Los Angeles — 2023-02-27

(1)\n17-0758-S2\nCAO and City Attorney reports relative to the Phase II eCivis Grants Management Program; and acceptance of the California Board of State and Community Corrections Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Grant Program - Los Angeles Diversion Outreach and Opportunities for Recovery for Fiscal Years 2022-26.\n(Approved by Public Safety and Personnel, Audits, and Hiring Committees)

(10)\n21-0822\nController, City Administrative Officer, and Board of Public Works joint report relative to approving the Second Amended and Restated Contract C-131440 with Macias, Gini and O’Connell, LLP, for the Annual and Single Audits for Fiscal Years 2020-21 and 2021-22.

(11)\n23-0174\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Abbie Gray v. City of Los Angeles, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC686939. (This matter arises from an incident involving members of the Los Angeles Police Department that occurred on November 4, 2016, in Los Angeles, California.)\nReport from City Attorney dated 2-09-23

(12)\n23-0173\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Regina Autrey v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV0755. (This matter arises from a trip and fall that occurred on March 15, 2019, at approximately 12:00 pm, concrete stairs adjacent to 100 N. Main Street, in the City of Los Angeles.)\nReport from City Attorney dated 2-09-23

(13)\n23-0185\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Jose Castellon v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV03369. (This matter arises from a motor vehicle collision that occurred on March 17, 2020, on Corbin Street.)\nReport from City Attorney dated 2-09-23

(14)\n22-1494\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Montcell Chauncey Bolen v. Silverio Munoz, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 18STCV09971. (This matter arises from a bicycle v. car accident. Plaintiff was riding his bicycle on Riverside Drive when he was struck by a vehicle driven by a non-City driver.)\nReport from City Attorney dated 11-23-22\nReport from City Attorney dated 2-09-23.pdf

(15)\n23-0181\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Anthony Joseph Krol v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV06754. (This matter arises from a solo motorcycle accident that occurred on 6th Street at Rimpau Boulevard.)\nReport from City Attorney dated 2-09-23.pdf

(16)\n23-0183\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Juan Jose Romo v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV04938. (This matter arises from a July 3, 2019 motorcycle accident on Whitsett Street in the San Fernando Valley area of Los Angeles.)\nReport from City Attorney dated 2-09-23.pdf

(17)\n23-0180\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Kimberly Ann Miller v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 18STCV01372. (This matter arises from a trip and fall incident which occurred on June 20, 218, near 422 Bauchet Street, in the City of Los Angeles.)\nReport from City Attorney dated 2-09-23

(18)\n23-0179\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Floris Mikail Kalime v. County of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCv24543. (This matter arises from a trip and fall, August 14, 2018, on a residential sidewalk in front of 7119 Lasaine Avenue, in the Lake Balboa community in Los Angeles.)\nReport from City Attorney dated 2-09-23

(19)\n23-0176\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Christian Jaimes v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV22268. (This matter arises from Plaintiff’s claims of Disability Discrimination, Failure to Provide Reasonable Accommodation, Failure to Engage in the Interactive Process, Retaliation, and Failure to Prevent Discrimination and Retaliation.)\nReport from City Attorney dated 2-10-23

(2)\n21-1015-S1\nCity Administrative Officer report relative to the authority for the Board of Public Works, and General Manager, Bureau of Sanitation, to prepare federal and state grant applications for various programs, and related matters.\n(Referred to the Energy and Environment and Budget, Finance and Innovation Committees)

(20)\n13-1482-S3\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to pending litigation entitled AIDS Healthcare Foundation v. City of Los Angeles / CRA/LA, CRA/LA Governing Board; CRA/LA Oversight Board, Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2020-80003462-CU-WM-GDS and Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCP04589.\nReport from City Attorney dated 12-20-22\nFinal Ordinance No 186325 11_11_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 10_23_2019\nMayor ConcurrenceCouncil Action 09_30_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 09_25_2019\nSpeaker Card(s) 09_20_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 09_19_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 09_19_2019\nAttachment to Communication dated 091919 - Response to TOC Comments 09_19_2019\nCommunication from Department of City Planning 09_19_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 09_17_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 09_17_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 09_17_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 09_17_2019\nReport from Planning and Land Use Management Committee 09_17_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 09_16_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 09_15_2019\nReport from City Attorney 09_06_2019\nAttachment to City Attorney Report dated 09062019 - Draft Ordinance 09_06_2019\nAttachment to Communication from Department of City Planning dated 09062019 - Re\nCommunication from Department of City Planning - Supplemental Transmittal 09_06_\nCommunication from Department of City Planning - Errata to Initial Study Negati\nCommunication(s) from Public 08_28_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 08_27_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 08_27_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 08_27_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 08_27_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 08_27_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 08_27_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 08_27_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 08_27_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 08_27_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 08_27_2019\nSpeaker Card(s) 08_27_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 08_27_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 08_27_2019\nReport from City Attorney 08_23_2019\nAttachment to Report dated 082319 - Draft Ordinance 08_23_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 08_23_2019\nCommunication from Department of City Planning - Resolution 08_22_2019\nCommunication from Department of City Planning - Supplemental Transmittal 08_22_\nCommunication from Department of City Planning - Findings 08_22_2019\nCommunication from Department of City Planning 07_18_2019\nAttachment to Communication dated 07182019 - Notice of Intent to Adopt 07_18_201\nAttachment to Communication dated 07182019 - Case No ENV-2019-4121-ND 07_18_2019\nCommunication from Deputy City Clerk to City Attorney 04_09_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 03_19_2019\nSpeaker Card(s) 03_19_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 03_19_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 03_19_2019\nCommunication(s) from Public 03_18_2019\nCommunication from Department of City Planning - Revisions to Determination Lett\nReport from Department of City Planning 03_14_2019\nReport from Los Angeles City Planning Commission 12_21_2018\nAttachment to Report dated 12212018 - Mailing List 12_21_2018\nAttachment to Report dated 12212018 - Environmental Clearance 12_21_2018\nAttachment to Report dated 12212018 - Findings 12_21_2018\nAttachment to Report dated 12212018 - Proposed Ordinance 12_21_2018\nAttachment to Report dated 12212018 - Resolution 12_21_2018\nAttachment to Report dated 12212018 - Staff Report 12_21_2018

(21)\n23-0138\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled George Lakner v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC708560. (This is an inverse condemnation action in which George Lakner seeks recovery for alleged damage to his property at 17603 West Posetano Road, Pacific Palisades, from a landslide.)\nReport from City Attorney dated 2-06-23

(22)\n23-0139\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled LAGD Properties LLC v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV02977. (This case involves damages to plaintiff’s residential property allegedly caused by storm waters from Montecito Drive.)\nReport from City Attorney dated 2-07-23

(23)\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the following cases: Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 22STCV39662; Newcastle Courtyards, LLC, etc., et al. v. City of Los Angeles, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Case No 2:23-cv-00104 JAK (ASx); Newcastle Courtyards, LLC, etc., et al. v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 23STCV00352. (These cases challenge Measure ULA, commonly known as the “mansion tax,” which imposes a new “Homelessness and Housing Solutions Tax” on certain transfers of residential and commercial real property in the city of Los Angeles.)

(3)\n22-1042\nCONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 13, 2023\nLos Angeles Police Department report relative to the release and use of overtime funds allocated for A Bridge Home and other homeless housing sites.\n(Public Safety Committee approved this matter on December 7, 2022)

(4)\n22-0256\nOffice of Finance reports relative to the Investment Reports for July 2022 – October 2022.

(5)\n23-0043\nCollections Board of Review report relative to delinquent accounts receivables submitted by the Los Angeles Housing Department for the quarter ending September 30, 2022.\nReport from Collections Board of Review.pdf\nAttachment to Report Dated 2-06-23 - LAHD Uncollectible Claims.pdf\nAttachment to Report Dated 2-06-23 - Findings.pdf

(6)\n23-0186\nCollections Board of Review report relative to delinquent accounts receivables submitted by the Los Angeles Housing Department for the quarter ending December 31, 2022.\nReport from Collections Board of Review dated 2-06-23.pdf\nAttachment to Report dated 2-06-23 - Findings.pdf\nAttachment to Report dated 2-06-23 - LAHD Uncollectible Claims.pdf

(7)\n23-0085\nMotion (Blumenfield – Raman) relative to current process of paying city vendors, best practices of the County of Los Angeles and other municipalities, and next steps necessary to ensure city vendor invoices are paid within 30-90 days.\nMotion (Blumenfield - Raman) dated 1-24-23

(8)\n22-0600-S71\nBoard of Public Works report relative to the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget recommendation regarding the potential use of funding in the Unappropriated Balance for Graffiti Abatement.

(9)\n19-1193\nCity Attorney and City Administrative Officer reports relative to acceptance of a grant award from the Los Angeles County Department of Workforce Development, Aging, and Community Services, for the City Attorney’s Dispute Resolution Program, Fiscal Year 2022-23 Dispute Resolution Program (Community) Funding - Year 4/5.