LA County Board

2-D.\nMultifamily Affordable Housing Developments in Bellflower and\nUnincorporated Arcadia\nRecommendation: Approve loans to the recommended developers to fund the\ndevelopment of two affordable multifamily rental housing developments located\nin Bellflower and unincorporated Arcadia (4 and 5), selected through the Notice\nof Funding Availability (NOFA) Rounds 30 and 31, issued by the Los Angeles\nCounty Development Authority (LACDA), using up to a total of $15,020,000 in\nAffordable Housing Trust Funds (AHTF) and $8,010,000 No Place Like Home\n(NPLH) funds. Authorize the Executive Director of the Los Angeles County\nDevelopment Authority to negotiate, execute, and if necessary, amend, or\nreduce the loan agreements with the recommended developers, or their\nLACDA-approved assignees, and all related documents, including but not\nlimited to documents to subordinate the loans to construction and permanent\nfinancing, and any intergovernmental, interagency, or inter-creditor agreements\nnecessary for the implementation of each development. Authorize the Executive\nDirector to accept and incorporate, as needed, up to $15,020,000 AHTF and\n$8,010,000 in NPLH into LACDA’s approved Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget for\nthe purposes described herein. Authorize the Executive Director to reallocate\nLACDA funding set aside for affordable housing at the time of project funding,\nas needed and within each project’s approved funding limit, in line with each\nproject’s needs, and within the requirements for each funding source. Find that\napproval of funding for these projects is not subject to the California\nEnvironmental Quality Act. APPROVE (26-1430)\nBoard Letter\nVI. NOTICES OF CLOSED SESSION FOR MARCH 17, 2026\nCS-1.\nCONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION\n(Paragraph (1) of Subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9)\nThe People of the State of California, ex rel. Xavier Becerra, Attorney General\nof the State of California vs. County of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles County\nSuperior Court Case No. 21STCV01309.\nNOTE: County Counsel requests that this item be continued to April 28,\n2026. (23-1790)\nCS-2.\nCONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION\n(Paragraph (1) of Subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9)\nRaul Gutierrez, et al. v. Los Angeles County Probation Department, Los Angeles\nCounty Superior Court Case No. 24STCV06193.\nNOTE: County Counsel requests that this item be continued to April 28,\n2026. (24-3888)\nCS-3.\nCONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION\n(Paragraph (1) of Subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9)\nCounty of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Probation Department v. Board\nof State and Community Corrections, Los Angeles County Superior Court Case\nNo. 25STCP01415.\nNOTE: County Counsel requests that this item be continued to April 28,\n2026. (25-2331)\nCS-4.\nCONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION\n(Paragraph (1) of Subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9)\nJohn (LOJHK) Doe by and through his Guardian Ad Litem Katheryn Godbolt\nJones v. County of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.\n25NWCV00448.\nNOTE: County Counsel requests that this item be continued to April 28,\n2026. (25-3056)\nCS-5.\nCONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION\n(Paragraph (1) of Subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9)\nHousing Authority of the County of San Diego, et al. v. Turner et al., United\nStates District Court, Northern District of California Case No.\n4:25-CV-08859-JST. (26-1335)\nCS-6.\nCONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION\n(Paragraph (1) of Subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9)\nCity of Fresno, et al. v. Turner, et al., United States District Court, Northern\nDistrict of California Case No. 3:25-CV-07070-RS. (26-1337)\nCS-7.\nCONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION\n(Paragraph (1) of Subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9)\nCounty of Santa Clara, et al. v. Noem, et al., United States District Court,\nNorthern District of California Case No. 3:25-CV-08330-WHO. (26-1336)\nCS-8.\nCONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION\n(Paragraph (1) of Subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9)\nCity of Fresno, et al. v. Noem, et al., United States District Court, Northern\nDistrict of California Case No. 3:26-CV-01535-BLF. (26-1726)\nCS-9.\nCONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION\n(Paragraph (2) of Subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9)\nSignificant exposure to litigation (two cases).\nNOTE: County Counsel requests that one case be continued to April 28,\n2026. (25-1458)\nCS-10.\nPUBLIC EMPLOYMENT\n(Government Code Section 54957(b)(1))\nConsideration of candidate(s) for the position of Interim Director of the Child\nSupport Services Department. (26-1452)\nCS-11.\nPUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION\n(Government Code Section 54957(b)(1))\nChief Probation Officer\nDirector of Health Services\nDirector of Mental Health\nDirector of Public Health\nDirector of Internal Services\nDirector of Youth Development\nDirector of Personnel\nSuperintendent of Schools of the Los Angeles County Office of Education\nNOTE: County Counsel requests that this item be continued to April 28,\n2026. (24-3887)\nCS-12.\nCONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS\n(Government Code Section 54957.6)\nAgency designated representatives: Joseph M. Nicchitta, Acting Chief\nExecutive Officer and designated staff.\nEmployee Organization(s) for represented employees: All individual member\nunions of the Coalition of County Unions, AFL CIO; SEIU, Local 721; All\naffiliated member unions of SEIU; All affiliated member unions of AFSCME\nCouncil 36; Los Angeles County Deputy Public Defenders Union; Program\nManagers Association; Child Support Attorneys; Supervising Child Support\nOfficers; and Probation Directors. (25-1693)\nVII. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 96