Los Angeles — 2026-03-25

City Council

#1 Item
(1)\n25-0677\nCD 2\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to the City’s\nutilization of its own or contract forces to abate a public nuisance\nlocated at 7779 Varna Avenue (Assessor Parcel No. 2301015021).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nORDER the Board of Public Works to cause the abatement of the\nnuisance located at 7779 Varna Avenue (Assessor Parcel No.\n2301015021).
#10 Item
(10)\n25-0525-S2\nCIVIL RIGHTS, EQUITY, IMMIGRATION, AGING, AND DISABILITY\nCOMMITTEE REPORT relative to Community Block Grant (CDBG)\nCapital Project expenditures, amending, and reprogramming funds for\nthe 51st Program Year of the Housing and Community Development\nConsolidated Plan (2025-2026) (Action Plan); and amending and\nreprogramming funds for the 46th Program Year; and related matters.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. APPROVE the projects as detailed in Table 1 of the Community\nInvestment for Families Department (CIFD) report dated\nFebruary 2, 2026, attached to the Council file, for new and\nadditional funding for projects, and amend the 51st Program\nYear (PY 51) Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) to reflect the\nchanges in funding.\n2. APPROVE the reprogramming of $6,555,733 in CDBG funds\nand $1,400,000 in Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS\n(HOPWA) funds as a source of revenue for the revised PY 51\nCDBG Con Plan budget, the reprogramming of $1,150,000 in\nCDBG-CV funds for the PY 46 CDBG - Corona Virus Aid, Relief,\nand Economic Security Act (CDBG - CV) Con Plan budget, and\nthe reprogramming of approximately $355,524 in State Family\nHomelessness Challenge grant (FHC) grant funds within CIFD\nMiscellaneous Grants and Awards Fund No. 65G/21, as\ndetailed in Attachment 1 contained in the CIFD report dated\nFebruary 2, 2026, attached to the Council file.\n3. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, CIFD, or designee, to\nprepare and post a Substantial Amendment to the PY 51 Action\nPlan, as detailed in Attachment 2 of the CIFD report dated\nFebruary 2, 2026, attached to the Council file, to incorporate\nchanges to the CDBG, CDBG-CV and HOPWA funded program\nactivities identified, for up to a seven-day public comment\nperiod, listing all revisions as detailed in the CIFD report dated\nFebruary 2, 2026, attached to the Council file, and submit the\namendment to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban\nDevelopment (HUD) for approval.\n4. AUTHORIZE the General Managers of implementing\ndepartments, or their designees, to negotiate and execute\ncontracts, contract amendments, and/or interdepartmental\nagreements with grant recipients identified in the Contract\nAuthorities, as detailed in Attachment 3 of the CIFD report dated\nFebruary 2, 2026, attached to the Council file, consistent with\nCouncil action, in consultation with CIFD as grant administrator,\nsubject to City Attorney approval, as to form.\n5. INSTRUCT all implementing departments to provide to CIFD for\nreview and approval all information required to document\ncompliance with CDBG grant regulations that the project is\neligible, ready, and meets federal environmental requirements,\nand to provide regular progress and expenditure reports.\n6. APPROVE the Controller Instructions, as detailed in Attachment\n4 of the CIFD report dated February 2, 2026, attached to the\nCouncil file, and AUTHORIZE the General Manager of the\nimplementing departments, or designees, to prepare Controller\nInstructions and any technical adjustments including returning\nfunds to HUD to correct payment expenditures per HUD\nguidelines, subject to the approval of the Office of the Chief\nLegislative Analyst (CLA), and AUTHORIZE the Controller to\nimplement these instructions.\n7. APPROVE cancelling the promissory notes and reconveying\nthe deeds of trust for $400,000 in AB 1290 and City General\nPurpose funds for Reach for the Top - Casa Amador, in\naccordance with the Third and Seventh Amendments to\nContract #C-126691.\n8. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, CIFD, or designee, to\nrelease a Request for Proposals (RFP) to select a qualified\nvendor to provide Certified Access Specialist (CASp) consulting\nservices.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The CIFD reports that there is no impact on\nthe General Fund.
#11 Item
(11)\n26-0155\nCIVIL RIGHTS, EQUITY, IMMIGRATION, AGING, AND DISABILITY\nCOMMITTEE REPORT relative to instructing the Civil + Human Rights\nand Equity Department (CHRED), with assistance from Economic and\nWorkforce Development Department (EWDD), to report on the impacts\nof Dr. Mehmet Oz's statements in the Valley Glen video incident, and\nrelated matters.\nRecommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion\n(Nazarian – Soto-Martínez):\n1. INSTRUCT the CHRED, with assistance from EWDD, to report\nwithin 60 days on the impacts of this incident, including but not\nlimited to the following elements:\na. Detailed Accounting: Detailing Dr. Mehmet Oz's specific,\nalleged defamatory or discriminatory statements,\nidentifying the targeted groups (especially the Armenian\ncommunity), and categorizing the nature of the claims.\nb. Civil Rights and Discrimination Analysis: an analysis of the\nclaims against established civil rights law, focusing on\npotential unlawful discrimination based on Armenian\nnational origin, examining the resulting hostile\nenvironment, and assessing non-economic harms like\nemotional distress and reputational damage.\nc. Economic Impact Assessment: quantifying and detailing\nthe financial damage sustained by local Armenian-owned\nbusinesses due to the statements, including lost revenue,\nincreased costs, and devaluation of assets, and identifying\nany financial resources to support these businesses.\n2. REQUEST the City Attorney to report to Council on the legal\nstanding of the City of Los Angeles to join the Governor’s civil\nrights complaint or to file a separate amicus brief, and to\nexplore all available local and state legal remedies regarding\nthe defamation of the City’s commercial districts by a federal\nofficial.\n3. REQUEST the City Attorney report to Council within 60 days on\nfiling an amicus brief in support of any legal actions taken or\nmade by the state of California.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.
#12 Item
(12)\n26-0204\nCIVIL RIGHTS, EQUITY, IMMIGRATION, AGING, AND DISABILITY\nCOMMITTEE REPORT relative to requesting the City Attorney to\nprepare and present an ordinance to codify all of the instructions\nincluded in Mayor Bass’ Executive Directive 17 to ensure continued\ntransparency, accountability, and protections for City residents from the\npotential harms of federal immigration enforcement operations in the\nCity.\nRecommendation for Council action, Motion (Harris-Dawson – Soto-\nMartínez, et al.):\nREQUEST the City Attorney to prepare and present an ordinance to\ncodify all of the instructions included in Mayor Bass’ Executive\nDirective 17 to ensure continued transparency, accountability, and\nprotections for City residents from the potential harms of federal\nimmigration enforcement operations in the City.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.
#13 Item
(13)\n26-0022\nCD 9\nPLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to waiving all of the current fees, charges, and accumulated\ninterest associated with the property located at 1342 West 59th Place,\nexcept for the Non-Compliance Code Enforcement Fee.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Price –\nSoto-Martínez):\nINSTRUCT and authorize the Los Angeles Department of Building\nand Safety to waive all of the current fees, charges, and accumulated\ninterest associated with the property located at 1342 West 59th\nPlace, except for the Non-Compliance Code Enforcement Fee of\n$660.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.
#14 Item
(14)\n14-1061-S5\nPLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to the execution of a contract amendment with Terry A. Hayes\nAssociates, Inc. for environmental consulting services.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAUTHORIZE the Director of City Planning or designee, to execute a\nfirst amended and restated contract with Terry A. Hayes Associates,\nInc. reducing the total not-to-exceed amount by $100,456 for a total\nnot-to-exceed amount of $1,608,176 and extending the contract term\nfor an additional 24 months through January 7, 2028 for a total term\nof 13 years and four months to provide environmental consulting\nservices in substantial conformance with the proposed Agreement,\nattached to the City Administrative Officer (CAO) report dated\nJanuary 28, 2026, subject to the review and approval of the City\nAttorney as to form, and compliance with the City’s contracting\nrequirements.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that funding for the\nproposed first amended and restated contract will be provided by\nexisting budget appropriations for this purpose, and there is no\nadditional General Fund impact.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendation\nin this report complies with the City’s Financial Policies in that\nbudgeted funds will be used for intended purposes.
#15 Item
(15)\n26-0312\nCD 10\nPLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to initiating consideration of the property located at 3911 West\nAdams Boulevard, in the list of Historic-Cultural Monuments.\nRecommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Hutt –\nHarris-Dawson):\n1. INITIATE consideration of the property located at 3911\nWest Adams Boulevard, as a Historic-Cultural\nMonument (HCM) under the procedures set forth in\nSection 22.170.10 of the Los Angeles Administrative\nCode.\n2. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning to prepare\nthe HCM application for review and consideration of the\nCultural Heritage Commission (CHC).\n3. REQUEST the CHC, after reviewing the application, to\nsubmit its report and recommendation to the Council\nregarding the inclusion of the property located at 3911\nWest Adams Boulevard, in the City’s list of HCM.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.
#16 Item
(16)\n17-0274-S5\nPREVIOUSLY ADOPTED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. ENV-2016-\n3432-ND, PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE\nREPORT and RESOLUTION relative to the Affordable Housing\nLinkage Fee Market Areas.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND, in the independent judgment of the decisionmaker,\nbased on the whole of the record the project was\nassessed in the Affordable Housing Linkage Fee\nEnvironmental Negative Declaration No. ENV-2016-3432-\nND adopted on February 23, 2017 and pursuant to the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines\nSection 15162, no subsequent EIR is required based on a\nchange to the project, change to circumstances or new\ninformation; and determine that pursuant to CEQA\nGuidelines Section 15378(b)(4) the Affordable Housing\nLinkage Fee Five Year Map Update is not a CEQA project.\n2. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION, to adopt the\nupdated Market Area Maps included in Figure A.3 and A.5\nof the Department of City Planning (DCP) Staff Report\ndated January 21, 2026.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the DCP. Neither the City\nAdministrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed\na financial analysis of this report.
#17 Item
(17)\n26-0076\nCD 13\nENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR), STATEMENT OF\nOVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, MITIGATION MONITORING\nPROGRAM, AND EIR ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS; and PLANNING\nAND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) appeal for the property\nlocated at 5950 - 6048 West Hollywood Blvd; and 6037 West Carlton\nWay.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND that the City Council has reviewed and considered\nthe information contained in the Draft EIR, ENV-2022-\n6688-EIR (SCH No. 2023050659), dated November 2024,\nand the Final EIR, dated May 2025 (6000 Hollywood\nBoulevard Project EIR), as well as the whole of the\nadministrative record.\na. CERTIFY the following:\ni. The 6000 Hollywood Boulevard\nProject EIR has been completed in\ncompliance with CEQA.\nii. The 6000 Hollywood Boulevard\nProject EIR was presented to the\ndecision-making body of the lead\nagency.\niii. The 6000 Hollywood Boulevard EIR\nreflects the independent judgement\nand analysis of the lead agency.\nb. ADOPT the following:\ni. The related and prepared 6000\nHollywood Boulevard Project EIR\nEnvironmental Findings.\nii. The Statement of Overriding\nConsiderations.\niii. The Mitigation Monitoring Program\nprepared for the 6000 Hollywood\nBoulevard Project EIR.\n2. ADOPT the Findings of the Los Angeles City Planning\nCommission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council.\n3. RESOLVE TO DENY the APPEAL filed by Coalition for\nResponsible Equitable Economic Development Los\nAngeles (CREED LA), c/o Aidan P. Marshall, Adams,\nBroadwell, Joseph & Cardozo (Representative: Aidan P.\nMarshall, Adams, Broadwell, Joseph & Cardozo), and\nTHEREBY SUSTAIN the LACPC’s determination in\ncertifying the EIR, and adopting a Statement of Overriding\nConsiderations, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and EIR\nEnvironmental Findings, as the environmental clearance\nfor a mixed-use development comprised of 350 residential\nunits (including 44 units for Very Low Income households),\n136,000 square feet of office, 18,004 square feet of retail,\nand 4,038 square feet of restaurant, the proposed uses\nwould be within three primary buildings (Buildings A, B,\nand C), and 11 low-rise structures dispersed throughout\nthe Project Site, Building A would be a 136,000 square\nfeet, six-story office and retail building; Building B would\nbe a 289,079 square feet, 35 story residential tower; and\nBuilding C would be a 23,560 square feet four-story\nresidential building, Buildings A and B and the low-rise\nstructures would front Hollywood Boulevard (Hollywood\nLot) and Building C would be located on a single lot\nfronting Carlton Way (Carlton Lot), one of the low-rise\nstructures would be a 4,038 square-foot, two-story\nrestaurant and the remaining 10 structures would include\n38 residential townhomes, ranging from two to four stories\nin height, upon completion, the Project would result in a\ntotal floor area of 501,185 square feet on a 3.7-acre site,\nwith a maximum building height of 419 feet, all of the\nexisting improvements and uses on the Project Site would\nbe demolished; for the properties located at 5950 - 6048\nWest Hollywood Boulevard, and 6037 West Carlton Way,\nsubject to Conditions of Approval.\nApplicant: 6000 Hollywood Boulevard Associates, LLC\nRepresentative: Spencer B. Kallick, Allen Matkins Leck Gamble\nMallory & Natsis, LLP\nCase No. ENV-2022-6688-EIR-1A\nEnvironmental No. ENV-2022-6688-EIR-1A\nRelated Cases: VTT-83987-2A; ZA-2022-6687-CUB-DB-SPR-HCA-\n1A\nFiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General\nFund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.
#18 Item
(18)\n26-0076-S1\nCD 13\nPREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT\n(EIR), and RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS, and PLANNING\nAND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a\nVesting Tentative Tract Map appeal for the properties located at 5950 -\n6048 West Hollywood Blvd; and 6037 West Carlton Way.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND, based on the independent judgement of the\ndecision-maker, after consideration of the whole of the\nadministrative record, the Project was assessed in the\npreviously certified EIR No. ENV-2022-6688-EIR (State\nClearinghouse No. 2023050659), and pursuant to the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Sections\n15162 and 15164, that no subsequent EIR, negative\ndeclaration, or addendum is required for approval of the\nProject.\n2. ADOPT the Findings of the Los Angeles City Planning\nCommission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council.\n3. RESOLVE TO DENY the APPEAL filed by Coalition for\nResponsible Equitable Economic Development Los\nAngeles (CREED LA), c/o Aidan P. Marshall, Adams,\nBroadwell, Joseph & Cardozo (Representative: Aidan P.\nMarshall, Adams, Broadwell, Joseph & Cardozo), and\nTHEREBY SUSTAIN the determination of the LACPC in\ndenying the appeal, and sustaining the Advisory Agency’s\ndetermination dated September 2, 2025; and approving,\npursuant to Sections 17.03 and 17.15 of the Los Angeles\nMunicipal Code (LAMC), a Vesting Tentative Tract Map\nNo. 83987 (stamped map, dated April 25, 2025) for the\nmerger and re-subdivision of an approximately 3.7-acre\nsite into one ground lot and nine airspace lots; and a Haul\nRoute for the export of up to 252,000 cubic yards of soil;\nfor the properties located at 5950 - 6048 West Hollywood\nBoulevard, and 6037 West Carlton Way, subject to\nConditions of Approval.\nApplicant: 6000 Hollywood Boulevard Associates, LLC\nRepresentative: Spencer B. Kallick, Allen Matkins Leck, Gamble\nMallory & Natsis, LLP\nCase No. VTT-83987-2A\nEnvironmental No. ENV-2022-6688-EIR-1A\nRelated Case: ZA-2022-6687-CUB-DB-SPR-HCA-1A\nFiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General\nFund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.
#19 Item
(19)\n26-0173\nPLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to preparing an ordinance to amend the Los Angeles Municipal\nCode (LAMC) to mandate accountability, close regulatory loopholes,\nand safeguard the public right-of-way with penalties sufficient to deter\nillegal off-site signage and ambush marketing activity; and related\nmatters.\nRecommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion\n(Yaroslavsky, Blumenfield – Harris-Dawson, et al.):\n1. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning (DCP), with\nthe assistance of the Los Angeles Department of Building\nand Safety (LADBS), the City Attorney and the City\nAdministrative Officer (CAO), to prepare and present an\nordinance to amend to the LAMC to mandate\naccountability, close regulatory loopholes, and safeguard\nthe public right-of-way with penalties sufficient to deter\nillegal off-site signage and ambush marketing activity. The\namendments should include the following elements:\na. Establish a broad definition of Outdoor Advertising\nCompanies (OACs) that captures any entity\nmarketing space facing the public right-of-way;\nrequire all OACs to register a sworn inventory of\nassets, similar to the Home Sharing Ordinance\nregistration requirements; and mandate an\nirrevocable Letter of Credit or Surety Bond to\nguarantee compliance and cost reimbursement.\nb. Establish a fine of up to $50,000 per day for code\nviolations related to maintaining digital, off-site\nsignage in any format; and a fine of up to $25,000\nper day for violations related to maintaining static,\noff-site signage in any format; thereby establishing a\nsevere penalty framework with substantial daily,\nescalating fines.\nc. Redefine "on-site” to strictly require bona fide,\nprimary business operations, thereby prohibiting any\nartificial business arrangement designed to\ncircumvent the City’s off-site advertising prohibitions.\nd. Clarify that this framework applies to all commercial\nsign formats including but not limited to, billboards,\nwallscapes, wild postings, mobile, supergraphics,\nrooftop structures, and window-displays.\ne. Include mechanisms to hold parent companies,\nproperty owners, and affiliates liable for fines\nincurred by shell entities to halt the ability of OACs\nand property owners to hide assets.\nf. Exercise authority under California Government\nCode Sections 38771 and 38773 to declare illegal\noff-site signs a public nuisance per se, authorizing\nsummary abatement (removal) of signage and\nequipment, with all costs assessed against the\nowner via nuisance abatement liens.\ng. Ensure the applicability of this Ordinance to violators\nof the Olympic and Paralympic Planning and Zoning\nExemption Ordinance (Council file No. 15-0989-\nS47).\nh. Preclude any OAC or property owner with\noutstanding sign violations, or more than 3 violations\nof the revised enforcement framework within the\nprior 3 years, from bidding on future City contracts or\npartnerships and from obtaining a permit for any\nadditional off-site signage.\ni. Ensure the applicability of this Ordinance to violators\nof LAMC Section 14.4.17.\nj. Facilitate a streamlined process for sign takedowns\nand pulling demolition permits for unpermitted signs;\nand waive all related plan check and inspection fees.\nk. Provide a private right of action against registered or\nunregistered OACs or property owners, as well as\nadditional mechanisms to enlist registered OACs to\nassist the City in identification of and enforcement\nagainst unpermitted signs.\n2. INSTRUCT the DCP, with the assistance of the LADBS\nand the City Attorney to prepare and present an ordinance\nto amend LAMC Section 14.4.17 that includes the\nfollowing elements:\na. A mechanism to require a revenue share with the\nCity on all expected gross advertising revenue.\nb. Higher fees for vacant properties to discourage\ncontinued vacancies.\nc. Increased responsibility for graffiti and nuisance\nabatement clean-up.\nd. A requirement that all currently permitted temporary\nconstruction wall signs must:\ni. Register as an OAC.\nii. Immediately display identification signage\n("Imprint") listing the operator and permit\nnumber for the remainder of their permit term\nto facilitate enforcement and verify compliance.\n3. INSTRUCT the CAO, with the assistance of the DCP, the\nLADBS, and the City Attorney, to provide\nrecommendations within 30 days on:\na. Establishing substantial fines and penalties sufficient\nto fully offset the City’s costs derived from permitting\nlegal\nsignage,\nenforcement\nframework\nadministration.\nb. Mechanisms to maximize the City’s revenue-sharing\npercentage from permitted advertising.\nc. A requirement that signage on temporary\nconstruction walls comply with the City’s existing\nsign regulations and zoning code, including\napplicable limitations on size and location.\nd. A prohibition on temporary signs on construction\nwalls surrounding any open business.\ne. Penalties for OACs that fail to submit required clean-\nup information to the Office of Community\nBeautification and Council Offices. f. Staffing\nrequired for effective enforcement of sign\nregulations.\n4. INSTRUCT the DCP, with the assistance of the LADBS\nand the City Attorney, to provide recommendations\nregarding additional amendments to LAMC 14.4.17,\nincluding:\na. Improvements to the permitting process to\nencourage compliance.\nb. Restrictions on permits for temporary signs that are\nwithin the clean-up radius of an existing permitted\nsign.\n5. INSTRUCT the LADBS that reports submitted pursuant to\nCouncil file No. 25-1182 also be submitted under Council\nfile No. 26-0173.\n6. INSTRUCT the City Attorney, with the assistance of the\nLADBS and DCP, to report back with a legal analysis of\nthe revenue share, fine structure, regulatory authority to\nregulate a market when the City is a participant, and any\nother potential issues of liability and/or constitutionality as\noutlined in the motion prior to final consideration of the\nordinances.\n7. INSTRUCT the DCP to report to the Los Angeles City\nPlanning Commission (LACPC) with a report and\nrecommendations on both potential ordinances for LACPC\nand Council consideration.\n8. INSTRUCT the CAO, with the assistance of the LADBS\nand DCP, to report back with a budget and staffing\nanalysis and recommendations to enhance and support\npro-active code enforcement against illegal on-site\nsignage.\n9. REQUIRE that any replacement ordinance shall require\nthat signage on temporary construction walls comply with\nthe City's existing sign regulations and zoning code,\nincluding applicable limitations on size and location; the\nordinance shall not create a new category of off-site\nsignage exempt from those regulations and shall establish\nclear time limits to ensure such signage remains\ntemporary.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.
#2 Item
(2)\n09-0969-S4\nEXEMPTION, PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT\nCOMMITTEE REPORT, and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION\nrelative to amending the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) for the\nimplementation of a fee update of the Department of City\nPlanning’s case processing application fees.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. DETERMINE that the adoption of this ordinance does not\nconstitute a “project,” as defined by the California\nEnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA\nGuidelines Section 15378(b)(4), and even if it were found to be\na “project” under CEQA, the adoption of this ordinance is\nexempt from CEQA based upon CEQA Guidelines Section\n15061(b)(3).\n2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated\nFebruary 27, 2026, amending Section 19.16 of Article 9,\nChapter I and Section 15.7.3 of Article 15, Chapter 1A of the\nLAMC to implement a fee update by the Department of City\nPlanning for case processing application fees.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither\nthe City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.
#20 Item
(20)\n25-1182\nPLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to reporting on the City’s regulations regarding the installation\nof building wraps; and related matters.\nRecommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion\n(Rodriguez – Hutt):\n1. INSTRUCT the Los Angeles Department of Building and\nSafety (LADBS), with the assistance of the City Attorney,\nto report on the City’s regulations relative to the\ninstallation of building wraps, and provide\nrecommendations on whether the City can compel\nproperty owners to use building wraps as a potential\nsolution to address blight to support the Vacant Building\nAbatement program.\n2. INSTRUCT the LADBS, with the assistance of the City\nAttorney and the Department of City Planning, to report on\nthe potential to allow property owners who are subject to\nvacant building abatement orders to generate temporary\nrevenue from building wrap advertising opportunities as a\nway to offset City department costs associated with the\nVacant Building Abatement program, and identify the\nappropriate building and/or planning code changes that\nwould be necessary to effectuate this action.\n3. INSTRUCT the LADBS that reports submitted pursuant to\nCouncil file No. 25-1182 also be submitted under Council\nfile No. 26-0173.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.
#21 Item
(21)\n25-1183\nCD 10\nPLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to preparing a report with recommendations, to require, as part\nof the issuance of construction permits by the Los Angeles Department\nof Building and Safety (LADBS), and as part of Plan Check permitting,\nthat project applicants maintain a roll-off dumpster on site for\nconstruction clean-outs, and thereby ensure that illegal dumping does\nnot occur in any abutting alleys and neighborhood.\nRecommendation for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Hutt –\nMcOsker):\nINSTRUCT the LADBS, in consultation with the City Attorney and the\nDepartment of Public Works, Bureau of Sanitation (LASAN),\ninasmuch as LASAN issues Solid Waste Hauler permits, to prepare a\nreport with recommendations, to require, as part of the issuance of\nconstruction permits by LADBS, and as part of Plan Check permitting,\nthat project applicants maintain a roll-off dumpster on site for\nconstruction clean-outs, or other mechanisms to ensure that\nconstruction waste is disposed of properly, including verifiable proof,\nand thereby ensure that illegal dumping does not occur in any\nabutting alleys and neighborhoods.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.
#22 Item
(22)\n24-0544\nHOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS and PERSONNEL AND HIRING\nCOMMITTEES’ REPORT relative to a Middle-Income Affordable\nHousing Pilot Program, and related matters.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nADOPT the following in lieu of the recommendations listed in the\nOctober 20, 2025 Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD) report:\n1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to\namend the Affordable Housing Bond Policies and\nProcedures approved by City Council in August of 2019 to\nallow for the creation of a Middle-Income Pilot Program to\noperate within the boundaries of the City of Los Angeles\nthat could utilize partnership with a conduit issuer to issue\ngovernmental bonds for the purpose to develop, acquire,\nand operate real property assets; and to impose\ncovenants or regulatory agreements limiting the\noccupancy of housing units in such properties to families\nwith incomes between 50% and 120% of the area median\nincome for Los Angeles County, to be leased at affordable\nrental rates to such families with rents capped at 4 percent\nannually.\n2. INSTRUCT the LAHD to address the following when the\nBond Guidelines are amended and to submit the Conduit\nIssuer Bond Guidelines to the City Council for approval\nbefore any bond is issued:\n​\na. To issue, the bond, the City will have no liability\nb. That Possessory Interest tax will not ever\nbecome the responsibility of the tenant or the\nCity but will be the responsibility of the\ndeveloper should it be required.\nc. That future potential property taxes are offset\nby other taxes and tenant savings\nd. Construction completion will be protected by\nperformance bonds, insurance and completion\nreserves.\n3. DIRECT the LAHD to report back with the value of\npotential loss of tax revenue, if any.\n4. INSTRUCT the LAHD to report back within 30 days on the\nparameters of the Los Angeles County Affordable Housing\nSolutions Agency social bond program and how it\ninterrelates to the creation of a City-led Middle-Income\nPilot Program.\n5. INSTRUCT the LAHD to report back during the FY2026-\n27 Budget process on staffing needs for this pilot program.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The LAHD reports that there is no General\nFund impact for the requested position, Financial Development Officer\nII, to develop the expertise to manage the pilot program, select\npartnership entities, and monitor investments. The cost of this position\nis $178,538.65 to be paid from the Municipal Housing Finance Fund\nNo. 815. These middle-income projects are exempt from property\ntaxes and could potentially replace other developments that would\ncontribute property tax revenue. In 2024, property tax revenue\nrepresented 34.64% of total revenue for the City’s General Fund.
#23 Item
(23)\n26-0192\nEXEMPTION and ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE\nREPORT relative to the acceptance of two easement deeds with long-\nterm indemnification from U.S. Borax Inc., located in Bishop, Inyo\nCounty, California, near Owens Lake, a portion of the Assessor Parcel\nNumber (APN) 029-180-29.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. ADOPT the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)\ndeterminations of the Board of Water and Power\nCommissioners that accepting an easement is exempt from\nCEQA pursuant to Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2) that states\nan activity is not subject to CEQA if the activity will not result in\na direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in\nthe environment.\n2. APPROVE the Department of Water and Power (DWP)\nproposed Resolution authorizing the DWP to accept two\neasement deeds with long-term indemnification provisions from\nU.S. Borax Inc., at no cost to DWP, granting the City rights to\nconstruct, operate, maintain, repair, replace, and reconstruct\nroads over and across real property owned by U.S. Borax Inc.,\nlocated in Bishop, Inyo County, California, near Owens Lake,\nand identified as a portion of Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN)\n029-180-29.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer reports that\napproval for the DWP to accept the two easement deeds from U.S.\nBorax Inc. will have no impact on the City’s General Fund. There is no\ncost to DWP, as the easements will be purchased by the State on\nbehalf of the City. The above recommendations comply with the\nDWP’s adopted Financial Policies.
#24 Item
(24)\n26-0191\nEXEMPTION, ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE REPORT\nand ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the Large\nPower Transformers and Variable Shunt Reactors for Various\nSubstations Project (Project).\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. DETERMINE that the Project is exempt pursuant to Section\n15060(c)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)\nGuidelines. In accordance with this section, an activity is not\nsubject to CEQA if it does not meet the definition of a project.\nSection 15378(b)(4) states that government fiscal activities\nwhich do not involve any commitment to any specific project\nwhich may result in a potentially significant physical impact on\nthe environment do not meet the definition. Therefore, the\napproval of this draft ordinance to authorize procurement of\npower transformers, spare parts, and commissioning services is\nnot subject to CEQA.\n2. APPROVE the Department of Water and Power (DWP)\nproposed Resolution for the Large Power Transformers and\nVariable Shunt Reactors for Various Substations Project:\na. Authorizing the DWP to use a competitive sealed bid\nproposal method in accordance with Charter Section\n371(a) and Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC)\nSection 10.15(f), permitting negotiations after proposals\nare submitted to allow clarifications and changes to the\nproposal.\nb. Award in whole or in part, one or more contracts at an\nestimated cost of $732 million and a term not-to-exceed\nnine years, to procure large power transformers and\nvariable shunt reactors for various substations, including\nspare parts and associated manufacturer representative\nservices.\n3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated\nFebruary 24, 2026, authorizing the Board of Water and Power\nCommissioners to award one or more agreements pursuant to a\ncompetitive sealed proposal method and to permit negotiations\nrelating to the procurement of highly specialized power system\nequipment.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer reports that\nthere is no impact on the General Fund. The proposed Resolution and\nOrdinance authorizes the use of the competitive sealed proposal\nmethod under LAAC Section 10.15(f) to procure Large Power\nTransformers, Variable Shunt Reactors, spare parts, and associated\nmanufacturer representative services. The Resolution and Ordinance\ncovers only administrative costs and excludes any contract\nexpenditures. The ensuing contract(s) is funded through a power\nreliability surcharge passed on to DWP customers for a total\nestimated cost of approximately $732 million. The above\nrecommendations comply with the DWP adopted Financial Policies.
#25 Item
(25)\n26-0190\nEXEMPTION, ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE REPORT\nand ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to updating\nregulatory programs and adding new types of environmental energy\nand renewable energy credit products available for purchase, sale, and\nexchange.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. DETERMINE that California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)\nFindings Amendments to Los Angeles Administrative Code\n(LAAC) Section 23.143.1 are exempt pursuant to CEQA\nGuidelines Section 15060(c)(3). In accordance with this section,\nan activity is not subject to CEQA if it does not meet the\ndefinition of a project. Section 15378(b)(5) states that\norganizational or administrative activities that will not result in\ndirect or indirect physical changes in the environment do not\nmeet that definition. Therefore, amendments to LAAC Section\n23.143.1 are not subject to CEQA.\n2. APPROVE the Department of Water and Power (DWP)\nproposed Resolution authorizing amendment of LAAC Section\n23.143.1 to update the regulatory programs referenced and add\nnew types of environmental energy and renewable energy\ncredit products available for purchase, sale, and exchange.\n3. DELEGATE authority to the General Manager, DWP, to update\nthe Environmental Credit and Renewable Energy Credit Policy.\n4. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated\nFebruary 18, 2026, amending LAAC Section 23.143.1 to\nmaintain compliance with environmental laws and regulations\nrelated to environmental/emission credit and renewable energy\ncredit programs.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer reports that\napproval of the amendment to LAAC Section 23.143.1 will have no\nimpact on the General Fund. The environmental credits and\nrenewable energy credits purchased or sold are for compliance\npurposes only and subject to limitations of prices. The above\nrecommendations comply with the DWP adopted Financial Policies.
#26 Item
(26)\n25-1380\nGENERAL EXEMPTION, ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT\nCOMMITTEE REPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION\nrelative to quitclaiming a water facility easement, located in the City\nand identified as Assessor’s Parcel No. 5571-001-004, to Jalmia Creek\nInvestments, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. ADOPT the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)\ndeterminations of the Board of Water and Power\nCommissioners (Board) that quitclaiming an easement is\nexempt from CEQA pursuant to the General Exemption\ndescribed in Section 15061(b)(3) that states an activity is not\nsubject to CEQA if the activity does not have a significant effect\non the environment.\n2. APPROVE the Board Resolution authorizing the Department of\nWater and Power (DWP) to execute a Quitclaim Deed\nquitclaiming a water facility easement at Assessor’s Parcel No.\n5571-001-004 in the City, to Jalmia Creek Investments, LLC, a\nCalifornia Limited Liability Company, at no cost to DWP.\n3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated\nFebruary 10, 2026, approving Board Resolution No. 026 143\nauthorizing the DWP to quitclaim a public water facility\neasement to Jalmia Creek Investments, LLC, a California\nLimited Liability Company.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer reports that\nthere is no impact on the City General Fund. The DWP Water\nRevenue Fund will receive onetime revenue of $6,420 as a\nprocessing fee for the quitclaim of this easement, which the property\nowner of record has paid to DWP. The recommendations above\ncomply with the DWP adopted Financial Policies.
#27 Item
(27)\n26-0051\nGENERAL EXEMPTION, ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT\nCOMMITTEE REPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION\nrelative to quitclaiming a public power facility easement, located in the\nCity and identified as Assessor’s Parcel No. 2119-017-041, to Level Up\nMotors RE, LLC, a Kansas Limited Liability Company.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. ADOPT the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)\ndeterminations of the Board of Water and Power\nCommissioners (Board) that quitclaiming an easement is\nexempt from CEQA pursuant to the General Exemption\ndescribed in Section 15061(b)(3) that states an activity is not\nsubject to CEQA if the activity does not have a significant effect\non the environment.\n2. APPROVE the Board Resolution authorizing the Department of\nWater and Power (DWP) to execute a Quitclaim Deed\nquitclaiming a public power facility easement at Assessor’s\nParcel No. 2119-017-041 in the City to Level Up Motors RE,\nLLC, a Kansas Limited Liability Company, at no cost to DWP.\n3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated\nJanuary 23, 2026, approving Board Resolution No. 026 125\nauthorizing the DWP to quitclaim a public power facility\neasement to Level Up Motors RE, LLC, a Kansas Limited\nLiability Company.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer reports that\nthere is no impact on the City General Fund. The DWP Power\nRevenue Fund will received onetime revenue of $6,420 as a\nprocessing fee for the quitclaim of this easement, which the property\nowner of record has paid to DWP. The recommendations above\ncomply with the DWP adopted Financial Policies.
#28 Item
(28)\n26-0053\nEXEMPTION, ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE REPORT\nand ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the utilization\nof an alternative project delivery method on a competitive sealed\nproposal basis and approval of project delivery criteria for the Encino\nReservoir Floating Pilot Project (Project).\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. DETERMINE that this Project is exempt pursuant to the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section\n15060(c)(2). In accordance with this section, an activity is not\nsubject to CEQA if it will not result in a direct or reasonably\nforeseeable indirect physical change in the environment. The\napproval of this draft ordinance will authorize the use of the\ncompetitive sealed bid proposal method to let a contract and will\nnot result in any physical change in the environment; therefore,\nthe proposed action is not subject to CEQA.\n2. APPROVE Board of Water and Power Commissioners (Board)\nResolution for the Project:\na. Authorizing the Department of Water and Power (DWP) to\nutilize a competitive sealed bid proposal process in\naccordance with Charter Section 371(b), establish\nalternative project delivery contract criteria using the\nEngineer-Procure-Construct method, and execute a\ncontract for a term not-to-exceed five years, with two one-\nyear renewal options for a total of seven years.\nb. Award a contract at an estimated cost of $24.175 million\nfor the complete design, engineering, procurement, and\nconstruction of the Project.\n3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated\nFebruary 4, 2026, authorizing the Board to award an agreement\npursuant to a competitive sealed proposal method, to permit\nnegotiations relating to the engineering, procurement, and\nconstruction of the Project.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer reports that\napproval of the proposed Resolution and Ordinance authorizing DWP\nto use the competitive sealed proposal method to secure an\nEngineer-Procure-Construct contract for the Project will not have a\nGeneral Fund impact. The ensuing contract will impact the DWP\nPower Revenue Fund and result in total estimated Project\nexpenditures of $24.175 million. The recommendations above comply\nwith the DWP adopted Financial Policies.
#29 Item
(29)\n26-0056\nCD 4\nEXEMPTION, ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE REPORT\nand ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the use of the\ncompetitive sealed bid proposal method for the award of one or more\ncontracts to accelerate the implementation of the Plug into Power:\nCommunity Distributed Energy Resources Project (Project).\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. DETERMINE that this Project is exempt pursuant to the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section\n15060(c)(2). In accordance with this section, an activity is not\nsubject to CEQA if it will not result in a direct or reasonably\nforeseeable indirect physical change in the environment. The\napproval of this draft Ordinance will authorize the use of the\ncompetitive sealed bid proposal method to let a contract and will\nnot result in any physical change in the environment; therefore,\nthe proposed action is not subject to CEQA.\n2. APPROVE Board of Water and Power Commissioners\nResolution authorizing the use of the competitive sealed bid\nproposal method for the award of one or more contracts for a\nterm not-to-exceed 10 years, utilizing the criteria set forth in the\nOrdinance to accelerate the implementation of the Project to\nassist in meeting the Department of Water and Power (DWP)\n2022 Strategic Long-Term Resource Plan and Senate Bill 100\ngoals.\n3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated\nFebruary 2, 2026, to award one or more contracts pursuant to a\ncompetitive sealed proposal method to permit negotiations\nrelating to the design, engineering, procurement, and\nconstruction of the accelerated implementation of the Project.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer reports that\nthere is no impact on the City General Fund. The Ordinance proposed\nby the DWP authorizing the use of the competitive sealed bid\nproposal method of contract award under Charter Section 371(b) to\naccelerate implementation of the Project involves only proposal\nadministration costs and does not include the cost of any contract(s)\nrecommended for award which cannot be identified at this time. The\nproposed recommendations comply with DWP Financial Policies.
#3 Item
(3)\n26-0296\nCD 11\nCATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE\nCITY ENGINEER relative to an offer to dedicate an easement for\nsidewalk purposes on 4112-4134 South Del Rey Avenue - Right of\nWay No. 36000-10363.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND that the dedication of an easement for sidewalk purposes\non 4112-4134 South Del Rey Avenue (Dedication) is\ncategorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality\nAct of 1970 pursuant to Article III, Class 5(4) of the City's\nEnvironmental Guidelines.\n2. ACCEPT the petitioner's offer for the Dedication, substantially\nas shown on the Exhibit Map of the February 25, 2026 City\nEngineer report, attached to the Council file.\n3. AUTHORIZE the Board of Public Works to acquire the\nDedication.\n4. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to forward a copy of the Council\naction on this project to the Bureau of Engineering, Survey\nDivision for processing.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that a $3,416.51\nfee for processing this report was paid pursuant to Sections 7.3 and\n7.41.1 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code. No additional City\nfunds are needed.
#30 Item
(30)\n24-0477\nCD 2\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Annual Planning Report (APR) for\nthe North Hollywood Transit, Property-Based, Business Improvement\nDistrict (BID).\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND that the APR for the North Hollywood Transit 2025-2030\nBID's 2026 FY attached to the City Clerk report dated\nDecember 29, 2025, attached to the Council file, complies with\nthe requirements of the State Law.\n2. FIND that the increase in the 2026 budget concurs with the\nintentions of the North Hollywood Transit 2025-2030 BID’s\nManagement District Plan and does not adversely impact the\nbenefits received by assessed property owners.\n3. ADOPT said APR for the North Hollywood Transit 2025-2030\nBID’s 2026 FY, pursuant to the State Law.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no\nimpact to the General Fund associated with this action.
#31 Item
(31)\n23-0391\nCD 14\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEES REPORT\nrelative to Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Annual Planning Report (APR) for the\nArts District Los Angeles, Property-Based, Business Improvement\nDistrict (BID).\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND that the APR for the Arts District Los Angeles 2024-2030\nBID's 2026 FY attached to the City Clerk report dated January\n14, 2026, attached to the Council file, complies with the\nrequirements of the State Law.\n2. FIND that the increase in the 2026 budget concurs with the\nintentions of the Arts District Los Angeles 2024-2030 BID’s\nManagement District Plan and does not adversely impact the\nbenefits received by assessed property owners.\n3. ADOPT said APR for the Arts District Los Angeles 2024-2030\nBID’s 2026 FY, pursuant to the State Law.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no\nimpact to the General Fund associated with this action.
#32 Item
(32)\n23-0460\nCD 14\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEES REPORT\nrelative to Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Annual Planning Report (APR) for the\nHistoric Core, Property-Based, Business Improvement District (BID).\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND that the APR for the Historic Core 2024-2028 BID's 2026\nFY attached to the City Clerk report dated December 10, 2025,\nattached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of\nthe State Law.\n2. FIND that the increase in the 2026 budget concurs with the\nintentions of the Historic Core 2024-2028 BID’s Management\nDistrict Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits\nreceived by assessed property owners.\n3. ADOPT said APR for the Historic Core 2024-2028 BID’s 2026\nFY, pursuant to the State Law.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no\nimpact to the General Fund associated with this action.
#33 Item
(33)\n16-0749\nCD 11\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEES REPORT\nrelative to Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Annual Planning Report (APR) for the\nVenice Beach, Property-Based, Business Improvement District (BID).\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND that the APR for the Venice Beach 2022-2026 BID's 2026\nFY attached to the City Clerk report dated December 10, 2025,\nattached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of\nthe State Law.\n2. FIND that the increase in the 2026 budget concurs with the\nintentions of the Venice Beach 2022-2026 BID’s Management\nDistrict Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits\nreceived by assessed property owners.\n3. ADOPT said APR for theVenice Beach 2022-2026 BID’s 2026\nFY, pursuant to the State Law.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no\nimpact to the General Fund associated with this action.
#34 Item
(34)\n22-0587\nCD 3\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Annual Planning Report (APR) for the\nTarzana Safari Walk, Property-Based, Business Improvement District\n(BID).\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND that the APR for the Tarzana Safari Walk 2023-2032 BID's\n2026 FY attached to the City Clerk report dated November 14,\n2025, attached to the Council file, complies with the\nrequirements of the State Law.\n2. FIND that the increase in the 2026 budget concurs with the\nintentions of the Tarzana Safari Walk 2023-2032 BID’s\nManagement District Plan and does not adversely impact the\nbenefits received by assessed property owners.\n3. ADOPT said APR for the Tarzana Safari Walk 2023-2032 BID’s\n2026 FY, pursuant to the State Law\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no\nimpact to the General Fund associated with this action.
#35 Item
(35)\n14-1515\nCD 5\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Annual Planning Report (APR) for the\nWestwood, Property-Based, Business Improvement District (BID)\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND that the APR for the Westwood 2017-2026 BID's 2026 FY\nattached to the City Clerk report dated December 4, 2025,\nattached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of\nthe State Law.\n2. FIND that the increase in the 2026 budget concurs with the\nintentions of the Westwood 2017-2026 BID’s Management\nDistrict Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits\nreceived by assessed property owners.\n3. ADOPT said APR for the Westwood 2017-2026 BID’s 2026 FY,\npursuant to the State Law.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no\nimpact to the General Fund associated with this action.
#36 Item
(36)\n14-0943-S3\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Annual Planning Report (APR) for the\nLos Angeles Tourism Marketing District, Property-Based, Business\nImprovement District (BID).\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND that the APR for the Los Angeles Tourism Marketing\nDistrict 2025-2034 BID's 2026 FY attached to the City Clerk\nreport dated January 20, 2026, attached to the Council file,\ncomplies with the requirements of the State Law.\n2. FIND that the increase in the 2026 budget concurs with the\nintentions of the Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District 2025-\n2034 BID’s Management District Plan and does not adversely\nimpact the benefits received by assessed property owners.\n3. ADOPT said APR for the Los Angeles Tourism Marketing\nDistrict 2025-2034 BID’s 2026 FY, pursuant to the State Law.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no\nimpact to the General Fund associated with this action.
#37 Item
(37)\n12-0139\nCDs 1, 8, 9\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Annual Planning Report (APR) for the\nFigueroa Corridor, Property-Based, Business Improvement District\n(BID).\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND that the APR for the Figueroa Corridor 2018-2027 BID's\n2026 FY attached to the City Clerk report dated December 19,\n2025, attached to the Council file, complies with the\nrequirements of the State Law.\n2. FIND that the increase in the 2026 budget concurs with the\nintentions of the Figueroa Corridor 2018-2027 BID’s\nManagement District Plan and does not adversely impact the\nbenefits received by assessed property owners.\n3. ADOPT said APR for the Figueroa Corridor 2018-2027 BID’s\n2026 FY, pursuant to the State Law.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no\nimpact to the General Fund associated with this action.
#38 Item
(38)\n14-0101-S1\nCD 1, CD 10\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Annual Planning Report (APR) for the\nByzantine Latino Quarter-Pico, Property-Based, Business\nImprovement District (BID).\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND that the APR for the Byzantine Latino Quarter-Pico 2019-\n2028 BID's 2026 FY attached to the City Clerk report dated\nDecember 29, 2025, attached to the Council file, complies with\nthe requirements of the State Law.\n2. FIND that the increase in the 2026 budget concurs with the\nintentions of the Byzantine Latino Quarter-Pico 2019-2028 BID’s\nManagement District Plan and does not adversely impact the\nbenefits received by assessed property owners.\n3. ADOPT said APR for the Byzantine Latino Quarter-Pico 2019-\n2028 BID’s 2026 FY, pursuant to the State Law.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no\nimpact to the General Fund associated with this action.
#39 Item
(39)\n14-0979\nCD 11\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Annual Planning Report (APR) for the\nWestchester Town Center, Property-Based, Business Improvement\nDistrict (BID).\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND that the APR for the Westchester Town Center 2022-2031\nBID's 2026 FY attached to the City Clerk report dated January\n21, 2026, attached to the Council file, complies with the\nrequirements of the State Law.\n2. FIND that the increase in the 2026 budget concurs with the\nintentions of the Westchester Town Center 2022-2031 BID’s\nManagement District Plan and does not adversely impact the\nbenefits received by assessed property owners.\n3. ADOPT said APR for the Westchester Town Center 2022-2031\nBID’s 2026 FY, pursuant to the State Law.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no\nimpact to the General Fund associated with this action.
#4 Item
(4)\n26-0251\nTRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a fallen power\npole that caused a full closure of Interstate 110 near Gaffey Street in\nSan Pedro, on February 18, 2026.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (McOsker –\nJurado):\nREQUEST the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans),\nDepartment of Transportation, and Department of Water and Power,\nin coordination with the Emergency Management Department, Los\nAngeles Police Department, and any other relevant agencies, to\nreport within 30 days with:\na. A timeline of the response to the Interstate 110/Gaffey Street\nincident, including agency roles and communication protocols\nutilized.\nb. The availability, use, and protocols for electronic notifications to\nresidents of similar road disruptions.\nc. The current inventory, location, and deployment status of\nportable changeable message signs and other mobile traffic\ncontrol devices Citywide.\nd. Existing coordination protocols with Caltrans for incidents\noccurring on State freeway facilities within City boundaries,\nincluding delineation of responsibilities.\ne. Recommendations, if any, to improve resource availability,\ninteragency coordination, and communication for residents for\nfuture incidents.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.
#40 Item
(40)\n22-0058\nCD 13\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Annual Planning Report (APR) for the\nLarchmont Village Property, Property-Based, Business Improvement\nDistrict (BID).\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND that the APR for the Larchmont Village Property 2023-\n2032 BID's 2026 FY attached to the City Clerk report dated\nDecember 22, 2025, attached to the Council file, complies with\nthe requirements of the State Law.\n2. FIND that the increase in the 2026 budget concurs with the\nintentions of the Larchmont Village Property 2023-2032 BID’s\nManagement District Plan and does not adversely impact the\nbenefits received by assessed property owners.\n3. ADOPT said APR for the Larchmont Village Property 2023-2032\nBID’s 2026 FY, pursuant to the State Law.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no\nimpact to the General Fund associated with this action.
#41 Item
(41)\n13-0705\nCD 5\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Annual Planning Report (APR) for the\nMelrose Property, Property-Based, Business Improvement District\n(BID)\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND that the APR for the Melrose Property 2019-2028 BID's\n2026 FY attached to the City Clerk report dated December 8,\n2025, attached to the Council file, complies with the\nrequirements of the State Law.\n2. FIND that the increase in the 2026 budget concurs with the\nintentions of the Melrose Property 2019-2028 BID’s\nManagement District Plan and does not adversely impact the\nbenefits received by assessed property owners.\n3. ADOPT said APR for the Melrose Property 2019-2028 BID’s\n2026 FY, pursuant to the State Law.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no\nimpact to the General Fund associated with this action.
#42 Item
(42)\n22-0310\nCD 9, CD 14\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Annual Planning Report (APR) for the\nGreater South Park, Property-Based, Business Improvement District\n(BID).\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND that the APR for the Greater South Park 2023-2029 BID's\n2026 FY attached to the City Clerk report dated January 6,\n2026, attached to the Council file, complies with the\nrequirements of the State Law.\n2. FIND that the increase in the 2026 budget concurs with the\nintentions of the Greater South Park 2023-2029 BID’s\nManagement District Plan and does not adversely impact the\nbenefits received by assessed property owners.\n3. ADOPT said APR for the Greater South Park 2023-2029 BID’s\n2026 FY, pursuant to the State Law.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no\nimpact to the General Fund associated with this action.
#43 Item
(43)\n24-0415\nCD 1, CD 14\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Annual Planning Report (APR) for the\nHighland Park, Property-Based, Business Improvement District (BID).\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND that the APR for the Highland Park 2025-2034 BID's 2026\nFY attached to the City Clerk report dated December 3, 2025,\nattached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of\nthe State Law.\n2. FIND that the increase in the 2026 budget concurs with the\nintentions of the Highland Park 2025-2034 BID’s Management\nDistrict Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits\nreceived by assessed property owners.\n​\n3. ADOPT said APR for the Highland Park 2025-2034 BID’s 2026\nFY, pursuant to the State Law.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no\nimpact to the General Fund associated with this action.
#44 Item
(44)\n25-1004\nPERSONNEL AND HIRING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to\namending the Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) to explicitly\nprohibit city officials and employees (civilian and sworn) from engaging\nin civil immigration enforcement as part of any compensated outside\nemployment, activity, or enterprise.\nRecommendation for Council action:\n1. APPROVE the ORDINANCE dated March 4, 2026 adding\nArticle 13 to Chapter 7 of Division 4 of the LAAC to explicitly\nprohibit city officials and employees (civilian and sworn) from\nengaging in civil immigration enforcement as part of any\ncompensated outside employment, activity, or enterprise.\n2. REQUEST the City Attorney to prepare and present an\namended Ordinance substantially similar to the Ordinance\nreferred to above in Recommendation No. 1 and to include an\nUrgency Clause.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney.\nNeither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative\nAnalyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.
#45 Item
(45)\n25-0030\nRESOLUTION (HARRIS-DAWSON - BLUMENFIELD) relative to the\nDeclaration of Local Emergency by the Mayor dated January 7, 2025,\nand Updated Declaration of Local Emergency by the Mayor dated\nJanuary 13, 2025, due to the windstorm and extreme fire weather\nsystem and devastating wildfires in the City of Los Angeles (City),\npursuant to Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) Section 8.27.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION, dated January 14, 2025,\nto:\n1. Resolve that a local emergency exists resulting from ongoing\nwindstorm and extreme fire weather system and the devastating\nwildfires in the City within the meaning of LAAC Section 8.21, et\nseq., as set forth in the Mayor’s January 13, 2025 Updated\nDeclaration of Local Emergency, which incorporated the\ndeclaration of emergency dated January 7, 2025, which the City\nCouncil hereby ratifies.\n2. Resolve that because the local emergency, which began on\nJanuary 7, 2025, continues to exist, there is a need to continue\nthe state of local emergency, which the City Council hereby\nratifies.\n3. Instruct and request all appropriate City departments (including\nproprietary departments), agencies, and personnel, in\naccordance with LAAC Code Section 8.21 et seq., to continue\nto perform all duties and responsibilities to represent the City in\nthis matter to respond to and abate the emergency and prevent\nfurther harm to the life, health, property, and safety, and receive,\nprocess; and, coordinate all inquiries and requirements\nnecessary to obtain whatever State and Federal assistance that\nmay become available to the City and/or to the citizens of the\nCity who may be affected by the emergency.\n4. Instruct the General Manager, Emergency Management\nDepartment, to advise the Mayor and City Council on the need\nto extend the state of local emergency, as appropriate.\n5. Resolve that, to the extent the public interest and necessity\ndemand the immediate expenditure of public funds to safeguard\nlife, health, or property in response to the local emergency and\nto support the emergency operations of the City and its\ndepartments (including its proprietary departments), agencies,\nand personnel (including mutual aid resources) in responding to\nthe declared local emergency, the competitive bidding\nrequirements enumerated in City Charter Section 371, and\nfurther codified in the LAAC, including LAAC Section 10.15 be\nsuspended until termination of the state of emergency and\nsolely with respect to purchases and contracts needed to\nrespond to the declared state of emergency.\n6. Direct and request City departments and agencies making\npurchases pursuant to the authority granted in paragraph five\n(5), above, to report every two weeks to the City Council\nregarding the purchases and contracts made during the prior\ntwo week period on the reasons justifying why such purchase or\ncontract was necessary to respond to the emergency, including\nwhy the emergency did not permit a delay resulting from a\ncompetitive solicitation for bids or proposals, and why\ncompetitive proposals or bidding was not reasonably practicable\nor compatible with the City’s interests.\n7. Request all City departments and agencies who have the\nauthority to investigate and/or enforce any/all forms of price\ngouging, fraud, and theft by deceit, as described in the\nCalifornia Penal Code, to do so to the fullest extent permissible\nunder federal, state, and local law.\n8. Instruct the City Clerk, unless and until Council directs\notherwise or discontinues the state of emergency, to timely\nagendize this matter so that Council may consider whether\nto continue the state of emergency.\n9. Instruct the City Clerk to forward copies of this Resolution\nto the Governor of the State of California, the Director of\nthe Office of Emergency Services of the State of California,\nthe Los Angeles County Office of Emergency Management,\nand the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors.
#46 Item
(46)\n25-0600-S133\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Third\n(Mid-Year) Financial Status Report (FSR) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\nAPPROVE the recommendations contained in the City Administrative\nOfficer (CAO) report dated February 27, 2026, attached to the\nCouncil file, relative to the Third FSR for FY 2025-26, as amended to\ninclude the following recommendation:\na. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $680,000 from the\nGeneral City Purposes Fund No. 100/56, Account No.\n000903 (Council Community Projects – Operation Safe\nStreets Initiative), to a new account in the Capital\nTechnology Improvement Expenditure Program Fund No.\n100/54 for engineering and design services for the Dirt\nMulholland project.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that a total of $209.44\nmillion in projected over-expenditures are identified in the Third (Mid-\nYear) FSR. Transfers, appropriations, and other budgetary\nadjustments totaling approximately $322.40 million are recommended\nin Sections 1 and 2 of said CAO report.\nFinancial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the\nrecommendations the report comply with the City’s Financial Policies\nas the recommended transactions use current revenues and balances\nto pay for current operations.
#47 Item
(47)\n25-0600-S40\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE and TRANSPORTATION\nCOMMITTEE REPORTS relative to an overview and update of the Los\nAngeles Department of Transportation’s (DOT) parking citation fine\nstudy and increases.\nA. TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT\nRecommendation for Council action:\nINSTRUCT the DOT to report in 120 days with any additional\nproposed increases to parking citation fines.\nB. BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. INSTRUCT the DOT to report in 120 days with any\nadditional proposed increases to parking citation fines.\n2. DELETE the recommendation to reduce the fine for\nparking more than 18” from the curb from Attachment A of\nthe DOT report dated July 1, 2025, attached to the Council\nfile.\n​\n3. ADD an instruction to have DOT report within 30 days with\nrecommendations for establishing a parking violation with\nan objective standard to allow ticketing of vehicles that\npartially or completely block a bike lane, with appropriate\nfines that reflect the safety hazard this creates; and\nrecommendations about enhanced fines for parking in a\nmarked AB 413 red zone.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The DOT reports that adjustments to\nparking citation fines, as outlined in Attachments A and B of the report,\ncould produce an estimated amount of over $8 million revenue\nincrease over a five-year period that would be deposited to the\nGeneral Fund. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief\nLegislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.
#48 Item
(48)\n20-0021-S2\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS and BUDGET AND\nFINANCE COMMITTEES’ REPORT relative to a grant acceptance\nfrom the California Board of State and Community Corrections for\nimplementation of the Cohort 5 Proposition (Prop) 47 Pathways to\nHealing and Recovery Program.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. NOTE and FILE the Mayor’s Office of Community Safety\n(MOCS) report dated December 11, 2025, attached to the\nCouncil file.\n2. AUTHORIZE the MOCS to:\na. Accept the Prop 47 Grant in the amount of $8,000,000\nfrom the California Board of State and Community\nCorrections (BSCC) to support the Pathways for Healing\nand Recovery (Pathways) Program for the period from\nOctober 1, 2025 through June 30, 2029.\nb. Submit any other necessary grant agreements and\ndocuments relative to the implementation of the Pathways\nProgram, subject to the review and approval of the City\nAttorney as to form and legality.\nc. Negotiate and execute a contract with the RAND\nCorporation to provide data evaluation services for the\nPathways Program for a period of 45 months within the\ngrant performance period in an amount not to exceed\n$800,000, subject to the review and approval of the City\nAttorney as to form and legality, compliance with the City’s\ncontracting requirements, and the availability of funds.\nd. Negotiate and execute contract amendments with the\nseven community-based organizations listed below for a\nperiod of up to 36 months within the grant performance\nperiod, for a total amount not to exceed $5,950,000, to\nimplement the Pathways Program, subject to the review\nand approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality,\ncompliance with the City’s contracting requirements, and\nthe availability of funds:\ni. Service Provider: St. John’s Community Health\n1. Regional Center Services; Central Service\nArea: Amount: $1,000,000\n2. Housing Services; Citywide Service Area;\nAmount: $1,715,000\nii. Service Provider: Tarzana Treatment Center;\nRegional Center Services; Valley Service Area;\nAmount: $870,000\niii. Service Provider: Arming Minorities Against\nAddiction and Disease; Regional Center\nServices; South Service Area; Amount: $1,000,000\niv. Service Provider: El Proyecto del Barrio;\nEmployment Services; Valley Service Area; Amount:\n$255,000\nv. Service Provider: Center for Employment\nOpportunities; Employment Services; Central\nService Area; Amount: $255,000\nvi. Service Provider: Watts Labor Community Action\nCenter; Employment Services; South Service Area;\nAmount: $255,000\nvii. Service Provider: Legal Aid Foundation Los Angeles;\nLegal Services; Citywide Service Area;\nAmount: $600,000\n3. APPROVE the funding allocation of the Prop 47 grant award to\nimplement the Pathways Program for the period from October\n1, 2025 through June 30, 2029 for the following categories in\nthe total amount of $8,000,000:\na. Salaries and Benefits; Amount: $1,200,000\nb. Service Provider Contracts; Amount: $5,950,000\nc. Evaluation/Data Collection; Amount: $800,000\nd. Other Administrative Costs; Amount: $50,000\n4. REQUEST the Controller to:\na. Establish a new interest-bearing fund entitled “Fiscal Year\n25 Proposition 47 Cohort 5 BSCC (FY25 Prop 47 Cohort\n5) Grant Fund” No. XXX/46, for the receipt and\ndisbursement of Prop 47 grant funds, to be administered\nby the MOCS.\nb. Establish new appropriation accounts within the FY25\nProp 47 Cohort 5 Grant Fund No. XXX/46 as follows for a\ntotal amount of $8,000,000:\n​\ni. ​Account No. 46C146, Mayor; Amount: $780,031.16\nii. Account\nNo.\n46C299,\nRelated\nCosts;\nAmount: $419,968.84\niii. Account No. 46C304, Contractual Services;\nAmount: $6,750,000.00\niv. Account No. 46C602, Other; Amount: $50,000.00\nc. Increase appropriations in the amount of $780,031.16\nwithin the Mayor’s Fund No. 100/46, Account No. 001020,\nGrant Reimbursed, for the reimbursement of grantfunded\nsalary costs.\nd. Transfer up to $419,968.84 from the FY25 Prop 47 Cohort\n5 Grant Fund No. XXX/46, Account No. 46C299, to the\nMayor’s Fund No. 100/46, Revenue Source Code 5346,\nfor the reimbursement of grant-funded fringe benefits.\n5. AUTHORIZE the MOCS to prepare Controller instructions\nand/or make technical adjustments as necessary to implement\nthe actions approved by the Mayor and City Council, subject to\nthe approval of the City Administrative Officer (CAO); and\nREQUEST the Controller to implement the instructions.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that the proposed grant\nactivities, including partial salary costs of five positions in the Mayor’s\nOffice, will be funded by the Prop 47 Cohort 5 Grant. There is no\nmatch requirement associated with the grant. There is no additional\nimpact to the General Fund.\nFinancial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the\nrecommendations in the report are in compliance with the City's\nFinancial Policies in that all grant funds will be utilized for grant-\neligible activities.
#49 Item
(49)\n26-0233\nGOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE REPORT and\nRESOLUTION relative to the acceptance and funding requirements of\nthe 2026 Cannabis Equity Act Grant from the State of California\nGovernor’s Office of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz).\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. AUTHORIZE the Executive Director, Department of Cannabis\nRegulation (DCR), or designee, to:\na. Accept the 2026 Cannabis Equity Act Grant in the amount\nof $3,500,000 (CEG-2026-687) from the GO-Biz.\nb. Execute, on behalf of the City of Los Angeles, all other\nCEG-2026-687 grant documents necessary in connection\nwith the grant award.\nc. Expend said funds from the accounts listed above for the\npurposes set forth in said DCR report and consistent with\nthe Grant Agreement.\n2. ADOPT the accompanying Grant RESOLUTION, included as\nAttachment 1 of the DCR report dated February 17, 2026,\nattached to the Council file, authorizing the Executive Director,\nDCR, or designee, to execute the Grant Agreement on behalf of\nthe City of Los Angeles, included as Attachment 2 of said DCR\nreport, for CEG-2026-687 for the period of April 1, 2026 through\nOctober 31, 2027, including any extensions or amendments\nthereof.\n3. AUTHORIZE the Controller to:\na. Accept, deposit, and set up grant receivables up to\n$3,500,000 of CEG2026-687 grant funds in the California\nLocal Equity Grant Program Fund No. 64F/13.\nb. Establish and appropriate up to $3,500,000 within Fund\nNo. 64F/13, California Local Equity Grant Program Fund,\nAccount No. TBD entitled "2026 Cannabis Equity Grant",\nfor the receipt and disbursement of grant funds.\nc. Set up an account entitled “CEG 2026 Receivables” within\nthe DCR Special Revenue Trust Fund No. 60E for the 25\npercent front-funding required by CEG-2026-687, to be\nrepaid when grant funds are made available.\n4. AUTHORIZE the DCR to prepare Controller instructions and/or\nmake any corrections or clarifications to the above instructions\nthat may be required, subject to the approval of the City\nAdministrative Officer, in order to effectuate the intent of City\nCouncil; and, REQUEST the Controller to implement these\ninstructions.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The DCR reports that there is no General\nFund impact because the non-grant funded personnel costs\nassociated with administering the DCR’s Social Equity Program and\nsupporting Social Equity Applicants and Licensees are utilized toward\nthe local matching fund requirement.
#5 Item
(5)\n26-0303\nCD 2\nCATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE\nREPORT and RESOLUTION relative to a boundary expansion for\nPreferential Parking District (PPD) No. 55 in the Toluca Lake area of\nCouncil District Two (CD 2).\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND that the residents of the Toluca Lake area in CD 2 need\nimmediate relief as a result of general intrusive parking from\nnon-residents and customers of the businesses along Riverside\nDrive, and impacts created by an adjacent City parking permit\nrestriction.\n2. FIND that the expansion of PPD No. 55 boundaries, pursuant to\nLos Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 80.58.d, is\nexempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)\nas a Class 1 Categorical Exemption, under Article III.1.a.3 of the\n2002 Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.\n3. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to expand the\nboundaries of PPD No. 55, pursuant to the City Council’s\nNovember 6, 2018 “Rules and Procedures for Preferential\nParking Districts,” which currently includes the residential district\narea generally bounded by the following streets and freeway:\na. The centerlines of Vineland Avenue, Riverside Drive,\nCahuenga Boulevard, Lankershim Boulevard, and the\nHollywood Freeway (US-101).\nExpansion to include both sides of the residential areas\ngenerally bounded by the following blocks (unless otherwise\nnoted):\nb. South side of Riverside Drive between Cahuenga\nBoulevard and Auckland Avenue.\nc. East side of Auckland Avenue between Riverside Drive\nand alley south of Ventura Freeway (State Route 134).\nd. Alley south of Ventura Freeway (State Route 134)\nbetween Auckland Avenue and Ledge Avenue.\ne. Ledge Avenue between alley south of Ventura Freeway\n(State Route 134) and Riverside Drive.\nf. Riverside Drive between Ledge Avenue and Sancola\nAvenue.\ng. Placidia Avenue between Riverside Drive and dead end.\nh. Arcola Avenue between Riverside Drive and dead end.\ni. West side of Sancola Avenue between Riverside Drive\nand dead end.\nj. South side of Riverside Drive between Sancola Avenue\nand Clybourn Avenue (City boundary).\nk. West side of Clybourn Avenue (City boundary) between\nRiverside Drive and gate to Lakeside Golf Course.\nl. Valley Spring Lane between Cahuenga Boulevard and\ndead end at Lakeside Golf Course.\nm. Cahuenga Boulevard between Valley Spring Lane and\nLankershim Boulevard.\n4. AUTHORIZE the following parking restrictions for use on the\nresidential portions of all streets in PPD No. 55:\na. 2 HOUR PARKING 8 AM TO 6 PM MONDAY TO FRIDAY;\nVEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 55 PERMITS EXEMPT\nb. NO PARKING 8 AM TO 6 PM; VEHICLES WITH\nDISTRICT NO. 55 PERMITS EXEMPT\nc. 2 HOUR PARKING 8 AM TO 6 PM; VEHICLES WITH\nDISTRICT NO. 55 PERMITS EXEMPT\nd. NO PARKING 6 PM TO 8 AM, 2 HOUR PARKING 8 AM\nTO 6 PM; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 55 PERMITS\nEXEMPT\ne. NO PARKING 6 PM TO 8 AM; VEHICLES WITH\nDISTRICT NO. 55 PERMITS EXEMPT\n5. INSTRUCT the Department of Transportation (DOT) to initiate\nthe necessary procedures for the preparation and sale of\nparking permits to residents within PPD No. 55, as specified in\nSection 80.58 of the LAMC.\n6. DIRECT the DOT to:\na. Post or remove the authorized parking restrictions on the\nresidential portions of the street segments enumerated in\nRecommendation No. 3, except for areas where parking is\ncurrently prohibited in the interest of traffic flow or public\nsafety.\nb. Post or remove the authorized parking restrictions upon\nreceipt and validation of petitions containing signatures\nfrom at least 75 percent of the dwelling units, covering\nmore than 50 percent of the developed frontage on a\nstreet segment requesting installation or removal of the\nparking restrictions set forth in Recommendation No. 4,\nwithout further action of the City Council.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The DOT reports that revenue from the sale\nof permits will cover the cost of implementing, administering, and\nenforcing PPD No. 55. Additionally, violations of the posted parking\nrestrictions may result in citation fines deposited into the General\nFund. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative\nAnalyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.
#50 Item
(50)\n25-0006-S81\nCOMMUNICATION FROM DEPARTMENT OF AGING relative to the\nacceptance of the California Department of Aging (CDA) Wildfire Relief\nGrant, and memorializing an agreement with Wise and Healthy Aging\nfor wildfire relief.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Department of Aging\n(DOA), or designee, to accept $100,000 in Wildfire Relief grant\n(WF-2425-25) funds from the CDA; to execute Standard\nAgreement No. WF-2425-25 with the CDA, included as\nAttachment A of the DOA report dated March 4, 2026, attached\nto the Council file, and any unilateral amendments to the\nsubgrant agreement, subject to review and approval of the City\nAttorney as to form and legality, and in compliance with Los\nAngeles Administrative Code Section 14.8 et seq. (City grant\nregulations); and, to approve the WF-2425-25 Budget.\n2. AUTHORIZE the Interim General Manager, DOA, or designee,\nto utilize the existing 12-month agreement with Wise and\nHealthy Aging, in the total amount of $90,000, for the period of\nApril 1, 2025 through March 31, 2026, previously executed and\nsubject to review by the City Attorney as to form and legality.\n3. AUTHORIZE the Controller to:\na. Establish new accounts and appropriate $100,000 within\nFund No. 67A, titled “Funds for Other Aging Grants &\nMisc. programs”, to administer the Wildfire Relief grant for\nthe period ending March 31, 2026, as follows:\ni. Fund No. 67A, Account No. 02C102, Aging; Amount:\n$10,000\nii. Fund No. 67A, Account No. 02CWF1, Wildfire Relief;\nAmount: $90,000\nb. Increase the appropriations within Fund No. 100/02, and\ntransfer funds on an as-needed basis (Revenue Source\nCode 5693), as follows:\nFrom: Fund No. 67A; Account No. 02C102, Aging;\nAmount: $10,000\nTo: Fund No. 100/02; Account No. 001010, Salaries –\nGeneral; Amount: $10,000\nc. Expend funds upon proper demand of the General\nManager, DOA, or designee.\n4. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, DOA, or designee, to\nprepare Controller’s Instructions for any technical adjustments,\nsubject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer; and,\nAUTHORIZE the Controller to implement the instructions.\nFiscal Impact Statement:\nThe DOA reports that approval of the recommended actions will\nauthorize the acceptance and expenditure of $100,000 in grant funds.\nThere is no impact on the General Fund.
#51 Item
(51)\n26-0371\nCD 7\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final\nmap of Parcel Map L.A. No. 2024-0268, located at 7700 West\nWentworth Street easterly of Mount Gleason Avenue.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the final map of Parcel Map L.A. No. 2024-0268, located\nat 7700 West Wentworth Street easterly of Mount Gleason Avenue\nand accompanying Subdivision Improvement Agreement and\nContract with security documents.\nOwner: Henry Stepanian and Cynthia Stepanian ; Surveyor:\nLawrence J. Schmal\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the\nsubdivider has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final\nparcel map pursuant to Section 19.02(B)(3) of the Los Angeles\nMunicipal Code. No additional City funds are needed.
#52 Item
(52)\n15-0863\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD OF WATER AND POWER\nCOMMISSIONERS relative to Amendment No. 3 and Ratification to\nAgreement No. 47967 with Open Systems International, Inc. for\nsupervisory control and data acquisition systems.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nCONCUR with action of the Board of Water and Power\nCommissioners of January 27, 2026, Resolution No. 026-147,\napproving Amendment No. 3 and Ratification to Agreement No.\n47967 with Open Systems International, Inc.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO)\nreports that there is no impact on the City’s General Fund. The\nproposed Resolution and Third Amendment to Agreement No. 47967\nis to extend the term only and does not change the not-to-exceed\ncontract authority of $49,435,367. Approval of the proposed Third\nAmendment to the Agreement is budgeted in the Department of Water\nand Power (DWP) Power Revenue Fund. The recommendations in\nthe CAO report dated December 5, 2026, attached to the Council file,\ncomply with the DWP adopted Financial Policies.
#53 Item
(53)\n20-1626\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD OF WATER AND POWER\nCOMMISSIONERS relative to the Third Amendment to a Lease with\nNev De Soto, LLC for Call Center Operations at 9332 De Soto Avenue,\nChatsworth, California, 91311.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nCONCUR with action of the Board of Water and Power\nCommissioners of February 24, 2026, Resolution No. 026-164,\napproving the Third Amendment to a Lease with Nev De Soto, LLC\nfor Call Center Operations at 9332 De Soto Avenue, Chatsworth,\nCalifornia, 91311.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO)\nreports that approval of the proposed lease agreement for\nsupplemental call center operations at 9332 De Soto Avenue,\nChatsworth, California, will not have an impact on the City's General\nFund. The total estimated base rent cost over the 10-year term is\n$4,632,399, including common area expenses and annual automatic\nrent rate adjustments of 3.5 percent. All lease payments and common\narea expenses are budgeted within and funded from the Department\nof Water and Power (DWP) Power Revenue Fund. The\nrecommendations stated in the CAO report dated October 21, 2025.\nattached to the Council file, comply with the DWP adopted Financial\nPolicies.
#54 Item
(54)\n26-0316\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER\n(CAO) relative to the Letter of Agreement (LOA) with Mattress\nRecycling Council California, LLC (MRC) for detailed coordination and\nfacilitation of the efficient consolidation of mattresses from designated\nCity solid waste facilities.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAUTHORIZE the Board of Public Works, on behalf of the Bureau of\nSanitation, to execute the LOA with MRC for detailed coordination\nand facilitation of the efficient consolidation of mattresses from\ndesignated City solid waste facilities and compensation to the City in\ncompliance with the Used Mattress Collection Compensation\nProgram, and pursuant to the Used Mattress Recovery and Recycling\nAct (SB 254), subject to approval by the City Attorney and compliance\nwith the City’s contracting requirements; the term is retroactive to July\n1, 2025 through June 30, 2040 with anticipated compensation /\nrevenue amount to the City of $2,628,153.76 for the 15-year term of\nwhich $131,643.49 is anticipated in the first year.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no impact on\nthe General Fund. This LOA generates revenues. Approval of the\nabove recommendation will result in compensation to the City\ncurrently estimated at $2,628,153.76 for the 15-year term of which\n$131,643.49 is anticipated for 2025-26. These monies are to be\ndeposited to the Solid Waste Resources Revenue Fund, Fund No.\n508/50, Departmental Revenue Source Code 518801, Miscellaneous\nRevenues – Others.\nFinancial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the above\nrecommendation complies with the City’s Financial Policies in that\nfinancial obligations are limited to appropriated and available funds,\nand that special funds are used to fund applicable expenditures and\nare limited to the mandates of the funding source.
#55 Item
(55)\n99-0005-S12\nCD 9\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 237 East 30th Street (Case No. 849866), Assessor I.D. No.\n5128-004-028, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated March 17, 2026,\nattached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 237 East 30th Street(Case\nNo. 849866), Assessor I.D. No. 5128-004-028 from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.
#56 Item
(56)\n26-0005-S23\nCD 11\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 1233 South Westgate Avenue (Case No. 843872),\nAssessor I.D. No. 4263-007-244, from the Rent Escrow Account\nProgram (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated March 17, 2026,\nattached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 1233 South Westgate\nAvenue (Case No. 843872), Assessor I.D. No. 4263-007-244 from the\nREAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.
#57 Item
(57)\n26-0005-S38\nCD 13\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 4233 West Burns Avenue (Case No. 794624), Assessor\nI.D. No. 5539-007-022, from the Rent Escrow Account Program\n(REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated March 17, 2026,\nattached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 4233 West Burns\nAvenue (Case No. 794624), Assessor I.D. No. 5539-007-022 from the\nREAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.
#58 Item
(58)\n26-0005-S39\nCD 8\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 812 West 82nd Street (Case No. 898667), Assessor I.D.\nNo. 6032-007-002, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated March 17, 2026,\nattached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 812 West 82nd Street (Case\nNo. 898667), Assessor I.D. No. 6032-007-002 from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.
#59 Item
(59)\n26-0005-S40\nCD 9\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 863 East 51st Street (Case No. 878035), Assessor I.D. No.\n5108-014-026, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated March 17, 2026,\nattached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 863 East 51st Street (Case\nNo. 878035), Assessor I.D. No. 5108-014-026 from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.
#6 Item
(6)\n26-0008-S4\nCD 3\nTRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT relative to establishing\noversize vehicle parking restrictions along certain street segments of\nMartha Street, Winnetka Avenue, Mason Avenue, Hart Street,\nSherman Way, and others, in Council District Three (CD 3).\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution\n(Blumenfield – Padilla):\nRESOLVE to:\n1. PROHIBIT, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nSection 80.69.4, the parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22\nfeet in length or over seven (7) feet in height, during the hours\nof 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m., along the south side of Martha\nStreet between Corbin Avenue and Winnetka Avenue, and\nalong both sides of the following street segments:\na. Winnetka Avenue between Keswick Street and Victory\nBoulevard.\nb. Mason Avenue between Roscoe Boulevard and Vanowen\nStreet.\nc. Heart Street between De Soto Avenue and Gazette\nAvenue.\nd. Sherman Way between Mason Avenue and Corbin\nAvenue.\ne. Corbin Avenue between Saticoy Street and Victory\nBoulevard.\nf. Owensmouth Avenue between the cul-de-sac and\nBurbank Boulevard.\ng. Ponce Avenue between Victory Boulevard and Friar\nStreet.\nh. Friar Street between the cul-de-sac and Ponce Avenue.\ni. Vassar Avenue between Oxnard Street and Califa Street.\nj. Winnetka Avenue between Victory Boulevard and Brahma\nDrive.\nk. Wilbur Avenue between Strathem Street and Saticoy\nStreet.\nl. Corbin Avenue between Martha Street and Ventura\nBoulevard.\nm. Lindley Avenue between Burbank Boulevard and Killion\nStreet.\nn. Wilbur Avenue, between Martha Street and Philliprimm\nStreet.\n2. DIRECT the Department of Transportation (DOT), upon\nadoption of this Resolution, to post signs giving notice of a “tow\naway, no parking” restriction for oversize vehicles, with the\nspecific hours detailed, at the above locations.\n3. AUTHORIZE the DOT to make technical corrections or\nclarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the\nintent of this Resolution.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.
#60 Item
(60)\n26-0005-S41\nCD 8\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 233 East 105th Street (Case No. 654666), Assessor I.D.\nNo. 6063-018-021, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated March 17, 2026,\nattached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 233 East 105th Street (Case\nNo. 654666), Assessor I.D. No. 6063-018-021 from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.
#61 Item
(61)\n26-0005-S42\nCD 11\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 402 East Brooks Avenue (Case No. 887663), Assessor I.D.\nNo. 4239-010-022, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated March 17, 2026,\nattached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 402 East Brooks Avenue\n(Case No. 887663), Assessor I.D. No. 4239-010-022 from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.
#62 Item
(62)\n26-0005-S43\nCD 11\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 12726 West Caswell Avenue (Case No. 863442), Assessor\nI.D. No. 4236-019-007, from the Rent Escrow Account Program\n(REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated March 17, 2026,\nattached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 12726 West Caswell Avenue\n(Case No. 863442), Assessor I.D. No. 4236-019-007 from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.
#63 Item
(63)\n26-0005-S44\nCD 5\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 833 North Poinsettia Place (Case No. 877499), Assessor\nI.D. No. 5526-007-023, from the Rent Escrow Account Program\n(REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated March 17, 2026,\nattached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 833 North Poinsettia\nPlace (Case No. 877499), Assessor I.D. No. 5526-007-023 from the\nREAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.
#64 Item
(64)\n26-0005-S45\nCD 5\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 3670 South Greenfield Avenue (Case No. 771835),\nAssessor I.D. No. 4252-018-019, from the Rent Escrow Account\nProgram (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated March 17, 2026,\nattached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 3670 South Greenfield\nAvenue (Case No. 771835), Assessor I.D. No. 4252-018-019 from the\nREAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.
#65 Item
(65)\n26-0005-S46\nCD 8\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 1702 West Leighton Avenue (Case No. 856615), Assessor\nI.D. No. 5035-010-001, from the Rent Escrow Account Program\n(REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated March 17, 2026,\nattached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 1702 West Leighton\nAvenue (Case No. 856615), Assessor I.D. No. 5035-010-001 from the\nREAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.
#66 Item
(66)\n26-0005-S47\nCD 5\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 1417 South Crest Drive (Case No. 877197), Assessor I.D.\nNo. 4305-007-005, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated March 17, 2026,\nattached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 1417 South Crest\nDrive (Case No. 877197), Assessor I.D. No. 4305-007-005 from the\nREAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.
#67 Item
(67)\n26-0005-S48\nCD 9\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 202 West 65th Street (Case No. 866597), Assessor I.D.\nNo. 6012-001-018, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated March 17, 2026,\nattached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 202 West 65th Street (Case\nNo. 866597), Assessor I.D. No. 6012-001-018 from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.
#68 Item
(68)\n26-1100-S6\nCONSIDERATION OF THE SIMPLIFIED BALLOT SUMMARY\n“DIGEST” prepared by the Ballot Simplification Committee pursuant to\nthe Los Angeles Election Code Section 405 for the three proposed\nmeasures appearing on the June 2, 2026, Primary Election ballot.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the SIMPLIFIED DIGEST prepared by the Ballot\nSimplification Committee for three proposed ballot measures\nappearing on the June 2, 2026, Primary Election ballot, pursuant to\nLos Angeles Election Code Section 405:\nAPPLYING CANNABIS BUSINESS TAXES TO UNLICENSED\nCANNABIS BUSINESSES – PROPOSITION\nAPPLYING TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX TO ONLINE TRAVEL\nCOMPANIES – PROPOSITION\nFUNDING FOR CITY SERVICES THROUGH MODIFICATIONS TO\nTHE TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX – PROPOSITION
#69 Item
(69)\n21-1188-S13\nCOMMUNICATION FROM CITY ATTORNEY relative to proposed\namendments to Contract Nos. C-140018 and C-139942 with Beveridge\n& Diamond PC for legal services related to the July 11, 2021 flooding\nincident at the Hyperion Reclamation Plant, in the cases entitled\nMecklenburg v. Hyperion Water Reclamation Plant; Abdelnur v. City of\nLos Angeles; and, Konig v. City of Los Angeles.\n[The City Council may recess to Closed Session pursuant to\nGovernment Code Sections 54956.9(d)(1), (d)(2), and (e)(1), to\nconfer with its legal counsel to discuss the need for term\nextensions and additional funding for the outside counsel\ncontracts relative to significant exposure to litigation, including\nthe pending personal injury litigation case entitled Mecklenburg\nv. Hyperion Water Reclamation Plant, Los Angeles Superior\nCourt (LASC) Case No. 21STCV28114; mass tort litigation case\nentitled Abdelnur v. City of Los Angeles, LASC Case No.\n22STCV00153; and, Konig v. City of Los Angeles, LASC Case No.\n22STCV00970. (These cases arise from regulatory enforcement,\ncivil, and administrative matters that pertain to the July 11, 2021\nflooding incident at the Bureau of Sanitation’s Hyperion Water\nReclamation Plant.)]
#7 Item
(7)\n26-0008-S5\nCD 12\nTRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT relative to establishing\noversize vehicle parking restrictions along certain street segments of\nCanby Avenue, Devonshire Street, and Hartland Street, in Council\nDistrict Twelve.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Lee –\nPadilla):\nRESOLVE to:\n1. PROHIBIT, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nSection 80.69.4, the parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22\nfeet in length or over 84 inches in height, during the hours of\n2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m., along the following street segments:\na. West side of Canby Avenue from Chase Street to the cul-\nde-sac.\nb. Both sides of Devonshire Street from Jordan Avenue to\nTopanga Canyon.\nc. Both sides of Hartland Street from Melba Avenue to\nBerquist Avenue.\n2. DIRECT the Department of Transportation (DOT), upon\nadoption of this Resolution, to post signs giving notice of a “tow\naway, no parking” restriction for oversize vehicles, with the\nspecific hours detailed.\n3. AUTHORIZE the DOT to make technical corrections or\nclarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the\nintent of this Resolution.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.
#70 Item
(70)\n21-1240\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to national settlements with Remnant Defendants in\nthe case entitled City of Los Angeles v. Purdue Pharma, L.P., et\nal., Case No. 1:18-OP-45601-DAP [This matter involves national\nsettlements with a group of defendants known as the “Remnant\nDefendants”. The Remnant Defendants are Associated Pharmacies,\nInc., American Associated Pharmacies, J M Smith Corporation,\nLouisiana Wholesale Drug Company, Inc., Morris & Dickson Co., North\nCarolina Mutual Wholesale Drug Company, Inc., United Natural Foods,\nInc. (including without limitation its direct and indirect subsidiaries\nSuperValu, Inc., Advantage Logistics Southwest, Inc., Advantage\nLogistics USA West, L.L.C., Advantage Logistics USA East, L.L.C., and\nUNFI Distribution Company, LLC) collectively, and all their past and\npresent subsidiaries (excluding, in the case of United Natural Foods,\nInc., New Albertsons, Inc., a former subsidiary of SuperValu, Inc.),\ndivisions, predecessors, successors, and assigns (in each case,\nwhether direct or indirect). ]\n(The Budget and Finance Committee will consider the above\nmatter on March 23, 2026.)
#8 Item
(8)\n25-0600-S76\nCIVIL RIGHTS, EQUITY, IMMIGRATION, AGING, AND DISABILITY\nREPORT relative to the resources needed, including staffing and other\nexpenses, to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)\nregulations and requirements for large scale events, including the 2026\nWorld Cup and the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games, and whether\nthese expenses could be reimbursed by the LA2028 Agreement in\nresponse to the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Recommendation.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO), in\ncoordination with Department on Disability (DOD), to:\na. Identify $66,107 for one Senior Management Analyst (with\nsix-month authority) and $140,000 for Contractual\nServices.\nb. Report on all City costs, including DOD’s accessibility\nservices, that will be reimbursable by LA28, once the\nEnhanced City Resources Master Agreement has been\nfinalized.\n2. DIRECT all City departments with major events-related\nresponsibilities to report to the Office of Major Events on how\nthey are accounting for and integrating the costs of Americans\nwith Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance into their work; and any\nresources, including staff and other expenses, that are needed\nto comply with ADA regulations and requirements.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The DOD reports that there will be an initial\nGeneral Fund impact to providing these resources in preparation for\nupcoming major events, including the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic\nGames. DOD is exploring potential funding offsets for Games related\nposition authorities, but does not anticipate the availability of special\nfunds for contractual service or other costs. However, it is DOD’s\ncontention that providing funding for DOD’s major events related work\nultimately will decrease the City’s risk of non-compliance. Doing so\nwill save hundreds of thousands to hundreds of millions of dollars\nduring the Games and beyond that would otherwise be expended on\nlitigation costs, including settlements and judgments for\nnoncompliance.
#9 Item
(9)\n26-0069\nCIVIL RIGHTS, EQUITY, IMMIGRATION, AGING, AND DISABILITY\nand ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEES’\nREPORT relative to providing short-term targeted assistance, including\nfinancial support to small businesses negatively impacted by recent\nImmigration and Customs Enforcement actions and directing various\ndepartments report on associated economic impacts of reduced\nconsumer activity.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Rodriguez -\nJurado):\nDIRECT the Community Investment for Families Department (CIFD)\nand the Economic Workforce and Development Department (EWDD),\nwith the assistance of the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA) and the City\nAdministrative Officer (CAO), to:\na. Report to Council within 30 days on providing short-term\ntargeted assistance, including financial support to small\nbusinesses negatively impacted by recent ICE actions.\nb. Report to Council within 60 days on the economic impacts of\nreduced consumer activity associated with these actions,\nincluding effects on small business revenue, employment, and\nneighborhood-level economic activity; and a strategic economic\ndevelopment plan to support affected commercial corridors,\nrestore consumer confidence, and help small businesses\nrecover and remain resilient.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.

Public Works

#1 Item
(1)\n25-1142\nBureau of Engineering report relative to Pedestrian Facility Inventory\nand Condition Assessment Pilot Project, the Pedestrian Facility\nDamage Severity Matrix, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self\nEvaluation and Transition Plan for Public Right of Way, and related\nmatters.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes
#10 Item
(10)\n25-1101\nCD 9\nMotion (Price – Park) relative to temporarily closing the alley south of\nWest 62nd Street and north of West Gage Avenue between Figueroa\nStreet and Flower Street, with the southern portion of the alley to\nremain open to ensure all adjacent properties remain accessible.
#11 Item
(11)\n26-0344\nCD 1\nMotion (Hernandez – Rodriguez) relative to designating the\nintersection of Avenue 26 and North San Fernando Road by the Los\nAngeles River Center as “Senator Richard Polanco Square."
#12 Item
(12)\n24-1400\nCD 5\nCity Engineer reports relative to the vacation of a portion of the north\nside of National Boulevard approximately 100 feet west of Clarington\nAvenue (VAC- E1401459).\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes
#13 Item
(13)\n26-0329\nCD 4\nMotion (Raman – Soto-Martínez) relative to designating the\nintersection at Ventura Boulevard and Berry Drive in Studio City as “Oil\nCan Harry’s Square."
#14 Item
(14)\n26-0271\nCD 8\nMotion (Harris-Dawson – Hernandez) relative to recommendations to\ntemporarily closing four alleys in the area of Gramercy Place and Van\nNess Avenue.
#15 Item
(15)\n26-0374\nCD 4\nMotion (Rodriguez, Raman – Hernandez) relative to designating the\nintersection of Ventura Boulevard and Fulton Avenue as "Rafael 'Ray'\nVega Square."
#2 Item
(2)\n26-0268\nBoard of Public Works report relative to the Request for Qualifications\n(RFQ) to establish a pre-qualified list of contractors for urgent\nnecessity design/build repairs of pedestrian facilities for the City.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes
#3 Item
(3)\n20-1074-S6\nJoint report from Bureau of Engineering, Bureau of Sanitation,\nDepartment of Transportation, Department of Building and Safety, and\nEconomic and Workforce Development Department relative\nto addressing the lack of enrollment in the permanent L.A. Al Fresco\nprogram. (This item is referred to Economic Development and\nJobs Committee and Public Works Committee.)\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes
#4 Item
(4)\n26-0162\nMotion (Padilla – Rodriguez) relative to issues with the MyLA311\nsystem. (Referred to the Government Operations Committee and\nPublic Works Committee)
#5 Item
(5)\n18-0191\nCD 14\nMotion (Jurado – McOsker) relative to re-initiating the street vacation\nproceedings for Banning Street, Jackson Street, and Ducommun\nStreet from Center Street to their respective easterly terminuses.
#6 Item
(6)\n26-0202\nCD 9\nMotion (Price - Hutt) relative to designating the intersection at 49th\nStreet and Avalon Boulevard as “Bishop Kenneth Little Square."
#7 Item
(7)\n17-0638\nCD 9\nMotion (Price - Harris-Dawson) relative to designating the intersection\nof East 4th Street and McKinley Avenue as “Victory Baptist Church\nSquare."\n(Scheduled pursuant to Council Action of January 20, 2026)
#8 Item
(8)\n23-0555\nCD 9\nBureau of Engineering report relative to the temporary closure of an\nalley southerly of Manchester Avenue between Avalon Boulevard and\nMcKinley Place.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes
#9 Item
(9)\n26-0197\nCD 9\nMotion (Price – Hernandez) relative to temporarily closing the alley\nadjacent to 1900 South Main Street, located between East Washington\nBoulevard and East 21st Street.

Transportation Committee

#1 Item
(1)\n19-0131-S2\nCD 1\nMotion (Hernandez – Nazarian) relative to the electric vehicle (EV)\ncarsharing pilot program operated by BlueLA / Blink Mobility.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted.
#10 Item
(10)\nPresentation by the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority\n(Metro) Ad Hoc Board Composition Committee on its review of the\nstructure, size, and composition of the Metro Board in light of Measure\nG's passage and the governing framework set forth in the State Public\nUtilities Code. (Joint item for the Public Works Committee and\nTransportation Committee.)
#11 Item
(11)\nDOT General Manager and staff verbal report relative to an update on\nthe status of the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games Transportation\nPlan.
#2 Item
(2)\n25-0606\nCD 10\nCity Attorney report and draft ordinance relative to establishing a\nParking Meter Zone on West Adams Boulevard, between La Brea\nAvenue and Hauser Boulevard.
#3 Item
(3)\n25-0668\nCDs 2, 6, 12\nDepartment of Transportation (DOT) report relative to current safety\nmeasures at each highway-rail grade crossing and establishing a quiet\nzone in the City of Los Angeles portion of the Ventura Subdivision.
#4 Item
(4)\n25-0894\nCity Attorney report and draft ordinance relative to dissolving the Major\nTransit and Transportation Construction Traffic Management\nCommittee.
#5 Item
(5)\n25-0919\nCD 6\nDOT report relative to access improvements to the Sun Valley\nMetrolink parking lot and station platform.
#6 Item
(6)\n26-0345\nCD 14\nMotion (Jurado – Hutt) relative to traffic control mechanisms that can\nbe implemented to deter street takeovers in Downtown Los Angeles.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted.
#7 Item
(7)\n26-0381\nMotion (Hutt – Soto-Martinez) relative to installing a bike lane as part\nof the Vermont Transit Corridor project required under Measure HLA.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted.
#8 Item
(8)\n26-0008-S6\nCD 11\nResolution (Park – Hutt) relative to establishing oversize vehicle\nparking restrictions along certain street segments of West 81st Street,\nWest Manchester Avenue, Beloit Avenue, and Venice Boulevard, in\nCouncil District Eleven.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted.
#9 Item
(9)\n26-0380\nMotion (Hutt – McOsker) relative to current Parking Enforcement and\nTraffic Control staff available for deployment throughout the City.\n(Referred to Budget and Finance Committee and Transportation\nCommittee.)\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted.