Los Angeles
City Council
(18) 26-0076-S1
CD 13 PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
(EIR), and RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS, and PLANNING
AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a
Vesting Tentative Tract Map appeal for the properties located at 5950 -
6048 West Hollywood Blvd; and 6037 West Carlton Way.
Recommendations for Council action:
1. FIND, based on the independent judgement of the
decision-maker, after consideration of the whole of the
administrative record, the Project was assessed in the
previously certified EIR No. ENV-2022-6688-EIR (State
Clearinghouse No. 2023050659), and pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Sections
15162 and 15164, that no subsequent EIR, negative
declaration, or addendum is required for approval of the
Project.
2. ADOPT the Findings of the Los Angeles City Planning
Commission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council.
3. RESOLVE TO DENY the APPEAL filed by Coalition for
Responsible Equitable Economic Development Los
Angeles (CREED LA), c/o Aidan P. Marshall, Adams,
Broadwell, Joseph & Cardozo (Representative: Aidan P.
Marshall, Adams, Broadwell, Joseph & Cardozo), and
THEREBY SUSTAIN the determination of the LACPC in
denying the appeal, and sustaining the Advisory Agency’s
determination dated September 2, 2025; and approving,
pursuant to Sections 17.03 and 17.15 of the Los Angeles
Municipal Code (LAMC), a Vesting Tentative Tract Map
No. 83987 (stamped map, dated April 25, 2025) for the
merger and re-subdivision of an approximately 3.7-acre
site into one ground lot and nine airspace lots; and a Haul
Route for the export of up to 252,000 cubic yards of soil;
for the properties located at 5950 - 6048 West Hollywood
Boulevard, and 6037 West Carlton Way, subject to
Conditions of Approval.
Applicant: 6000 Hollywood Boulevard Associates, LLC
Representative: Spencer B. Kallick, Allen Matkins Leck, Gamble
Mallory & Natsis, LLP
Case No. VTT-83987-2A
Environmental No. ENV-2022-6688-EIR-1A
Related Case: ZA-2022-6687-CUB-DB-SPR-HCA-1A
Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General
Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.