Santa Ana
City Council
28. Public Hearing Recovery of Uncollected Costs Incurred by the City Related to the
5. Determine that the approvals and authorizations provided for herein do not constitute a
"project" within the meaning of California Public Resources Code § 21065 and authorize
filing a notice of exemption based on the "common sense" exemption of 14 C.C.R. §
15061(b)(3) to the extent any activity would be considered a "project" because it can be
seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a
significant effect on the environment and the activity is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
28. Public Hearing Recovery of Uncollected Costs Incurred by the City Related to the
Abatement of Dangerous and Abandoned Buildings
Legal notice published in OC Reporter on July 3, 2024 and property owner notification
letters mailed on same date.
Department(s): Planning and Building Agency
Recommended Action: 1. Adopt a resolution affirming the Fiscal Year 20232024
Dangerous and Abandoned Building Program Report and authorize the transmittal of
uncollected charges incurred by the City related to the abatement of dangerous and
abandoned buildings to the office of AuditorController, County of Orange.
RESOLUTION NO. 2024XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA ANA CONFIRMING THE COSTS OF SECURING AND/OR DEMOLITION
OF VARIOUS STRUCTURES DECLARED TO BE PUBLIC NUISANCES; MAKING,
CONFIRMING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR SUCH COSTS; AND ORDERING
SUCH COSTS TO BE RECORDED WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY RECORDER’S
OFFICE
2. Determine that the proposed action does not constitute a “project” under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with section 15378(a) and (b)(5) as the
adoption of this resolution authorizes an administrative action and will not result in a direct
or reasonable foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and there is no
possibility it will have a significant effect on the environment. Accordingly, it is exempt from
further CEQA review pursuant to section 15061(b)(3) and (b)(5) of the CEQA guidelines as
amended.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS