Pasadena — 2025-10-27

A. CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Property\nAddresses:\n1\n165 Hurlbut Street, Pasadena, CA\n2\n215 Wigmore Drive, Pasadena, CA\n3.\n225 Madeline Drive, Pasadena, CA\n4.\n230 Madeline Drive, Pasadena, CA\n5.\n235 Bellefontaine Street, Pasadena, CA\n6.\n600 St. John Avenue, Pasadena, CA\n7.\n602 St. John Avenue, Pasadena, CA\n8.\n640 St. John Avenue, Pasadena, CA\n9.\n646 St. John Avenue, Pasadena, CA\n10. 714 St. John Avenue, Pasadena, CA\n11. 726 St. John Avenue, Pasadena, CA\n12. 737 Pasadena Avenue, Pasadena, CA\n13. 866 Pasadena Avenue, Pasadena, CA\n14. 925 Jane Place, Pasadena, CA\n15. 929 Pasadena Avenue, Pasadena, CA\n16. 966 Pasadena Avenue, Pasadena, CA\n17. 1030 Pasadena Avenue, Pasadena, CA\n18. 1150 Pasadena Avenue, Pasadena, CA\n19. 1151 Pasadena Avenue, Pasadena, CA\n20. 1199 Pasadena Avenue, Pasadena, CA\nAgency negotiator: Miguel Márquez\nNegotiating parties: State of California, Department of Transportation\nUnder negotiation: Price and terms of payment

B.\nCITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8\nProperty addresses: 299 N. Euclid Ave.; 199 S. Los Robles Ave.; 150 S. Los Robles Ave.; 221 E. Walnut St.; 1055 E. Colorado Blvd.;\n215 N. Marengo Ave.\nAgency Negotiator: Miguel Márquez\nNegotiating Parties: Euclid Holdings I and Euclid Holdings; 199 Los Robles, LLC, Sand 199 S. Los Robles, LLC and Robles SM,\nLLC; Sherman Oaks Capital Associates, L.P., and Pasadena Holdings, LLC., dba\nPasadena Tri City Ventures; Park Center L.P.; BCSP 1055 East Colorado Property LLC.; Walnut Plaza, L.P., respectively.\nUnder Negotiation: Price and Terms

C.\nCONSIDERATION OF INITIATION OF LITIGATION pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4): Two potential cases

D. CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL regarding significant exposure to potential litigation pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(2): One potential case\nPUBLIC MEETING – 6:00 P.M.\nROLL CALL, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, AND CEREMONIAL MATTERS\nPUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA\nPublic comment will be limited to a total of 20 minutes at the beginning of the meeting and will continue at the conclusion of the meeting, if\nnecessary. Comments are limited to 3 minutes each, and the Mayor may limit this time if reasonable under the circumstances. The City Council\nmay not discuss or take action on issues not on the meeting agenda, except that members of the City Council or staff may briefly respond to\nstatements made or questions posed by persons exercising public testimony rights (Government Code Section 54954.2).\nCONSENT CALENDAR\n(The Consent Calendar consists of routine items which will be approved by one motion and one vote unless removed for separate discussion.\nThere will be one opportunity for public comment on all consent items. Comments are limited to 3 minutes each, and the Mayor may limit this time if\nreasonable under the circumstances.)\nCity Manager/Executive Director

1.\nJOINT ACTION: AUTHORIZE THE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN ADMINISTRATOR TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR UP TO\nTEN YEARS WITH EMPOWER ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF\nAMERICA TO PROVIDE PLAN ADMINISTRATION, INVESTMENT OPTIONS, RECORD KEEPING, AND PARTICIPANT EDUCATION\nSERVICES FOR THE CITY’S DEFERRED COMPENSATION (457(B) AND 401(A))\nPLANS (Finance Dept.)\nRecommendation: It is recommended that the City Council/Deferred Compensation Plan Trustees:\n(1)\nFind that the proposed action in the agenda report is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA\nguidelines Section 15061(b)(3) “Common Sense” exemption; and\n(2)\nAuthorize the Deferred Compensation Plan Administrator (Director of Finance) to enter into a contract, as a result of a competitive\nselection process, as specified in Section 4.08.047 of the Pasadena Municipal Code, with\nEmpower Annuity Insurance Company of America, for a period of five years with one five-year optional extension period, to provide plan\nadministration, investment options, record keeping, and participant education services for the\nCity’s Deferred Compensation (IRC §457(b)) and Defined Contribution (IRC §401(a)) plans. Competitive bidding is not required pursuant to\nCity Charter Section 1002(F), contracts for professional or unique services.

10.\n10a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES\nOctober 3, 2022\n457 Deferred Compensation Plan Trustees\nMarch 17, 2025\nPasadena Public Financing Authority\nSeptember 29,\n2025\nSuccessor Agency to the Pasadena\nCommunity Development Commission\nSeptember 29,\n2025\nCity Council\n10b. RECEIVE AND FILE CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY OF PASADENA\nClaim No.\nClaimant\n2026-0097\nJohn Oden\n2026-0098\nSenior Classic Leasing\nClaim Amount\n35,000.00+\n7,764.86\n2026-0099\nTerry Zoller Cross\n2026-0100\nSean Elliott Gurevich\n2026-0101\nGary Eliahu Gurevich\n2026-0102\nLana Gurevich\n500.00\n35,000.00+\n35,000.00+\n35,000.00+\nOLD BUSINESS:

11. \nCONSIDERATION OF FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE ON CITY COUNCILMEMBERS’\nCOMPENSATION REGARDING COMPENSATION, ALLOWANCES, AND\nBENEFITS FOR THE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL\nRecommendation: It is recommended by the Committee on City Councilmembers’ Compensation that the City Council:\n(1) Find that the recommended actions in the agenda report are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to\nState CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), the “Common Sense” exemption that\nCEQA only applies to projects that may have an effect on the environment;\n(2) Consider Final Report and Recommendations of the Committee on City Councilmembers’ Compensation, regarding the following\nincreases to City Council compensation:\n(a) Establish an annual Family Care Reimbursable Allowance in the amount of $18,000 for each Councilmember and the Mayor;\n(b) Establish a per term Office Setup, Operations and Security Reimbursable Allowance in the amount of $20,000 for each\nCouncilmember and the Mayor;\n(c) Increase the annual General Expense Reimbursable Allowance for Councilmember from $3,600 to $6,000, and for the Mayor from\n$6,000 to $11,000, without restricting use for another category of expense; and\n(d) Increase the annual stipend for each Councilmember from $23,292 to $36,000 and for the Mayor from $34,932 to $54,000; and\n(3) Direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance within 60 days to incorporate adjustments to the compensation paid to each\nCouncilmember and the Mayor by amounts not-to-exceed the recommendations of the Committee,\nsubject to approval by not less than 2/3 majority vote of the City Council.

12.\nRECOMMENDED TRAFFIC REDUCTION AND TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FEE UPDATE (Transportation Dept.)\nRecommendation: It is recommended that the City Council:\n(1)\nFind that the actions proposed in the agenda report are statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)\npursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15273 (Rates, Tolls, Fares, and Charges);\n(2)\nOpen the public hearing on the recommended Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvement Fee update;\n(3)\nClose the public hearing on the recommended Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvement Fee update; and\n(4)\nAfter conducting a public hearing on October 27, 2025, conduct first reading on an Ordinance Amending Title 4, Chapter 4.19, Sections\n4.19.020, 4.19.040, 4.19.050, and 4.19.060, to Update the Traffic Reduction and\nTransportation Improvement Fee for Existing Land Use Categories and to add New Land Use Categories to the Fee Structure; and adopt the\nRecommended Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvement Fee Update in the\nSchedule of Taxes, Fees, and Charges.\nCity Council Decision and Need for Public Hearing: Department of Transportation (DOT) staff presented the methodology and findings of\nthe nexus study, as well as staff recommendations to the Municipal Services\nCommittee (MSC) on July 8, 2025. The Committee approved the staff recommendation with an amendment that either no fees be assessed\nfor Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) (because the fees imposed would be de minimis) or\nthat staff provide an alternative recommendation to City Council for ADU fees. Staff revised the recommendations accordingly, to exempt\nADUs to 900 square feet or less, and to waive the Traffic Reduction and Transportation\nImprovement Fee (TR/TIF) for ADUs governed by a Housing Agreement. Staff presented the revised recommendations at the City Council\nmeeting on July 14, 2025, and the Council approved the recommendations.\nCalifornia Government Code Section 54954.6 states that before adopting any new or increased general tax assessment, the City Council must\nconduct at least one public meeting before the public hearing. While the TR/TIF\nrates are decreasing for most land uses, the TR/TIF rate for one land use (medical office) is increasing compared to the current fee. As such,\nstaff presented the TR/TIF update before the City Council on October 20, 2025. Upon\nclosing the public hearing on October 27, 2025, City Council will formally adopt the TR/TIF update through an ordinance. The notice of public\nmeeting for this item was published in the Pasadena Press on September 15, September\n22, and September 29 of 2025.\nRecommendation of the Transportation Advisory Commission: DOT staff presented the methodology and findings of the nexus study, as\nwell as staff recommendations, to the Transportation Advisory Commission (TAC) on\nMarch 27, 2025 and at a special meeting on April 14, 2025. The TAC discussed the addition of the new proposed land use categories and\nwhether this may encourage or discourage the development of certain types of land uses in\nthe City. The TAC approved the following motion: Support the fees as recommended, and urge council to consider if the reallocation of the fee\ncategories may provide better outcomes on future development.\n(To be discussed and considered concurrently with Item No. 15)

13. APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 17 (ZONING CODE) OF THE PASADENA MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE CITY’S SPECIFIC PLANS\nFOR PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEWS (PPRs), DESIGN REVIEW,\nSIGNS AND AWNINGS, OUTDOOR AND TEMPORARY USES, ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (ADUs), PARKING AND TRANSITORIENTED DEVELOPMENTS (TODs), IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW STATE\nLEGISLATION, AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS UPDATES (Planning Dept.)\nRecommendation: It is recommended that the City Council:\n(1)\nFind that the Zoning Code and Specific Plan Amendments are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)\npursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), the “Common Sense” exemption that\nCEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty\nthat there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the\nenvironment, the activity is not subject to CEQA;\n(2)\nAdopt the Findings for the Zoning Code and Specific Plan Amendments in Attachment A of the agenda report;\n(3)\nApprove the Zoning Code and Specific Plan Amendments as outlined in the agenda report and in Attachment B of the agenda report;\nand\n(4)\nDirect the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance for the Zoning Code and Specific Plan Amendments within 120 days consistent with\nthe provisions set forth in the agenda report and in Attachment B of the agenda report.\nRecommendation of the Planning Commission: On August 27, 2025, the Planning Commission voted to recommend the City Council approve\nthe proposed Zoning Code and Specific Plan Amendments as recommended by\nstaff, with the following changes:\n(1) Design Review – For new multifamily projects, maintain the existing threshold of 10 units for projects to be reviewed by the Design\nCommission. Staff supports this recommended change.\n(2) Parking – For existing buildings that are greater than 50 years old, do not require additional parking for additions necessary to meet\nbuilding, safety or fire requirements. Staff supports this recommended change.\nRecommendations of the Economic Development & Technology Committee and Design Commission: On June 18, 2024, staff presented\nrecommended changes to the Predevelopment Plan Review (PPR) Section to the\nEconomic Development and Technology Committee. On December 10, 2024, staff presented the recommended changes to the Design\nReview Section to the Design Commission. Both were supportive of the proposed changes.

14. ADOPTION OF THE FOCUSED LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY ACTION PLAN AND A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A CITY GOAL OF\nZERO TRAFFIC FATALITIES AND A REDUCTION IN SERIOUS INJURIES\nRESULTING FROM TRAFFIC COLLISIONS BY THE YEAR 2035 (Transportation Dept.)\nRecommendation: It is recommended that the City Council:\n(1)\nFind that the proposed action in the agenda report is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to State\nCEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), the “Common Sense” exemption that CEQA\nonly applies to projects that may have an effect on the environment;\n(2)\nAdopt the Final Draft Pasadena Local Roadway Safety Action Plan (LRSAP) as a final document that prioritizes transportation safety\nprojects and identifies a subset of City roadways as Safety Corridors; and\n(3)\nAdopt a resolution establishing a City goal for zero traffic fatalities and a reduction in serious injuries resulting from traffic collisions by\n2035.\nRecommendation of the Transportation Advisory Commission: Department of Transportation (DOT) staff presented the Final Draft Local\nRoadway Safety Action Plan (LRSAP) to the Transportation Advisory Commission\n(TAC) on September 25, 2025. Following a discussion of the plan, TAC unanimously supported the LRSAP, supported the establishment of a\ngoal to eliminate traffic fatalities and reduce serious injuries within the City by 2035 and\nrecommended adoption of the LRSAP by City Council.\nRecommendation of the Municipal Services Committee: City staff presented the Final Draft LRSAP to the Municipal Services Committee (MSC)\non October 14, 2025. Committee members expressed concerns about the\nLRSAP setting project prioritization framework Citywide. While the LRSAP priority projects are prioritized based on the selection criteria\nestablished for SS4A and other similar state and regional program priorities, the LRSAP\npriority list does not encompass all safety-related projects that are citywide priorities for which other funding sources could be pursued. As a\nresult, the committee recommended the report title be changed from LRSAP to Focused\nLRSAP to reflect the purpose of the grant-specific requirements and not replace other City transportation safety priorities, such as the Capital\nImprovement Program.\nAdditionally, committee members recommended an extension of the project limits of previously adopted projects on Washington Boulevard to\ninclude the full extent of the corridor. A motion supporting the staff recommendation with\nthe modifications identified above was approved by the committee. These recommended changes are reflected in the Focused LRSAP.

15. \nConduct first reading of “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASADENA AMENDING TITLE 4, CHAPTER 4.19, SECTIONS 4.19.020,\n4.19.040, 4.19.050, 4.19.060, TO UPDATE THE TRAFFIC REDUCTION AND\nTRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FEE FOR EXISTING LAND USE CATEGORIES AND TO ADD NEW LAND USE CATEGORIES TO\nTHE FEE STRUCTURE”\n(To be discussed and considered concurrently with Item No. 12)\nORDINANCE

16. \nConduct first reading of “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASADENA AMENDING SECTIONS 2.05.160, 2.05.170, 2.05.180, 2.05.190,\nAND 2.05.200 OF TITLE 2 (ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION),\nCHAPTER 2.05 (CITY COUNCIL) OF THE PASADENA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING COUNCIL COMMITTEES”\nORDINANCE

17. \nConduct first reading of “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASADENA AMENDING TITLE 10 (VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC), CHAPTER\n10.60 (BICYCLES) OF THE PASADENA MUNICIPAL CODE TO DEFINE\nELECTRIC BICYCLES, REMOVE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS, AND UPDATE RIDING REGULATIONS”\nORDINANCE\nSecond Reading:

18. \nAdopt “AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASADENA EXTENDING ORDINANCE NO. 7455 PROHIBITING\nURBAN LOT SPLITS AND CONSTRUCTION OF MULTIPLE DWELLINGS PURSUANT\nTO SENATE BILL 9 IN VERY HIGH FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE EATON FIRE” (Introduced by\nCouncilmember Masuda)

2.\nFINANCE COMMITTEE: JOINT ACTION APPROVE THE EXTENSION OF THE STANDBY BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT (SBPA)\nWITH BMO BANK, N.A. (AS SUCCESSOR TO BANK OF THE WEST) RELATED\nTO THE PASEO COLORADO BONDS (Finance Dept.)\nRecommendation: It is recommended that the City Council:\n(1)\nFind that this action proposed in the agenda report is not a “project” subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant\nto State CEQA Guidelines Section 21065 and within the meaning of Section 15378(b);\n(2)\nAdopt a resolution of the City Council of the City of Pasadena approving the form of and authorizing the execution and delivery of a fourth\namendment to standby bond purchase agreement; and authorizing the execution and\ndelivery of other related documents and approval of other documents and actions in connection therewith; and\n(3)\nTo the extent that the proposed amendment of the SBPA could be considered subject to a new competitive selection process, grant the\nproposed amendment an exemption from the competitive selection process of the\nCompetitive Bidding and Purchasing Ordinance, Pasadena Municipal Code Chapter 4.08, pursuant to Section 4.08.049(B) contracts for which\nthe City’s best interests are served.\nIt is recommended that the Pasadena Public Financing Authority:\n(1)\nAdopt a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Pasadena Public Financing Authority approving the form of and authorizing the\nexecution and delivery of a fourth amendment to standby bond purchase agreement; and\nauthorizing the execution and delivery of other related documents and approval of other documents and actions in connection therewith.

3.\nFINANCE COMMITTEE: APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO FISCAL YEAR 2026 ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET (Finance Dept.)\nRecommendation: It is recommended that the City Council:\n(1)\nFind that the proposed action in the agenda report is not a “project” subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant\nto State CEQA Guidelines Section 21065 and within the meaning of Section 15378(b);\nand\n(2)\nApprove amending the Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Adopted Operating Budget as detailed in the agenda report.

4.\nFINANCE COMMITTEE: APPROVE FISCAL YEAR 2025 GENERAL FUND EMERGENCY CONTINGENCY COMMITMENT OF\n$51,292,500 AND UP TO $17,097,500 IN THE GENERAL FUND OPERATING RESERVE\nCOMMITMENT (Finance Dept.)\nRecommendation: It is recommended that the City Council:\n(1)\nFind that the proposed action in the agenda report is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section\n21065 of CEQA and State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2), 15060(c)(3), and\n15378, and as such, no environmental document pursuant to CEQA is required.\n(2)\nAdopt a resolution approving the City of Pasadena General Fund Emergency Contingency commitment of $51,292,500 and General\nFund Operating Reserve commitment of up to $17,097,500 (with the final amount to be\ndetermined upon conclusion of Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 financial statement preparation based solely on General Fund sub-fund 101 (Fund\n101)).\nRESOLUTION

5.\nFINANCE COMMITTEE: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO ENTER INTO AN\nAGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION\n(CALTRANS) TO RECEIVE GRANT FUNDING FOR THE SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING GRANT (STPG) PROGRAM IN\nTHE AMOUNT OF $442,650 TO DEVELOP THE ROSEBOWL AREA AND\nBROOKSIDE PARK MULTIMODAL CONNECTIVITY PLAN (Transportation Dept.)\nRecommendation: It is recommended that the City Council:\n(1)\nFind that the action proposed in the agenda report is not a “project” subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant\nto State CEQA Guidelines Section 21065 and within the meaning of Section 15378(b);\n(2)\nAdopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager or their designee to execute agreements with Caltrans to receive grant funding for the\nSustainable Transportation Planning Grant (STPG), and execute any subsequent\nagreements regarding this grant award; and\n(3)\nAmend the Fiscal Year 2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget to recognize and appropriate $442,650 in STPG Program\ngrant funds and transfer $57,350 in local match funds from the FY 2026 Department of\nTransportation General Fund Operating Budget to the Rose Bowl Pedestrian and Bicycle Access Study Project.\nRESOLUTION

6.\nFINANCE COMMITTEE: AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT AGREEMENT WITH THE LOS ANGELES\nCOUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (METRO) TO\nACCEPT METRO ACTIVE TRANSPORT, TRANSIT, AND FIRST/LAST MILE PROGRAM CYCLE 2 (MAT) FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF\n$7,171,250 FOR THE PASADENA ROSE BOWL MULTIMODAL OLYMPIC ROUTE\n(Transportation Dept.)\nRecommendation: It is recommended that the City Council:\n(1)\nFind that the action proposed in the agenda report is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State\nCEQA Guidelines Section 21065 and within the meaning of Section 15378(b);\n(2)\nAuthorize the City Manager or their designee to enter into an agreement with Metro to receive grant funding for the MAT grant in the\namount of $7,171,250 and execute any subsequent agreements regarding this grant award;\nand\n(3)\nAmend the Fiscal Year 2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget to appropriate $7,171,250 in MAT Program grant funds to the\nMobility Hubs and First/Last Mile Improvements project.

7.\nFINANCE COMMITTEE: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CERTIFICATIONS AND\nASSURANCES AND AUTHORIZED AGENT FORMS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A\nLOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION TO CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION\nAND APPROPRIATE $136,786 TO THE BUS STOP IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM\nCIP PROJECT (Transportation Dept.)\nRecommendation: It is recommended that the City Council:\n(1)\nFind that the proposed action is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21065 of\nCEQA and Sections 15060(c)(2), 15060(c)(3), and 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines,\nand as such, no environmental document pursuant to CEQA is required;\n(2)\nAdopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the Certifications and Assurances and Authorized Agent Forms required to\nsubmit a Low Carbon Transit Operations Program grant application to the California\nDepartment of Transportation; and\n(3)\nAmend the Fiscal Year 2026 Capital Improvement Program to appropriate $136,786 in Low Carbon Transit Operation Program funds to\nthe Bus Stop Improvement Program project.\nRESOLUTION

8.\nITEM PULLED\nCity Council

9.\nAPPOINTMENTS, REAPPOINTMENTS, AND RESIGNATIONS\nAPPOINTMENT OF DAVID STEIMAN TO THE PASADENA COMMUNITY ACCESS CORPORATION BOARD (Pasadena City College\nNomination)\nCity Attorney\nCity Clerk/Secretary