Huntington Beach — 2024-04-16

1. 24-237 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION.\n(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Van (Dinh\nCong) v. Lukehart (Brendan Cameron), City of Huntington Beach, et\nal.; OCSC Case No.: 30-2023-01363173-CU-PA-CJC.

10. 24-267 Huntington Beach Police Chaplain Bob Ewing\nCLOSED SESSION REPORT BY CITY ATTORNEY\nANNOUNCEMENT OF SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS (Received After Agenda\nDistribution)

11. 24-265 2024 Safe and Sane Fireworks Stand Lottery\nCONSENT CALENDAR (Items 12-19)\nCity Clerk

12. 24-266 Approve and Adopt Minutes\nRecommended Action:\nApprove and adopt the City Council/Public Financing Authority regular meeting minutes of\nApril 2, 2024.\nCommunity Development

13. 23-1042 Adopt Resolution No. 2024-13 declaring the City’s Intention to Modify\nthe Management District Plan for the Huntington Beach Tourism\nBusiness Improvement District, conduct a Public Meeting on May 7,\n2024, and set a Public Hearing date of June 4, 2024\nRecommended Action:\nAdopt Resolution No. 2024-13, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington\nBeach Declaring its Intention to Modify the Management District Plan of the Huntington\nBeach Tourism Business Improvement District (HBTBID)”, which sets a public meeting\ndate for May 7, 2024, and a public hearing date for June 4, 2024.\nPolice

14. 24-245 Annual Military Equipment Use Report (AB 481)\nRecommended Action:\nA) Approve report and renew Ordinance No. 4255, authorizing the continued use of the\nlisted military equipment by the Police Department; and,\nB) Find that each type of military equipment identified in that report attached hereto as\nAttachment 1 complies with the following standards for approval: 1. The military\nequipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the\nsame objective of officer and civilian safety. 2. The proposed military equipment use\npolicy will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties. 3. Any future\npurchased equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that\ncan achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. 4. Prior military equipment\nuse complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time, or if prior\nuses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective\naction has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance.

15. 24-264 Adopt Ordinance No. 4317 amending Chapter 8.42 of the Huntington\nBeach Municipal Code relating to the use of police services at loud\nparties or other activities\n(Approved for Introduction on 4-02-2024 by a vote of 7-0)\nRecommended Action:\nAdopt Ordinance No. 4317, “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Huntington\nBeach Amending the Huntington Beach Municipal Code by Amending Chapter 8.42 Use\nof Police Services at Loud Parties or Other Activities.”

16. 24-263 Adopt Ordinance No. 4319 amending Huntington Beach Municipal\nCode (HBMC) Chapter 13.08 related to activities on Huntington City\nBeach and in the Beach Activity Zone, and making a finding of\nexemption under CEQA\n(Approved for Introduction on 4-02-2024 by a vote of 7-0)\nRecommended Action:\nAdopt Ordinance No. 4319 “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Huntington\nBeach Amending the Huntington Beach Municipal Code by Amending Chapter 13.08\nBeach Regulations.”\nPublic Works

17. 24-231 Adopt Resolution No. 2024-16 Authorizing an Application for Funds\nfor the Environmental Cleanup, Tier 1 Grant Program Under the\nOrange County Transportation Authority Environmental Cleanup\nProgram\nRecommended Action:\nAdopt Resolution No. 2024-16, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington\nBeach Authorizing an Application for Funds for the Environmental Cleanup, Tier 1 Grant\nProgram Under Orange County Local Transportation Ordinance No. 3 for the Huntington\nBeach Trash Removal Project, Phase III - V2.”

18. 24-082 Reject lowest bid for the Atlanta Pump Station Trash Removal\nProject, CC-1737; reject all remaining bids, re-scope, and re-submit\nthe project for OCTA funding\nRecommended Action:\nReject all bids for the Atlanta Pump Station Trash Removal Project, CC-1737.

19. 24-212 Accept the lowest responsive and responsible bid and authorize\nexecution of a construction contract with Palp, Inc. DBA Excel\nPaving Company in the amount of $1,398,435 for the Water Main\nReplacement Project in the alley East of Alabama Street Between\nLincoln Avenue and Knoxville Avenue (CC-1716) and the alley East\nof Alabama Street Between Lincoln Avenue and Memphis Avenue\n(CC-1717)\nRecommended Action:\nA) Accept the lowest responsive and responsible bid submitted by Palp, Inc. DBA Excel\nPaving Company in the amount of $1,398,435; and ,\nB) Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a construction contract in a form\napproved by the City Attorney .

2. 24-238 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION.\n(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Pacific\nAirshow, LLC v. City of Huntington Beach and Kim Carr; OCSC Case\nNo. 30-2022-01287749.

20. 24-217 Public Hearing to Consider Water and Sewer Rate Adjustments\nRecommended Action:\nA) Adopt Resolution No. 2024-18 “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of\nHuntington Beach Readopting and Revising the City's Water Commodity Rates”;\nB) Adopt Resolution No. 2024-20 “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of\nHuntington Beach Adopting Water Meter Rates, Including a Capital Surcharge, and\nPrivate Fire Line Service pursuant to Section 14.12.040 of the Huntington Beach\nMunicipal Code”; and,\nC) Adopt Resolution No. 2024-19 “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of\nHuntington Beach Adopting Sewer Service User Charges, Pursuant to Section 14.54.040\nof the Huntington Beach Municipal Code”

3. 24-239 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION.\n(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Clayton-Tarvin\n(Gina) v. City of Huntington Beach, Michael Gates, et al.; OCSC Case\nNo.: 30-2023-01329927.

4. 24-240 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION.\n(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Frahm (Robert),\net al. v. City of Huntington Beach; OCSC Case No.:\n30-2023-01319592.

5. 24-241 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION.\n(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). City of\nHuntington Beach v. Newsom/HCD (RHNA); 8:23-CV-00421-FWS\n(ADSx).

6. 24-242 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION.\n(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Gapezzani\n(Gary) v. John Romero, City of Huntington Beach; OCSC Case No.:\n30-2021-01225030.

7. 24-243 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION.\n(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Segal-Kaloski\n(Pamela) v. City of Huntington Beach, et al.; OCSC Case No.:\n30-2021-01222791.

8. 24-272 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION.\n(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Unkovich\n(Laura) v. City of Huntington Beach, et al.; OCSC Case No.:\n30-2022-01297077.

9. 24-273 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION.\n(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Gallier\n(Michael) v. City of Huntington Beach/Gance; OCSC Case No.:\n30-2023-01359146-CU-PO-CJC.\n6:00 PM – COUNCIL CHAMBERS