Los Angeles — 2023-01-26

1. DETERMINATION TO CONTINUE HOLDING MEETINGS VIA TELECONFERENCE\nMotion Required. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 54953(e)(1)(B)-(C), (e)(3)(A), and (e)(3)(B)(i),\na determination that the COVID-19 State of Emergency continues to directly impact the ability of members\nto meet safely in person and possible Commission Action.

2. DIRECTOR’S REPORT AND COMMISSION BUSINESS\n● Items of Interest\n● Advance Calendar\n● Commission Requests

3. NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL POSITION STATEMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS\nPresentations by Neighborhood Council representatives on any Neighborhood Council resolution, or\ncommunity impact statement filed with the City Clerk, which relates to any agenda item listed or being\nconsidered on this agenda. The Neighborhood Council representative shall provide the Board or\nCommission with a copy of the Neighborhood Council's resolution or community impact statement by\nemail to apcsouthvalley@lacity.org. At the Chair’s discretion, presentations of Neighborhood Councils on\nany matter listed on the agenda for this Commission meeting may be taken at the time the agenda is\ntaken for consideration.

5. RECONSIDERATIONS\na. MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER – The Commission may make a motion to reconsider a Commission\nAction on any agenda items from its previous meeting, consistently with the Commission Rule 9.3,\nprovided the Commission retains jurisdiction over the matter.\nb. MERITS OF ANY ITEM THE COMMISSION HAS VOTED TO RECONSIDER – If a majority of the\nCommission has approved a motion to reconsider a Commission Action, the Commission may\naddress the merits of the original Commission Action.

6. *APCSV-2016-4655-ZC-CU-ZV-CDO Council District: 3 - Blumenfield\nCEQA: ENV-2016-4656-CE **Last Day to Act: 3-12-23\nPlan Area: Reseda - West Van Nuys\nPUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED\nPROJECT SITE: 7217 North Geyser Avenue\nPROPOSED PROJECT:\nThe continued use and maintenance of an automotive and tow truck repair, storage, and dispatch service\nwith multi-family residential use all on an approximately 30,707-square-foot lot. No new construction is\nproposed.\nREQUESTED ACTIONS:\n1. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301, Class 1, and 15303, Class 3, an Exemption from\nCEQA and that there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical\nexemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 applies;\n2. Pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (“LAMC” or “Municipal Code”) Section 12.32 F, a Zone\nChange from [Q]P-1VL-CDO to [Q]C2-1VL-CDO over the entire site and modification of the\npermanent [Q] Conditions in Ordinance No. 176,558 (Reseda Central Business District Community\nDesign Overlay) that prohibit new auto-related uses, including the open storage of vehicles;\n3. Pursuant to LAMC Section 12.24 W.4, a Conditional Use to allow an automotive use in a C Zone that\ndoes not comply with the development standards and operating conditions as enumerated in LAMC\nSection 12.22 A.28: (a) existing doors/windows that are parallel to a street consist of 0 percent\ntransparency in lieu of the minimum required 50 percent transparency; (b) existing bay doors used for\nvehicular ingress/egress face and are within 100 feet of a residential zone/use as otherwise prohibited;\n(c) landscaping deviations from LAMC Sections 12.41 - 12.43 including the requirement for an\nautomatic irrigation system and minimum five foot landscaped setbacks along all street frontages and\nthe perimeters of parking areas abutting a residential zone/use;\n4. Pursuant to LAMC Section 12.24 W.50, a Conditional Use to allow automobile and truck storage within\n500 feet of a R Zone;\n5. Pursuant to LAMC Section 12.27, a Zone Variance to allow truck repair, towing dispatch, and storage\nincluding the overnight parking and open storage of automobiles and towing vehicles in the C2 Zone,\nas otherwise prohibited by LAMC Section 12.14; and\n6. Pursuant to LAMC Section 13.08, compliance with the Reseda Central Business District Community\nDesign Overlay Ordinance Nos. 176,557 and 176,558 except as modified herein.\nApplicant: Michael Reiter\nRepresentative: Elizabeth Fonvergne\nStaff: Laura Frazin-Steele, City Planner\nlaura.frazinsteele@lacity.org\n(818) 374-9919\nSouth Valley Area Planning Commission 3 January 26, 2023

7. ZA-2022-2735-CU-1A\nCEQA: ENV-2020-1181-CE Council District: 3 – Blumenfield\nPlan Area: Canoga Park - Winnetka - Woodland Hills - West Hills **Last Day to Act: 1-31-23\nPUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED\nPROJECT SITE: 22949 West Del Valle Street\nPROPOSED PROJECT:\nConstruction, use, and maintenance of a new 23-vehicle public parking area, including one accessible\nstall on an approximately 6,507-square-foot vacant lot in a residential zone.\nAPPEAL:\n1. An appeal of the November 1, 2022, Zoning Administrator’s Determination which:\n2. Determined, based on the whole of the administrative record, that the Project is exempt from CEQA\nGuidelines, Article 19, Section 15311, Class 11, and there is no substantial evidence demonstrating\nthat an exception to categorical exemption pursuant to Guidelines, Section 15300.2 applies;\n3. Approved, pursuant to Section 12.24 W.37 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC), a conditional\nuse to allow the construction, use, and maintenance of a new 23-vehicle public parking area including\none accessible stall on an approximately 6,507-square-foot vacant lot in a residential zone; and\n4. Adopted the Conditions of Approval and Findings.\nApplicant: Baback Hakimi, Manager, Del Valle Holdings, LLC\nRepresentative: Larry Mondragon, Craig Fry & Associates, LLC\nAppellant: Frank M. Arlotti\nStaff: Laura Frazin-Steele, City Planner\nlaura.frazinsteele@lacity.org\n(818) 374-9919\nTheodore L. Irving, Associate Zoning Administrator

8. APCSV-2018-5294-SPE-ZAA-ZAD-DRB-SPP-MSP\nCEQA: ENV-2018-5295-CE Council District: 4 – Raman\nPlan Area: Sherman Oaks - Studio City - Toluca Lake - Cahuenga Pass **Last Day to Act: 1-31-23\nPUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED\nPROJECT SITE: 13375 - 13411 West Mulholland Drive\nPROPOSED PROJECT:\nConstruction of a new, 9,999.68 square-foot (Residential Floor Area), three-story, single-family dwelling\nwith a 4,487 square-foot basement, a 701 square-foot four car garage at grade level, 535 square feet of\nmultiple covered patios, and two pools with decks on two vacant lots totaling approximately 64,860.4\nsquare-feet. The Project includes approximately 9,762 square feet of hardscape. The proposed structure\nis a total of 9,999.68 square feet of Residential Floor Area and a maximum height of approximately 52\nfeet. The Project is in the Inner Corridor and is subject to the Baseline Hillside Ordinance adopted on\nMarch 17, 2017. The Project is downslope from the Mulholland Drive right-of-way and is visible from\nMulholland Drive. The Project is within 200 feet of a designated parkland. The Project proposes a haul\nroute and 3,235 cubic yards of cut, 844 cubic yards of fill, zero cubic yards of import, and 2,391 cubic\nSouth Valley Area Planning Commission 4 January 26, 2023\nyards of export grading. There are six protected coast live oak trees and four protected Southern\nCalifornia black walnut trees on site. The Project does not propose the removal of any protected trees.\nREQUESTED ACTIONS:\n1. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Article III, Section 15303, Class 3 an Exemption from CEQA, and that\nthere is no substantial evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical exemption pursuant\nto CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2 applies;\n2. Pursuant to Section 11.5.7 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC), a Specific Plan Exception to\npermit a front yard setback of 20 feet in lieu of the 40-foot setback required under Mulholland Specific\nPlan Section 5.D.3;\n3. Pursuant to LAMC Section 12.28, a Zoning Administrator's Adjustment to permit the construction of\nthree retaining walls, each with a maximum height of 10 feet, in the required front yard, in lieu of the\nallowed maximum height of 3.5 feet per Section 12.22 C.20 (f)(2);\n4. Pursuant to LAMC Section 12.28, a Zoning Administrator's Adjustment to permit the construction of\none retaining wall with a maximum height of 10 feet in the required side yard, in lieu of the allowed\nmaximum height of six feet per Section 12.22 C.20 (f)(3);\n5. Pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 12.24 X.26, a Zoning Administrator's\nDetermination to permit the construction of six retaining walls of variable height, between three feet\nand 10 feet in height, in lieu of the otherwise allowed maximum of one 12-foot in height retaining wall\nor two 10-foot in-height retaining walls per LAMC Section 12.21.C.8(a);\n6. Pursuant to LAMC Section 12.24 X.28, a Zoning Administrator's Determination to permit the\nconstruction, use, and maintenance of a new single-family dwelling on a lot fronting a Substandard\nHillside Limited Street that is not improved to a width of at least 20 feet, as required by LAMC 12.21\nC.10.(i)(2);\n7. Pursuant to LAMC Section 12.37.I, a waiver of the street dedication to the public right-of-way, as\nrequired per Section 12.21 C.10.(i); and\n8. Pursuant to LAMC Sections 11.5.7 C and 16.50, a Project Permit Compliance and Design Review as\nrequired by the Mulholland Scenic Parkway Specific Plan (Ordinance No. 167,943).\nApplicant: Hamid Reza Barr, RHB Trust\nRepresentative: Larry Mondragon, Craig Fry & Associates\nStaff: Katie Knudson, City Planner\nKatie.Knudson@lacity.org\n(213) 847-3659

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION\n(Subdivision (d)(1) of Government Code Section 54956.9)\nNatural Resources Defense Council, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al.\nLos Angeles Superior Court Case No. BS070017

2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION\n(Subdivision (d)(1) of Government Code Section 54956.9)\nNatural Resources Defense Council, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al.\nSan Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2021-00023385-CU-TT-CTL

3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS\n(Government Code Section 54956.8)\nProvide instructions to its real estate negotiators with respect to Permit 999 with China\nShipping Holding Company, Ltd.:\nProperty: Berths 100-103, San Pedro\nCity Negotiator: Michael DiBernardo\nTenant Negotiator: Paul Nazzaro\nNegotiating Parties: City and China Shipping Holding Company, Ltd.\nUnder Negotiation: Price and Terms

4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION\n(Subdivision (d)(2) of Government Code Section 54956.9)\nSignificant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (d)(2) of Section 54956.9:\n(one case)\nSPECIAL MEETING AGENDA

5. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS\n(Government Code Section 54956.8)\nProvide instructions to its real estate negotiators with respect to Revocable Permit 1006\nwith Marine Sheet Metal Works:\nProperty: 813 South Seaside Avenue, Terminal Island\nCity Negotiator: Marisa Katnich\nTenant Negotiator: Jason Matthews\nNegotiating Parties: City and Marine Sheet Metal Works\nUnder Negotiation: Price and Terms

6. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS\n(Government Code Section 54956.8)\nProvide instructions to its real estate negotiators with respect to a proposed permit with\nSan Pedro Fish Market:\nProperty: Berths 93C, D, E, San Pedro\nCity Negotiator: Eugene D. Seroka\nTenant Negotiator: Michael Ungaro\nNegotiating Parties: City and San Pedro Fish Market\nUnder Negotiation: Price and Terms

7. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – INITIATE LITIGATION `\n(Subdivision (d)(4) of Government Code Section 54956.9)\nInitiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (d)(4) of Section 54956.9:\n(one case)\nSPECIAL MEETING AGENDA

1. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE\nCITY OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR DEPARTMENT AND EVERETT DOREY LLP FOR\nLIABILITY LITIGATION DEFENSE COUNSEL\nSummary: The Office of the City Attorney (Office) requests approval of an Agreement between\nthe City of Los Angeles Harbor Department (Harbor Department) and Everett Dorey LLP\n(Everett) for legal services related to liability litigation defense counsel. The proposed Agreement\nis for a term of three years and maximum compensation of $350,000. The Harbor Department\nis financially responsible for payment of expenses incurred under the proposed Agreement.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City\nCEQA Guidelines; (2) find in accordance with Charter Section 1022 that the scope of work of\nthe proposed Agreement can be more economically and feasibly provided by an independent\ncontractor than by City employees; (3) approve a Legal Services Agreement with Everett Dorey\nLLP in the amount of $350,000 for a three-year term; (4) authorize the Executive Director and\nBoard Secretary to execute and attest to the Agreement; and (5) adopt Resolution\nNo.____________.\nSPECIAL MEETING AGENDA\nWaterfront & Commercial Real Estate

2. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - ORDER RESETTING COMPENSATION UNDER\nPERMIT NO. 930 WITH THE JANKOVICH COMPANY, LLC\nSummary: Staff requests approval of the proposed Order resetting compensation under Permit\nNo. 930 (P930) with The Jankovich Company, LLC (Jankovich), a Washington limited liability\ncompany, for the five-year period of November 6, 2022 to November 5, 2027. P930 has a 20-\nyear term that commenced on November 6, 2017, with two consecutive five-year options to\nextend the term. Compensation is to be reset every five years, with an annual Consumer Price\nIndex (CPI) adjustment. P930 grants Jankovich the use of 2.72 acres of land, subsurface, and\nsubmerged land, along with 10,966 square feet of office space in San Pedro for the operation of\na marine fueling terminal at Berth 73A and Berth 73B. Jankovich has agreed to new\ncompensation effective November 6, 2022. Effective November 6, 2022, approval of the\nproposed compensation reset will increase annual rent by $141,359 or 45 percent from $315,219\npreviously to $456,578 ($38,048 per month) as proposed. Thereafter, rent will be increased\nannually by the change in the CPI, subject to a floor of 0 percent.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City\nCEQA Guidelines; (2) approve the Order resetting compensation under Permit No. 930 with The\nJankovich Company, LLC; (3) authorize the Board Secretary to attest to the Order resetting\ncompensation under Permit No. 930; and (4) adopt Resolution No.____________ and Order\nNo.____________.\nSPECIAL MEETING AGENDA\nMedia Relations & Strategic Communications

3. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF LOS\nANGELES HARBOR DEPARTMENT AND FAYE BUSINESS SYSTEMS GROUP AND\nSILVERTECH FOR AS-NEEDED WEB DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT\nSERVICES\nSummary: Staff requests approval of two (2) separate three-year agreements with Faye\nBusiness Systems Group, Inc. (Faye), a software solutions and optimization partner, and\nSilverTech, Inc. (SilverTech), a digital experience agency, to provide as-needed website design,\ndevelopment, and support services for Port of Los Angeles-hosted websites. The Port has\nutilized outside contractors for managed web hosting services since the late 1990s. Spending\nwill not exceed $690,000, in aggregate, on a pooled basis across the two proposed Agreements.\nThe Harbor Department is financially responsible for payment of expenses incurred under the\nproposed Agreements.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City\nCEQA Guidelines; (2) find that in accordance with the Los Angeles City Charter Section 1022,\nthe services required can be performed more feasibly by an outside contractor than by City\nemployees; (3) approve the three-year agreement with Faye Business Systems Group, Inc. for\na pooled amount not-to-exceed $690,000; (4) approve the three-year agreement with\nSilverTech, Inc. for a pooled amount not-to-exceed $690,000; (5) authorize the Executive\nDirector to execute and the Board Secretary to attest to the said agreements; and (6) adopt\nResolution No.___________.\nSPECIAL MEETING AGENDA\nCargo Marketing

4. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - APPROVAL OF THE FOREIGN-TRADE ZONE\nOPERATING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR\nDEPARTMENT AND PORT LOGISTICS GROUP, LLC, FTZ 202, SITE 42\nSummary: Staff requests approval of a Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) Operating Agreement\nbetween the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department (Harbor Department) and Port Logistics\nGroup, LLC (PLG), to operate its facility within FTZ No. 202, Site 42, located at 501 S. Cheryl\nLane, City of Industry, CA 91789. The 20.57 acre property includes a warehouse and office\nspace, approximately 50 miles north of the Port of Los Angeles. In January 2022, Ryder\nSystems, Inc., acquired Port Logistics Group, Inc. and changed the legal entity to an LLC. Port\nLogistics Group, Inc., worked under Operating Agreement 17-3487. With this new ownership\nand name change, it is recommended a new Operating Agreement be executed. The proposed\nAgreement is for a term of five years with three, five-year renewal options. If the proposed\nAgreement is approved, the Harbor Department will receive $7,750 annually from PLG (per FTZ\nTariff No. 2).\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the administratively exempt from the requirements of the California\nEnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City CEQA\nGuidelines; (2) approve the proposed Foreign-Trade Zone Operating Agreement between the\nCity of Los Angeles Harbor Department and Ports Logistics Group, LLC; (3) direct the Board\nSecretary to transmit the proposed Foreign-Trade Zone Operating Agreement to the Los\nAngeles City Council for approval pursuant to Section 373 of the Charter of the City of Los\nAngeles and Section 10.5 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code; (4) authorize the Executive\nDirector to execute and the Board Secretary to attest to the proposed Foreign-Trade Zone\nOperating Agreement; and (5) adopt Resolution No.____________.\nSPECIAL MEETING AGENDA\nRegular Items (5 & 6)\nEnvironmental Management

5. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - APPROVAL OF PERSONAL SERVICES\nAGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR DEPARTMENT\nAND APEX COMPANIES, LLC, BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY,\nINC., LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC., NINYO & MOORE GEOTECHNICAL AND\nENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES CONSULTANTS, PACIFIC EDGE ENGINEERING,\nINC., PARSONS ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP, INC., TETRA TECH,\nINC., AND TRC SOLUTIONS, INC. FOR AS-NEEDED SITE ASSESSMENT AND\nRESTORATION SERVICES\nSummary: Staff requests approval of the proposed Agreements (Agreements) with APEX\nCompanies, LLC (Apex), Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. (B&M), Leighton\nConsulting, Inc. (Leighton), Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences\nConsultants (N&M), Pacific Edge Engineering, Inc. (Pacific Edge), Parsons Environment &\nInfrastructure Group, Inc. (Parsons), Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tetra Tech), and TRC Solutions, Inc.\n(TRC) to provide the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department (Harbor Department) with as-\nneeded site assessment and environmental restoration services. This action will authorize eight\nproposed Agreements, each for a three-year term, with a combined not-to-exceed amount of\n$21,000,000. The Harbor Department is financially responsible for payment of services rendered\nunder the proposed Agreements.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the proposed action is exempt from the\nrequirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II, Section 2(f) of\nthe Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines as determined by the Director of Environmental\nManagement; (2) find that in accordance with the City Charter Section 1022, work under the\nsubject Agreements can be performed more feasibly by independent consultants rather than by\nCity employees; (3) approve the proposed Agreements for a term of three-years each, with a\ncombined contract total of $21,000,000 as follows: a. Tetra Tech, Inc. (Pasadena, CA) for\n$4,000,000; b. APEX Companies, LLC (Signal Hill, CA) for $4,000,000; c. Leighton Consulting,\nInc. (Irvine, CA) for $3,000,000; d. Pacific Edge Engineering, Inc. (Mission Viejo, CA) for\n$3,000,000; e. Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. (Brea, CA) for $2,500,000; f.\nParsons Environment & Infrastructure Group, Inc. (Pasadena, CA) for $1,500,000; g. Ninyo &\nMoore Geotechnical & Environmental Science Consultants (Los Angeles, CA) for $1,500,000;\nand h. TRC Solutions, Inc. (Irvine, CA) for $1,500,000; (4) authorize the Executive Director to\nexecute and the Board Secretary to attest to said Agreements, for and on behalf of the Board;\nand (5) adopt Resolution No.___________.\nSPECIAL MEETING AGENDA\nEnvironmental Management

6. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT NO. 19-\n3685 WITH THE NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY FOR THE ZERO\nEMISSION SHORE TO STORE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT\nSummary: Staff requests approval of the proposed Second Amendment to Subrecipient\nAgreement No. 19-3685 with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) to perform\ndata collection, analysis, and reporting for the grant funded, zero emissions “Shore to Store”\nProject (Project). In this Project, the Harbor Department is partnering with Kenworth Truck\nCompany (Kenworth), the Port of Hueneme (POH), NREL, and Shell Oil Products, US (Shell) to\ndevelop and demonstrate on-road hydrogen fuel cell and off-road battery electric zero emissions\nvehicles, including the necessary fueling infrastructure. The Project was approved by the Board\nof Harbor Commissioners (Board) on March 7, 2019, along with acceptance of the grant award\nfrom the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and approval of Grant Agreement No. 19-3969\nin the amount of $41,122,260 to implement the Project. The Board approved the First\nAmendment to Grant Agreement No. 19-3969 on April 1, 2021, to extend the project term. In\nOctober, 2021, the Board approved the First Amendment to Subrecipient Agreement No. 19-\n3685 with NREL to align with the amended Grant Agreement. This proposed Second\nAmendment to Subrecipient Agreement No. 19-3685 with NREL incorporates updates to the\nproject schedule and milestones to account for the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the\nproject timeline and provides additional funding to cover the extended time. All other terms and\nconditions will remain unchanged. If the proposed Amendment is approved, the Harbor\nDepartment will be financially responsible for the payment of $148,000 in additional funding to\nNREL to complete data collection, analysis and reporting related to the project.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively and categorically exempt from the\nrequirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f)\nand Article III Class 6(2) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines; (2) approve the Second\nAmendment to Agreement No. 19-3685 between the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department\nand National Renewable Energy Laboratory to extend the term, add funds, and update the\nschedule and project milestones for the Shore to Store Demonstration Project; (3) authorize the\nExecutive Director to execute and the Board Secretary to attest to said Second Amendment with\nthe National Renewable Energy Laboratory for and on behalf of the Board; and (4) adopt\nResolution No.____________.

B. Closed Session

C. Executive Director Remarks

D. Comment from the Public on Non-Agenda Items

E. Report from the Neighborhood Council Representatives – An opportunity for\nNeighborhood Council representatives to provide remarks on Neighborhood Council\nResolutions or Community Impact Statements filed with the City Clerk which relate to any\nagenda item listed or being considered on this agenda for the Board of Harbor\nCommissioners.

F. Reports of the Commissioners

G. Board Committee Reports\nNone

I. Presentation\nNone

J. Level I Coastal Development Permit\nThe Executive Director has issued one (1) Level I CDP:\nCDP No. 22-01: City of Los Angeles Harbor Department – Cargo Support Facility at\nthe Former LAXT Rail Loop on Terminal Island\nSPECIAL MEETING AGENDA

K. Board Reports of the Executive Director\nConsent Items (1 – 4)\nOffice of the City Attorney