Los Angeles — 2024-06-12

(1) 24­0600­S11\nMotion (Hutt – Raman, et al.) relative to funding for the Rapid Response\nSenior Meals Program.

(10) 24­0592\nCity Attorney report relative to a proposed legal services Agreement with\nColantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC to provide legal services related to\nthe case entitled Dustin Bramell v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 23STCP03825.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(11) 24­1200­S17\nCommunication from the Mayor relative to the appointment of Almuhtada\n"Al" Smith to the Innovation and Performance Commission.\nFinancial Disclosure Statement: Completed\nBackground Check: Pending

(12) 24­0270\nCity Administrative Officer (CAO) report relative to funding in the amount of\n$400,000 from the Innovation Fund for the CAO End­to­End Procurement\nSystem Pilot Project.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nFinancial Policies Statement: Yes

(13) 24­0467\n$400,000 from the Innovation Fund for the CAO End­to­End Procurement\nSystem Pilot Project.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nFinancial Policies Statement: Yes

(14) 24­0451\nDepartment of Building and Safety report relative to a refund claim filed by\n643 Hancock LLC (Claim No. 169427) for the project located at 645 North\nRossmore Avenue in Council District 5.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(15) 24­0311\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Nathan Rocky Glover v. City of Los Angeles, et al., United\nStates District Court Case No. CV21­09915­FWS­ASx. (This matter\narises from an incident involving members of the Los Angeles Police\nDepartment on March 19, 2021, in Los Angeles, California.)

(16) 24­0381\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Melaney Mitchell Gould, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al.,\nUnited States District Court Case No. 2:21­CV­03845­VAP (KSx). (This\nmatter arises from an incident involving members of the Los Angeles\nPolice Department on May 30, 2020, in Los Angeles, California.)

(17) 24­0347\nCD 5 The Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled City of Los Angeles v. John P. Perches, et al., Los\n(16) 24­0381\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Melaney Mitchell Gould, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al.,\nUnited States District Court Case No. 2:21­CV­03845­VAP (KSx). (This\nmatter arises from an incident involving members of the Los Angeles\nPolice Department on May 30, 2020, in Los Angeles, California.)\n(17) 24­0347\nCD 5 The Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled City of Los Angeles v. John P. Perches, et al., Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV09368. (This matter arises from\neminent domain action involving property located at 10366 Northvale\nRoad, Los Angeles CA 90064 for construction of the Exposition Bike Path\n(Northvale Segment) Project.)

(18) 24­0439\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Becca Standt v. City of Los Angeles, et al., United States\nDistrict Court Case No. 2:21­CV­09381­FLA­JPRx. (This matter arises\nfrom an incident involving members of the Los Angeles Police Department\non March 25, 2021.)

(19) 24­0440\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Dawn Loryne v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 19STCV25758. (This matter arises from a claim\nunder the Fair Employment & Housing Act for Failure to Accommodate,\nFailure to engage in the Interactive Process, Disability Discrimination,\nHarassment and Retaliation.)

(2) 24­0600­S12\nMotion (Hutt ­ McOsker, et al.) relative to funding for the Los Angeles\nITEM(S)\n(1) 24­0600­S11\nMotion (Hutt – Raman, et al.) relative to funding for the Rapid Response\nSenior Meals Program.

(20) 24­0441\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Siranush (Sarah) Arakelian v. City of Los Angeles, Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 18STCV09091. (This matter arises from\nan Office of Finance employee’s allegations of discrimination and other\nclaims under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act.)

(21) 24­0442\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Saptarshi Majumdar v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV25162. (This matter arises from\na vehicle versus pedestrian traffic collision on August 6, 2020, at or near\nthe intersection of Colby Avenue and Missouri Avenue, in the City of Los\nAngeles.)

(22) 24­0502\nclaims under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act.)\n(21) 24­0442\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Saptarshi Majumdar v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV25162. (This matter arises from\na vehicle versus pedestrian traffic collision on August 6, 2020, at or near\nthe intersection of Colby Avenue and Missouri Avenue, in the City of Los\nAngeles.)\n(22) 24­0502\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Rohini Perera v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 22STCV14544. (This matter arises from a traffic\ncollision at the intersection of Gold Canyon and Copper Hills Drive that\noccurred on August 6, 2021.)

(23) 22­0767\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Emily Perez, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV03492. (This matter arises from\nan industrial incident at the Hyperion Water Reclamation Plant in Playa Del\nRey.)

(24) 24­0513\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Lisa Lynn Daube v. Department of Water and Power, et\nal., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV48442. (This matter\narises from a trip and fall accident which occurred on January 24, 2020, at\n630 Masselin Avenue, in the City of Los Angeles.)

(25) 24­0514\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Monica Cunningham v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCV39177. (This matter arises from\na trip and fall incident that occurred on April 29, 2019, on the sidewalk\nlocated at 13549 Reliance Street, in the City of Los Angeles.)

(26) 24­0515\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Nargess Mozafari v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV06447. (This matter arises from\na trip and fall incident on September 26, 2020, near 6959 Esplanade\nStreet, in the City of Los Angeles.)

(27) 23­0519\na trip and fall incident that occurred on April 29, 2019, on the sidewalk\nlocated at 13549 Reliance Street, in the City of Los Angeles.)\n(26) 24­0515\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Nargess Mozafari v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV06447. (This matter arises from\na trip and fall incident on September 26, 2020, near 6959 Esplanade\nStreet, in the City of Los Angeles.)\n(27) 23­0519\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Valerie Morris v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 20STCV08646. (This matter arises from a trip\nand fall incident on October 19, 2019, on the sidewalk on Waring Avenue\nnear 815 North El Centro Avenue, in the City of Los Angeles.)

(28) 23­0773\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe cases entitled Edward Clay v. City of Los Angeles, et al. (Consolidated)\nand Charlette Lawrence v. City of Los Angeles, et al. (Lead), Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case Nos. 21STCV06277 (Consolidated) and\n21STCV04242 (Lead). (This matter arises from a traffic accident that\noccurred on March 31, 2020, at the intersection of Crenshaw Boulevard\nand Hyde Park Avenue, in Los Angeles, California.)

(29) 24­0518\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Joshua Fruhman, et al. v. Tenelius Joel Hooper, et al.\n(Related LASC Case No. 22STCV35092), Los Angeles Superior Court\nCase No. 21STCV25133. (This matter arises from a vehicle versus\npedestrian accident which occurred on May 6, 2021, at the intersection of\nWest Sunset Boulevard and North Crescent Heights Boulevard, in Los\nAngeles, California.)

(3) 24­0600­S14\nMotion (Hutt – Park) relative to Transportation Committee Jurisdiction in\nconnection with transportation grant funds.

(30) 24­0519\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Mina Kian Manesh v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 21STCV25831. (This matter arises from a trip\nand fall incident on September 5, 2020, near Ventura Boulevard and\nWoodley Avenue, in Los Angeles.)

(31) 24­0520\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Ani Tatintsyan, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV14762. (This matter arises from\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Mina Kian Manesh v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 21STCV25831. (This matter arises from a trip\nand fall incident on September 5, 2020, near Ventura Boulevard and\nWoodley Avenue, in Los Angeles.)\n(31) 24­0520\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Ani Tatintsyan, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV14762. (This matter arises from\na vehicle versus vehicle traffic collision which occurred on May 21, 2020,\nnear the intersection of La Mirada Avenue and Wilton Place, in the City of\nLos Angeles.)

(32) 24­0521\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Silvia Bautista v. Esther Eunhae Lee, et al., Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 21STCV39181. (This matter arises from an\nincident between a pedestrian and a Los Angeles Police Department\nvehicle on January 30, 2021, at New Hampshire Avenue and 8th Street.)

(33) 24­0522\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Justin Cabrera v. Enrique Oseguera Ceja, et al., Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV41756. (This matter arises from\nan automobile accident which occurred on March 26, 2021, on the 110\nFreeway approaching Gage Avenue.)

(34) 24­0523\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Michelle Champeau v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 22STCV06585. (This matter arises from a trip\nand fall incident that occurred on July 24, 2021 near the intersection of 7th\nStreet and New Hampshire.)

(35) 24­0524\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Danielle M. Halyak v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV25850. (This matter arises from\nan incident involving a Los Angeles Police Department officer on or about\nSeptember 5, 2022 in the City of Los Angeles.)

(36) 24­0525\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Fahren James v. City of Los Angeles, et al., United States\nDistrict Court Case No. 2:21­CV­04525­CBM­AS. (This matter arises from\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Danielle M. Halyak v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV25850. (This matter arises from\nan incident involving a Los Angeles Police Department officer on or about\nSeptember 5, 2022 in the City of Los Angeles.)\n(36) 24­0525\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Fahren James v. City of Los Angeles, et al., United States\nDistrict Court Case No. 2:21­CV­04525­CBM­AS. (This matter arises from\nan incident involving members of the Los Angeles Police Department that\noccurred on May 30, 2020.)

(37) 24­0526\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Maria Del Carmen Sevilla v. City of Los Angeles, et al.,\nLos Angeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV08070. (This matter arises\nfrom a trip and fall incident on a cracked alleyway located at 8600 Willis\nAvenue in the City of Los Angeles.)

(38) 24­0527\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Grady Dunning v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 22STCV29204. (This matter arises from a fall\nfrom a bicycle that occurred on June 25, 2022, on 836 Radcliff Avenue, in\nthe City of Los Angeles.)

(39) 24­0528\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Damian Brown v. Los Angeles Fire Department, et al.,\nLos Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV22747. (This matter arises\nfrom allegations of discrimination, harassment, retaliation, failure to\naccommodate and provide responsible accommodations for a Los\nAngeles Fire Department firefighter.)

(4) 21­1188­S8\nCity Attorney report relative to a proposed Amendment to Contract No. C­\n140018 for legal services with Beveridge & Diamond related to the July 11,\n2021, flooding incident at the Hyperion Water Reclamation Plant.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(40) 24­0529\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Patricia Hines v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 19STCV28431. (This matter arises from a\nNovember 25, 2018 incident wherein plaintiffs’ daughter was involved in a\nfatal car accident at the intersection of Strathern Street and Balboa\nBoulevard.)

(41) 24­0094\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\n(40) 24­0529\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Patricia Hines v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 19STCV28431. (This matter arises from a\nNovember 25, 2018 incident wherein plaintiffs’ daughter was involved in a\nfatal car accident at the intersection of Strathern Street and Balboa\nBoulevard.)\n(41) 24­0094\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section 54956.9(d)(2), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the\ncase entitled JCDECAUX Airport, Inc. (This case arises from a business\ntax payment.)

(42) 24­0200\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section 54956.9(d)(1) & (d)(2), to confer with its legal counsel\nrelative to the case entitled Cirgadyne Incorporated. (This case arises from\nBusiness License Tax assessments for tax years 2009­2021.)

(43) 24­0253\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Christian Pineda v. City of Los Angeles, et al., United\nStates District Court Case No. CV21­06470­CBM­ASx. (This matter\narises from an incident involving members of the Los Angeles Police\nDepartment that occurred on May 29, 2020.)

(44) 24­0571\nCD 11 The Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Ali Pourmola v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 22SMCV00483. (The complaint in this action\nalleges dangerous condition of public property and inverse condemnation\nin connection with a sewer backup incident at 140 Homewood Road, Los\nAngeles California.)

(45) 20­0441\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Alex Aguilar, Jr., et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., United\nStates District Court Case No: 2:17­CV­04382 CBM (MRWx) and United\nStates Court of Appeal for the 9th Circuit Case Nos: 23­55328; 23­55386 .\n(This matter arises from an incident involving members of the Los Angeles\nPolice Department on June 9, 2016, in Los Angeles, California.)

(46) 24­0648\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Argelia Alvarado, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, Los\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Alex Aguilar, Jr., et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., United\nStates District Court Case No: 2:17­CV­04382 CBM (MRWx) and United\nStates Court of Appeal for the 9th Circuit Case Nos: 23­55328; 23­55386 .\n(This matter arises from an incident involving members of the Los Angeles\nPolice Department on June 9, 2016, in Los Angeles, California.)\n(46) 24­0648\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Argelia Alvarado, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV27837. (This matter arises from\na September 26, 2020, incident involving injuries caused by a dog bite.)

(47) 23­1448\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Zeeshan H. Khan, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al.,\nUnited States District Court Case: CV21­03289 CAS. (This matter arises\nfrom an incident involving members of the Los Angeles Police Department\nthat occurred on August 21, 2020.)\nSUPPORTING MATERIALS\nMaterials relating to items on the agenda are available on the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System found at\nhttps://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect by entering the Council File number (e.g., 00­0000) associated with the agenda item.\nPUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS\nMembers of the public who wish to speak on one or multiple items shall have an opportunity to speak up to one minute per item up\nto a total of two minutes for two or more agenda items. At regular meetings, members of the public shall also have an opportunity to\nspeak up to one minute for general public comment on any matter within the subject­matter jurisdiction of the Committee. The\nCommittee is not required to take general public comment at special meetings. The Committee may limit the total amount of time for\npublic comment on any specific agenda item, on all agenda­items collectively, and/or on general public comment, based on the\nanticipated time required to hear from public speakers on any given or all agenda items, on the availability of Committee members\nand the need to maintain quorum, and on any other relevant factor. The Committee shall not discuss or take action relative to any\ngeneral public comment except as explicitly permitted under the Brown Act.\nCOMMITTEE INFORMATION, ASSIGNMENTS, AND STRUCTURE\nhttps://clerk.lacity.gov/clerk­services/cps/council­committee­meetings/info­assignments­structure\nSPECIAL ACCOMMODATION\nRequests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with\nDisabilities Act, can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978­1075. For Telecommunications Relay Service for the\nhearing impaired, please see the information below.\nNOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES\nIf a member of the public is compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require them to register as a\nlobbyist and report this activity. More information can be found at Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. or at\nethics.lacity.org/lobbying. Further assistance can be found by contacting the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­1960 or\nethics.commission@lacity.org.\nEXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES\nA member of the public seeking to challenge a City action in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public\nhearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk prior to the public hearing in time\nRequests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with\nDisabilities Act, can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978­1075. For Telecommunications Relay Service for the\nhearing impaired, please see the information below.\nNOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES\nIf a member of the public is compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require them to register as a\nlobbyist and report this activity. More information can be found at Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. or at\nethics.lacity.org/lobbying. Further assistance can be found by contacting the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­1960 or\nethics.commission@lacity.org.\nEXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES\nA member of the public seeking to challenge a City action in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public\nhearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk prior to the public hearing in time\nreasonably to be considered by the Committee members. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City\nCouncil's final action on a matter will become a part of the administrative record.\nTELECOMMUNICATIONS RELAY SERVICE (TRS) COMMUNICATIONS\nIndividuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, and individuals with a speech disability, may be able to avail themselves of both for\npeer­to­peer and third­party telecommunications relay service (TRS) communications. Telecommunications Relay Service is a\ntelephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in\nall 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers ­\ngenerally telephone companies ­ are compensated for the costs of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no\ncost to the TRS user.\nWhat forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the equipment\navailable: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY­Based TRS; Speech­to­Speech Relay Service; Shared Non­English Language Relay\nService; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for detail\ndescriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications­relay­service­trs.\nDon't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the caller is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello, this is the relay\nservice…" when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who is deaf,\nhard­of­hearing, or has a speech disability.\nFor more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the\nFCC's Disability Rights Office website.

(5) 24­0406\nCity Attorney report relative to a proposed legal services Agreement to\nretain Downey Brand LLP as outside counsel.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(6) 24­0437\nCity Attorney report relative to a proposed legal services Agreement with\nBurke, Williams & Sorenson, LLP to provide legal services related to the\ncase entitled The Highroad LLC v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 21STCV37436.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(7) 24­0569\nCity Attorney report relative to proposed legal services Agreements with\nShea Larson to provide legal services related to the case entitled People v.\nPolymer 80, Inc. and with Jaburg Will to provide legal services related to\nthe case entitled People v. Kandypens, Inc.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(8) 23­0271\nCity Attorney report relative to a proposed legal services Agreement with\nColantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC to provide legal services associated\nwith the case entitled Apartment Owners Association of California, Inc. v.\nCity of Los Angeles, lead Los Angeles Superior Court (LASC) Case No.\nBC677423, consolidated for all purposes with Frederick H. Leeds v. City of\nLos Angeles, consolidated LASC Case No. BC709658.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(9) 24­0552\nCity Attorney report relative to a proposed legal services Agreement with\nColantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC to provide legal services related to\nthe case entitled Dustin Bramell v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 23STCP03825.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(1) 24­0607\nCD 11 City Administrative Officer report relative to a Personal Services Contract\nwith Waste Management of California, Inc., to provide landfill disposal of\ngrit and screenings services for the Bureau of Sanitation.

(10) 24­0487\nCD 8 Resolution (Harris­Dawson – McOsker) relative to declaring the property\nlocated at 5400 South Western Avenue a public nuisance as the result of\nthe presence of large amounts of trash.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(11) 24­0498\nCD 8 Resolution (Harris­Dawson – McOsker) relative to declaring the property\nlocated at 7216 South Western Avenue a public nuisance as the result of\nthe presence of large amounts of trash, encampments, and illicit drug\nactivity.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\n(11) 24­0498\nCD 8 Resolution (Harris­Dawson – McOsker) relative to declaring the property\nlocated at 7216 South Western Avenue a public nuisance as the result of\nthe presence of large amounts of trash, encampments, and illicit drug\nactivity.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(12) 24­0584\nCD 6, CD 7 Motion (Padilla ­ Rodriguez) relative to addressing lighting deficiencies for\nthe two pedestrian tunnels at the intersections of Sharp Avenue and Pierce\nStreet and Sharp Avenue and Filmore Street, including creative solutions\nto fortify the lighting at these underpasses.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(13) 24­0587\nCD 4 Motion (Raman ­ Lee) relative to designating the intersection at Sherman\nWay and Hesperia Avenue in Reseda as “MTO Shahmaghsoudi Square."\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(14) 24­0392\nMotion (Padilla, Blumenfield, Rodriguez ­ Hutt) relative to the method of\ndisposal relating to waste created as a result of stone masonry fabrication\nand molding (slab production fabrication), in order to increase compliance\nwith Cal/OSHA’s emergency regulations on respirable crystalline silica to\nreduce the incidents of silicosis, and related matters.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nSUPPORTING MATERIALS\nMaterials relating to items on the agenda are available on the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System found at\nhttps://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect by entering the Council File number (e.g., 00­0000) associated with the agenda item.\nPUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS\nMembers of the public who wish to speak on one or multiple items shall have an opportunity to speak up to one minute per item up\nto a total of two minutes for two or more agenda items. At regular meetings, members of the public shall also have an opportunity to\nspeak up to one minute for general public comment on any matter within the subject­matter jurisdiction of the Committee. The\nCommittee is not required to take general public comment at special meetings. The Committee may limit the total amount of time for\npublic comment on any specific agenda item, on all agenda­items collectively, and/or on general public comment, based on the\nanticipated time required to hear from public speakers on any given or all agenda items, on the availability of Committee members\nand the need to maintain quorum, and on any other relevant factor. The Committee shall not discuss or take action relative to any\ngeneral public comment except as explicitly permitted under the Brown Act.\nCOMMITTEE INFORMATION, ASSIGNMENTS, AND STRUCTURE\nMaterials relating to items on the agenda are available on the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System found at\nhttps://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect by entering the Council File number (e.g., 00­0000) associated with the agenda item.\nPUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS\nMembers of the public who wish to speak on one or multiple items shall have an opportunity to speak up to one minute per item up\nto a total of two minutes for two or more agenda items. At regular meetings, members of the public shall also have an opportunity to\nspeak up to one minute for general public comment on any matter within the subject­matter jurisdiction of the Committee. The\nCommittee is not required to take general public comment at special meetings. The Committee may limit the total amount of time for\npublic comment on any specific agenda item, on all agenda­items collectively, and/or on general public comment, based on the\nanticipated time required to hear from public speakers on any given or all agenda items, on the availability of Committee members\nand the need to maintain quorum, and on any other relevant factor. The Committee shall not discuss or take action relative to any\ngeneral public comment except as explicitly permitted under the Brown Act.\nCOMMITTEE INFORMATION, ASSIGNMENTS, AND STRUCTURE\nhttps://clerk.lacity.gov/clerk­services/cps/council­committee­meetings/info­assignments­structure\nSPECIAL ACCOMMODATION\nRequests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with\nDisabilities Act, can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978­1064. For Telecommunications Relay Service for the\nhearing impaired, please see the information below.\nNOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES\nIf a member of the public is compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require them to register as a\nlobbyist and report this activity. More information can be found at Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. or at\nethics.lacity.org/lobbying. Further assistance can be found by contacting the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­1960 or\nethics.commission@lacity.org.\nEXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES\nA member of the public seeking to challenge a City action in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public\nhearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk prior to the public hearing in time\nreasonably to be considered by the Committee members. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City\nCouncil's final action on a matter will become a part of the administrative record.\nTELECOMMUNICATIONS RELAY SERVICE (TRS) COMMUNICATIONS\nIndividuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, and individuals with a speech disability, may be able to avail themselves of both for\npeer­to­peer and third­party telecommunications relay service (TRS) communications. Telecommunications Relay Service is a\ntelephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in\nall 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers ­\ngenerally telephone companies ­ are compensated for the costs of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no\ncost to the TRS user.\nWhat forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the equipment\navailable: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY­Based TRS; Speech­to­Speech Relay Service; Shared Non­English Language Relay\nService; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for detail\ndescriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications­relay­service­trs.\nDon't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the caller is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello, this is the relay\nservice…" when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who is deaf,\nhard­of­hearing, or has a speech disability.\nFor more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the\nFCC's Disability Rights Office website.

(2) 24­0479\nCD 8 Resolution (Harris­Dawson – McOsker) relative to declaring the property\nlocated at 8873 South Broadway a public nuisance as the result of the\npresence of illegal dumping and abandoned vehicles.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(3) 24­0480\nCD 8 Resolution (Harris­Dawson – McOsker) relative to declaring the property\nlocated at 3762 Normandie Avenue a public nuisance as the result of the\npresence of illegal dumping, encampments, and other illicit activities.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(4) 24­0481\nCD 8 Resolution (Harris­Dawson – McOsker) relative to declaring the property\nlocated at 8654 South Broadway a public nuisance as the result of the\npresence of illegal dumping, encampments, and other illicit activities.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(5) 24­0482\nCD 8 Resolution (Harris­Dawson – McOsker) relative to declaring the property\nlocated at 8659 South Broadway a public nuisance as the result of the\npresence of illegal dumping.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(6) 24­0483\nCD 8 Resolution (Harris­Dawson – McOsker) relative to declaring the property\nlocated at 8216­8222­8224 South Western Avenue a public nuisance as a\nresult of the presence of illegal dumping and encampments.\nCD 8 Resolution (Harris­Dawson – McOsker) relative to declaring the property\nlocated at 8659 South Broadway a public nuisance as the result of the\npresence of illegal dumping.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\n(6) 24­0483\nCD 8 Resolution (Harris­Dawson – McOsker) relative to declaring the property\nlocated at 8216­8222­8224 South Western Avenue a public nuisance as a\nresult of the presence of illegal dumping and encampments.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(7) 24­0484\nCD 8 Resolution (Harris­Dawson – McOsker) relative to declaring the property\nlocated at 10727 South Central Avenue a public nuisance as the result of\nthe presence of debris and multiple fire incidents.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(8) 24­0485\nCD 8 Resolution (Harris­Dawson – McOsker) relative to declaring the property\nlocated at 6700 Crenshaw Boulevard a public nuisance as the result of the\npresence of large amounts of trash.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(9) 24­0486\nCD 8 Resolution (Harris­Dawson – McOsker) relative to declaring the property\nlocated at 10019 South Broadway a public nuisance as the result of\novergrown vegetation, trash, and debris.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted