Los Angeles — 2023-06-23

(9)\n23-0002-S54\nChief Legislative Analyst report and Resolutions relative to establishing the City’s position regarding the City’s 2023-24 State Legislative Program for Senate Bill 434 (Min) which would require California's major public transit operators to collect and publish survey data relative to their efforts to improve the safety of riders and reduce street harassment.

(10)\n23-0002-S55\nChief Legislative Analyst to report and Resolution (Blumenfield – Harris-Dawson) relative to establishing the City’s position regarding the City’s 2023-24 State Legislative Program for Assembly Bill 645 (Friedman-Santiago-Ting) that would authorize the City to implement a speed safety pilot program.

(11)\n23-0002-S57\nChief Legislative Analyst to report and Resolution (Hutt – Park, et al.) relative to establishing the City’s position regarding the City’s 2023-24 State Legislative Program for legislation that would require bicycle and pedestrian safety to be taught and included in the California Driver's Handbook, the California Commercial Driver's Handbook, Driver's License Knowledge Tests, Instruction Permits, Behind-the-Wheel Drive Tests, California Department of Motor Vehicles approved traffic school classes, and any other relevant area of instruction and licensing of vehicle drivers. (On June 3, 2023, the Transportation Committee approved this item.)

(12)\n23-0002-S58\nChief Legislative Analyst to report and Resolution (McOsker – Yaroslavsky) relative to establishing the City’s position regarding the City’s 2023-24 State Legislative Program for Senate Bill 529 (Gonzalez), the EVs for All Act of 2023 which would require the California Energy Commission to develop and administer a new competitive grant program to facilitate the establishment of EV car sharing services at affordable housing facilities.

(13)\n23-0002-S59\nChief Legislative Analyst report and Resolution (Soto-Martinez – Yaroslavsky) relative to establishing the City’s position regarding the City’s 2023-24 State Legislative Program for Assembly Bill 1620 (Zbur), which would authorize a jurisdiction to require an owner of a rent-controlled unit to allow a permanently physically disabled tenant to relocate to a comparable accessible unit and retain their same rental rate.

(14)\n23-0002-S60\nChief Legislative Analyst report and Resolution (De Leon – Krekorian) relative to establishing the City’s position regarding the City’s 2023-24 State Legislative Program for Senate Bill 710 (Durazo), to require the California Department of Transportation to establish and administer a Terminus Regional Planning Committee to report on potential land uses associated with the former State Route 710 Terminus Project.

(15)\n23-0002-S62\nChief Legislative Analyst to report and Resolution (Hernandez – Yaroslavsky) relative to establishing the City’s position regarding the City’s 2023-24 State Legislative Program for Assembly Bill 1317 (Carrillo) which would unbundle parking from the price of rent.

(16)\n23-0002-S63\nChief Legislative Analyst report and Resolution (Price – Soto-Martinez) relative to establishing the City’s position regarding the City’s 2023-24 State Legislative Program for Senate Bill 525 (Durazo), to increase wages for healthcare workers across California.

(17)\n23-0002-S64\nChief Legislative Analyst to report and Resolution (McOsker - Price) relative to establishing the City’s position regarding the City’s 2023-24 State Legislative Program for HR 36 (Gipson) which would annually declare the month of June as Fatherhood Well-being Month.

(18)\n23-0002-S65\nChief Legislative Analyst report and Resolution (Raman – Soto-Martinez) relative to establishing the City’s position regarding the City’s 2023-24 State Legislative Program for Assembly Bill 1738 (Carrillo) which would require the DMV to establish the Mobile Homeless Connect Pilot Program in specified areas to assist persons experiencing homelessness with obtaining an identification card.

(1)\n23-0630\nMotion (Krekorian – Harris-Dawson) relative to suspending Councilmember Price from the office of Councilmember of the 9th District of the Los Angeles City Council, pursuant to Charter Section 211.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nCommunication(s) from Public_06-15-2023\nMotion (Krekrorian - Harris-Dawson) dated 6-14-23\nCommunication(s) from Public_06-14-2023

(19)\n23-0593\nMotion (McOsker – Rodriguez, et al.) relative to amending the Los Angeles Administrative Code in order to allow for the City to raise the Progress Pride Flag in the Civic Center, which includes City Hall, City Hall East, City Hall South, and at other City facilities where the American, Californian and City flags are displayed during the month of June; and updating the city’s flag policy. (Also referred to the Government Operations Committee.)\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nMotion (McOsker - Rodriguez, et al.) dated 6-02-23\nCommunication(s) from Public_06-05-2023

(2)\n23-0633\nMotion (Harris-Dawson - Krekorian) relative to the eligibility requirements for potential appointments by the Council to fill the temporary vacancy in a Council District; and, the options for selecting a voting representative for the Council District that includes public input from constituents and civic institutions of the District.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nCommunication(s) from Public_06-15-2023\nMotion (Harris-Dawson - Krekorian) dated 6-14-23

(3)\n23-0002-S43\nChief Legislative Analyst report and Resolution (Park - Krekorian) relative to establishing the City’s position regarding the City’s 2023-24 State Legislative Program for Senate Bill 43 (Eggman) which would expand the definition of "gravely disabled" to include conditions that will result in serious harm to the physical and mental health of an individual.

(4)\n23-0002-S47\nChief Legislative Analyst to report and Resolution (Price – Harris-Dawson) relative to establishing the City’s position regarding the City’s 2023-24 State Legislative Program for Assembly Bill 1565 (Jones-Sawyer) to require the Controller to appropriate and disburse funding annually that directly furthers the purpose of the Social Equity Program.

(5)\n23-0002-S48\nChief Legislative Analyst report and Resolution (Park – Rodriguez) relative to establishing the City’s position regarding the City’s 2023-24 State Legislative Program for Senate Bill 376 (Rubio) to provide human trafficking victims the right to have a human trafficking advocate and support person present during law enforcement and legal interviews, and notification of their rights and confidentiality limitations.

(6)\n23-0002-S49\nChief Legislative Analyst report and Resolution (Yaroslavsky – Soto-Martinez) relative to establishing the City’s position regarding the City’s 2023-24 State Legislative Program for Senate Bill 85 (Wiener), the California Extended Case Management Act, which would expand services for refugees and asylees.

(7)\n23-0002-S51\nChief Legislative Analyst report and Resolution (Yaroslavsky – Raman) relative to establishing the City’s position regarding the City’s 2023-24 State Legislative Program for Assembly Bill 963 (Schiavo), the End the Foster Care-to-Homelessness Pipeline Act, which would require the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (IBank) to guarantee qualified loans for the construction, acquisition, and renovation for housing for current or former foster youth who are 18 to 25 years of age.

(8)\n23-0002-S53\nChief Legislative Analyst to report and Resolution (Hernandez, et al. – Hutt) relative to establishing the City’s position regarding the City’s 2023-24 State Legislative Program for legislation that would support the development of social housing in the City.