Los Angeles — 2026-01-27

City Council

#1 Item
(1)\n26-0006\nPERSONNEL AND HIRING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the\nexemption of one Water Hyperion Reclamation Plant Manager (Class\nCode 4130) position for the Bureau of Sanitation (BOE) from the Civil\nService pursuant to Charter Section 1001(b).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the exemption of one Water Hyperion Reclamation Plant\nManager (Class Code 4130) position for the BOE from the Civil\nService pursuant to Charter Section 1001(b).\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Mayor. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.
#10 Item
(10)\n24-0037\nPUBLIC SAFETY and TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEES’\nREPORT relative to the impact of California Assembly Bill (AB) 436\nregarding cruising laws and enforcement, and community\nengagement.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. NOTE and FILE the Department of Transportation (DOT) report,\ndated March 19, 2025, attached to the Council file, relative\nto AB 436 community engagement implementation inasmuch as\nit is for information purposes only and no action is required.\n2. REPEAL Section 80.36.10 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code\n(LAMC).\n3. DIRECT the DOT to remove all posted anti-cruising signs\nrelated to LAMC Section 80.36.10 and former Section 21100(k)\nof the California Vehicle Code.\n4. DIRECT the Bureau of Street Services, in order to balance\nprotecting public safety while also supporting the historical\nsignificance of cruising culture, to explore the use of special\nevent permits to allow for the hosting of regulated cruising and\ncar show events on the public right-of-way.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. The\nDOT reports that there is not any anticipated impact to the General\nFund as a result of these recommendations. Accommodations such\nas language access will incur additional costs, and the estimated cost\nfor interpretation services for a one-hour meeting range from $250\n(virtual) and $1,040 (in-person) based on recent quotes from the\nCity’s designated interpretation contractor. Additionally, any meetings\nconducted outside of regular hours of operation would need to incur\nstaff overtime. The engineering overtime cost to attend after-hours\nmeetings and provide technical oversight related to traffic controls is a\nmaximum of $500 per meeting (depending on day/time/and number of\nhours). Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative\nAnalyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.
#11 Item
(11)\n25-1256\nCD 2\nPUBLIC SAFETY and TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEES’ REPORT\nrelative to proactive and coordinated strategies for traffic control and\nstorm preparation during inclement weather.\nRecommendation for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Nazarian\n– Hernandez):\nINSTRUCT the Department of Transportation, in coordination with the\nBureau of Street Services, Bureau of Sanitation, Los Angeles Police\nDepartment, Los Angeles Fire Department, and Emergency\nManagement Department, to report to the City Council in 60 days\nwith a comprehensive plan for proactive traffic management and\nstorm preparation for major streets in Council District Two (CD 2) that\nare prone to significant flooding, and to include, but not be limited to,\nthe following elements:\na. Street drainage preparation at chronically flooded areas.\nb. An identification of the most critical and recurrent flooding\nhotspots on roadways in CD 2, including but not limited to\nVineland Avenue adjacent to the Hollywood Burbank Airport.\nc. A detailed protocol for the pre-deployment of traffic control\nresources, including traffic officers, detour signage, and digital\nmessage boards, in advance of and during predicted major\nstorm events.\nd. A plan for the rapid deployment of physical barricades to\nprevent vehicles from entering deeply flooded or impassable\nstreet sections.\ne. A strategy for a public information campaign to alert residents\nand commuters about flood-prone areas and alternative routes\nduring storm events.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.
#12 Item
(12)\n25-1370\nPUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the proposed\n2026 Los Angeles Fire Code.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nREQUEST the City Attorney to prepare and present an Ordinance\namending Article 7 of Chapter V of the Los Angeles Municipal Code\nto replace the current Los Angeles Fire Code with the 2025 California\nFire Code with specified modifications.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD)\nreports that the department has budgeted for the editing, publication\nand purchase of the 2026 LAFC amendment package. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.
#13 Item
(13)\n25-1359\nPUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the request for\npayment of reward offer (DR No. 2303-13540) in a hit-and-run case.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. APPROVE the payment of $50,000 for information leading to\nthe apprehension and conviction of the perpetrator in\nconnection with a fatal hit-and-run case. (DR No. 2303-13540).\n2. AUTHORIZE the Controller to transfer $50,000 from the\nReserve Fund to the Unappropriated Balance and appropriate\ntherefrom to the Special Reward Trust Fund No. 436/14.\n3. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to transfer $50,000 from the Special\nReward Trust Fund No. 436/14, Account No. XXXXXX to the\nPolice Department Fund No. 100/70, Secret Service Account\nNo. 004310.\n4. INSTRUCT the Los Angeles Police Department to make the\nappropriate reward payment.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Board of Police\nCommissioners. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief\nLegislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.
#14 Item
(14)\n25-0706-S1\nPUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Supplemental\nPolice Account Second Quarterly Report 2025 (April through June\n2025).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nNOTE and FILE the Board of Police Commissioners report dated\nNovember 12, 2025, attached to Council file No. 25-0706-S1, relative\nto the Supplemental Police Account Second Quarterly Report 2025\n(April through June 2025).\nFiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.
#15 Item
(15)\n12-0347-S2\nCD 14\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE MUNICIPAL FACILITIES\nCOMMITTEE relative to a lease assignment with Kevin Kim, dba\nExpress News & Lotto for the retail space located at 155-A South Main\nStreet.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAUTHORIZE the Department of General Services to assign and\nexecute a lease amendment with Kevin Kim, dba Express News &\nLotto for the retail space located at 155-A Main South Street, Los\nAngeles, CA 90012 under terms and conditions substantially outlined\nin the December 11, 2025 MFC report, attached to the Council File.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The MFC reports that there is no additional\nGeneral Fund impact resulting from this lease amendment.
#16 Item
(16)\n26-0078\nCD 13\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final\nmap of Parcel Map L.A. No. 2015-3153, located at 1119 Sanborn\nAvenue, northerly of Wit Place.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the final map of Parcel Map L.A. No. 2015-3153, located\nat 1119 Sanborn Avenue, northerly of Wit Place, and accompanying\nSubdivision Improvement Agreement and Contract with security\ndocuments.\nOwner: Judd Burton; Surveyor: Ken M. Shank\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the\nsubdivider has paid a fee of $14,064 for the processing of this final\nparcel map pursuant to Section 19.02(B)(3) of the Los Angeles\nMunicipal Code. No additional City funds are needed.
#17 Item
(17)\n25-0029\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to potential\nballot measures, options and proposals for the June and November\n2026 elections to increase General Fund Tax revenue.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. APPROVE the following general revenue tax options to\nStrengthen Fiscal Stability and Preserve Core Services for\nplacement on the June 2, 2026 Primary Nominating Election\nBallot:\na. Tax Measure: Transient Occupancy Tax; Current\nRate: General Fund – 13 percent, Total – 14 percent; Rate\nIncrease: 4.0 percent, 2.0 percent; Duration: 4 percent\nuntil December 2028, 2 percent thereafter and permanent;\nAnnual Estimated Revenue Impact: $89 million, $45\nmillion\nb. Tax Measure: Parking Occupancy Tax; Current Rate: 10\npercent; Rate Increase: 5.0 percent; Duration: Permanent;\nAnnual Estimated Revenue Impact: $67 million\nc. Tax Measure: Cannabis Business Tax Parity; Current\nRate: Various; Rate Increase: N/A; Duration: Permanent;\nAnnual Estimated Revenue Impact: Approximately $70\nmillion\n2. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of the City\nAdministrative Officer (CAO) and Chief Legislative Analyst\n(CLA), to prepare and present the necessary Resolutions and\nOrdinances for the proposed ballot measures stated above for\nthe June 2, 2026 Primary Nominating Election Ballot, on or\nbefore January 28, 2026, for Council adoption by no later than\nFebruary 11, 2026; and, to include a separate ballot measure to\nclose the TOT loophole regardless of the amount, as follows:\na. Revise the definitions of tax applicability to explicitly\ninclude Online Travel Company (OTC) charges and\nmarkups as taxable charges.\nb. Add a requirement that operators disclose all OTCs\nproviding payments.\nc. Add language clarifying the applicability of TOT to certain\ncommon fees and charges.\nd. Add language requiring any organized platform or\nmarketplace facilitating short-term rental of property within\nthe City to collect applicable TOT at the time of payment\nand remit the money collected to the City.\ne. How the City can address enforcement with OTCs, not\njust with the home-sharing platforms, as many of whom\nare working with the City in good-faith.\n3. INSTRUCT the CAO to engage on-call consultants to study the\nfollowing four general revenue tax options for consideration as a\nmeasure on the November 3, 2026 Ballot, or future ballots:\n​\na. Major Event Tax\nb. Shared Ride Tax\nc. Vacancy Tax\nd. Retail Delivery Fee\n4. INSTRUCT the CAO to identify funding up to $100,000 per\nstudy for each of the tax and fee revenue options selected by\nthe Council for further consideration, excluding any options\nselected for the June 2, 2026 Ballot.\n5. INSTRUCT the CLA and Office of Finance, with assistance from\nthe Department of City Planning (DCP), to provide an update to\nthe next scheduled Budget and Finance Committee and\nPlanning and Land Use Management (PLUM) Committee on\nthe status of the pending Vacation Rental Ordinance [Council\nfile No. (CF) 18-1246], including options to increase the citywide\ncap on vacation rentals, changing the geographic unit subject to\nconcentration caps from Census tracts to community plan areas\nand increase said cap, increasing the maximum number of days\nper calendar year a vacation rental may be rented, and\nimplementing a vacation rental application fee to fund\nenforcement activities.\n6. STRIKE Recommendation No. 7 contained in said CAO report\nrelative to rescinding the Council action of July 30, 2025, CF 22-\n0392-S1, which requests the City Attorney to prepare and\npresent an ordinance to amend Ordinance No. 188699 relative\nto the establishment of a Transportation Communications\nNetwork (TCN) Revenue Fund, that would allocated 75 percent\nof TCN Revenue by Council District based on the percentage of\ntotal area (square feet) of operational digital displays located\nwithin each Council District, and 25 percent for citywide\npurposes.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no immediate\nfiscal impact on the General Fund as a result of the recommendations\nin the report; however, recommendations identify potential future\nactions that may require additional appropriations through interim\nbudget actions subject to Mayor and Council approval.\nFinancial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the\nrecommendations in the report comply with the City’s Financial\nPolicies in that the report is for informational purposes only and does\nnot commit the City to any future expenditure of funds without further\nlegislative action.
#18 Item
(18)\n25-1423\nCD 10\nCONSIDERATION OF MOTION (HUTT – JURADO) relative to\nnegotiating a lease for office space at 2922 Crenshaw Boulevard, Los\nAngeles, CA 90016 that will be utilized as a field office for Council\nDistrict 10.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nINSTRUCT the Department of General Services, with the assistance\nfrom the City Attorney, to negotiate a lease for office space at 2922\nCrenshaw Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90016 that will be utilized as a\nfield office for Council District Ten.
#19 Item
(19)\n26-0088\nMOTION (RAMAN - HARRIS-DAWSON) relative to a request to City\nAttorney to prepare and present ballot measure language, with a\nseverability clause, and the necessary ballot resolutions and election\nordinance to place the measure on the June 2, 2026 ballot, to amend\nthe Measure ULA ordinance.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nREQUEST the City Attorney to prepare and present ballot measure\nlanguage, with a severability clause, and the necessary ballot\nresolutions and election ordinance to place the measure on the June\n2, 2026 ballot, to amend the Measure ULA ordinance with the\nfollowing changes:\nCommercial/Multifamily & Palisades Exemptions:\nAmend Section 21.9.2 to:\n• Create a fifteen year exemption for newly constructed\nmultifamily, commercial or mixed use (i.e. multifamily and\ncommercial combined). The exemption should apply to\nmultifamily and commercial properties transferred within 15\nyears from issuance of the most recent certificate of occupancy\nfor new construction or substantial rehabilitation. Multifamily is\ndefined as any properties containing 4 or more dwelling units\nand commercial is defined as any properties containing non-\nresidential uses.\n• Amend Measure ULA to allow the Office of Finance to issue an\nexemption for three years after any natural disaster upon a\nshowing by the listed taxpayer that the Measure ULA tax will\ncause an undue hardship. This rule should be retroactive to\nowners of record of residential properties on January 7, 2025 in\nfire-impacted areas.\nAffordable Housing Production Technical Changes:\n• Amend Section 21.9.14 to add non-profit and a limited\npartnership whose general partner is a single-member limited\nliability company wholly controlled by a nonprofit corporation\nmeeting the affordable housing development qualifications.\n• Amend Section 22.618.3 (d)(l)(i)b.4 to clarify that the language\nis not applicable in cases of transfers by foreclosure, deed-in-\nlieu of foreclosure, or other similar conveyance. Replace the\nresale requirement with a first right of refusal clause for qualified\nnon-profits, Community Land Trusts, and Limited Equity\nHousing Cooperatives with affordable housing development\nqualifications to bid on the property at fair market value with a\n60 day response period.\n• Amend Section 22.618.3(d)(l)(i)b.7 to provide necessary\nflexibility for seniority to be determined based on the\nrequirements of other public funders and based on the size of\neach lender's loan.\n• Amend Section 22.618.3(d)(l)(i)b.1 and b.2 to provide flexibility\nto the Los Angeles Housing Department to permit an\nadjustment of rents up to 80% of Area Median Income to ensure\npositive cash flow, for example following the loss of subsidy or\nthe risk of foreclosure for project feasibility. This opportunity to\nshift affordability levels within a project should only be used in\ntimes of financial distress to remove any risk.\nContracting\n• Add a provision to ensure that upon City Council approval for\nmatters related to Measure ULA, the City Attorney must\nconclude review as to form in 90 days or less.
#2 Item
(2)\n25-0005-S142\nCD 1\nCONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNICATION FROM THE\nLOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION\nrelative to removing the property at 815 South Bonnie Brae Street\n(Case Nos. 864023, 869143 and 877520), Assessor I.D. No. 5142-\n004-024, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated November 3,\n2025, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 815 South Bonnie Brae\nStreet (Case Nos. 864023, 869143 and 877520), Assessor I.D. No.\n5142-004-024, from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.
#3 Item
(3)\n26-0057\nMOTION (HERNANDEZ - McOSKER) relative to authorizing the\nDepartment of Public Works to use the City Hall Tom Bradley Room for\na Small Business Seminar and Luncheon on February 26, 2026.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAUTHORIZE the Board of Public Works to use the City Hall Tom\nBradley Room on Thursday, February 26, 2026 from 11 a.m. to 3\np.m. for a Small Business Seminar and Luncheon.
#4 Item
(4)\n25-0008-S10\nCD 15\nMOTION (McOSKER - LEE) and RESOLUTION relative to amending\nthe prior Council action of August 20, 2025 regarding establishing\noversize vehicle parking restrictions along certain street segments of\nTorrance Boulevard, Normandie Avenue, and Vermont Avenue in the\nHarbor Gateway area.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAMEND the prior Council action of August 20, 2025 regarding\nestablishing oversize vehicle parking restrictions along certain street\nsegments of Torrance Boulevard, Normandie Avenue, and Vermont\nAvenue in the Harbor Gateway area (Council file No. 25-0008-S10) to\nADOPT the revised Resolution attached to the Motion.
#5 Item
(5)\n17-0638\nCD 9\nMOTION (PRICE - HUTT) relative to reactivating and restoring Council\nfile No. (CF) 17-0638 regarding the 4802 South McKinley Avenue /\nVictory Baptist Church / Ceremonial Sign.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nREACTIVATE CF 17-0638, which expired per Council policy (CF 05-\n0553); and, RESTORE the matter of the 4802 South McKinley\nAvenue / Victory Baptist Church / Ceremonial Sign, to its most recent\nlegislative status as of the date of the file's expiration.
#6 Item
(6)\n21-0862\nCD 9\nMOTION (PRICE - HUTT) relative to reactivating and restoring Council\nfile No. (CF) 21-0862 regarding the 3511 Central Avenue / Florence\nMills Theatre / Permanent Ceremonial Sign(s).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nREACTIVATE CF 21-0862, which expired per Council policy (CF 05-\n0553); and, RESTORE the matter of the 3511 Central Avenue /\nFlorence Mills Theatre / Permanent Ceremonial Sign(s), to its most\nrecent legislative status as of the date of the file's expiration.
#7 Item
(7)\n26-4118-S1\nCD 5\nRESOLUTION (PADILLA for YAROSLAVSKY - McOSKER) relative to\ndesignating locations in Council District 5 for enforcement against\nsitting, lying, sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining, or placing\npersonal property, or otherwise obstructing the public right-of-way, as\nfurther detailed in Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 41.18.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. RESOLVE, pursuant to Section 41.18 of the LAMC, to\ndesignate the following locations for enforcement against sitting,\nlying, sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining, or placing\npersonal property, or otherwise obstructing the public right of\nway, up to the maximum distance and effective for the\nmaximum period of time prescribed, and as further detailed in\nthe LAMC:\na. 10860 Santa Monica Blvd - Public Safety\nb. 6077 W. 3rd Street - Public Safety\nc. Drexel Avenue and San Vicente Boulevard - Public Safety\nd. 3rd Street and San Vicente Boulevard - Public Safety\ne. Robertson Boulevard and Alden Drive - Public Safety\nf. Sepulveda Boulevard and Sardis Avenue - Overpass\ng. Sepulveda Boulevard and Richland Avenue - Overpass\nh. Sepulveda Boulevard and National Boulevard - Overpass\n​\n2. RESOLVE to direct and authorize the City department(s) with\njurisdiction over the identified locations to post appropriate\nnotices of the above prohibitions at these locations, and to\nbegin enforcement upon the expiration of any required posting\nperiod.
#8 Item
(8)\n26-0067\nMOTION (RODRIGUEZ - PADILLA) relative to funding for services in\nconnection with Council District 7’s special recognition of the Los\nAngeles Rams, including the illumination of City Hall.\nRecommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\nTRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $1,462 from the General City\nPurposes Fund No. 100/56, Account No. 000832 (Heritage Month\nCelebrations and Special Events) to the General Services Fund No.\n100/40, Account No. 001100 (Hiring Hall) for services in connection\nwith Council District 7’s special recognition of the Los Angeles Rams\non January 26, February 6, February 7, and February 8, 2026,\nincluding the illumination of City Hall.
#9 Item
(9)\n25-0866\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY and ORDINANCE\nFIRST CONSIDERATION relative to amending the Los Angeles\nAdministrative Code (LAAC) to establish an ex parte communication\ndisclosure requirement for members of the Charter Reform\nCommission.\nRecommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\nPRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated\nJanuary 23, 2026, adding Section 8.336 to the Los Angeles\nAdministrative Code to establish an ex parte communication\ndisclosure requirement for members of the Charter Reform\nCommission.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney.\nNeither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative\nAnalyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

PLUM

#1 Item
(1)\n25-1372\nCD 11\nPreviously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), No. ENV-\n2024-116-MND, and the Mitigation Monitoring Program prepared for\nthe MND, and related California Environmental Quality Act Findings;\nreports from Mayor and Los Angeles City Planning Commission\n(LACPC); Resolution for General Plan Amendment to the Palms – Mar\nVista – Del Rey Community Plan to amend Footnote No. 1 of the\nCommunity Plan Map to allow Height District No. 2 for the project site;\nand a draft Ordinance effectuating a Height District Change from\nHeight District No. 1 to 2 to allow the proposed project to be developed\nwith a Floor Area Ratio of 2.1:1 and approximately 298,908 square feet\nof floor area, resulting in a Height District Change from M2-1 to (T)\n(Q)M2-2D; for the construction of an 82,324 square-foot, 44-foot three-\ninch, three-story mixed-use building over a basement consisting of\nretail and self-storage uses, the Proposed Project will consist of 3,959\nsquare feet of retail use and parking at ground floor and 78,365 square\nfeet of self-storage use at the second and third floors and basement\nlevel, the Proposed Project will provide 70 automobile parking spaces\nand 64 bicycle parking spaces, the Proposed Project will require\napproximately 13,541 cubic yards of grading and export, the Proposed\nProject will be developed at the vacant portion of a site that is currently\ndeveloped with an existing 216,584 square-foot self-storage building\nthat will remain; for the property located at 12681 West Jefferson\nBoulevard, subject to Conditions of Approval; and adoption of project\nfindings.\nApplicant: Cherry Miao, Public Storage\nRepresentative: Francis Park, Park & Velayos LP\nCase No. CPC-2024-115-GPA-ZC-HD-CU-ZAA-SPR\nEnvironmental No. ENV-2024-116-MND\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes
#2 Item
(2)\n25-1441\nCD 12\n2021-2029 Housing Element Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No.\nENV-2020-6762-EIR, State Clearinghouse (SCH) No. 2021010130,\nAddendum Nos. ENV-2020-6762-EIR-ADD1 and ENV-2020-6762-EIR-\nADD2, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and related Environmental\nFindings, pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)\nGuidelines Section 15168, the project is within the scope of the\nprogram approved earlier with the Housing Element EIR and the EIR\nadequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; report\nfrom the Los Angeles City Planning Commission; and draft Ordinance\nto effectuate a Zone Change from the existing A1-1 Zone to (T)A2-1\nacross the entire property; for the subdivision of one 11.38-acre parcel\ninto five lots ranging in size from 2.0 to 3.25 acres each, the Project\nretains the existing home and all existing accessory structures on\nproposed Parcel 2, the Project also includes a Zoning Administrator’s\nAdjustment to allow an existing accessory structure to remain in place,\n42.8 feet from the new front lot line of proposed Parcel 2 in lieu of 55\nfeet from the front lot line [Los Angeles Municipal Code 12.21 C.5(b)],\nno new construction is proposed; for the property located at 10777\nNorth Winnetka Avenue, subject to Conditions of Approval, including T\nConditions; and adoption of project findings.\nApplicant: Chuck Stevens and Stephanie Vitacco\nRepresentative: Chris Nassiri, Iacobbellis & Associates, Inc.\nCase No. CPC-2023-1263-ZC-ZAA-HCA\nEnvironmental No. ENV-2023-1264-HES\nRelated Case: TT-83950-HCA\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes
#3 Item
(3)\n26-0031\nCD 6\nMotion (Padilla - Lee) relative to investigating any matters of reported\nnuisance activities occurring onsite at the property located at 10955\nRatner Street, Sun Valley, CA 91352; and thereafter, the Zoning\nAdministrator may initiate Administrative Nuisance Abatement\nProceedings (Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 12.27.1; Chapter\n1A Section 13B.6.2); and related matters.
#4 Item
(4)\n25-1315\nCD 10\nMotion (Hutt – Lee) relative to investigating any matters of reported\nnuisance activities occurring onsite at the property located at 2618\nWest Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90008; and\nthereafter, the Zoning Administrator may initiate Administrative\nNuisance Abatement Proceedings (Los Angeles Municipal Code\nSection 12.27.1; Chapter 1A Section 13B.6.2); and related matters.
#5 Item
(5)\n26-0075\nCD 15\nMotion (McOsker - Lee) relative to investigating any matters of\nreported nuisance activities occurring onsite at the property located at\n1005 South Gaffey Street, San Pedro, CA 90731; and thereafter, the\nZoning Administrator may initiate Administrative Nuisance Abatement\nProceedings (Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 12.27.1; Chapter\n1A Section 13B.6.2); and related matters.
#6 Item
(6)\n26-1200-S3\nCommunication from the Mayor relative to the appointment of Dr.\nLaura Dominguez to the Cultural Heritage Commission for the term\nending June 30, 2028.\nFinancial Disclosure Statement: Filed\nBackground Check: Pending
#7 Item
(7)\n25-1264\nCD 7\nCONTINUED FROM 1/13/26\nCategorical Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act\n(CEQA) pursuant to Article 19, Section 15308, Class 8 and Article 19,\nSection 15331, Class 31 of the State CEQA Guidelines, and report\nfrom the Cultural Heritage Commission relative to the inclusion of\nRowley Residence, located at 8436 West Hillrose Street, in the list of\nHistoric-Cultural Monuments.\nApplicant: Marsha Perloff, Little Landers Historical Society\nOwners: Armen Sarvari and Narine Aghakiant; and Michael and Marina\nP. Dahlen\nCase No. CHC-2025-4173-HCM\nEnvironmental No. ENV-2025-4174-CE\nFiscal Impact Statement: No
#8 Item
(8)\n25-1198-S1\nCD 15\nCONTINUED FROM 1/13/26\nPreviously Adopted Negative Declaration, No. ENV-2022-6860-ND,\nand related Environmental findings; report from the Los Angeles City\nPlanning Commission (LACPC); and an Appeal filed by Coalition for\nResponsible Equitable Economic Development Los Angeles (CREED\nLA) (Representative: Andrew Graf, Adams Broadwell Joseph &\nCardozo), from the LACPC’s determination in approving, pursuant to\nLos Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 12.24 X.22, a Zoning\nAdministrator Determination to allow Transitional Height of 65 feet\nwithin a distance of 100 to 199 feet from the R1 zone, in lieu of the\nTransitional Height of 61 feet otherwise allowed by LAMC\n12.21.1.A.10; for the improvement and expansion of an existing one-\nstory, 42-foot tall, 221,496 square-foot cold storage facility, resulting in\na two-story, 65-foot tall, 267,960 square foot facility, with a total 0.36:1\nFloor Area Ratio, the expansion includes the demolition of 27,157\nsquare feet of an existing cold dock for a new 71,331 square foot\nfreezer, resulting in a net addition of 44,174 square feet of new floor\narea, the improvements include 2,290 square feet of a new\nengine/mechanical room, electrical room, and fire pump room, the\nProject also involves a new automated racking system, other interior\nimprovements, and reducing the length of the existing double rail spur,\nthe Project will provide 114 parking spaces, with no trees to be\nremoved, and the grading of less than 500 cubic yards of soil and\nimport of 7,000 cubic yards of soil; for the properties located at 1420\nand 1500 North Coil Avenue; and 1532, 1540, and 1542 North\nAlameda Street, subject to Conditions of Approval; and adoption of\nproject findings.\nApplicant: Richard Burke, Konoike Pacific Calf Inc.\nRepresentative: John Parker, Pacific Crest Consultants\nCase No. CPC-2022-6859-GPA-HD-ZAD-WDI-1A\nEnvironmental No. ENV-2022-6860-ND\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee

#1 Item
(1)\n24-0412-S2\nBoard of Airport Commissioners (BOAC) report relative to BOAC\nResolution No. 28290 and consideration of termination and partial\ntermination of Concession Agreements and convenience termination\npayments for the concession units in Terminal 5 at Los Angeles\nInternational Airport (LAX); and categorical exemption from the\nrequirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),\npursuant to Article III, Class 1(18)(c) of the Los Angeles CEQA\nGuidelines.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No
#2 Item
(2)\n20-0450-S5\nBoard of Airport Commissioners (BOAC) report relative to BOAC\nResolution No. 28275 and proposed Seventh Amendment to\nConcession Agreement LAA-8647 with DFS Group LP; and categorical\nexemption from the requirements of the California Environmental\nQuality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Article III, Class 1(18)(c) of the Los\nAngeles CEQA Guidelines.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No
#3 Item
(3)\n25-1545\nBoard of Airport Commissioners (BOAC) report relative to BOAC\nResolution No. 28259 and proposed First Amendment to Contract DA-\n5602 with Amadeus Airport IT Americas Inc.; and administrative\nexemption from the requirements of the California Environmental\nQuality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Article II, Section 2(f) of the Los\nAngeles CEQA Guidelines.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No
#4 Item
(4)\n25-1546\nBoard of Airport Commissioners (BOAC) report relative to BOAC\nResolution No. 28263 and proposed Contract with Lutron Services\nCompany Inc.; and administrative exemption from the requirements of\nthe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Article II,\nSection 2(f) of the Los Angeles CEQA Guidelines.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No
#5 Item
(5)\n26-0042\nCD 15\nBoard of Harbor Commissioners (BOHC) report relative to BOHC\nResolution No. 25-10646 and proposed Personal Services Agreement\nwith CSDA Design Group for Residential Sound Insulation Mitigation\nProgram; and administrative exemption from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article II,\nSection 2(f) of the Los Angeles CEQA Guidelines.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No
#6 Item
(6)\n23-0337-S1\nCD 15\nBoard of Harbor Commissioners (BOHC) report relative to BOHC\nResolution No. 25-10643 and proposed Amendments to six\nAgreements for as-needed Air Quality Services; and administrative\nexemption from the requirements of the California Environmental\nQuality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article II, Section 2(f) of the Los\nAngeles CEQA Guidelines.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No
#7 Item
(7)\n24-0171-S1\nCD 15\nBoard of Harbor Commissioners (BOHC) report relative to BOHC\nResolution No. 25-10645 and proposed Second Amendment to\nReimbursement Agreement No. 21-9795 with Bellwether Financial\nGroup, Inc.; and administrative exemption from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article II,\nSection 2(f) of the Los Angeles CEQA Guidelines.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No
#8 Item
(8)\n25-1505\nMotion (Park - Padilla) relative to requesting a report on the\nenvironmental, public health, and equity impacts of residential\ndevelopment near Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), best\npractices for protecting residents in high-exposure areas, and the\nfeasibility of establishing an airport noise and environmental exposure\noverlay zone to guide future land-use decisions. (This item is referred\nto the Planning and Land Use Management Committee, and Trade,\nTravel and Tourism Committee.)
#9 Item
(9)\n25-1514\nMotion (Raman - Padilla) relative to requesting a report on potential\nchanges to the composition of the Van Nuys Airport Citizens Advisory\nCouncil, including Council consideration of appointment rules, and the\ncompilation and codification of all existing and future bylaw changes\ninto a single, comprehensive set of bylaws.