU-WM-CTL\nShare Tweet

k.\nCalifornians for Homeownership, Inc. v. Coronado City Council\nSan Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2021-00029267-CU-WM-CTL\nShare Tweet

l.\nDiLonardo v. Impact Activities, LLC, et al.\nSan Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2021-000-22-774-CU-FR-CTL\nShare Tweet

m.\nHayes v. De LaGrave, et al.\nSan Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2022-00008000\nShare Tweet

n.\nJane Doe v. Roe School, Roe Police Department, et al\nSan Diego Superior Court Case 37-2022-00047230-CU-PO-CTL

a.\nCOUNCIL REPORTS ON INTER-AGENCY COMMITTEE AND BOARD ASSIGNMENTS.\n(Questions allowed to clarify but no responses, discussion or action.)\nRecommendation: None.

b.\nCONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT OF ONE NEW AT-LARGE MEMBER TO SERVE A THREE-\nYEAR TERM ON THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION\nRecommendation: Consider for appointment Sue Godwin to serve a three-year term to expire July\n31, 2026 on the Design Review Commission as an at-large member.

c.\nREQUEST COUNCIL DIRECTION FOR FINAL DESIGN AND AUTHORIZE BID ADVERTISEMENT\nFOR THE LAWN BOWLING GREEN TURF REPLACEMENT PROJECT\nRecommendation: Provide direction for final design to complete the bid documents and authorize bid\nadvertisement for the Lawn Bowling Green Turf Replacement project using two bid packages: 1)\nInstall concrete root barriers and drainage system; and 2) Remove existing turf, repair/replace\nexisting base, install new turf. In addition, staff requests Council provide direction on the proposed\nremoval of the leaning torrey pine tree P-56.

d.\nPUBLIC SCOPING COMMENTS FOR THE SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT\nSTATEMENT FOR IMPROVING HOMEPORT FACILITIES FOR THREE NIMITZ-CLASS\nAIRCRAFT CARRIERS IN SUPPORT OF THE U.S. PACIFIC FLEET\nRecommendation: Review the draft public scoping comment letter and provide direction.\nShare Tweet\n11.\nCITY ATTORNEY\n12.\nCOMMUNICATIONS - WRITTEN:

a.\nLetter to The White House Council on Environmental Quality regarding Request to Support\nTijuana Infrastructure Repairs in the Ocean Justice Strategy\nShare Tweet

b.\nLetter to the San Diego County Board of Supervisors regarding Proclamation of a Local\nEmergency for U.S.-Mexico Transboundary Pollution Environmental Crisis and Request for\nFederal State of Emergency\nShare Tweet\nCONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION\n13.\nADJOURNMENT

a.\nAPPROVAL OF READING BY TITLE AND WAIVER OF READING IN FULL OF ORDINANCES ON\nTHIS AGENDA\nRecommendation: Approve the reading by title and waive the reading in full of all Ordinances on the\nagenda.

b.\nREVIEW AND APPROVE THAT THE WARRANTS, AS CERTIFIED BY THE CITY/AGENCY\nTREASURER, ARE ALL CORRECT, JUST, AND CONFORM TO THE APPROVED BUDGET FOR\nFISCAL YEAR 2022-23\nRecommendation: Approve the Warrants as certified by the City/Agency Treasurer.

c.\nQUARTERLY CITY PROJECTS PROGRESS REPORT\nRecommendation: Receive report and provide direction, as needed.

d.\nRESPONSE TO THE 2022/2023 SAN DIEGO GRAND JURY REPORT ENTITLED “HOUSING IN\nSAN DIEGO COUNTY”\nRecommendation: Accept the staff report and authorize the transmittal of the proposed response to\nthe Presiding Judge overseeing the Grand Jury.

e.\nAUTHORIZE STAFF TO ADVERTISE THE POINT PUMP STATION UPGRADE PROJECT FOR\nBID AND AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF A WORK ORDER WITH NASLAND ENGINEERING FOR\nAN ADDITIONAL $19,500 FOR BID AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES\nRecommendation: Authorize staff to advertise the Point Pump Station Upgrade project for bid and\nauthorize the City Manager to execute a work order modification with Nasland Engineering in a not\nto exceed the amount of $19,500 for bid and construction support services.\nShare Tweet

f.\nACCEPT THE STREET PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE (FY 2022-23 ANNUAL PROGRAM)\nCAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND DIRECT THE CITY CLERK TO FILE A NOTICE OF\nCOMPLETION\nRecommendation: Accept the Street Preventive Maintenance (FY 2022-23 Annual Program) Capital\nImprovement Project and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion.\nShare Tweet

g.\nAUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A THREE-YEAR AGREEMENT\nWITH OPTION TO EXTEND FOR TWO (2) ADDITIONAL ONE-YEAR PERIODS, FOR THIRD-\nPARTY WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION WITH KEENAN & ASSOCIATES FOR\nAN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $131,193 IN THE FIRST YEAR\nRecommendation: Authorize the City Manager to execute a three-year agreement with the option to\nextend for two additional one-year periods, with Keenan & Associates, who will continue to provide\nthird-party workers’ compensation claims administration, including bill review, utilization review and\nmedical management of the City’s active cases.\nShare Tweet\n6.\nCOMMUNICATIONS - ORAL:\nEach person wishing to speak before the City Council on matters not listed on this\nagenda shall approach the City Council, give their name, and limit comments to three\n(3) minutes. Members of the public may also submit written comments on the City’s\nwebsite, via email or request to provide live public comment via Zoom during the\nmeeting. Requests for live public comment must be made at least 24 hours\nin advance of the meeting. Please contact the City Clerk at (619) 522-7321 or\ncityclerk@coronado.ca.us for more information.\n7.\nCITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR:

a.\nUpdate on Council Directed Actions and Citizen Inquiries. (Informational Item)\nShare Tweet\n8.\nPUBLIC HEARINGS:

a.\nCONSIDERATION OF A ONE-LOT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TO ALLOW FOR CONDOMINIUM\nOWNERSHIP OF FOUR RESIDENTIAL UNITS AT 741-747 G AVENUE AND DETERMINATION\nTHAT THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT UNDER THE CALIFORNIA\nENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES SECTION 15332\nRecommendation: Staff recommends approval of the one-lot Tentative Parcel Map to allow for\ncondominium ownership of four residential units at 741-747 G Avenue with the attached findings and\nconditions and determine that the project is categorically exempt under Class 32 of the California\nEnvironmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development).\nShare Tweet

b.\nPUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A MAJOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION TO\nALLOW A REMODEL, SECOND STORY ADDITION, AND CONTINUED OPERATION OF AN\nEXISTING GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE LOCATED AT 400 ORANGE AVENUE IN\nTHE R-4 (MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)/ORANGE AVENUE CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN\nZONE AND DETERMINATION THAT THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT UNDER\nSECTION 15332 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (PC2022-11)\nRecommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Major Special Use Permit\nModification and determine that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental\nQuality Act under Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines.

c.\nPHILTHY PHILZ CARWASH – CONSIDER AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S\nDECISION TO DENY AN APPLICATION TO RENEW A MINOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND\nCOASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A CARWASH AT 150 C AVENUE IN THE\nCOMMERCIAL/ORANGE AVENUE CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN ZONE (PC 2023-05 AND CP\n2023-04)\nRecommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Resolution to deny the appeal\nand deny the Minor Special Use Permit and Coastal Permit renewal request for carwash operations\nat 150 C Avenue.\n9.\nCOMMISSION AND COMMITTEE REPORTS: None.\n10.\nCITY COUNCIL: