Irvine

City Council

December 09, 2025 Order of Business 3 #12

Agenda Item 12

3.12 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NOS. 25-27 AND\n25-28 REGARDING ZONE CHANGES FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT\nLOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PORTOLA PARKWAY AND\nJEFFREY ROAD IN PROPOSED PLANNING AREA 2 (GATEWAY\nVILLAGE), AND ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING GATEWAY\nRESIDENTIAL PARCEL AS EXEMPT SURPLUS LAND\nACTION:\n1) Read by title only, second reading and adoption of ORDINANCE NO. 25-\n27 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRVINE,\nCALIFORNIA,\nAPPROVING\nZONE\nCHANGE\n00961267-PZC\nTO\nINCORPORATE A NEW CHAPTER IN THE IRVINE ZONING ORDINANCE\nTO ESTABLISH PLANNING AREA 2 (GATEWAY VILLAGE), REZONE LAND\nWITHIN GATEWAY VILLAGE FROM 1.5 RECREATION TO 2.4J MEDIUM-\nHIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, ALLOW A MAXIMUM RESIDENTIAL UNIT\nCAP OF 1,360 DWELLING UNITS, AND ADD DEVELOPMENT\nSTANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATIONS RELATIVE TO\nRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE 2.4J MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY\nRESIDENTIAL ZONE; FILED BY BROOKFIELD RESIDENTIAL AND THE\nCITY OF IRVINE\n2) Read by title only, second reading and adoption of ORDINANCE NO. 25-\n28 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRVINE,\nCALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE\n00965568-PZC TO\nEFFECTUATE A PRE-ZONING ACTION TO DESIGNATE APPROXIMATELY\nTWO ACRES OF LAND WITHIN PROPOSED PLANNING AREA 2\n(GATEWAY VILLAGE), WHICH IS CURRENTLY OUTSIDE OF CITY LIMITS\nAND WITHIN THE CITY SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UNDER THE\nJURISDICTION OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, AS 2.4J MEDIUM-HIGH\nDENSITY RESIDENTIAL; GENERALLY LOCATED 3,000 FEET NORTH OF\nTHE INTERSECTION OF BEE CANYON ACCESS ROAD AND PORTOLA\nPARKWAY; FILED BY BROOKFIELD RESIDENTIAL AND THE CITY OF\nIRVINE\n3) Adopt - AN AMENDED AND RESTATED RESOLUTION OF THE CITY\nCOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRVINE, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING GATEWAY\nRESIDENTIAL PARCEL AS EXEMPT SURPLUS LAND PURSUANT TO\nGOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54221(f)(1)(H)\nUnless otherwise directed by a Member of the City Council, the vote at\nsecond reading will reflect the same vote as at first reading. However, if a\nCouncilmember was absent at first reading, his or her vote cast at second\nreading will be reflected. If a Councilmember is not present at the second\nreading/adoption, the vote will be reflected as absent.)\n3.12