Los Angeles — 2023-03-23

2. NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL POSITION STATEMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS\nPresentations by Neighborhood Council representatives on any Neighborhood Council resolution, or\ncommunity impact statement filed with the City Clerk, which relates to any agenda item listed or being\nconsidered on this agenda. The Neighborhood Council representative shall provide the Board or\nCommission with a copy of the Neighborhood Council's resolution or community impact statement by email\nto cpc@lacity.org. At the Chair’s discretion, presentations of Neighborhood Councils on any matter listed\non the agenda for this Commission meeting may be taken at the time the agenda item is taken for\nconsideration.

4. RECONSIDERATIONS\na. MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER – The Commission may make a motion to reconsider a Commission\nAction on any agenda items from its previous meeting, consistently with the Commission Rule 9.3,\nprovided the Commission retains jurisdiction over the matter.\nb. MERITS OF ANY ITEM THE COMMISSION HAS VOTED TO RECONSIDER – If a majority of the\nCommission has approved a motion to reconsider a Commission Action, the Commission may address\nthe merits of the original Commission Action.

5. CONSENT CALENDAR (NO ITEMS)\nConsent Calendar items are considered to be not controversial and will be treated as one agenda item.\nThe Consent Calendar will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items\nunless the item is removed from the Consent Calendar, in which event the item will be considered as time\nallows on the regular agenda.

6. DIR-2018-4190-TOC-SPR-1A Council District: 1 – Hernandez\nCEQA: ENV-2018-4189-CE Last Day to Act: 03-23-23\nPlan Area: Northeast Los Angeles Continued from: 12-15-22\n02-09-23\n03-09-23\nPUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED\nPROJECT SITE: 3800 – 3830 North Pasadena Avenue;\n3832 – 3836 North Figueroa Street; 110 East Avenue 39\nPROPOSED PROJECT:\nDemolition of existing structures and the construction, use, and maintenance of a new, seven-story mixed-\nuse building with 100 dwelling units, including 10 dwelling units set aside for Extremely Low Income\nHouseholds and 14,734 square feet of ground floor commercial space within 13 commercial condominium\nunits. The Project includes commercial, residential and parking on the ground floor. The Project will provide\na total of 114 automobile parking spaces, 16 short-term and 210 long-term bicycle parking spaces.\nAPPEALS:\nTwo appeals of the September 15, 2022, Director of Planning's determination which:\n1. Determined, that based on the whole of the administrative record, that the Project is exempt from the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Article 19, Section 15332,\nClass 32, and there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical\nexemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 applies;\n2. Approved, pursuant to Section 12.22 A.31 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC), a 70 percent\nincrease in density consistent with the provisions of the Transit Oriented Communities Affordable\nHousing Incentive Program along with the following one Additional Incentive for a Tier 3 project with\na total 100 dwelling units and 13 commercial condominium units, including 10 units reserved for\nExtremely Low Income (ELI) Household occupancy for a period of 55 years:\na. Height. To permit a maximum of two additional stories up to an additional 22 feet;\n3. Conditionally Approved, pursuant to LAMC Section 16.05, a Site Plan Review for the construction, use\nand maintenance of a new, seven-story, 150,501 square foot mixed-use building with 100 dwelling\nCity Planning Commission 3 March 23, 2023\nunits, and 14,734 square feet of commercial space within 13 commercial condominium units in the\n[T][Q]RAS3-1VL Zone; and\n4. Adopted the Conditions of Approval and Findings.\nApplicant: Michael Naim, Naim Associates, Architecture & Development\nRepresentative: Harvey Goodman C.E.\nAppellants: Derek Ryder, Arroyo Seco Alliance\nSaul Ramirez, Jr., Ramirez Family\nStaff: Michelle Carter, City Planner\nmichelle.carter@lacity.org\n(213) 978-1262

7. DIR-2022-5371-TOC-SPR-HCA-1A Council District: 1 – Hernandez\nCEQA: ENV-2022-5372-CE Last Day to Act: 04-01-23\nPlan Area: Westlake\nPUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED\nPROJECT SITE: 1921, 1923, 1925, and 1929 West Olympic Boulevard;\n918,920,926,932,936,942, 946, and 950 South Westlake Avenue\nPROPOSED PROJECT:\nDemolition of existing improvements (commercial building and surface parking) and the construction use\nand maintenance of an eight-story, mixed use building with 238 dwelling units (34 units reserved for Very\nLow Income households). “Tower A” has 49,034 square feet of floor area, 51 dwelling units, and 9,700\nsquare feet of restaurant uses. “Tower B” has 135,951 square feet of floor area and 187 dwelling units.\nThe Project includes one level of subterranean parking and two levels of above grade parking with 26\ncommercial and 167 residential parking spaces.\nAPPEALS:\nA partial appeal of the December 22, 2022, Director of Planning's determination which:\n1. Determined, that based on the whole of the administrative record, that the Project is exempt from the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Article 19, Section 15332,\nClass 32, and there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that any exceptions contained in Section\n15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines regarding location, cumulative impacts, significant effects based on\nunusual circumstances, scenic highways, hazardous waste sites, or historical resources apply;\n2. Conditionally Approved, pursuant to Section 16.05 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code, a Site Plan\nReview for a development project resulting in 50 or more dwelling units; and\n3. Adopted the Conditions of Approval and Findings.\nApplicant: KT Real Estate, LLC. & HL Properties America Corporation\nRepresentative: Julia Chang, DGB Line Architects\nAppellant: Enrique Velasquez, Coalition for an Equitable Westlake MacArthur Park\nStaff: Renata Ooms, City Planner\nrenata.ooms@lacity.org\n(213) 978-1222\nCity Planning Commission 4 March 23, 2023\nThe next special meeting of the City Planning Commission\nwill be held on Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 8:30 a.m.\nLos Angeles City Hall\nCouncil Chamber, Room 340\n200 North Spring Street\nLos Angeles, CA 90012\nNotice to Paid Representatives:\nIf you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require you to register as a lobbyist and\nreport your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 48.01 et seq. More information is available at\nethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978-1960 or\nethics.commission@lacity.org.\nReasonable Accommodations Consistent with Federal and State Law\nAs a covered entity under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Los Angeles does not discriminate on\nthe basis of disability and, upon request, will provide reasonable accommodations to ensure equal access to its programs,\nservices and activities. Sign language interpreters, assistive listening devices, or other auxiliary aids and/or other services\nmust be requested 72 hours prior to the meeting by calling the Commission Executive Assistant at (213) 978-1299 or by\nemail at cpc@lacity.org.\nTelecommunication Relay Services\nTelephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in\ntechnology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of\nhearing, and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced\ntelecommunications methods, both for peer-to-peer and third-party telecommunications relay service (TRS)\ncommunications.\nTelecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place\nand receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories\nfor local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers - generally telephone companies - are compensated for the costs of\nproviding TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user.\nWhat forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the\nequipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY-Based TRS; Speech-to-Speech Relay Service; Shared Non-English\nLanguage Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service.\nPlease visit this site for detailed descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-\nservice-trs.\nDon't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the Communications Assistant (CA) is a\ntelemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This is the relay service ... "when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are\nabout to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who is deaf, hard-of-hearing, or has a speech disability.\nFor more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities,\nvisit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.\nCity Planning Commission 5 March 23, 2023

2. NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL POSITION STATEMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS\nPresentations by Neighborhood Council representatives on any Neighborhood Council resolution, or\ncommunity impact statement filed with the City Clerk, which relates to any agenda item listed or being\nconsidered on this agenda. The Neighborhood Council representative shall provide the Board or Commission\nwith a copy of the Neighborhood Council's resolution or community impact statement by email to\napcsouthvalley@lacity.org. At the Chair’s discretion, presentations of Neighborhood Councils on any matter\nlisted on the agenda for this Commission meeting may be taken at the time the agenda item is taken for\nconsideration.

4. RECONSIDERATIONS\na. MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER – The Commission may make a motion to reconsider a Commission Action\non any agenda items from its previous meeting, consistently with the Commission Rule 9.3, provided the\nCommission retains jurisdiction over the matter.\nb. MERITS OF ANY ITEM THE COMMISSION HAS VOTED TO RECONSIDER – If a majority of the\nCommission has approved a motion to reconsider a Commission Action, the Commission may address\nthe merits of the original Commission Action.

5. DIR-2021-10482-DRB-SPP-MSP-1A Council District: 4 – Raman\nCEQA: ENV-2021-10483-CE Last Day to Act: 5-01-23\nPlan Area: Sherman Oaks - Studio City - Toluca Lake - Cahuenga Pass\nSouth Valley Area Planning Commission 2 March 23, 2023\nPUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED\nPROJECT SITE: 15001 West Sunstone Place\nPROPOSED PROJECT:\nDemolition of an existing 2,268 square-foot, one-story, single-family residence and a 476 square feet two-car\ngarage and construction of a 4,376 square-foot, two-story, single-family residence, a 424 square foot two-car\ngarage, and a 184 square foot covered patio. The Project includes approximately 4,127.6 square feet of\nhardscape on a lot that is approximately 16,438.5 square feet. The proposed structure is a total of 4,376\nsquare feet of residential floor area and a maximum height of approximately 29 feet . The Project proposes\napproximately 55.5 cubic-yards of cut, 55.5 cubic yards of fill, zero cubic yards of import, and zero cubic yards\nof export grading. There are no protected trees on-site and all existing trees and landscaping will remain\nunchanged.\nAPPEAL:\nAn appeal of the January 31, 2023, Director of Planning’s Determination which:\nDetermined, based on the whole of the administrative record, that the Project is exempt from CEQA, pursuant\nto CEQA Guidelines Article 19, Section 15303, Class 3, and that there is no substantial evidence\ndemonstrating that an exception to a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2\napplies;\nApproved with Conditions, a Project Permit Compliance and Design Review for the demolition of an existing\n2,268 square-foot, one-story, single-family residence, and a 476 square-foot garage, and construction of a\nnew 4,352 square-foot single-family residence with a 424 square-foot two-car garage and a 184 square-foot\ncovered patio. The Project includes approximately 4,127.6 square-feet of hardscape on a lot that is\napproximately 16,438.5 square feet.; and\nAdopted the Conditions of Approval and Findings.\nApplicant: Derek Ahgchay\nRepresentative: Kevin Williams\nAppellant: Madeline Drake Riley\nStaff: Brian Chun, Planning Assistant\nbrian.chun@lacity.org\n(818) 374-5061

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION\n(Subdivision (d)(1) of Government Code Section 54956.9)\nNatural Resources Defense Council, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al.\nLos Angeles Superior Court Case No. BS070017

2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION\n(Subdivision (d)(1) of Government Code Section 54956.9)\nNatural Resources Defense Council, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al.\nSan Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2021-00023385-CU-TT-CTL

3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS\n(Government Code Section 54956.8)\nProvide instructions to its real estate negotiators with respect to Permit 999 with\nChina Shipping Holding Company, Ltd.:\nProperty: Berths 100-103, San Pedro\nCity Negotiator: Michael DiBernardo\nTenant Negotiator: Paul Nazzaro\nNegotiating Parties: City and China Shipping Holding Company, Ltd.\nUnder Negotiation: Price and Terms

4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION\n(Subdivision (d)(2) of Government Code Section 54956.9)\nSignificant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (d)(2) of Section 54956.9:\n(one case)

5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – INITIATE LITIGATION\n(Subdivision (d)(4) of Government Code Section 54956.9)\nInitiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (d)(4) of Section 54956.9:\n(one case)

6. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS\n(Government Code Section 54956.8)\nProvide instructions to its real estate negotiators with respect to Permit 529 with Union\nPacific Railroad Company:\nProperty: 2401 East Sepulveda Blvd., Long Beach\nCity Negotiator: Marisa Katnich\nTenant Negotiator: Gregory Brigham\nNegotiating Parties: City and Union Pacific Railroad\nUnder Negotiation: Price and Terms

7. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS\n(Government Code Section 54956.8)\nProvide instructions to its real estate negotiators with respect to a Lease 904A with\nAltaSea at the Port of Los Angeles:\nProperty: 2500 Signal Street, San Pedro\nCity Negotiator: Michael Galvin\nTenant Negotiator: Terry Tamminen\nNegotiating Parties: City and AltaSea at the Port of Los Angeles\nUnder Negotiation: Price and Terms

8. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS\n(Government Code Section 54956.8)\nProvide instructions to its real estate negotiators with respect to a proposed permit with\nSan Pedro Fish Market:\nProperty: Berths 93C, D, E, San Pedro\nCity Negotiator: Eugene D. Seroka\nTenant Negotiator: Michael Ungaro\nNegotiating Parties: City and San Pedro Fish Market\nUnder Negotiation: Price and Terms

1. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - ORDER APPROVING COMPENSATION RESET\nUNDER PERMIT NO. 925 WITH AUGELLO ENTERPRISES, LLC\nSummary: Staff requests approval of an Order resetting compensation under Permit No. 925\n(P925) with Augello Enterprises, LLC (Augello) for the period of November 6, 2022 through\nNovember 5, 2027. P925 grants Augello use of 15,927 square feet of paved land, 29,784 square\nfeet of unpaved land, and 64 square feet of nonexclusive wharf space for the operation and\nmaintenance of a fish processing and cold storage facility used for the offloading and processing\nof wet fish from commercial fishing boats, and associated water-dependent operations. P925 is\nfor a term of five years, with three five-year extensions at the sole discretion of the Board of\nHarbor Commissioners. Augello’s current annual rent is $157,011.72. Under the proposed\nOrder, rent will increase on a graduated basis:\n• Effective retroactively to November 6, 2022, monthly rent increases by 16.2 percent from\n$13,084.31 to $15,205.81 per month.\n• Effective January 1, 2023, monthly compensation would increase by an additional 7.1\npercent, such that annual compensation would increase by 23.2 percent from\n$157,011.72 to $193,445.76 during the first year of the five-year reset period.\n• Effective November 6, 2023, and annually thereafter, rent would increase by the annual\nincrease in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), with a floor of zero and no cap.\nThe proposed rent increase makes the rates consistent with current rates set forth in Tariff No.\n4.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City\nCEQA Guidelines; (2) approve the Order resetting compensation under Permit No. 925 with\nAugello Enterprises, LLC for the compensation period of November 6, 2022 through November\n5, 2027; (3) authorize the Board Secretary to attest to the Order resetting compensation under\nPermit No. 925; and (4) adopt Order No.__________ and Resolution No.___________.

2. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 39987 TO QUINN\nCOMPANY FOR PURCHASE OF HEAVY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT\nSummary: Staff requests approval of a one-year contract, Contract No. 39987, with Quinn\nCompany (Quinn) of City of Industry, California for the purchase and delivery of heavy-duty\nconstruction equipment as identified in the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department (Harbor\nDepartment) capital equipment budget approved as part of the annual budget process. The total\namount of the Contract shall not exceed $1,500,000. Payment of expenditures incurred under\nthe proposed Contract are the financial responsibility of the Harbor Department.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City\nCEQA Guidelines; (2) find that in accordance with City of Los Angeles Administrative Code\nDivision 10, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 10.15(a)(8), the Harbor Department may enter into an\nagreement with Quinn Company utilizing a current agreement for such services with Sourcewell\nthrough their Contract No. 032119-CAT, a cooperative purchase agreement; (3) approve\nContract No. 39987 with Quinn Company in the amount of $1,500,000 for a period of one year;\n(4) authorize the Executive Director to execute and Board Secretary to attest to Contract No.\n39987 for and on behalf of the Board; and (5) adopt Resolution No.____________.

3. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 39989 TO 72 HOUR\nLLC FOR PURCHASE OF MEDIUM AND HEAVY DUTY TRUCKS – CLASS 4, 5, 6, 7, 8\nCHASSIS\nSummary: Staff requests the approval of a one-year contract with two one-year renewal options,\nContract No. 39989 with 72 Hour LLC dba National Auto Fleet Group (72 Hour), of Watsonville,\nCalifornia for the purchase and delivery of medium and heavy duty trucks as identified in the City\nof Los Angeles Harbor Department (Harbor Department) capital equipment budget approved as\na part of the department’s annual budget process. The amount of this contract shall not exceed\n$5,000,000 for the initial year. If the two renewal options are exercised, $5,000,000 will be\nauthorized for the second year and $5,000,000 for the third year. The total contract amount\nwould not exceed $15,000,000 over the three years if the renewal options are exercised.\nPayment of expenditures incurred under the proposed Contract are the financial responsibility\nof the Harbor Department.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City\nCEQA Guidelines; (2) find that in accordance with City of Los Angeles Administrative Code\nDivision 10, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 10.15 (a)(8), the Harbor Department may enter into an\nagreement with 72 Hour utilizing a current agreement for such services with Sourcewell through\ntheir Contract No. 060920-NAF, a cooperative purchase agreement; (3) approve Contract No.\n39989 with 72 Hour in the amount of $5,000,000 for a period of one year, with two one-year\nrenewal options in the same amount annually to be exercised by the Executive Director or his/her\ndesignee; (4) authorize the Executive Director to execute and Board Secretary to attest to\nContract No. 39989 for and on behalf of the Board; and (5) adopt Resolution\nNo.________________.\nCommunity Relations

4. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT NO. 20-\n3741 BETWEEN THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR DEPARTMENT AND\nHARBOR BREEZE CORP. FOR AS-NEEDED BOAT TOURS\nSummary: Staff requests approval of the First Amendment (Amendment) to Agreement No. 20-\n3741 with Harbor Breeze Corp. (Harbor Breeze) for boat tours for both the City of Los Angeles\nHarbor Department’s (Harbor Department) student/youth programs and as-needed tours for\nbusiness and community stakeholders, visiting delegations, as well as distinguished groups or\nguests. The proposed Amendment extends the term of the Agreement by two years from three\nyears currently to five years as proposed, through May 18, 2025. The Agreement is being\nextended due to boat tours being placed on hold during the COVID-19 pandemic. Compensation\nunder the proposed Amendment will remain unchanged with a total not-to-exceed amount of\n$585,000 for the duration of the agreement and annual costs not-to-exceed $181,000 per Fiscal\nYear (FY). The Harbor Department will continue to be financially responsible for payment of\nexpenses incurred under the agreement.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City\nCEQA Guidelines; (2) find that in accordance with the City Charter Section 1022, the Harbor\nDepartment does not own the required equipment and that the contractor will provide the\nvessels, as well as the crew; (3) approve the First Amendment to Agreement No. 20-3741\nextending the three-year term to a total of five years for a total not-to-exceed amount of $585,000\nfor the entire five-year term; (4) authorize the Board Secretary to transmit said Amendment to\nthe Los Angeles City Council for approval in accordance with Charter Section 373 and Los\nAngeles Administrative Code Section 10.5(a); (5) upon the approval of City Council in\naccordance with Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 10.5(a), authorize the Executive\nDirector to execute and the Board Secretary to attest to the First Amendment to Agreement No.\n20-3741 for and on behalf of the Board; and (6) adopt Resolution No._______________.\nExecutive Office

5. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - RECEIVE AND FILE HARBOR COMMUNITY\nBENEFIT FOUNDATION SUBMISSION OF THE ANNUAL AIR QUALITY MITIGATION\nFUND REVIEW FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2022 AND BUDGET FOR CALENDAR YEAR\n2023\nSummary: Staff requests the Board of Harbor Commissioners (Board) to receive and file the\nHarbor Community Benefit Foundation (HCBF) reports of the Air Quality Mitigation Fund (AQMF)\nCalendar Year (CY) 2022 Review and Calendar Year 2023 Budget. In accordance with the\nChina Shipping Amended Stipulated Judgment MOU, the HCBF is required to submit a yearly\nbudget report on the AQMF to the City of Los Angeles, Harbor Department (Harbor Department)\nExecutive Director, and to receive budget approval from the Harbor Department. Accordingly,\nthe HCBF has submitted its CY 2023 AQMF Budget request of $82,305. Because the CY 2023\nbudget request is within the Executive Director’s authority, it has been approved. This receive\nand file report is being presented to the Board as information. No transfer of Harbor Department\nmonies would be required to fund the CY 2023 AQMF Budget.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City\nCEQA Guidelines; (2) receive and file the Reports of the Harbor Community Benefit\nFoundation’s Air Quality Mitigation Fund CY 2022 Review and CY 2023 Budget; and (3) adopt\nResolution No.___________.

6. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - APPROVAL OF HARBOR COMMUNITY BENEFIT\nFOUNDATION’S AIR QUALITY MITIGATION PROGRAM, ROUND 2 GRANT AND THE\nTRANSFER OF AIR QUALITY MITIGATION PROGRAM FUNDS\nSummary: Staff requests that the Board of Harbor Commissioners (Board) approve Harbor\nCommunity Benefit Foundation’s (HCBF) selection of WattEV to receive funding from the Air\nQuality Mitigation Program, Round 2 Grant and transfer $2,000,000 from the Air Quality\nMitigation Fund (AQMF) to HCBF. The AQMF was established by the City of Los Angeles Harbor\nDepartment (Harbor Department) pursuant to a Memorandum of Agreement with HCBF and\nChina Shipping Petitioners approved by the Board in 2015 and 2021, for the purpose of funding\nmitigation projects which are reasonably calculated to reduce port-related air emissions. The\nHCBF, an independent nonprofit organization established to operate the AQMF, is responsible\nfor identifying qualifying projects to receive grant funding from the AQMF, to be approved by the\nBoard. The HCBF Board of Directors has selected WattEV to receive $2,000,000 in funding from\nthe Air Quality Mitigation Program, Round 2 Grant and is requesting Board approval of the award\nrecipient and transfer of funds from the AQMF, in accordance with the requirements of the China\nShipping Memoranda of Agreements (MOA). The proposed project has a Tidelands nexus and\nwill mitigate air emissions impacts on the local communities of Wilmington and San Pedro. Upon\nthe transfer of funds from the AQMF to HCBF, HCBF will be financially responsible for the\nproposed project and for the disbursement of funds to the grantee in accordance with the China\nShipping MOA and the Grant Agreements. The Harbor Department funded the original AQMF,\nand no additional payments from the Harbor Department will be required to fund this request.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City\nCEQA Guidelines; (2) approve Harbor Community Benefit Foundation’s selection of one project\nto receive a grant of $2,000,000 from the Air Quality Mitigation Program Round 2, funded by the\nAir Quality Mitigation Fund; (3) authorize the Executive Director or his designee to execute a\njoint letter with the Harbor Community Benefit Foundation to approve the distribution of funds in\none lump sum payment of $2,000,000 from the AQMF account at Bank of America to the Harbor\nCommunity Benefit Foundation to be used in accordance with Harbor Community Benefit\nFoundation’s request; and (4) adopt Resolution No.__________.

7. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - APPROVE TRANSFER OF PERMIT NO. 882 TO\nMILLENNIUM MARITIME, INC., NOW KNOWN AS WESTOIL TUG SERVICES, INC.,\nUNDER A NEW CORPORATE STRUCTURE; APPROVE TRANSFER OF A FIVE-YEAR\nOPTION TO EXTEND TERM OF PERMIT NO. 882 AND DEEM THE EXERCISE OF THE\nOPTION EFFECTIVE; AND APPROVE ORDER RESETTING COMPENSATION\nUNDER PERMIT NO. 882\nSummary: Staff requests approval of three separate actions concerning Permit No. 882 (Permit)\nbetween Millennium Maritime, Inc., now known as Westoil Tug Services, Inc.\n(Millennium/Westoil) and the City of Los Angeles: 1) Transfer of the Permit to Millennium/Westoil\nunder a new corporate structure resulting from the sale of stock and/or assets, merger and/or\nconsolidation and/or reorganization by or of Millennium/Westoil; 2) transfer of the option to\nextend the term of the Permit from November 1, 2021 to October 31, 2026, and deeming\nMillennium/Westoil’s exercise of that option effective; and 3) resetting compensation under the\nPermit for the period of November 1, 2021 to October 31, 2026. There is a companion item also\nagendized for the March 16, 2023, Board of Harbor Commissioners meeting that requests\napproval of the Second Amendment to Permit No. 882 with Millennium Maritime, Inc. which\nchanges the name of the permittee from Millennium Maritime, Inc. to Westoil Tug Services, Inc.\nand changes the name of its parent company, Harley Marine Services, Inc. to Centerline\nLogistics Corporation in the guaranty of the Permit. If the proposed actions are approved,\nmonthly rent would remain at $58,227.91, or $698,734.92 per year until the next Consumer Price\nIndex (CPI) adjustment due July 1, 2023.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed actions are administratively and categorically exempt from the\nrequirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f)\nand Article III Class 1(18) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines; (2) approve the Order\nauthorizing the transfer of Permit No. 882 to Millennium Maritime, Inc., now known as Westoil\nTug Services, Inc., under a new corporate structure; (3) approve the Order authorizing the\ntransfer of the option to extend the term of Permit No. 882 from November 1, 2021 to October\n31, 2026, to Millennium Maritime, Inc., now known as Westoil Tug Services, Ind., under a new\ncorporate structure and deem the exercise of that option effective; (4) approve the Order\nresetting compensation under Permit No. 882 for the period of November 1, 2021 to October 31,\n2026; (5) authorize the Board Secretary to attest to the Order approving the transfer of Permit\nNo. 882 to Millennium Maritime, Inc., now known as Westoil Tug Services, Inc. under a new\ncorporate structure; (6) authorize the Board Secretary to attest to the Order approving the\ntransfer of the option to extend the term of Permit No. 882 from November 1, 2021, to October\n31, 2026, to Millennium Maritime, Inc., now known as Westoil Tug Services, Ind., under a new\ncorporate structure and deem the exercise of that option effective;\n(7) authorize the Board Secretary to attest to the Order resetting compensation under Permit\nNo. 882 for the period of November 1, 2021 to October 31, 2026; and (8) adopt Resolution No.\n_____________ and Order Nos. _______________________.\nCargo & Industrial Real Estate

8. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - APPROVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO\nPERMIT NO. 882 BETWEEN MILLENNIUM MARITIME, INC. AND THE CITY OF LOS\nANGELES HARBOR DEPARTMENT\nSummary: Staff requests approval of the Second Amendment to Permit No. 882 (Permit), which\neffects the following changes: 1) changes the name of the permittee from Millennium Maritime,\nInc. (Millennium) to Westoil Tug Services, Inc. (Westoil); 2) increases the insurance limits set\nforth in the Permit; and 3) provides a guaranty by Centerline Logistics Corporation, Westoil’s\nparent company. There is a companion item also agendized for the March 16, 2023 Board of\nHarbor Commissioners meeting, which is related to this action. That item concerns the approval\nand consent to a transfer, the exercise of an option to extend, and a compensation adjustment\nfor Permit No. 882.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed actions are administratively exempt from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City\nCEQA Guidelines; (2) approve the Second Amendment to Permit No. 882; (3) direct the Board\nSecretary to transmit the Second Amendment to Permit No. 882 to the City Council for approval\npursuant to Section 606 of the City Charter; (4) the Executive Director to execute and the Board\nSecretary to attest to the Second Amendment to Permit No. 882; and (5) adopt Resolution\nNo._____________.

9. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LOS\nANGELES HARBOR DEPARTMENT AND KNIGHT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR\nMAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT FOR THE PORT POLICE COMMUNICATIONS\nSYSTEMS\nSummary: Staff requests approval to enter into an Agreement with Knight Communications, Inc.,\nto provide maintenance and support services twenty-four hours per day, seven days a week for\nthe City of Los Angeles Harbor Department Port Police Communications Systems. The\nrecommendation to select Knight is based on a competitive Request for Proposal process\nperformed by the Harbor Department. The proposed Agreement has a three-year term and a\nnot-to-exceed compensation amount of $5,765,000. The payment of expenditures incurred\nunder the proposed Agreement are the financial responsibility of the Harbor Department.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively and categorically exempt from the\nrequirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f)\nand Article III Class 1(2) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines; (2) find that in accordance\nwith the Los Angeles City Charter Section 1022, it is more feasible for outside contractors to\nperform this work than City employees; (3) approve the Agreement with Knight for a duration of\nthree years and a not-to-exceed compensation amount of $5,765,000; (4) authorize the\nExecutive Director to execute and the Board Secretary to attest to the said Agreement for and\non behalf of the Board; and (5) adopt Resolution No.___________.

B. Executive Director Remarks

C. Comment from the Public on Non-Agenda Items

D. Report from the Neighborhood Council Representatives – An opportunity for\nNeighborhood Council representatives to provide remarks on Neighborhood Council\nResolutions or Community Impact Statements filed with the City Clerk which relate to any\nagenda item listed or being considered on this agenda for the Board of Harbor\nCommissioners.

E. Reports of the Commissioners

F. Board Committee Reports\nNone

H. Presentation\n1. Banning High School – Cal Maritime Scholarship Fund – Jim Morgan, Cal Maritime\nAcademy Foundation Director Emeritus\n2. California Regional Clean Hydrogen Hubs, San Pedro Bay Ports Proposed Project –\nMichael Galvin, Director of Waterfront & Commercial Real Estate

I. Level I Coastal Development Permit\nNone

J. Board Reports of the Executive Director\nCargo & Industrial Real Estate

K. Closed Session