City Council

21.\netc.)\nDiscussion and possible action.\nCouncilmember Comments ( Agency/ Committee/ AB 1234 Reports, District Updates, etc.)\nRECOMMENDATION:\nDiscussion and possible action.\nCLOSED\nSESSION\nCONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED\nLITIGATION\nPursuant to Government Code Section 54956. 9( d)( 2) and/ or ( d)( 3)\nSignificant exposure to litigation: One case.\nCONFERENCE\nPursuant\nWITH LEGAL COUNSEL -\nto Government\nCode Section\nEXISTING\nLITIGATION\n54956. 9 ( d)( 1)\nName of Case: In RE: National Prescription\nOpiate Litigation,\nU. S. District Court for the Northern\nDistrict of Ohio, Case No. 1: 17- MD- 2804\nCONFERENCE\nWITH\nLEGAL\nCOUNSEL -\nEXISTING\nPursuant to Government Code Section 54956. 9 ( d)( 1)\nof Case: In RE: Purdue Pharma, L. P., et. al.,\nName\nLITIGATION\nU. S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern\nDistrict of New York, Case No. 19- 23649\nCONFERENCE\nWITH LEGAL COUNSEL -\nEXISTING\nLITIGATION\nPursuant to Government Code Section 54956. 9( d)( 1)\nPeople' s Collective for Environmental Justice v. Inland Valley Development Agency, et. al., San\nBernardino County Court, Case No. CIVSB2510434 ( City sued as Real Party in Interest)