Los Angeles — 2026-01-28

(1)\n25-1081\nCONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC WORKS and\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEES’ REPORT\nrelative to exploring opportunities to assist vertical content creators by\nestablishing a grant program that provides upfront funding to\nincentivize local production, and related matters.\nA. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. DIRECT the Economic and Workforce Development\nDepartment (EWDD), with the assistance of the Board of\nPublic Works (BPW), to report with:\na. Economic development tools to attract long-term\nindustry infrastructure investments.\nb. Explore how to leverage EWDD's special funds and\nother funding sources to finance a targeted local\nincentive to complement the State credit and reward\nlocal hiring.\nc. Review permit fee structure for small and\nindependent productions to improve competitiveness\nfor local productions, with a "Micro-Budget\nConcierge" service at FilmLA guaranteeing a 3-day\npermit turnaround.\nd. Identify opportunities to offer augmented in-kind cost\noffsets (e.g. reduce or waive all city service fees for\nqualifying productions).\ne. Explore complementary tools and incentives to\nenhance the impact of the State's expanded Film &\nTelevision Tax Credit Program and to boost local\nproduction for vertical content in Los Angeles.\n2. DIRECT the Office of Finance, with the assistance of the\nEWDD and BPW, to report with tax rebate opportunities\nfor property owners who offer discounted rates to\nqualifying productions to increase inventory of affordable\nlocations for vertical content creators.\n3. DIRECT the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), with\nassistance from the EWDD and City Administrative Officer,\nto identify $5,000,000 in public and/or private/philanthropic\nfunding sources to establish a "40% Launch & Rebate"\ngrant, which provides up-front funding to micro-drama\nproductions offering a 40 rebate on qualifying LA\nexpenditures with an initial 20% upfront grant upon project\napproval to address cash-flow for small productions, and\nthe final 20% paid upon completion.\nB. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE\nREPORT\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. CONCUR with the recommendations of the Public Works\nCommittee.\n2. DIRECT the EWDD and CLA to report to Council on\nrecommending a feasible production threshold to impose\nemployer-sponsored portable healthcare labor standards\nthat will not be detrimental to the budget of the project.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable

(10)\n25-1264\nCD 7\nCATEGORICAL\nEXEMPTION\nFROM\nTHE\nCALIFORNIA\nENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA), AND COMMUNICATION\nFROM THE CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION relative to the\ninclusion of Rowley Residence, located at 8436 West Hillrose Street, in\nthe list of Historic-Cultural Monuments.\nApplicant: Marsha Perloff, Little Landers Historical Society\nOwners: Armen Sarvari and Narine Aghakiant; and Michael and Marina\nP. Dahlen\nCase No. CHC-2025-4173-HCM\nEnvironmental No. ENV-2025-4174-CE\n(Planning and Land Use Management Committee report to be\nsubmitted in Council. If a public hearing is not held in Committee,\nan opportunity for public comment will be provided.)\n(Please visit www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.)

(11)\n23-1022-S18\nHOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to\nproposed change to the services provided by the Time-Limited Subsidy\n(TLS) Program in relation to the Alliance Settlement Agreement\n(Alliance) Program; and associated increase in the annual TLS bed\nrate; and related matters.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. APPROVE the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority’s\n(LAHSA) proposed TLS annual slot rate of $29,560 for the\nAlliance TLS Program, which reflects the following proportionate\ncosts:\na. $6,767 annual service costs per TLS slot\nb. $22,793 annual rental assistance costs per TLS slot\n2. APPROPRIATE up to $8,316,666 from the following accounts to\nHomeless Housing, Assistance, and Prevention Program Round\n4 (HHAP-4) Fund No. 66C/10, Account No. 1 0Y783, FC - 3\nRapid Rehousing and Housing Navigation:\na. $1,447,700 from Fund No. 66C/10, Account No. 10Y782,\nFC - 2 Skid Row\nb. $2,040,745.05 from Fund No. 66C/10, Account No.\n10Y784, FC - 4 Outreach, Hygiene, Prevention and\nSupportive Services\nc. $4,690,168.09 from Fund No. 66C/10, Account No.\n10Y786, FC - 6 Administrative Costs and Systems\nSupport\nd. $138,052.86 from Fund No. 66C/43, Account No. 43AC94,\nShelter Program\n3. APPROPRIATE up to $8,316,666 from Homeless Housing,\nAssistance, and Prevention Program Round 3 (HHAP-3) Fund\nNo. 65S/10, Account No. 10A780, Master Leasing to Fund No.\n65S/10, Account No. 10W741, FC-1 Interim Housing Operations\nand Capital Costs.\n4. APPROPRIATE up to $8,316,666 from HHAP-4 Fund No.\n66C/10, Account No. 10Y781, FC - 3 Rapid Rehousing and\nHousing Navigation to HHAP-4 Fund No. 66C/10, Account No.\n10A780, Master Leasing.\n5. APPROVE and APPROPRIATE up to $16,287,030 from HHAP-\n4 Fund No. 66C/10, Account No. 10A780, Master Leasing to the\nLos Angeles Housing Department (LAHD) Fund No. 66C/43, in\na new account entitled, "Alliance Time-Limited Subsidies" for\nthe following expenses:\na. $13,606,515 for the annual cost for 450 Alliance TLS\nProgram slots:\ni. $3,045,150 for service costs\nii. $10,256,850 for rental assistance\niii. $304,515 for LAHSA Administration\nb. $2,680,515 for approximately 89 additional TLS slot costs,\npending allocation\n6. AMEND and APPROVE Recommendation No. 6 contained in\nthe City Administrative Officer (CAO) report dated January 16,\n2026, attached to Council file No. 23-1022-S18, respectively, to\nread as follows:\nINSTRUCT the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to\nexecute a new contract with Housing Operations and\nManagement, Inc. ("HOM, Inc.), based on LAHSA's\ncompetitively bid, "Time Limited Subsidy Financial Assistance\nProgram Agreement," with HOM, Inc. ("LAHSA/HOM\nAgreement") for the purpose of providing fiscal support for the\nAlliance TLS Program. The new contract will be for an amount\nup to $45,586,000 and will be for a term of commencing on\nMarch 1, 2026 and ending on June 30, 2026, however, said\nterm may be extended and the scope of work may be amended\nin accordance with extensions and amendments to the\nunderlying LAHSA/HOM Agreement.\n7. INSTRUCT the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to\namend the Alliance Program contract (Contract No. C-141840)\nwith LAHSA to reflect increases for the following:\n​\na. Up to $13,534,000 for up to 2,000 Alliance TLS Program\nslots beginning March 1, 2026, through February 28, 2027\nb. Up to $1,354,000 for LAHSA administration at 10 percent\nof the service provider Alliance TLS Program allocated\nslots beginning March 1, 2026, through February 28, 2027\n8. AMEND and APPROVE Recommendation No. 8 contained in\nthe CAO report dated January 16, 2026, attached to the Council\nfile, respectively, to read as follows:\n​INSTRUCT the CAO, in coordination with the LAHD, the Chief\nLegislative Analyst, and HR&A Associates to create a pool of\nrent reasonable units, bulk landlord negotiation, and housing\nnavigation services to speed up lease up.\n9. AUTHORIZE the CAO to:\n​\na. Prepare Controller instructions or make necessary\ntechnical adjustments, including to the names of the\nSpecial Fund accounts recommended for this report, to\nimplement the intent of these transactions; and,\nREQUEST the Controller to implement these instructions.\nb. Prepare any additional Controller instructions to reimburse\nCity Departments for their accrued labor, material or\npermit costs related to projects in this report, to implement\nthe intent of these transactions; and, REQUEST the\nController to implement these instructions.\n10. INSTRUCT the CAO to report to the Housing and\nHomelessness Committee with an update on service\nreimbursements when available.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no immediate\nGeneral Fund impact as a result of the recommendations in this report\nas it recommends using Homeless Housing, Assistance, and\nPrevention funding. There may be a potential future General Fund\nimpact of up to $21.6 million in Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-27 and $13.5\nmillion in FY 2027-28, if alternative funding sources are not identified.\nFinancial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the above\nrecommendations in this report comply with the City’s Financial\nPolicies in that budgeted funds are being used to fund recommended\nactions.

(12)\n26-0005-S1\nCD 8\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 3918 South Brighton Avenue (Case No. 885851), Assessor\nI.D. No. 5036-015-020, from the Rent Escrow Account Program\n(REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated January 16,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 3918 South Brighton Avenue\n(Case No. 885851), Assessor I.D. No. 5036-015-020, from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(13)\n26-0005-S2\nCD 9\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 875 East 40th Place (Case No. 854026), Assessor I.D. No.\n5114-012-007, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated January 16,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 875 East 40th Place (Case\nNo. 854026), Assessor I.D. No. 5114-012-007, from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(14)\n26-0005-S3\nCD 9\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 624 East 84th Street (Case Nos. 804879; 891146),\nAssessor I.D. No. 6029-024-027, from the Rent Escrow Account\nProgram (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated January 16,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 624 East 84th Street (Case\nNos. 804879; 891146), Assessor I.D. No. 6029-024-027, from the\nREAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(15)\n25-0412\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the\nremoval of delinquent accounts receivables submitted by the Los\nAngeles Housing Department (LAHD) for the quarter ending December\n31, 2024.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the Collections Board of Review’s (CBR) recommendation\nand findings for the LAHD to remove from its active accounts\nreceivable 178 uncollectible invoices totaling $290,363.94, each\naccount owing $5,000 or more, as detailed in the CBR report dated\nMarch 27, 2025, attached to the Council file.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The Collection Board of Review reports that\nthe proposed action will decrease the City’s receivable base by\n$290,363.94.

(16)\n25-1548\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a request\nfor permit and linkage fee refund from 409 NORTH LLC – Refund\nClaim No. 179247, for the project located at 409 North Alta Vista\nBoulevard.\nRecommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\nAPPROVE Refund Claim No. 179247 in the amount of $83,315.94\nfrom 409 NORTH LLC for Building Permit No. 20010-20000-01611 for\nthe project located at 409 North Alta Vista Boulevard, Los Angeles,\nCalifornia 90036.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Department of\nBuilding and Safety. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the\nChief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.

(17)\n26-0016\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT, RESOLUTION and\nORDINANCES FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the issuance and\nsale of Municipal Improvement Corporation of Los Angeles (MICLA)\nLease Revenue Bonds (Bonds), lease and leaseback of real\nproperty between the City and MICLA; and, creation of a special fund\nto record accounting transactions.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. ADOPT the accompanying Authorizing RESOLUTION, attached\nto the City Administrative Officer (CAO) report dated January 8,\n2026, attached to the Council file, which authorizes the\nissuance and sale in a principal amount up to $255 million of\nMICLA Bonds, Series 2026-A (Capital Equipment and Real\nProperty), to be sold on a negotiated basis; and, authorizes the\nexecution and delivery of related bond documents in connection\nwith the issuance and sale of the Bonds.\n2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated\nJanuary 9, 2026, approving the lease and leaseback of certain\nreal properties by and between the City and MICLA in\nconnection with the issuance of Bonds by MICLA, to be issued\nto retire certain maturities of commercial paper notes issued by\nMICLA.\n3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated\nJanuary 9, 2026, adding Section 5.162.57 to Article 2.5,\nChapter 9, Division 5 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code to\ncreate a special fund related to the Bonds to be issued by\nMICLA, in one or more series, preliminarily named the\nMunicipal Improvement Corporation of Los Angeles Lease\nRevenue Bonds, Series 2026-A (Capital Equipment and Real\nProperty), with such additional series and subseries\ndesignations as determined by the City, to record certain\naccounting transactions related to the Bonds.\n4. INSTRUCT the Controller to create an account in the Capital\nFinance Administration Fund (Fund No. 100/53) that will be\nused to pay for future lease payments entitled “MICLA 2026-A\n(Capital Equipment & Real Property)”.\n5. AUTHORIZE the CAO to make technical corrections and\nadjustments as necessary to those transactions included in said\nCAO report to implement the Mayor and Council intentions.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that the issuance of the\nBonds in an aggregate principal amount up to $255 million will be\npayable from lease payments to be made by the City to MICLA\npursuant to the Lease Agreement, which is an obligation of the\nGeneral Fund, subject to annual appropriations in the Adopted Budget\nwithin the Capital Finance Administration Fund (Fund No. 100/53).\nThe resulting semi-annual lease payments will be due on April 15 and\nOctober 15 in sufficient amounts to pay semi-annual debt service\npayments for the Bonds. There is no additional General Fund impact\nas the first lease payment will occur in Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-27.\nFinancial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the issuance of\nthe Bonds in an aggregate principal amount up to $255 million, along\nwith the associated lease payments, will not cause the City’s debt\nservice obligations to exceed six percent of General Fund revenues\nfor non-voter-approved debt, as required by the City’s Financial\nPolicies. After the issuance of the Bonds, the projected non-voter\napproved debt ratio is estimated to be 2.40 percent in FY 2025-26\nand 2.73 percent in FY 2026-27, as detailed in Attachment B of said\nCAO report.\nDebt Impact Statement: The CAO reports that the Bonds will be\npayable from lease payments to be made by the City pursuant to the\nLease Agreement, which is a General Fund obligation. These lease\npayments to MICLA will be annually budgeted in the Capital Finance\nAdministration Fund (Fund No. 100/53). The average annual debt\nservice for the Bonds is estimated to be $15.9 million over 20 years,\nthrough May 1, 2046. The total debt service, including total principal\nand interest, over the life of the Bonds is estimated to be\napproximately $318.8 million. Actual interest rates may differ as rates\nare dependent on market conditions at the time of issuance. After the\nissuance of the Bonds, the projected non-voter approved debt ratio is\nestimated to be 2.40 percent in FY 2025-26 and 2.73 percent in FY\n2026-27, as detailed in Attachment B of said CAO report.

(18)\n13-1465-S1\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the\nAnnual Reserve Fund Loan Review.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. WRITE OFF $931,638.13 in Reserve Fund loans and advances\nlisted on Attachment 1 of the City Administrative Officer (CAO)\nreport dated June 30, 2025, attached to the Council file.\n2. INSTRUCT City departments with outstanding loans to work\nwith the special fund administrators and report to the CAO in 90\ndays on the status of loans listed on Attachment 1 of said CAO\nreport as requiring further analysis.\n3. INSTRUCT City departments to prioritize and expedite the\nsubmission of invoices to the appropriate City department(s) in\norder to recover Reserve Fund loans made for special fund\nexpenditures.\n4. AUTHORIZE the CAO to make technical corrections as\nnecessary to those transactions included in said CAO report to\nimplement the Mayor and City Council intentions.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no General\nFund impact resulting from the actions recommended within said CAO\nreport, as the Fiscal Year 2024-25 and 2025-26 Budgets do not\nassume the repayment of these loans. In addition, these actions will\nnot impact the current status of the Reserve Fund.

(19)\n21-1188-S11\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a Fourth\nAmendment to Contract No. C-139762 with Summa LLP to extend the\ncontract term for the provision of legal services with regard to the July\n11, 2021 flooding incident at the Hyperion Water Reclamation Plant.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. APPROVE the Fourth Amendment to Contract No. 139762 with\nSumma LLP to extend the contract term to September 1, 2027.\n2. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to prepare\nController instructions for any necessary technical\namendments, subject to the approval of the City Administrative\nOfficer (CAO); and, AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement\nthe instructions.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither\nthe CAO nor the City Administrative Officer has completed a financial\nanalysis of this report.

(2)\n17-1071-S1\nCDs 3, 4\nCATEGORICAL EXEMPTION , PLANNING AND LAND USE\nMANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE REPORT and ORDINANCE\nFIRST CONSIDERATION relative to amending the Ventura-Cahuenga\nBoulevard Corridor Specific Plan to streamline the review process for\nsigns, interior tenant improvements, and a change of use, and update\nthe appointment process and composition of the Ventura-Cahuenga\nBoulevard Corridor Specific Plan Review Board.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. FIND, that the draft Ordinance is categorically exempt from the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources\nCode sections 21000, et seq.) under CEQA Guidelines, Section\n15301; Section 15303; Section 15311; and Section 15320;\nbased on the whole of the administrative record, substantial\nevidence supports the project falls within the categorical\nexemption and there is no substantial evidence supporting an\nexception to a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA\nGuidelines, Section 15300.2.\n2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning\nCommission (LACPC), as the Findings of Council.\n3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated\nNovember 17, 2025, amending the Ventura-Cahuenga\nBoulevard Corridor Specific Plan to streamline the review\nprocess for signs, interior tenant improvements, and a change\nof use, and update the appointment process and composition of\nthe Ventura-Cahuenga Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan Review\nBoard.\n4. REQUEST the City Attorney and the Department of City\nPlanning to clarify, before the matter is scheduled for Council,\nwhether modifications to the Ventura Specific Plan regarding\nthe conversion of existing mural signs can be accommodated\nnow, or whether these modifications would require the matter to\nreturn to the LACPC for further review.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither\nthe City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(20)\n25-1457\nBUDGET AND FINANCE and TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEES’\nREPORT relative to applications for and acceptance of funding from\nthe Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro)\nOpen and Slow Streets Program for Cycles 6 and 7.\nRecommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\nAUTHORIZE the:\n1. Previous submission of:\na. Eight grant applications by the General Manager,\nDepartment of Transportation (DOT) and one grant\napplication by the City of West Hollywood in partnership\nwith DOT, to the Open and Slow Streets Cycle 6 and 7\nGrant Program for the projects identified in the DOT report\ndated December 4, 2025, attached to the Council file.\nb. Two grant applications by the General Manager, El\nPueblo, to the Open and Slow Streets Cycle 6 and 7\nGrant Program for the projects identified in said report.\n2. General Managers, DOT and El Pueblo, to:\na. Execute any necessary funding and contractual\ndocuments, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as\nto form and legality, to receive Metro Open Streets Grant\nProgram Cycle 6 and 7 awards, and to commit to provide\nthe minimum required local match of up to $1,924,844\nthrough in-kind match for projects for which the City of Los\nAngeles is the Lead Agency, and up to $100,000 for which\nthe City of Los Angeles is a partner agency, in Fiscal\nYears 2025-26, 2026-27, 2027-28, and 2028-29.\nb. Make any technical adjustments or clarifications as\nnecessary and consistent with the intent of this report,\nsubject to the approval of the Office of the City\nAdministrative Officer (CAO); and AUTHORIZE the City\nController to implement these instructions.\n3. General Manager, DOT, to:\na. Establish a new appropriation account in the amount of\n$3,193,271 within the Transportation Grant Fund No.\n655/94, as a front-funding source for this reimbursable\ngrant.\nb. Enter into a letter of agreement with partner agencies\ndelivering Open Streets events that travel through the City\nof Los Angeles jurisdiction, including the City of West\nHollywood, in order to facilitate grant funding dispersal\nand ensure event coordination.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The DOT reports that there is no impact to\nthe General Fund at this time. Open Streets events are largely funded\nthrough grants and available special funds. Additionally, DOT\nrequests funding annually through the City's budget process for\nportions of the program that are not grant-funded, typically via special\npurpose fund appropriation requests in the City's Measure M Local\nReturn Fund. The DOT expects to submit Capital and Technology\nImprovement Plan budget requests for the required 30 percent local\nmatch. Neither the CAO nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(21)\n25-1464\nCD 14\nMOTION (JURADO - LEE) relative to amending the prior Council\naction of December 10, 2025 regarding the New Year’s Eve events at\nthe Civic Center and Grand Park (Council file No. [CF] 25-1465).\nRecommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\nAMEND the prior Council action of December 10, 2025 regarding\nissuing any needed Right of Entry permit and processing and\nexecuting any other related document to the organizers/sponsors of\nthe New Year’s Eve events at the Civic Center and Grand Park (CF\n25-1465) to replace the original instruction with the following new\ninstruction:\nAUTHORIZE the Department of General Services to issue any\nneeded Right of Entry permit and to process and execute any other\nrelated document(s) to the organizers/sponsors of the upcoming New\nYear’s Eve events at the Civic Center and Grand Park, subject to\nappropriate terms and conditions of operations; as well as issue,\nprocess and/or execute any hold harmless, and risk management\ndocuments acceptable to the City Administrative Officer, with the\nunderstanding that Grand Park will pay $4,789.20 to General\nServices Fund No. 100/40, Account No. (1100 Hiring Hall) for services\nin connection with this event.

(22)\n24-0971\nCD 11\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY relative to (1) a\nproposed amendment to Contract No. C-146250 with Nossaman, LLP\nto increase the funding for legal services for the City’s representation in\nthe case entitled LA Forward Institute, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et\nal., Los Angeles Superior Court (LASC) Case No. 24STCV17156, and\nrelated LASC cases; and (2) a request for closed session to confer\nwith the City Council with regards to the underlying litigation relative to\nthe same cases referenced above.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney to amend Contract No. C-\n146250 with Nossaman, LLP to increase the funding from the\noriginal of allocation of $620,000 to a new total of $1,380,000;\nfor which the additional $760,000 will be paid through funds that\nwere previously approved by City Council for Outside Counsel\ncosts (Council file No. 25-1225) on December 10, 2025.\n2. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney to amend Contract No. C-\n146250 with Nossaman, LLP to include in its scope of work,\nassistance with the lawsuit entitled Venice Community Housing\net al. v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case\nNo. 25STCV20355.\n3. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to prepare\nController instructions for any necessary technical adjustments,\nsubject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer\n(CAO); and, AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement the\ninstructions.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither\nthe CAO nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial\nanalysis of this report.

(23)\n20-0263-S5\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY relative to (1) a\nproposed Second Amendment to Contract No. 201616 witth Gibson,\nDunn & Crutcher, LLP for representation of the City in the case\nentitled LA Alliance for Human Rights, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et\nal.; and (2) a request for closed session to confer with the City Council\nwith regards to the underlying litigation relative to case referenced\nabove.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney to amend Contract No. 201616\nwith Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP to increase the funding from\nthe previously amended allocation of $5,694,000 to a new total\namount of $7,494,000. This $1,800,000 will be paid through\nfunds that were previously approved by City Council for Outside\nCounsel costs (Council file No. 25-1225) on December 10,\n2025.\n2. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to prepare\nController instructions for any necessary technical adjustments,\nsubject to the approval of the CAO, and authorize the Controller\nto implement the instructions.\n[The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), (d)(2), (e)(1), and (d)\n(4) [significant exposure to litigation] to (1) confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to a proposed Amendment to Legal Services\nAgreement No. C-201616 with Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP\nrelated to the case entitled LA Alliance for Human Rights, et al. v.\nCity of Los Angeles, et al., United States District Court Central\nDistrict Case No. 2:20-cv-02291-DOC-KES, Ninth Circuit Court of\nAppeals Case No. 22-55687 (one potential plaintiff).]; and (2) to\nconfer with its legal counsel with regards to the underlying\nlitigation relative to this matter.\n(Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of the\nabove matter.)

(24)\n25-0416\nTRANSPORTATION and BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEES’\nREPORT relative to awarded funding from the Los Angeles County\nMetropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) from Cycle 2 of the Metro\nActive Transport, Transit and First/Last Mile (MAT) Program.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. AUTHORIZE the respective lead City department to:\na. Execute any necessary funding, cooperative agreement,\nor contractual documents, subject to the approval of the\nCity Attorney as to form and legality, for accepting the\nfunding from Cycle 2 of the MAT Program.\nb. Establish a new appropriation account in the amount of\n$40,850,000 within the Transportation Grant Fund No.\n655/94, as a front-funding source for this reimbursable\ngrant.\n2. ADD position authorities for staffing resources for design and\nconstruction support of the awarded MAT Cycle 2 projects :\na. Ten Department of Public Works (PW) positions.\ni. Design and Construction Support:\n1. One Senior Civil Engineer\n2. Two Civil Engineers\n3. Three Civil Engineering Associate IIIs\nii. Construction Inspection:\n1. One Senior Construction Inspector\n2. Three Construction Inspectors\nFiscal Impact Statement:\nThe Department of Transportation and Bureaus of Engineering and\nContract Administration report that additional City staff resources are\nnecessary to ensure timely design and delivery of projects, and to\nensure continued funding of future project phases by Metro. Grant\nfunding acceptance is contingent upon dedicated staffing to design\nand deliver projects. Local match was neither required nor proposed\nfor these projects. The MAT Cycle 2 grant will fund the requested PW\npositions throughout the four fiscal years shown in Table 2. The\ninformation in Table 2 depicts an estimate of needed staff salary\nfunding based on the anticipated number of PW positions engaged\nper the anticipated project schedule. This estimate of funding\namounts is subject to change based on deviations to the project\nschedule and/or deviations to the level of effort anticipated for these\nprojects. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief\nLegislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(25)\n25-1416\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(4), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Downtown Natural Caregivers, Inc.\n(This matter arises from Business License Tax assessments.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on January 20, 2026.)

(26)\n25-1519\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Charles F. Wing v. City of Los\nAngeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 24VECV00512. (This\nmatter arises from a trip and fall on February 6, 2023, on the sidewalk\nof Kentland Avenue, near its intersection with Leadwell Street.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on January 20, 2026.)

(27)\n25-1506\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Victor Manuel Yepez Collazo v.\nCounty of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.\n24STCV24674. (This matter arises from a trip and fall incident on\nFebruary 27, 2024, on the sidewalk located at Olive Street and 11th\nStreet, Los Angeles.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on January 20, 2026.)

(28)\n25-1520\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Maria Del Carmen Elias v. City of\nLos Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV08475.\n(This matter arises from a fall incident on May 10, 2022 incident, near\n1136 East 41st Street, in Los Angeles, California.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on January 20, 2026.)

(29)\n25-1521\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Steven Nelson v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23LBCV02033.\n(This matter arises from a November 2, 2022, sidewalk trip and fall\nincident near 24907 Broad Avenue, in Los Angeles.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on January 20, 2026.)

(3)\n20-0450-S5\nCATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE\nBOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS relative to the Seventh\nAmendment to Concession Agreement LAA-8647 with DFS Group LP.

(30)\n25-1522\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Sonia Pier-Weisman v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23VECV05473.\n(This matter arises from an August 18, 2023, sidewalk and curb trip\nand fall incident located at the southeast corner of Noble Avenue and\nDickens Street, in the Sherman Oaks area.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on January 20, 2026.)

(31)\n25-1523\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Dinora Escobar v. City of Los\nAngeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV19695. (This\nmatter arises from a trip and fall incident on December 24, 2019, over\na raised slab of concrete located at 11409 Blucher Avenue, Granada\nHills, California.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on January 20, 2026.)

(32)\n25-1524\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Vonda Washington v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV35045.\n(This matter arises from a trip and fall incident on November 10, 2021,\nat 6027 8th Avenue, in the City of Los Angeles.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on January 20, 2026.)

(33)\n25-0616\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Diane Rios aka Dyan Rios v. City\nof Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.\n22STCV10015. (This matter arises from a trip and fall incident on\nAugust 6, 2021, on the sidewalk at 1429 and 1420 Ivar Avenue, in the\nCity of Los Angeles.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on January 20, 2026.)

(34)\n25-1525\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Rebeca Candelaria Ramirez v.\nJesus Miranda, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.\n20STCV06176. (This matter arises from a vehicle versus vehicle traffic\ncollision on August 13, 2019, at 1st Street West of Highland Avenue.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Closed Session on January 20, 2026.)

(35)\n25-1526\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled David Israel Velasquez v. Jonathan\nRafael Viramontes, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.\n23STCV19844. (This matter arises from a vehicle versus vehicle traffic\ncollision on December 31, 2021, at Avenue 26 and Barranca Street.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on January 20, 2026.)

(36)\n25-1527\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Grace Benites Lopez v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 24CMCV01055.\n(This matter arises from a vehicle versus vehicle incident on July 20,\n2022, at Central Avenue and 88th Place.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on January 20, 2026.)

(37)\n25-1528\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled D.E., a Minor, et al. v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV25856.\n(This matter arises from an officer-involved shooting on December 26,\n2021 incident at 2960 West Broadway in the City of Los Angeles,\nCalifornia 90031.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on January 20, 2026.)

(38)\n25-1529\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Dawn Swarm v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23SMCV00544.\n(This matter arises from a trip and fall incident on February 12, 2022,\non an uneven portion of the sidewalk in front of 3851 Minerva Avenue,\nLos Angeles, California.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on January 20, 2026.)

(39)\n25-1530\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Payman Heravi v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV35233.\n(This matter arises from a trip and fall incident on December 27, 2019,\nat 19927 Ventura Boulevard, in Woodland Hills, California.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on January 20, 2026.)

(4)\n25-1282\nCD 11\nPLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to amending the Certified Venice Land Use Plan.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Park - Lee):\nINSTRUCT the Department of City Planning, with the assistance of\nthe City Attorney, and in consultation with the California Coastal\nCommission, to prepare and present an ordinance to amend the\nCertified Venice Land Use Plan to clarify Policy I.C.1 (Industrial Land\nUse), to explicitly prescribe that commercial uses are permitted on\nindustrially designated land.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.

(40)\n25-1531\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Emely Lorena Santizo v. City of\nLos Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.\n23STCV12242. (This matter arises from a vehicle versus vehicle traffic\non August 3, 2022, at the intersection of Gage Avenue and Normandie\nAvenue.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on January 20, 2026.)

(41)\n25-1430\nCD 8\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to a revised settlement offer for the case\nentitled Strategic Actions for a Just Economy v City of Los Angeles et\nal., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCP00702. (This lawsuit\nseeks a writ of mandate related to the City’s approval of a Conditional\nUse Permit and Site Plan Review for the proposed hotel project\nlocated at 3685 South Vermont Avenue, Los Angeles, California\n90007.)\n(The Planning and Land Use Management Committee considered\nthe matter in Closed Session on December 9, 2025; and, the\nBudget and Finance Committee considered the matter in Closed\nSession on January 20, 2026.)

(42)\n25-0855\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section No. 54956.9(a), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Arturo Aceves Jimenez v. City of\nLos Angeles, County of Los Angeles, et al., United States District Court\nCase No. 2:21-cv-07117.\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on January 20, 2026.)

(5)\n25-1486\nPLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE\nREPORT relative to a detailed analysis of the application of Assembly\nBill (AB) 2011, AB 2243, and AB 893.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion\n(Blumenfield - Rodriguez):\nINSTRUCT the Department of City Planning, with the assistance of\nthe City Attorney, to report within 30 days with a detailed analysis of\nthe application of AB 2011, AB 2243 and AB 893 both to the proposed\nWoodland Hills Country Club project and to other parts of the city\nalong "commercial corridors" as defined in State law.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.

(6)\n25-1535\nCD 5\nHOUSING ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR)\nSTATE CLEARINGHOUSE (SCH) AND RELATED ENVIROMENTAL\nFINDINGS, PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM)\nCOMMITTEE REPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION\nrelative to a Zone and Height District Change for the properties located\nin the neighborhoods of Century Glen and Beverly Angeles, both of\nwhich are in the West Los Angeles Community Plan Area in Council\nDistrict 5.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. FIND, based on the whole of the record, in the\nindependent judgment of the decisionmaker, the Project\nwas analyzed in the Housing Element EIR No. ENV-2020-\n6762-EIR, SCH No. 2021010130 certified on November\n29, 2021, and Addendum ENV-2020-6762-EIR-ADD1\napproved June 14, 2022; and Addendum ENV-2020-6762-\nEIR-ADD2 approved February 7, 2025, and that no\nsubsequent or supplemental EIR is required pursuant to\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section\n15162 and 15164 to adopt the draft Ordinance.\n2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning\nCommission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council.\n3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE,\ndated December 11, 2025, to effectuate a Zone and\nHeight District Change from R1-1-O to R1V2-O, for the\nupdate in zoning to the R1V2 zone will convey most of the\nsame development standards and use allowances as the\nR1-1 zone, depending upon the size of a lot, the R1V2\nzone may allow slightly more residential floor area than\nthe current R1-1 zone; for the properties located in the\nneighborhoods of Century Glen and Beverly Angeles, both\nof which are in the West Los Angeles Community Plan\nArea in Council District 5, the Century Glen Project Area is\ngenerally bounded by Santa Monica Boulevard to the\nnorth, Pico Boulevard to the south, Beverly Glen\nBoulevard to the west, and Century Park West and Fox\nHills Drive to the east, the Beverly Angeles Project Area is\ngenerally bounded by Roxbury Drive to the north and\neast, Vidor Drive to the south, and Beverly Green Drive to\nthe west, including four parcels and three irregular shaped\nlots on the western side of Beverly Green Drive along the\nsouthwest boundary of the City of Beverly Hills.\nApplicant: City of Los Angeles\nCase No. CPC-2025-5011-ZC-HD\nEnvironmental Nos. ENV-2020-6762-EIR; ENV-2020-6762- EIR-\nADD1; and ENV-2020-6762-EIR-ADD2\nFiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General\nFund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

(7)\n25-0572-S1\nEXEMPTION, and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT\nCOMMITTEE REPORT relative to the transfer of certain Zoning Code\nauthorities from the Department of Building and Safety (DBS) to the\nDepartment of City Planning (DCP).\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. DETERMINE, based on the whole of the administrative\nrecord, that the proposed Zoning Code Amendment\nOrdinance is not a project under the California\nEnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA\nGuidelines, Section 15378(b)(5) and is exempt from\nCEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).\n2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning\nCommission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council.\n3. APPROVE the proposed ordinance relative to the transfer\nof certain zoning plan check responsibilities from the DBS\nto the DCP, included in the LACPC report dated\nDecember 17, 2025, attached to the Council file.\n4. REQUEST the City Attorney to prepare and present draft\nOrdinances to: 1) transfer certain zoning plan check\nresponsibilities from the DBS to the DCP, as detailed in\nthe LACPC report and 2) include amendments to the Los\nAngeles Administrative Code and the Building Code.\nApplicant: City of Los Angeles\nCase No. CPC-2025-5392-CA\nEnvironmental No. ENV-2025-5393-CE\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LACPC. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(8)\n26-0025\nHOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to\nrequesting reports on City investments made in affordable and\npermanent supportive housing (PSH); expenditures to support\naffordable and PSH and outcomes; and recommendations on\nunallocated funds.\nRecommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Raman -\nJurado):\n1. INSTRUCT the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD) with\nthe assistance of the City Administrative Officer (CAO); and,\nREQUEST the Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles\n(HACLA) to report within 60 days on the City's investments\nmade in affordable and PSH with a status of funded projects\nand a status of its older portfolio with the resources needed to\npreserve these units.\n2. INSTRUCT the LAHD with the assistance of the CAO; and,\nREQUEST HACLA to report within 60 days and thereafter\nquarterly on funds expended to support affordable and PSH and\noutcomes, and recommendations for unallocated funds to\nensure that the City is making the necessary investments in the\nmost effective manner.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the Chief Legislative\nAnalyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(9)\n23-0846\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to a proposed framework for cashless retail ban; and related\nmatters.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nINSTRUCT the Economic Workforce Development Department, with\nassistance of Civil + Human Rights and Equity Department and Chief\nLegislative Analyst (CLA), to seek comment from the small business\ncommunity, such as the Small Business Commission, Los Angeles\nArea Chamber of Commerce, Los Angeles County BizFed, California\nRestaurant Association, and other interested organizations, on the\nproposed framework and potential enforcement models, and report to\nCouncil in 60 days with a summary of its findings.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The CLA reports that there is no fiscal\nimpact from the recommendations in the report.

(1)\n25-1188\nCD 13\nCity Attorney report and draft ordinance relative to expanding the\nboundaries of the Santa Monica-Highland Parking Meter Zone in\nCouncil District Thirteen.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(2)\n25-1427\nMotion (Jurado – Soto-Martinez) relative to cooperation from\nautonomous vehicle (AV) operators on vehicle operations data, and\nadherence to local hire and workforce investment commitments. (This\nitem is referred to the Energy and Environment Committee, Public\nSafety   Committee,   Trade,   Travel   and   Tourism   Committee,   and\nTransportation Committee. On January 14, 2026, the Public Safety\nCommittee approved this item, and the Energy and Environment\nCommittee concurred on January 20, 2026.)

(3)\n25-1481\nCD 7\nMotion (Rodriguez – Hutt) relative to the review and comments for the\nMission Mile Sepulveda: Visioning for a Safe and Active Community\nproject in Council District Seven.

(4)\n25-0008-S28\nCD 7\nResolution (Rodriguez – Lee) relative to establishing oversize vehicle\nparking restrictions along certain street segments of Sunland\nBoulevard, Gladstone Avenue, and Borden Avenue, in Council District\nSeven.

(5)\n25-0008-S29\nCD 12\nResolution (Lee – Harris-Dawson) relative to establishing oversize\nvehicle parking restrictions along certain street segments of Gothic\nAvenue and Yolanda Avenue, in Council District Twelve.

(6)\n26-0008-S1\nCD 10\nResolution (Hutt – Lee) relative to establishing oversize vehicle parking\nrestrictions along a certain street segment of West 18th Street, in\nCouncil District Ten.

(7)\n25-1462\nCD 15\nMotion (McOsker – Hutt) relative to applying for the City’s local\nallocation of the South Bay Cities Council of Governments’ Measure M\nfunds for Cycle Year 2026. (This item is referred to the Public\nWorks Committee and the Transportation Committee.)

(8)\n25-1508\nMotion (Nazarian – Hutt) relative to making all non-specialized City-\nowned parking lots, yards, staging areas, and civic properties available\nto film and television productions for a nominal fee. (This is item is\nreferred to the Energy and Environment Committee, Government\nOperations   Committee,   Public   Works   Committee,   and\nTransportation Committee.)

(9)\n17-1125\nCONTINUED FROM 8/13/25 AND 9/19/25\nCity Attorney report and draft Ordinance relative to amending the Los\nAngeles Municipal Code to update the Shared Mobility Device Trip\nFees paid to the Department of Transportation (DOT), and DOT\nand City Administrative Officer reports relative to the On-Demand\nMobility Program Trip Fee update and methodology. (This   Item\nis referred to the Budget and Finance Committee, Public Works\nCommittee, and Transportation Committee.)\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nFinancial Policies Statement: Yes