Los Angeles — 2023-02-02
Board of Rec and Park Commission
#0
Board Report
23-029 Rancho Cienega Sports Complex Project- Phase 1 (PRJ20308) (PRJ21190) (W.O\n#E1907694) – Acceptance of Stop Payment Notices on Construction Contract No.\n3645, for Pinner Construction Co., Inc
#1
Board Report
23-030 Proposition 84 Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization\nProgram Grants (Prop 84) – Slauson-Wall Park (PRJ20769) Project – Grant\nExtension Contract Amendment
#2
Board Report
23-031 Measure A – Authorization to Submit Grant Application for 109th Street Recreation\nCenter Improvement Project and to Accept Grant if Awarded
#3
Board Report
23-032 South Park Recreation Center – Approval Of Mural Installation – Categorical\nExemption from the Provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)\nPursuant to Article III, Section 1, Class 1(1) [Operation, Repair, Maintenance or\nMinor Alteration of Existing Public or Private Structures, Facilities, Mechanical\nEquipment, or Topographical Features, Involving Negligible or No Expansion of\nUse Beyond that Previously Existing] of City CEQA Guidelines and Article 19,\nSection 15301(a) of California CEQA Guidelines
#4
Board Report
23-033 Penmar Recreation Center – Tennis Court and Lighting Improvements\n(PRJ21691) Project – Commitment of Park Fees – Categorical Exemption from the\nProvisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to Article\nIII, Section 1, Class 1(1) [Interior or Exterior Alterations Involving Remodeling or\nMinor Construction where there be Negligible or No Expansion of Use]; Class 1(12)\n[Outdoor Lighting and Fencing for Security and Operations] and Class 2\n[Replacement or Reconstruction of Existing Structures or Facilities where the New\nStructure will be Located on the Same Site as the Structure Replaced and have\nSubstantially the Same Purpose and Capacity] of City CEQA Guidelines and\n2\nArticle 19, Sections 15301 and 15302 of California CEQA Guidelines
#5
Board Report
23-034 Algin Sutton Recreation Center – Conceptual Approval of Childcare Center\nRenovation (PRJ21681) Project
#6
Board Report
23-035 Donation from Burgis Holdings, LLC. in Support of 2022 Summer Swim\nPrograms at Sylmar Pool
#7
Board Report
23-036 Griffith Park – Park Center – Approve Award and Authorize Execution of\nAgreement for the Operation and Maintenance of the Food and Beverage\nConcession; Categorical Exemption from the Provisions of the California\nEnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to Article III, Section 1, Class 1(1)\n[Interior and Exterior Alterations Involving Remodeling or Minor Construction\nwhere there be Negligible or No Expansion of Use], Class 1(14) [Issuance,\nRenewal or Amendment of any Lease, License or Permit to Use an Existing\nStructure or Facility Involving Negligible or No Expansion of Use] and Class 11(6)\n[Construction or Placement of Minor Structures Accessory to (Appurtenant to)\nExisting Commercial, Industrial or Institutional Facilities] of City CEQA Guidelines\nand Article 19, Sections 15301 and 15311 of California CEQA Guidelines\n8. VERBAL REPORT AND FINDINGS TO CONTINUE TELECONFERENCING\nPURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953 (AB 361) Board to Consider a\ndetermination in accordance with AB 361 Section 3(e)(3) that, while the state of\nemergency due to the Covid-19 pandemic, as originally proclaimed by the Governor on\nMarch 4, 2020, remains active and/or state or local officials have imposed or\nrecommended measures to promote social distancing, this legislative body has\nreconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency and that the state of\nemergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members of this Board, and the\nability of the members of all of this Board’s advisory bodies, including, but not limited to,\nall park advisory boards, the Greek Theatre Advisory Committee, and the Golf Advisory\nCommittee, as well as the public who might attend these meetings, to meet safely in\nperson and/or state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to\npromote social distancing.
#1
Commission Business
10. COMMISSION BUSINESS\nComments from Commissioners on Matters within the Board’s Jurisdiction and Requests\nby Commissioners to Schedule Specific Future Agenda Items
#1
Commission Task Force Updates
9. COMMISSION TASK FORCE UPDATES\n• Verbal Report from the Chair of the Commission Task Force on Concessions about\nthe Task Force’s most recent meeting\n• Verbal Report from the Chair of the Commission Task Force on Facility Repair and\nMaintenance about the Task Force’s most recent meeting\n3
City Planning Commission N Valley
#1
Item
1. DETERMINATION TO CONTINUE HOLDING MEETINGS VIA TELECONFERENCE\nMotion Required. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 54953(e)(1)(B)-(C), (e)(3)(A), and\n(e)(3)(B)(i), a determination that the COVID-19 State of Emergency continues to directly impact the\nability of members to meet safely in person and possible Commission Action.
#3
Item
3. NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL POSITION STATEMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS\nPresentations by Neighborhood Council representatives on any Neighborhood Council resolution, or\ncommunity impact statement filed with the City Clerk, which relates to any agenda item listed or being\nconsidered on this agenda. The Neighborhood Council representative shall provide the Board or\nCommission with a copy of the Neighborhood Council's resolution or community impact statement by\nemail to apcnorthvalley@lacity.org. At the Chair’s discretion, presentations of Neighborhood Councils\non any matter listed on the agenda for this Commission meeting may be taken at the time the agenda\nis taken for consideration.
#5
Item
5. RECONSIDERATIONS\na. MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER – The Commission may make a motion to reconsider a Commission\nAction on any agenda items from its previous meeting, consistently with the Commission Rule 9.3,\nprovided the Commission retains jurisdiction over the matter.\nb. MERITS OF ANY ITEM THE COMMISSION HAS VOTED TO RECONSIDER – If a majority of the\nCommission has approved a motion to reconsider a Commission Action, the Commission may\naddress the merits of the original Commission Action.