Los Angeles — 2026-02-17

(1)\n25-1474\nMotion (Rodriguez – Blumenfield) relative to the feasibility and fiscal\nimpact of raising the small business exemption threshold, and\nbusiness tax practices of other cities.

(10)\n26-0189\nCity Administrative Officer report relative to a proposed contract with\nFAST Enterprises, LLC for integrated tax solution and associated\nimplementation services.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nFinancial Policies Statement: Yes

(11)\n26-0176\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Movses Sisoyan v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25VECV02580.\n(This matter arises from a vehicle versus vehicle traffic accident on\nNovember 13, 2024, at the intersection of Hayvenhurst Avenue and\nNordhoff Street, in North Hills, California.)

(12)\n26-0177\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the cases entitled Richard Guzman, et al. v. City of\nLos Angeles, United States District Court (USDC) Case No. 2:23-cv-\n08689-FLA-Ex; and Margret Hill, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, USDC\nCase No. 2:24-cv-03484-FLA-Ex. (This matter arises from claims by\nformer employees of the Los Angeles Police Department that the City\nfailed to timely pay their banked compensatory time at the termination\nof their employment in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.)

(13)\n26-0178\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Maria Guadalupe Ramirez v. City\nof Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.\n23STCV18398. (This matter arises from a trip and fall incident that\noccurred on September 3, 2022, near 243 East 52nd Street, in the City\nof Los Angeles.)

(14)\n26-0179\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Yolanda White v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV06414.\n(This matter arises from a September 15, 2021, incident involving a trip\nand fall located at 3711 Beethoven Street, in the City of Los Angeles.)

(15)\n26-0180\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Hilda Combs v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV32710.\n(This matter arises from an incident on March 30, 2022, located at\nNorth Grand Avenue and Temple Street, where the incident occurred.)

(16)\n26-0036\nThe Committee shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(4), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Golden Entropy Inc. (This matter\narises from a Business License Tax assessment.)\nSUPPORTING MATERIALS\nMaterials relating to items on the agenda are available on the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System found at\nhttps://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect by entering the Council File number (e.g., 00-0000) associated with the agenda item.\nPUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS\nMembers of the public who wish to speak on one or multiple items shall have an opportunity to speak up to one minute per item up\nto a total of two minutes for two or more agenda items. At regular meetings, members of the public shall also have an opportunity to\nspeak up to one minute for general public comment on any matter within the subject-matter jurisdiction of the Committee. The\nCommittee is not required to take general public comment at special meetings. The Committee may limit the total amount of time for\npublic comment on any specific agenda item, on all agenda-items collectively, and/or on general public comment, based on the\nanticipated time required to hear from public speakers on any given or all agenda items, on the availability of Committee members\nand the need to maintain quorum, and on any other relevant factor. The Committee shall not discuss or take action relative to any\ngeneral public comment except as explicitly permitted under the Brown Act.\nCOMMITTEE INFORMATION, ASSIGNMENTS, AND STRUCTURE\nhttps://clerk.lacity.gov/clerk-services/cps/council-committee-meetings/info-assignments-structure\nSPECIAL ACCOMMODATION\nRequests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with\nDisabilities Act, can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978-1133. For Telecommunications Relay Service for the\nhearing impaired, please see the information below.\nNOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES\nIf a member of the public is compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require them to register as a\nlobbyist and report this activity. More information can be found at Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. or at\nethics.lacity.org/lobbying. Further assistance can be found by contacting the Ethics Commission at (213) 978-1960 or\nethics.commission@lacity.org.\nEXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES\nA member of the public seeking to challenge a City action in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public\nhearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk prior to the public hearing in time reasonably\nto be considered by the Committee members. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final\naction on a matter will become a part of the administrative record.\nTELECOMMUNICATIONS RELAY SERVICE (TRS) COMMUNICATIONS\nTelephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in\ntechnology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, and\nindividuals with a speech disability, may be able to avail themselves of both for peer-to-peer and third-party telecommunications\nrelay service (TRS) communications. Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or\nspeech disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and\nthe U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers - generally telephone companies - are compensated for the\ncosts of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user.\nWhat forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the equipment\navailable: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY-Based TRS; Speech-to-Speech Relay Service; Shared Non-English Language Relay\nService; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for\ndetail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs.\nDon't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the caller is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello, this is the\nrelay service…" when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who\nis deaf, hard-of-hearing, or has a speech disability.\nFor more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the\nFCC's Disability Rights Office website.

(2)\n26-0131\nMotion (Lee – Yaroslavsky) relative to a transfer of funds to address\nshortfalls in various Los Angeles Fire Department sworn and civilian\nsalary accounts.

(3)\n20-0021-S2\nCity Administrative Officer and Mayor reports relative to the\nacceptance of a grant award from the California Board of State and\nCommunity Corrections for implementation of the Cohort 5 Proposition\n47 Pathways to Healing and Recovery Program. (This   item   is\nreferred to the Economic Development and Jobs Committee and\nthe Budget and Finance Committee. The Economic Development\nand Jobs Committee approved the item on February 3, 2026.)\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nFinancial Policies Statement: Yes

(4)\n25-1431\nCity Administrative Officer report relative to actual cost information for\nthe General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026-A (Taxable) (Social Bonds),\nissued to fund Proposition HHH projects.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nFinancial Policies Statement: Yes\nDebt Impact Statement: Yes

(5)\n26-0055\nBoard of Recreation and Park Commissioners report relative to\nauthorizing the Department of Recreation and Parks to submit a two-\nyear grant application and accept the Kaiser Permanente Operation\nSplash Program grant for 2026 and 2027, if awarded, to support\naquatic programming. (This   item   is   referred   to   the  Arts,   Parks,\nLibraries, and Community Enrichment Committee and Budget and\nFinance Committee. The Arts, Parks, Libraries, and Community\nEnrichment Committee approved the item on January 27, 2026.)\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(6)\n25-0600-S125\nOffice of Finance report relative to the implementation of a business\ntax amnesty program for cannabis businesses. (This item is referred\nto   the   Government   Operations   Committee   and   Budget   and\nFinance   Committee.   The   Government   Operations   Committe\napproved the item as amended on February 3, 2026.)\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(7)\n08-3292-S1\nCD 6\nCity Clerk report relative to the escheatment of idle funds in the\nPanorama City Business Improvement District, Fund No. 51D.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(8)\n21-1188-S12\nCity Attorney report relative to a proposed amendment to Contract No.\nC-144882 with Kendall Brill & Kelly, LLP to increase the contract ceiling\nfor legal services related to the July 11, 2021 sewage discharge\nincident at the Hyperion Water Reclamation Plant.\n[The   Committee   may   recess   to   Closed   Session,   pursuant   to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) and (e)(2), to confer with\nits legal counsel to discuss the need for additional funding for\nrepresentation   regarding   exposure   to   litigation   in   the   above-\nentitled matter.]\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(9)\n18-0916-S1\nCD 5\nCity Attorney report relative to a request for payment of costs of suit,\npursuant to the ruling in the case entitled Friends of Westwanda Drive\nv. City of Los Angeles et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case\nNo. 20STCP03490. (This matter is regarding a challenge of building\npermits issued for a single-family home construction project located at\n10034 Westwanda Drive.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(1)\n25-0095\nCD 11\nENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR), MITIGATION\nMONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (MMRP), STATEMENT\nOF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, and CITY ENGINEER\nREPORT relative to the vacation of 96th Street between Sepulveda\nBoulevard and Jetway Boulevard, Vicksburg Avenue between 98th\nStreet and 96th Street, and a portion of the easterly side of Sepulveda\nBoulevard from approximately 150 feet southerly of 96th Street to\napproximately 575 feet northerly thereof, VAC- E1401456, (Project).\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. ACKNOWLEDGE that the vacation of the areas shown colored\norange on Exhibit B of the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) report\ndated December 22, 2025, attached to the Council file, are no\nlonger part of the request. These areas were withdrawn from\nthe request by the applicant in their letter dated August 21, 2025\n(Transmittal No. 7 of said BOE report).\n2. REVIEW and CONSIDER the Los Angeles International Airport\n(LAX) Airfield and Terminal Modernization Project (ATMP) EIR\n(consisting of the Draft and Final EIR), dated October 2020 and\nAugust 2021 (Transmittal No. 1 of said BOE report), and\nAddendum to the ATMP EIR, dated December 2024 (State\nClearinghouse No. 2019049020) (Transmittal No. 2 of said BOE\nreport), which was prepared by Los Angeles World Airports\n(LAWA) in compliance with the California Environmental Quality\nAct (CEQA).\n3. FIND under CEQA Guidelines Section No. 15091, that changes\nor alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the\nProject that mitigate or avoid significant effects on the\nenvironment as identified in the Final EIR and the ATMP MMRP\n(Transmittal No. 3 of said BOE report), dated August 2021, and\nas set forth in the CEQA Review Memo, dated September 25,\n2025 (Transmittal No. 4 of said BOE report). A Copy of Notice of\nDetermination (Transmittal No. 5 of said BOE report) which\ndocuments LAWA’s certification of the ATMP EIR and adoption\nof the ATMP MMRP is attached and incorporated herein.\n4. CONCUR with the Board of Airport Commissioners’ findings that\nthe unavoidable significant adverse impacts associated with the\nproposed Project are acceptable in light of the economic, legal,\nsocial, technological, and other benefits the proposed Project\nwill bring to the surrounding community and LAWA. These\nspecific overriding considerations are described in the\nStatement of Overriding Considerations for the LAX ATMP,\ndated September 2021 (Transmittal No. 6 of said BOE report),\nand is attached and incorporated herein.\n5. FIND that no new information exists to show that the Project or\ncircumstances of the Project have been changed to require\nadditional environmental review, under the California Public\nResources Code, Section No. 21166, and State CEQA\nGuidelines Section No. 15162, and therefore the existing\nenvironmental documents adequately describe the potential\nimpacts for this street vacation.\n6. FIND that street vacation proceedings pursuant to the Public\nStreets, Highways and Service Easements Vacation Law be\ninstituted for the vacation of the public right-of-way indicated in\nsaid BOE report and shown colored blue on the attached\nExhibit B of said BOE report:\n96th Street between Sepulveda Boulevard and Jetway\nBoulevard, Vicksburg Avenue between 98th Street and 96th\nStreet, and a portion of the easterly side of Sepulveda\nBoulevard from approximately 150-feet southerly of 96th Street\nto approximately 575-feet northerly thereof\n7. FIND that there is a public benefit to this Project. Upon vacation\nof the street, the City is relieved of its ongoing obligation to\nmaintain the street. In addition, the City is relieved of any\npotential liability that might result from continued ownership of\nthe involved street easements.\n8. FIND that, in conformance with Section 556 of the City Charter,\nthe vacation is in substantial conformance with the purposes,\nintent and provisions of the General Plan.\n9. FIND that, in conformance with Section 892 of the California\nStreets and Highways Code, the vacation area is not necessary\nfor non-motorized transportation facilities.\n10. FIND that, in conformance with Section 8324 of the California\nStreets and Highways Code, the vacation area is not necessary\nfor present or prospective public use.\n11. ADOPT said BOE report with the conditions contained therein.\n12. AUTHORIZE the BOE to issue a revocable permit to the\npetitioner of this vacation request, or its representative, subject\nto satisfaction of the conditions for issuing such permit, to close,\nfence, occupy, demolish, excavate, grade, and construct in the\npublic right-of-way of 96th Street between Sepulveda Boulevard\nand Jetway Boulevard, Vicksburg Avenue between 98th Street\nand 96th Street, and a Portion of the Easterly side of Sepulveda\nBoulevard from approximately 150-feet southerly of 96th Street\nto approximately 575-feet northerly thereof within the\nconditionally approved vacation area, prior to finalizing and\nrecording the street vacation of a portion of this street.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the petitioner\nhas paid a fee of $47,080 for the investigation of this request pursuant\nto Section 7.42 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC). Any\ndeficit fee to recover the cost pursuant to Section 7.44 of the LAAC\nwill be required of the petitioner. Maintenance of the public easement\nby City forces will be eliminated.

(10)\n26-0072\nCD 14\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT\nAND ORDINANCE OF INTENTION FIRST CONSIDERATION relative\nto renewing the Downtown Industrial District BID, Property Based, for a\nproposed seven-year term beginning January 1, 2027 and ending\nDecember 31, 2033.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE OF\nINTENTION, dated January 20, 2026, to establish a Property\nand BID to be known as the Downtown Industrial District BID,\npursuant to the Provisions of the Property and BID Law of 1994\n(Division 18, Part 7, Streets and Highways Code, State of\nCalifornia) and to levy assessments.\n2. APPROVE Recommendation Nos. 1 through 17 contained in\nthe Revised City Clerk report dated January 23, 2026, attached\nto Council file No. 26-0072, relative to the Downtown Industrial\nDistrict BID, Property Based, for a proposed seven-year term.\n3. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of the City\nClerk, to prepare an enabling Ordinance establishing the\nDowntown Industrial District BID for City Council consideration\nat the conclusion of the required public hearing.\n4. NOTE and FILE the City Clerk report dated January 13, 2026,\nattached to the Council file.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that the assessment\nlevied on the City-owned property within the District to be paid from\nthe General Fund total $16,929.76 for the first year of the District.\nFunding is available in the Business Improvement District Trust Fund\n659 to pay the General Fund share of the assessment for the first\noperating year. Proposition 218 requires the separation of general\nbenefits from the special benefits. The general benefit portion for the\nDowntown Industrial District Business Improvement District is\n$128,636.60 for the first year. However, funds other than assessment\nrevenue must be budgeted annually for the general benefit expense\nfor the remaining years of the BID's seven-year term. Funding is\navailable in the Business Improvement District Trust Fund 659 to pay\nthe General Fund share of the assessment for the first operating year.

(11)\n25-1198-S1\nCD 15\nPREVIOUSLY ADOPTED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, NO. ENV-2022-\n6860-ND, and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT\nCOMMITTEE REPORT relative to an appeal for the properties located\nat 1420 and 1500 North Coil Avenue; and 1532, 1540, and 1542 North\nAlameda Street.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. FIND, after consideration of the whole of the\nadministrative record, the project was assessed in\nNegative Declaration No. ENV-2022-6860-ND, adopted on\nDecember 10, 2025, and pursuant to California\nEnvironmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15162, no\nsupplemental or subsequent Environmental Impact Report\nor negative declaration is necessary.\n2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning\nCommission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council.\n3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by Coalition for\nResponsible Equitable Economic Development Los\nAngeles (CREED LA) (Representative: Andrew Graf,\nAdams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo), and THEREBY\nSUSTAIN the LACPC’s determination in approving,\npursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section\n12.24 X.22, a Zoning Administrator Determination to allow\nTransitional Height of 65 feet within a distance of 100 to\n199 feet from the R1 zone, in lieu of the Transitional\nHeight of 61 feet otherwise allowed by LAMC\n12.21.1.A.10; for the improvement and expansion of an\nexisting one-story, 42-foot tall, 221,496 square-foot cold\nstorage facility, resulting in a two-story, 65-foot tall,\n267,960 square foot facility, with a total 0.36:1 Floor Area\nRatio, the expansion includes the demolition of 27,157\nsquare feet of an existing cold dock for a new 71,331\nsquare foot freezer, resulting in a net addition of 44,174\nsquare feet of new floor area, the improvements include\n2,290 square feet of a new engine/mechanical room,\nelectrical room, and fire pump room, the Project also\ninvolves a new automated racking system, other interior\nimprovements, and reducing the length of the existing\ndouble rail spur, the Project will provide 114 parking\nspaces, with no trees to be removed, and the grading of\nless than 500 cubic yards of soil and import of 7,000 cubic\nyards of soil; for the properties located at 1420 and 1500\nNorth Coil Avenue; and 1532, 1540, and 1542 North\nAlameda Street, subject to Conditions of Approval.\nApplicant: Richard Burke, Konoike Pacific Calf Inc.\nRepresentative: John Parker, Pacific Crest Consultants\nCase No. CPC-2022-6859-GPA-HD-ZAD-WDI-1A\nEnvironmental No. ENV-2022-6860-ND\nFiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General\nFund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

(12)\n25-1036\nHOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE REPORT and\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE CHAIR AND MEMBER, ENERGY\nAND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE relative to options on adopting an\nordinance establishing a maximum indoor temperature threshold for\nrental housing units in the City; and related matters.\nRecommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion\n(Hernandez, et al. – Soto-Martinez):\n1. INSTRUCT the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD), the\nDepartment of City Planning (DCP), and the Department of\nBuilding and Safety (DBS), with the assistance of the City\nAttorney, to report in 180 days with options for an ordinance to\nadopt Chapter 11.20 of Title 11 – Health and Safety of the Los\nAngeles County Code to establish a maximum indoor\ntemperature threshold for all rental housing units in the City, and\nto do so with the collaboration of Los Angeles County Agencies.\n2. DIRECT the LAHD, the DCP, and the DBS to facilitate\nstakeholder involvement and feedback in order to receive input\nand recommendations for the report and process in order to\neffectuate the policy.\n3. REQUEST the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power\n(LADWP); and, DIRECT the Los Angeles Housing Department\nto report with recommendations to expand and align incentive\nand efficiency programs that allow renters to access and install\nenergy-efficient air conditioning equipment, including updating\nprevious shared programs such as Gateway-to-Green (G2G).\n4. REQUEST the LADWP to report on existing renewable energy\nand energy-efficiency incentive programs available to apartment\nbuilding owners, with recommendations for expanding support\nfor the installation and long-term maintenance of efficient air\nconditioning equipment, such as by partnering with and\npromoting available local union-run Heating, Ventilation, and Air\nConditioning (HVAC) rebates. The report should also consider\nopportunities to layer incentives for complementary\nimprovements, such as solar generation/storage and "cool\nroofs" on the same site.\n5. REQUEST the LADWP to report with a thorough grid capacity\nanalysis before adoption of an ordinance to avoid unintended\nrisks to the power system.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.

(13)\n21-0005-S40\nCD 13\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 816 North Mansfield Avenue (Case Nos. 819192; 864346),\nAssessor I.D. No. 5524-002-027, from the Rent Escrow Account\nProgram (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated February 6,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 816 North Mansfield Avenue\n(Case Nos. 819192; 864346), Assessor I.D. No.4228-005-023, from\nthe REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(14)\n26-0005-S7\nCD 10\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 1130 South Citrus Avenue (Case No. 570695), Assessor\nI.D. No. 5084-022-027, from the Rent Escrow Account Program\n(REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated February 6,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 1130 South Citrus Avenue\n(Case No. 570695), Assessor I.D. No. 5084-022-027, from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(15)\n26-0005-S8\nCD 10\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 1371 South Keniston Avenue (Case No. 867375), Assessor\nI.D. No. 5083-023-004, from the Rent Escrow Account Program\n(REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated February 6,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 1371 South Keniston Avenue\n(Case No. 867375), Assessor I.D. No. 5083-023-004, from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(16)\n26-0005-S9\nCD 8\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 3632 West 59th Street (Case No. 753059), Assessor I.D.\nNo. 4004-014-010, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated February 6,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 3632 West 59th Street (Case\nNo. 753059), Assessor I.D. No. 4004-014-010, from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(17)\n26-0005-S10\nCD 8\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 3945 South Denker Avenue (Case No. 723275), Assessor\nI.D. No. 5036-023-023, from the Rent Escrow Account Program\n(REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated February 6,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 3945 South Denker Avenue\n(Case No. 723275), Assessor I.D. No. 5036-023-023, from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(18)\n26-0005-S11\nCD 13\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 1651 North Golden Gate Avenue (Case No. 868348),\nAssessor I.D. No. 5429-023-011, from the Rent Escrow Account\nProgram (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated February 6,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 1651 North Golden Gate\nAvenue (Case No. 868348), Assessor I.D. No. 5429-023-011, from\nthe REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(19)\n26-0005-S12\nCD 14\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 1438 West Oak Grove Drive (Case No. 884762; 702035),\nAssessor I.D. Nos. 5480-027-003, from the Rent Escrow Account\nProgram (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated February 6,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 1438 West Oak Grove Drive\n(Case Nos. 884762; 702035), Assessor I.D. No. 5480-027-003, from\nthe REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(2)\n26-0015\nCD 14\nHEARING COMMENTS relative to an Application for Determination of\nPublic Convenience or Necessity for the sale of alcoholic beverages\nfor on-site consumption at 2222 East Damon Street, located at 2222\nDamon.\nApplicant: Craig Block - Block Family Trust\nRepresentative: Brett Engstrom - LiquorLicense.com\nTIME LIMIT FILE - APRIL 6, 2026\n(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - APRIL 3, 2026)\n(Motion required for Findings and Council recommendations for\nthe above application)

(20)\n26-0005-S13\nCD 9\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 1122 East 40th Place (Case No. 872330), Assessor I.D.\nNo. 5114-034-011, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated February 6,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 1122 East 40th Place (Case\nNo. 872330), Assessor I.D. No. 5114-034-011, from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(21)\n26-0005-S14\nCD 8\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 838 West 65th Street (Case No. 730805), Assessor I.D. No.\n6013-012-019, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated February 6,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 838 West 65th Street (Case\nNo. 730805), Assessor I.D. No. 6013-012-019, from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(22)\n26-0005-S15\nCD 11\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 418 East Venice Way (Case No. 878753), Assessor I.D.\nNo. 4238-020-022, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated February 6,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 418 East Venice Way (Case\nNo. 878753), Assessor I.D. No. 4238-020-022, from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(23)\n26-0005-S16\nCD 9\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 341 East 71st Street (Case No. 852667), Assessor I.D. No.\n6011-009-025, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated February 6,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 341 East 71st Street (Case\nNo. 852667), Assessor I.D. No. 6011-009-025, from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(24)\n26-0005-S17\nCD 9\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 325 West 65th Street (Case No. 866834), Assessor I.D.\nNo. 6005-001-005, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated February 6,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 325 West 65th Street (Case\nNo. 866834), Assessor I.D. No. 6005-001-005, from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(25)\n26-0005-S18\nCD 5\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 336 North Spaulding Avenue (Case No. 868395), Assessor\nI.D. No. 5527-041-021, from the Rent Escrow Account Program\n(REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated February 6,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 336 North Spaulding Avenue\n(Case No. 868395), Assessor I.D. No. 5527-041-021, from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(26)\n26-0005-S19\nCD 1\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 130 South Avenue 59 (Case No. 750130), Assessor I.D.\nNo. 5492-011-016, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated February 6,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 130 South Avenue 59 (Case\nNo. 750130), Assessor I.D. No. 5492-011-016, from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(27)\n26-0005-S20\nCD 13\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 210 South Hoover Street (Case No. 836670), Assessor I.D.\nNo. 5155-007-013, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated February 6,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 210 South Hoover Street\n(Case No. 836670), Assessor I.D. No. 5155-007-013, from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(28)\n26-0152\nMOTION (McOSKER - JURADO) relative to funding for services in\nconnection with Council District 15’s special recognition of St. Patrick’s\nDay, including the illumination of City Hall on March 13, 2026.\nRecommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\nTRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $438 from the Mayor’s portion of\nthe Heritage Month Celebration and Special Events line item in the\nGeneral City Purpose Fund No. 100/56 to the General Services Fund\nNo. 100/40, Account No. 001100 (Hiring Hall), for services in\nconnection with Council District 15’s special recognition of St.\nPatrick’s Day, including the illumination of City Hall on March 13,\n2026.

(29)\n26-0153\nCD 4\nMOTION (HUTT for RAMAN - JURADO) relative to funding for street\nlight repairs in Council District 4.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. AUTHORIZE the Director of Accounting, Board of Public Works,\nto transfer and appropriate $185,000 from the Council District 4\nportion of the General City Purpose Fund - Council Projects,\nFund No. 100/56, Account No. 000A28 to the Street Lighting\nFund No. 100/84 for street lighting repairs in Council District 4 in\nthe amounts and to the accounts listed in the Motion, attached\nto the Council file.\n2. AUTHORIZE the Department of Public Works to make any\ncorrections, clarifications or revisions to the above fund transfer\ninstructions, including any new instructions, in order to\neffectuate the intent of this Motion, and including any\ncorrections and changes to fund or account numbers; said\ncorrections / clarifications / changes may be made orally,\nelectronically or by any other means.

(3)\n21-0215-S1\nCD 14\nMOTION (JUARDO - BLUMENFIELD) and RESOLUTION relative to\nissuing bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed\n$30,572,770 for the purpose of financing, refinancing, and/or\nreimbursing the cost of acquisition, construction, improvement and\nequipping of certain educational facilities 97-unit multifamily housing\ndevelopment located at 3016 North Main Street in Council District 14.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. CONSIDER the results, attached to the Motion, of the Tax\nEquity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) public hearing\nheld on December 29, 2025 for the Brine Residential, located at\n3016 North Main Street.\n2. ADOPT the accompanying TEFRA RESOLUTION to approve\nthe issuance of bonds in an amount not to exceed $30,572,770\nfor the new construction of a 97-unit multifamily housing\ndevelopment, located at 3016 North Main Street in Council\nDistrict 14.\nItems for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(30)\n26-0154\nCD 4\nMOTION (HUTT for RAMAN - BLUMENFIELD) relative to funding for\ntwo security officers to provide security services at Runyon Canyon\nPark from 7 p.m. to 1 a.m.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $25,000 in the Council District\n4 portion of the Council Projects line item in the General City\nPurpose Fund No. 100/56, Account No. 000A28 to the\nRecreation and Parks Fund No. 302/88, Account No. 3040\n(Contractual Services) for two security officers to provide\nsecurity services at Runyon Canyon Park from 7 p.m. to 1 a.m.\n2. AUTHORIZE the Department of Recreation and Parks to make\nany corrections, clarifications or revisions to the above find\ntransfer instructions, including any new instructions, in order to\neffectuate the intent of this Motion, and including any\ncorrections and changes to fund or account numbers; said\ncorrections / clarifications / changes may be made orally,\nelectronically or by any other means.\n3. INSTRUCT and AUTHORIZE the Department of Recreation and\nParks to prepare, process and execute the necessary\ndocuments with and/or payments to Allied Universal Security, or\nany other agency or organization, as appropriate, utilizing the\nabove amount, for the above purpose, subject to the approval of\nCity Attorney as to form.

(31)\n26-0164\nCD 12\nMOTION (LEE - RODRIGUEZ) relative to funding for additional brush\nremoval from Limekiln Canyon, Wilbur-Tampa, Aliso Canyon, and other\nPorter Ranch Parks.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF\nTHE MAYOR:\n1. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $15,030 from the Porter\nRanch Neighborhood Council special funds Account to\nRecreation and Parks Fund No. 302/89 and Appr No. 89704H\nDeferred Maintenance - Porter Ranch.\n2. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk to make any corrections,\nclarifications or revisions to the above fund transfer instructions,\nincluding any new instructions, in order to effectuate the intent\nof this Motion including any corrections and changes to fund or\naccount numbers; said corrections / clarifications / changes may\nbe made orally, electronically or by any other means.

(32)\n26-0165\nMOTION (LEE - PARK) relative to funding for the purchase of radio\ncalibration equipment required for the Los Angeles Police Department\n(LAPD) to conduct radio calibration in-house in support of the transition\nto a trunked communication system.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF\nTHE MAYOR:\n1. AUTHORIZE the transfer of $191,408 from the Contractual\nServices Account (003040), Work Order Number 0790502X\n(Voice Radio Switch Extended Maintenance), to the Furniture,\nOffice, and Technical Equipment Account (007300) for the\npurpose of purchasing radio calibration equipment required for\nthe LAPD to conduct radio calibration in-house in support of the\ntransition to a trunked communication system.\n2. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to make any corrections, clarifications\nor revisions to the above fund transfer instructions, including\nany new instructions, in order to effectuate the intent of this\nMotion, and including any corrections and changes to fund or\naccount numbers; said corrections / clarifications / changes may\nbe made orally, electronically or by any other means.

(33)\n24-0865\nCD 11\nMOTION (PARK - LEE) relative to funding for the design,\nmanagement, and construction of the Revitalize Rose Avenue\nPedestrian Connectivity and Beautification Project.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $1,050,000 from the Coastal\nTransportation Corridor Fund No. 447/94, Account No. 9426NT\n(Westside Fast Forward Streets LA Sidewalk Projects-Coastal),\nto Bureau of Street Services Fund No. 100/86 as follows for the\ndesign, management, and construction of the Revitalize Rose\nAvenue Pedestrian Connectivity and Beautification Project:\na. Account No. 001010 (Salaries, General)-$610,000;\nb. Account No. 001090 (Salaries, Overtime) - $128,000;\nc. Account No. 001100 (Salaries, Hiring Hall) - $40,000;\nd. Account No. 001120 (Fringe Benefits, Hiring Hall) -$8,000;\ne. Account No. 001190 (Overtime, Hiring Hall) - $24,000;\nf. Account No. 003030 (Construction Materials) - $120,000;\ng. Account No. 003040 (Contractual Services) - $64,000; and\nh. Account No. 006020 (Operating Supplies & Expenses) -\n$56,000.\n2. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $55,445 from the Coastal\nTransportation Corridor Fund No. 447/94, Account No. 9426NT\n(Westside Fast Forward Streets LA Sidewalk Projects-Coastal),\nto Bureau of Street Lighting Fund No. 100/84 as follows for\nwork on the Revitalize Rose Avenue Pedestrian Connectivity\nand Beautification Project:\na. Account No. 001010 (Salaries, General) - $41,200;\nb. Account No. 006020 (Operating Supplies & Expenses) -\n$4,067; and\nc. Account No. 008780 (Street Lighting Improvements &\nSupplies) - $10,178.\n3. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $14,660 from the Coastal\nTransportation Corridor Fund No. 447/94, Account No. 9426NT\n(Westside Fast Forward Streets LA Sidewalk Projects-Coastal),\nto Bureau of Engineering Fund No. 100/78, Account No. 001010\n(Salaries, General) for work on the Revitalize Rose Avenue\nPedestrian Connectivity and Beautification Project.\n4. AUTHORIZE the Bureau of Street Services to make any\ncorrections, clarifications or revisions to the above fund transfer\ninstructions, including any new instructions, in order to\neffectuate the intent of this Motion, and including any\ncorrections and changes to fund or account numbers; said\ncorrections/ clarifications/ changes may be made orally,\nelectronically or by any other means.

(34)\n19-0290-S5\nMOTION (BLUMENFIELD - LEE) relative to coordinating a street\nbanner campaign to promote the Tarzana Neighborhood Council and\nencourage participation.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. APPROVE, in accordance with Los Angeles Municipal Code\n(LAMC) Section 62.132, the Street Banner program promoting\nthe Tarzana Neighborhood Council and encouraging\nparticipation, as a City of Los Angeles Non-Event Street Banner\nProgram for the period of April 3, 2026 - April 3, 2027.\n2. APPROVE the content of the street banner design attached to\nthe Motion.

(35)\n26-0166\nCD 15\nMOTION (MCOSKER - PADILLA) relative to funding for the design of\npublic safety improvements around the upper area of Sunken City.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF\nTHE MAYOR:\n1. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $140,000 from the AB1290\nFund No. 53P, Account No. 281215 (CD 15 Redevelopment\nProjects - Services) to the Bureau of Engineering Fund No.\n100/78, Account No. 001010 (Salaries, General) for the design\nof public safety improvements around the upper area of Sunken\nCity.\n2. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $40,000 from the AB1290\nFund No. 53P, Account No. 281215 (CD 15 Redevelopment\nProjects - Services) to a new account within the Engineering\nSpecial Services Fund No. 682/50 to be entitled "Sunken City\nConsultant Services" for environmental monitoring work related\nto public safety improvements around the upper area of Sunken\nCity.\n3. AUTHORIZE the Bureau of Engineering to make any\ncorrections, clarifications or revisions to the above fund transfer\ninstructions, including any new instructions, in order to\neffectuate the intent of this Motion, and including any\ncorrections and changes to fund or account numbers; said\ncorrections / clarifications / changes may be made orally,\nelectronically or by any other means.

(36)\n26-0168\nMOTION ( McOSKER - LEE) relative to funding to support the Garlic &\nGaelic event.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. ALLOCATE and AUTHORIZE $20,000 of the Council's portion\nof the Heritage Month Celebration & Special Events line item in\nthe General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to fund any aspect\nof the Garlic & Gaelic event.\n2. DIRECT the City Clerk to prepare and process the necessary\ndocuments and/or payments, directly with the vendor / service\nproviders, and/or any other agency or organization, as\nappropriate, in the above amount, for the above purpose,\nsubject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form, if\nneeded; and, AUTHORIZE the City Clerk to execute any such\ndocuments on behalf of the City.\n3. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk to make any corrections,\nclarifications, or revisions to the above fund transfer\ninstructions, including any new instructions, in order to\neffectuate the intent of this Motion, and including any\ncorrections and changes to fund or account numbers; said\ncorrections / clarifications / changes may be made orally,\nelectronically or by any other means.

(37)\n26-0169\nCD 15\nMOTION ( McOSKER - JURADO) relative to funding for the Harbor\nCity Recreation Center Outdoor Restrooms project.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $750,000 in the Fund No.\n298/50, Appropriation No. 50YPCA for the 109th Street\nRecreation Center Improvements to the Harbor City Recreation\nCenter Outdoor Restrooms under Fund No. 298/50,\nAppropriation No. 50YPCC.\n2. REAUTHORIZE the use of $750,000 in 2023-24 MICLA\nauthority (transferred / appropriated to Fund No. 298/50,\nAccount No. 50YPCC) and allow the continued use of funds\nbeyond the City's MICLA Three-Year Spending Policy for the\nHarbor City Recreation Center Outdoor Restrooms project\nconstruction activities.\n3. AUTHORIZE the Department of Recreation and Parks and the\nCity Administrative Officer to make any corrections, clarifications\nor revisions to the above fund transfer instructions, including\nany new instructions, in order to effectuate the intent of this\nMotion, and including any corrections and changes to fund or\naccount numbers; said corrections / clarifications / changes may\nbe made orally, electronically or by another other means.

(38)\n26-0170\nMOTION (PARK - RODRIGUEZ) relative to assistance for the renewal\nof the Venice Beach Business Improvement District (BID).\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to provide the necessary assistance\nfor the renewal of the Venice Beach BID.\n2. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk to make any changes or\nadjustments to the above instruction in order to effectuate the\nintent of this Motion.

(39)\n16-0965\nMOTION (HUTT - PADILLA) relative to reactivating Council file No.\n(CF) 16-0965 regarding amending Los Angeles Municipal Code\n(LAMC) to prohibit the slae, distribution, manufacture and possession\nof federal schedule I controlled substances and their analogs and\nanalogs of synthetic cannabinoid compounds.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nREACTIVATE CF 16-0965 relative to a draft ordinance amending\nLAMC Section 46.20 to prohibit the sale, distribution, manufacture\nand possession of federal schedule I controlled substances and their\nanalogs and analogs of synthetic cannabinoid compounds, which\nexpired per Council policy, and RESTORE the file to its more recent\nlegislative status as of the date of the File's expiration.

(4)\n26-1100-S1\nORDINANCE SECOND CONSIDERATION relative to a ballot measure\nregarding cannabis business taxes and applying the taxes to\nunlicensed cannabis businesses.\nRecommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\nPRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated,\nFebruary 5, 2026, calling an Election on Tuesday, June 2, 2026, for\nthe purpose of submitting to the voters of the City of Los Angeles a\nballot measure regarding cannabis business taxes and applying the\ntaxes to unlicensed cannabis businesses.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither\nthe City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(40)\n26-0175\nMOTION (RODRIGUEZ - PADILLA, et al.) relative to a report on Los\nAngeles Police Department (LAPD) crowd-control and crowd-\nmanagement tactics used during public demonstrations citywide.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. DIRECT the Chief of Police to appear before the City Council\nand report on LAPD crowd-control and crowd-management\ntactics used during public demonstrations citywide, including:\na. Current policies, training, and supervision related to crowd\nmanagement and public assembly events\nb. The use of skirmish lines, dispersal orders, crowd-control\nformations, and enforcement actions during demonstrations\nc. Communication and de-escalation strategies used to engage\nwith demonstrators and the public\nd. Protocols governing coordination with federal, state, or other\noutside law enforcement agencies during demonstrations\ne. Departmental guidelines and training related to youth-led\ndemonstrations and interactions with minors when they are\npresent at public demonstrations.\n2. REQUEST the Police Commission, with the assistance of the\nChief of Police, to review LAPD crowd-management policies,\nincluding use of force, coordination with outside agencies, and\ninteractions with minors, and report back with recommended\npolicy and training revisions.

(41)\n26-0182\nMOTION (LEE - BLUMENFIELD) relative to coordinating a street\nbanner campaign to celebrate local culture, bring the community\ntogether, and strengthen neighborhood identity for the period of March\n27, 2026 to April 27, 2026.\nRecommendation for Council action:\n1. APPROVE, in accordance with Los Angeles Municipal Code\nSection 62.132 the Street Banner Program was coordinated by\nCouncil District Twelve to celebrate local culture, bring the\ncommunity together, and strengthen neighborhood identity as a\nCity of Los Angeles Event Street Banner Program for the period\nof March 27, 2026 to April 27, 2026.\n2. APPROVE the content of the street banner design, attached to\nthe Motion.

(42)\n26-0183\nMOTION ( LEE - JURADO - RAMAN ) relative to funding for services\nin connection with the Council District 12's special recognition of Asian\nAmerican Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander Heritage Month.\nRecommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\nTRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $438 from the General City\nPurposes Fund No.100/56, Account No. 0947 (Heritage Month\nCelebration & Special Events - Council) to the General Services\nDepartment Fund No. 100/40, Account No. 1100 (Hiring Hall), for\nservices in connection with the Council District 12's special\nrecognition of Asian American Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander\nHeritage Month, including the illumination of City Hall on May 1, 2026.

(43)\n26-0151\nCD 13\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final\nmap of Parcel Map L.A. No. 2023-0094 located at 3328-3330 North\nAndrita Street, north easterly of Estara Avenue.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the final map of Parcel Map L.A. No. 2023-0094, located\nat 3328-3330 North Andrita Street, north easterly of Estara Avenue\nand accompanying Subdivision Improvement Agreement and\nContract with security documents.\n(Bond No. C-147037)\nOwner: Noel Gharibian, Raffy Mardirossian and Paruyr Matevosyan;\nSurveyor: Gerardo Garciamontes\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the\nsubdivider has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final\nparcel map pursuant to Section 19.02(B)(3) of the Los Angeles\nMunicipal Code. No additional City funds are needed.

(44)\n25-1539\nPUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the revised Basic\nCar Plan and Department Patrol Plan for 2025-2026.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. NOTE and FILE the Board of Police Commissioners (BOPC)\nreport dated December 19, 2025 attached to Council File No.\n25-1539.\n2. REQUEST the Mayor and City Administrative Officer (CAO)\ninclude funding for a new Basic Car Plan Request for Proposals\nin the Mayor’s 2026-27 Proposed Budget.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None from the BOPC. Neither the City\nAdministrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed\na financial analysis of this report.

(45)\n26-0029\nPUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to requesting a\nreport on current cannabis enforcement practices and identifying\nadditional staffing or resources needed to address illegal cannabis\noperations and strengthen the regulated market within the City.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Rodriguez -\nHutt):\nREQUEST the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) with the\nassistance of the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), the City\nAdministrative Officer (CAO) and all other necessary City\ndepartments and agencies, to report on the Cannabis Support Unit’s\ncurrent procedures and practices, including recommendations for any\nadditional staffing and resources needed to improve cannabis\nenforcement within the City.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed\na financial analysis of this report.

(46)\n25-1511\nPUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to requesting a\nreport on potential code or regulatory changes needed to allow the City\nto clear encampments and other fire hazards in hillside Very High Fire\nSeverity Zones (VHFSZ) without property owner permission, including\noptions for cost recovery.\nRecommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion\n(Rodriguez – Lee, Park):\n1. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of the Los\nAngeles Fire Department (LAFD) and the Department of\nBuilding and Safety (LADBS), to report on what municipal code\nor other regulatory changes are needed to allow hazardous\nmaterials including encampments to be cleared in hillside\nVHFSZ without having to gain permission from the property\nowner, including cost recovery for the City of Los Angeles.\n2. INSTRUCT the LAFD and the Department of Building and\nSafety, in consultation with the Office of the City Attorney, to\nreport on the process for determining and documenting that the\nmaterials identified for removal in these hillside Very High Fire\nSeverity Zones do in fact pose a fire hazard.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.

(47)\n26-0060\nPUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to requesting a\nreport on the Emergency Management Department’s resources and\ncapacity, including staffing and budget, comparisons with peer cities,\nand recommendations to enhance emergency preparedness,\nresponse, and recovery.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Rodriguez –\nMcOsker):\nDIRECT the Emergency Management Department, with the\nassistance of the City Administrative Officer (CAO) and the Chief\nLegislative Analyst (CLA), to report on the following:\n1. Current staffing levels, budget, organizational structure, and\noverall operational capacity.\n2. Whether existing resources are sufficient to meet the increasing\nfrequency, severity, and scale of emergencies facing the City.\n3. A comparative analysis of emergency management\ndepartments in other large cities and jurisdictions, including\nstaffing ratios, budget allocations, core responsibilities, and\norganizational models.\n4. Recommendations for any additional staffing, funding, or\nstructural changes necessary to ensure the City is adequately\nprepared to plan for, recover from and respond to future\nemergencies.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed\na financial analysis of this report.

(48)\n25-1328\nPUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to requesting a\nreport on the activities of the Los Angeles Police Department’s (LAPD)\nHuman Trafficking Task Forces in Operations of the South and Valley\nBureaus over the past five years, including annual arrests and the\nnumber of trafficked individuals rescued.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Padilla -\nLee):\nINSTRUCT the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) to report with\na status update and an overview of the work done by the Operations\n– South Bureau and Operations – Valley Bureau Human Trafficking\nTask Forces over the last five years, including the number of arrests\nmade annually and the number of rescues of trafficked individuals\nmade by the department.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Adminstrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.

(49)\n25-1437\nPUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to requesting a\nreport on options to strengthen enforcement against illegal dumping,\nincluding increasing fines, addressing enforcement gaps, improving\ndeterrence strategies, and exploring a dedicated revenue stream to\nsupport cleanup efforts and public reporting programs.\nRecommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Harris-\nDawson - Price):\n1. INSTRUCT the Bureau of Sanitation (BOS), in coordination\nwith the Bureau of Street Services (BSS), the Los Angeles\nPolice Department (LAPD), the Office of the City Attorney, and\nother relevant departments authorized to address and enforce\nthe City’s Illegal Dumping laws to prepare and submit a report to\nthe City Council on the feasibility to:\na. Increase at the City-level the criminal fines for illegal\ndumping of all forms of waste materials on unauthorized\npublic property or on private land for both first-time and\nrepeat offenders.\nb. Address the current gaps in enforcement and the\nnecessary resources required to implement a more\naggressive enforcement strategy.\nc. Develop a strategy to maximize deterrence and\nprosecution with the end goal of decreasing the incidents\nof illegal dumping across the City.\n2. INSTRUCT the BOS to report on the feasibility of establishing\na dedicated revenue stream, supported by the increased fines\ncollected from illegal dumping violations, to fund expanded\ncleanup efforts and public reward programs designed to\nencourage residents to report illegal dumping activities.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Adminstrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.

(5)\n26-1100-S3\nORDINANCE SECOND CONSIDERATION relative to a ballot measure\nregarding the City's transient occupancy tax (TOT) and increasing the\ntax rate and other modifications.\nRecommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\nPRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE B dated,\nFebruary 5, 2026, calling an Election on Tuesday, June 2, 2026, for\nthe purpose of submitting to the voters of the City of Los Angeles a\nballot measure regarding increasing the TOT by 2% through 2028\nand then by 1% thereafter and applying the TOT to online travel\ncompanies.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither\nthe City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(50)\n26-0045\nPUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to requesting a\nreport on the feasibility of implementing a non-emergency lift fee for\nnursing homes and long-term care facilities that request Fire\nDepartment assistance for residents who have fallen or need help\nstanding but do not require medical treatment or transport.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Hutt - Park):\nINSTRUCT the Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD), with the\nassistance of the City Administrative Officer (CAO) to report on the\nfeasibility of implementing a “Non-Emergency Lift” Fee, to be charged\nto nursing homes and other long-term, facilities that call the LAFD to\nassist residents of those facilities who have fallen or cannot stand\nwithout assistance, but otherwise do not need additional medical\ncare.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Adminstrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.

(51)\n26-0032\nPUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to accepting a non-\nmonetary donation valued at $30,000 from the Los Angeles Police\nFoundation for the purchase of new dry suits to benefit the Los\nAngeles Police Department (LAPD) Metropolitan Division Maritime\nDive Team.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the acceptance of non-monetary donation from the Los\nAngeles Police Foundation valued at approximately $30,000 for the\npurchase of new dry suits to benefit the LAPD Metropolitan Division\nMaritime Dive Team; and, THANK the donor for this generous\ndonation.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None from the Board of Police\nCommissioners. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief\nLegislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(52)\n26-0035\nPUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to accepting a non-\nmonetary donation valued at $45,000 to help fund the attendance of\npersonnel to the Los Angeles Women Police Officers and Associates\n(LAWPOA) 30th Annual Symposium 2026.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the acceptance of the non-monetary donation from the\nLos Angeles Police Foundation valued at approximately $45,000 to\nhelp fund the attendance of personnel to the LAWPOA 30th Annual\nSymposium 2026; and, THANK the donor for this generous donation.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None from the Board of Police\nCommissioners. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief\nLegislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(53)\n26-0033\nPUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to accepting a non-\nmonetary donation valued at $250,000 from the Los Angeles Police\nFoundation for Pacific Community Police Station facility repairs.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the acceptance of the non-monetary donation from the\nLos Angeles Police Foundation valued at approximately $250,000 for\nPacific Community Police Station facility repairs; and, THANK the\ndonor for this generous donation.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None from the Board of Police\nCommissioners. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief\nLegislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(54)\n22-1438-S2\nPUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the annual\nQuadruped Unmanned Ground Vehicle Inspection Report for Fiscal\nYear 2024-2025.\nRecommendations for Council action:\nNOTE and FILE the Board of Police Commissioners (BOPC) report\ndated October 3, 2025 attached to Council File No. 22-1438-S2.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None from the BOPC. Neither the CAO nor\nthe CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(55)\n25-1424\nPUBLIC SAFETY and BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEES’\nREPORT relative to developing a permanent City policy for waiving\nrebuilding fees for residents affected by natural disasters to ensure a\nconsistent and equitable approach to disaster recovery.\nRecommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Rodriguez\n– Lee):\n1. INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO) and Chief\nLegislative Analyst (CLA), with the assistance of the City\nAttorney and all relevant City departments, to develop and\nreport to Council on a permanent City policy for fee waivers for\ndisaster-impacted residents, including those affected by\nwildfires, floods, earthquakes, and other declared emergencies.\nThe report should include the following:\na. Identify eligible fee types, including building, plan-check,\ndevelopment impact, and related fees; and, define\neligibility criteria for affected property owners.\nb. Include considerations to differentiate benefits based on\nwhether property owners are insured, underinsured, or\nuninsured.\nc. Establish safeguards, such as fee caps or project scope\nlimitations, to prevent unintended fiscal impact on other\nresidents or departments.\nd. Provide mechanisms to coordinate with the Federal\nEmergency Management Agency, California Governor’s\nOffice of Emergency Services, or other funding sources to\nrecover waived fees where possible; and, identify\ncontingency funding sources if reimbursement is\nunavailable.\n2. REQUEST the City Attorney to report to Council with a draft\nordinance implementing this permanent disaster fee policy.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed\na financial analysis of this report.

(56)\n13-1301-S11\nPUBLIC SAFETY and BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEES’\nREPORT relative to the application and award for Fiscal Year 2025\nSecurity the Cities (STC) Program Sustainment Funding and Budget\nModifications for Fiscal Year 2020-2024 Awards.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. AUTHORIZE the Mayor, or designee, to:\na. Accept on behalf of the City, the STC Program\nSustainment Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Period 6 award\nfrom the United States Department of Homeland\nSecurity - Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction\nOffice, for the performance period effective from\nSeptember 1, 2020 through August 31, 2030.\nb. Negotiate and execute amendments to an existing\nmemorandum of agreement with the Los Angeles World\nAirports (Contract No. C-140372) to increase its total\ncontract amount by $50,000.00 for a new contract amount\nof $266,370.00, subject to the approval of the City\nAttorney as to form.\nc. Negotiate and execute amendments to an existing\nmemorandum of agreement with the Port of Los Angeles\n(Contract No. C-140220) to increase its total contract\namount by $50,000.00 for a new contract amount of\n$246,470.00, subject to the approval of the City Attorney\nas to form.\nd. Negotiate and execute amendments to subrecipient\nagreements with the Long Beach Police Department\n(Contract No. C-140156) to increase its total contract\namount by $20,000.00 for a new contract amount of\n$226,420.00, subject to the approval of the City Attorney\nas to form.\ne. Negotiate and execute amendments to subrecipient\nagreements with the Los Angeles County Department of\nPublic Health (Contract No. C-140131) to increase its total\ncontract amount by $285,000.00 for a new contract\namount of $823,007.50, subject to the approval of the City\nAttorney as to form.\nf. Negotiate and execute amendments to subrecipient\nagreements with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s\nDepartment (Contract No. C-140223) to increase its total\ncontract amount by $100,000.00 for a new contract\namount of $749,775.00, subject to the approval of the City\nAttorney as to form.\ng. Negotiate and execute amendments to subrecipient\nagreements with the Orange County Sheriff’s Department\n(Contract No. C-140137) to increase its total contract\namount by $75,000.00 for a new contract amount of\n$287,295.00, subject to the approval of the City Attorney\nas to form.\n2. AUTHORIZE the Mayor, or designee, to prepare Controller\ninstructions for any technical adjustments, subject to approval of\nthe City Administrative Officer (CAO); and, AUTHORIZE the\nController to implement the instructions.\n3. DIRECT the LAPD and the CAO, and REQUEST the Mayor to\nreport on the Securing the Cities Grant Program agreement\nbetween the City and the Department of Homeland Security\n(DHS), specifically as it pertains to whether the agreement\nobligates the City to any data-sharing with DHS or any other\nreporting requirements, and if data or reporting is required,\ndetail the reporting that is provided and what data is being\nshared.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the\nrecommendations in the report will provide the Mayor’s Office with\nauthority to increase funding for existing contracts with partner\njurisdictions for the continuance of Fiscal Years 2020 through 2024\nSTC Grant Program Sustainment Funding awards and approved\ncarryover funding from the FY 2020, FY 2021, FY 2022, FY 2023 and\nFY 2024 awards. No matching funds are required and there is no\nimpact to the General Fund.\nFinancial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the\nrecommendations in the report are in compliance with the City's\nFinancial Policies in that all grant funds will be expended for grant-\neligible activities.

(57)\n22-1479\nPUBLIC SAFETY and BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEES’\nREPORT relative to a change in scope of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022\nProsecuting Cold Cases Using DNA (FY22 Cold Cases) Grant\nProgram.\nRecommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\nAUTHORIZE the Chief of Police, Los Angeles Police Department\n(LAPD), or designee, to:\na. Accept the United States Department of Justice, Bureau of\nJustice Assistance’s approval to revise the scope of the FY22\nCold Cases Grant Program, expanding coverage from cold\ncases in the LAPD’s South Bureau Homicide Division to include\nthose in the Robbery Homicide Division.\nb. Negotiate and execute the programmatic grant modification,\nreflecting the change in scope, subject to the review of the City\nAttorney as to form.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO)\nreports that approval of the recommendations within the report will\nexpand the scope of coverage of the FY22 Cold Cases Grant\nProgram award to include cold cases in the LAPD Robbery Homicide\nDivision. No matching funds are required for this grant. There will be\nno additional impact to the General Fund.\nFinancial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the\nrecommendations provided in the report comply with the City’s\nFinancial Policies in that, to the extent possible, all grant funds will be\nutilized for grant-eligible activities.

(58)\n22-0057\nPUBLIC SAFETY and BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEES’\nREPORT relative to a no-cost extension for the Fiscal Year 2021\nCollaborative Crisis Response Training (FY21 CRT) Grant Program.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. AUTHORIZE the Chief of Police, Los Angeles Police\nDepartment (LAPD), or designee, to:\na. Accept the United States Department of Justice, Bureau\nof Justice Assistance’s approval of a no-cost extension for\nthe FY21 CRT Grant Program award, extending the award\nperiod from October 1, 2022 through September 30,\n2024; to October 1, 2022 through December 31, 2025.\nb. Negotiate and execute the grant agreement for the period\nof October 1, 2022 through December 31, 2025, subject to\nthe review of the City Attorney as to form.\n2. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to prepare Controller instructions for\nany technical adjustments, subject to the approval of the City\nAdministrative Officer (CAO); and, AUTHOIRZE the Controller\nto implement the instructions.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations\nwithin the report will authorize the continued expenditure of the CRT\nGrant award totaling $500,000 from the United States Department of\nJustice, Bureau of Justice Assistance, for the term from October 1,\n2022 through December 31, 2025. No matching funds are required for\nthis grant. There will be no additional impact to the General Fund.\nFinancial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the\nrecommendations provided in the report comply with the City’s\nFinancial Policies in that, to the extent possible, all grant funds will be\nutilized for grant-eligible activities.

(59)\n21-1015-S15\nPUBLIC SAFETY and BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEES’\nREPORT relative to a grant application and award from the California\nGovernor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) Homeland\nSecurity and Emergency Management (HSEM) – Fiscal Year (FY)\n2024-25 State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program (SLCGP).\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. AUTHORIZE the Mayor’s Office of Public Safety and the\nGeneral Manager, Information Technology Agency (ITA), or\ndesignee, to prepare and submit the grant application for the\nCal OES HSEM – SLGP – FY 2024-25 proposal.\n2. REQUEST the Mayor’s Office of Public Safety and INSTRUCT\nthe General Manager, ITA, or designee, upon notification from\nthe grantor, to report back if the City is awarded the grant, to\nrequest authority to accept the grant award; and, to request\napproval for any related actions to implement the grant award.\n3. AUTHORIZE the Mayor, or designee, to:\na. Accept the FY 2024 SLCGP grant in the amount of\n$250,000 from the Cal OES for the period effective from\nDecember 1, 2024 through December 31, 2026.\nb. Execute the Grant Award Agreement on behalf of the City\nand submit any other necessary agreements and\ndocuments relative to the grant award, subject to the\napproval of the City Attorney as to form.\nc. Approve the FY 2024 SLCGP budget and authorize the\nMayor's Office of Public Safety to expend the grant in\naccordance with the approved budget.\nd. Submit to the grantor on behalf of the City requests for\ndrawdown of funds for payment of reimbursements of the\nCity funds expended for approved grant purposes.\ne. Receive, deposit into, and disburse from a new SLCGP\nFund, the grant funds from the FY 2024 SLCGP grant\naward.\n4. AUTHORIZE the Controller to:\na. Establish a new interest-bearing fund entitled “Fiscal Year\n2024 State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program”, and\ncreate a receivable in the Fund in the amount of $250,000\nfor the FY 2024 SLCGP grant.\nb. Expend and receive funds upon presentation of\ndocumentation and proper demand by the Mayor’s Office\nof Public Safety to reimburse City departments for\napproved FY 2024 SLCGP grant purchases.\nc. Transfer funds between appropriation accounts upon\nrequest by the Mayor, pursuant to modifications of the\ngrant approved by the grantor.\n5. ADOPT the below FY 2024 SLCGP Grant Budget in the total\namount of $250,000, and authorize the Mayor to create new\nappropriation accounts within the new FY 2024 SLCGP Grant\nFund No. XXX as follows:\na. Appropriation Account No. 46C932 – ITA Grant Allocation;\nAmount: $237,500\nb. Appropriation Account No. 46C146 – Mayor’s Office\nSalaries; Amount: $8,486\nc. Appropriation Account No. 46C299 – Reimbursement of\nGeneral Fund Costs; Amount: $4,014\n6. TRANSFER appropriations from FY 2024 SLCGP Grant Fund\nNo. XXX/46, to the General Fund to reimburse the General\nFund for FY 2024 SLCGP as follows:\nFrom:\nFund No. XXX/46, Account No. 46C146 – Mayor’s Office\nSalaries; Amount: $8,486\nTo:\nFund No.100/46, Account No. 001020 – Grant Reimbursed\nSalaries; Amount: $8,486\n7. AUTHORIZE the Controller to transfer up to $4,014 from Fund\nNo. XXX, Account No. 46C299, to the General Fund,\nDepartment No. 46, Revenue Source Code No. 5346, for\nreimbursement of grant-funded fringe benefits.\n8. AUTHORIZE the Controller to transfer cash from Fund No.\nXXX/46 to reimburse the General Fund, on an as-needed basis,\nupon presentation of proper documentation from City\ndepartments, subject to the approval of the Mayor’s Office of\nPublic Safety.\n9. AUTHORIZE the Mayor, or designee, to prepare Controller\ninstructions for any technical adjustments, subject to approval of\nthe City Administrative Officer (CAO); and, AUTHORIZE the\nController to implement the instructions.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the\nrecommendations in the report will not result in a General Fund\nimpact. No matching funds are required for this funding opportunity.\nHowever, upon notification of a grant award, a reassessment on the\nGeneral Fund impact should be completed as it relates to either lower\nthan requested grant award amounts, verification of local match\nrequirements, or front-funding for grants on a reimbursement basis.\nFinancial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the\nrecommendations in the report comply with the City’s Financial\nPolicies.

(6)\n26-0054\nEXEMPTION, ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE REPORT\nand ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the sale of\nthree City-owned properties to its respective tenured tenants in Bishop,\nInyo County.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. ADOPT the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)\ndeterminations of the Board of Water and Power\nCommissioners (Board) that the sale of parcels of real property\nto existing leaseholders is exempt from CEQA pursuant to\nSection 15060(c)(3) and Section 15378(b)(5) that states an\nactivity is not subject to CEQA if the activity is not a project and\ndoes not have a significant effect on the environment.\n2. APPROVE the Department of Water and Power (DWP)\nproposed Resolution authorizing the DWP to execute three\nAgreements of Purchase and Sale of Real Property, and\nEscrow Instructions for the sale of three City-owned properties\nunder DWP management and control to its respective tenured\ntenants, specifically Mammoth Development, Inc., Ryan T.\nMiller, and Jack in the Box, Inc., in accordance with the Land\nManagement Guidelines - City Land Acquisition and Divestment\nPolicy for Inyo and Mono Counties, for a total of $610,000.\n3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated\nJanuary 23, 2026, approving Board Resolution No. 026135\nauthorizing Land Divestment Policy - sale of three properties to\nexisting tenured tenants in Bishop, Inyo County.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer reports that\nthere is no impact on the City General Fund. The DWP Water\nRevenue Fund will receive revenue of $610,000 from the three\nrespective Property sales. The above recommendations comply with\nthe DWP adopted Financial Policies.

(60)\n22-1316-S3\nPUBLIC SAFETY and BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEES’\nREPORT relative to the acceptance of the Resiliency in Communities\nAfter Stress and Trauma (ReCAST) Program – Year 4 grant award.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to:\na. Approve and execute the RECAST Program – Year\n4 grant agreement between the United Department of\nHealth and Human Services, Substance Abuse and\nMental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and the\nCity Attorney's Office.\nb. Accept the grant award in the amount of $1,000,000 from\nSAMHSA.\n2. AUTHORIZE the Controller to:\na. Establish a receivable within Fund No. 368 in the amount\nof $1,000,000 from SAMHSA.\nb. Establish a new appropriation account within Fund No.\n368 as follows:\nAccount No. 12C350 - Resiliency in Communities After\nStress and Trauma Program (ReCAST) Year 4; Amount:\n$1,000,000\nc. TRANSFER $99,585 from Fund No 368/12, Account No.\n12C350 - Resiliency in Communities After Stress and\nTrauma Program (ReCAST) Year 4, to Fund No. 100/12,\nAccount No. 001010- Salaries General, as reimbursement\nfor City Attorney salary expenses of one Resolution\nAuthority.\nd. Upon receipt of grant funds and approval of grant\nexpenses, transfer up to $67,907 from Fund No. 368/12,\nAccount No. 12C350 - Resiliency in Communities After\nStress and Trauma Program (ReCAST) Year 4, to Fund\nNo. 100/12, Revenue Source 5427 - Reimbursement from\nGrants, for salary expenses of one grant-reimbursed\nRegular Authority.\ne. Upon approval of expenses and receipt of grant funds,\ntransfer up to $94,071 from Fund No. 368/12, Account No.\n12C350 - Resiliency in Communities After Stress and\nTrauma Program (ReCAST) Year 4, to Fund No. 100/12,\nRevenue Source 5346 - Related Cost Reimbursement\nfrom Grants, as reimbursement for City Attorney fringe\nbenefits and indirect costs related to the project.\nf. TRANSFER $75,000 from Fund No. 368/12, Account No.\n12C350 - Resiliency in Communities After Stress and\nTrauma Program (ReCAST) Year 4, to Fund No. 100/70,\nAccount No. 001092 - Sworn Overtime.\n3. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to place on Council Calendar for\nJuly 1, 2026, the following actions relative to the\nReCAST Program – Year 4 grant:\na. AUTHORIZE the Controller to transfer $33,195 from\nFund No. 368/12, Account No. 12C350 - Resiliency in\nCommunities After Stress and Trauma Program\n(ReCAST) Year 4, to Fund No. 100/12, Account No.\n001010 - Salaries General, as reimbursement for City\nAttorney salary expenses of one Resolution Authority.\nb. AUTHORIZE the Controller to transfer $25,000 from\nFund No. 368/12, Account No. 12C350 - Resiliency in\nCommunities After Stress and Trauma Program\n(ReCAST) Year 4, to Fund No. 100/70, Account\nNo. 001092 - Sworn Overtime.\n4. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney to prepare Controller instructions\nfor any necessary technical adjustments, subject to the\napproval of the City Administrative Officer; and, INSTRUCT the\nController to implement the instructions.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Attorney reports that the total cost\nof the ReCAST Program – Year 4 is $1,019,739, of which $1,000,000\nwill be reimbursed by SAMHSA. The General Fund contribution is\n$19,739 in fringe and related costs not reimbursed from grant funds.

(61)\n25-1159\nPUBLIC\nSAFETY\nand\nBUDGET\nAND\nFINANCE\nCOMMITTEES’ REPORT relative to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26\nAlcohol Policing Partnership (APP) Program grant application and\naward.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief of Police, Los Angeles\nPolice Department (LAPD), or designee, to:\na. Retroactively apply for and accept the FY 2025-26 APP\nProgram grant, in the amount of $100,000 from the State\nof California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control,\nfor the period of July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026.\nb. Negotiate and execute any documents or agreements\nnecessary to accept the grant, subject to the approval by\nthe City Attorney as to form.\n2. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to:\na. Spend up to $100,000 in funding in accordance with the\ngrant award agreement.\nb. Submit grant reimbursement requests to the grantor and\ndeposit the FY 2025-26 APP grant funds received under\nthis agreement into the LAPD Grant Fund No. 339/70,\naccount number to be determined.\nc. Prepare Controller’s instructions for any technical\nadjustments as necessary to implement Mayor and\nCouncil intentions, subject to the approval of the City\nAdministrative Officer (CAO); and, authorize the Controller\nto implement the instructions.\n3. AUTHORIZE the Controller to:\na. Establish a grant receivable and appropriate up to\n$100,000 within the LAPD Grant Fund No. 339/70,\naccount number to be determined, for the receipt and\ndisbursement of the FY 2025-26 APP Program grant\nfunds.\nb. Increase appropriations and transfer, as necessary, from\nFY 2025-26 APP Program grant funds, Fund No. 339/70,\naccount number to be determined, to Fund No. 100/70,\naccount numbers and amounts as follows:\ni. Account No. 001092 – Overtime Sworn; Amount:\n$90,000\nii. Account No. TBD – Related Costs; Amount: $9,350\nFiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the\nrecommendations stated in the report will authorize the LAPD to\naccept a grant award in the amount of $100,000 from the State of\nCalifornia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control for participation\nin the FY 2025-26 APP Program. There is no matching requirement\nassociated with this grant award. There is no additional impact on the\nGeneral Fund.\nFinancial Policies Statement: The CAO further reports that the\nrecommendations provided in this report comply with the City’s\nFinancial Policies in that, to the extent possible, one-time grant\nfunding will be utilized for one-time program expenditures.

(62)\n25-1152\nARTS, PARKS, LIBRARIES, AND COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT and\nRULES, ELECTIONS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS\nCOMMITTEES’ REPORTS relative to requiring a disclosure statement\nof prior criminal history for individuals who seek to serve on a\nNeighborhood Council (NC).\nA. ARTS, PARKS, LIBRARIES, AND COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT\nCOMMITTEE REPORT\nRecommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion\n(Rodriguez – Padilla):\n1. REQUEST the Board of Neighborhood Commissioners\n(BONC), with the assistance of the Department of\nNeighborhood Empowerment (DONE), City Clerk, and the\nCity Attorney, to report to Council on the feasibility of\nrequiring NC applicants to disclose their status as\nregistered sex offenders, and to evaluate the feasibility of\nprohibiting individuals on the registry from serving on NCs\nthrough election, appointment, or selection.\n2. REQUEST the BONC, with the assistance of the DONE\nand the City Attorney, to work with the Los Angeles City\nCharter Commission to explore and report to Council on\nthe feasibility of incorporating a disclosure requirement, as\nwell as any related prohibitions, into the City Charter, with\nthe goal of strengthening safeguards for youth and\nensuring that NC spaces remain safe and secure.\n3. INSTRUCT the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), with the\nassistance of the City Attorney and Civil + Human Rights\nand Equity Department (CHRED), and in consultation with\nthe BONC and DONE, to report to Council on the risks of\ndisparate impact on the LGBTQ+ community and propose\nmitigation strategies before enforcement begins.\nB. RULES,\nELECTIONS\nAND\nINTERGOVERNMENTAL\nRELATIONS COMMITTEE REPORT\nRecommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion\n(Rodriguez – Padilla):\n1. REQUEST the BONC, with the assistance of\nthe DONE, City Clerk, and the City Attorney, to report to\nCouncil on the feasibility of requiring NC applicants to\ndisclose their status as registered sex offenders, and to\nevaluate the feasibility of prohibiting individuals on the\nregistry from serving on NCs through election,\nappointment, or selection.\n2. REQUEST the BONC, with the assistance of the DONE\nand the City Attorney, to work with the Los Angeles City\nCharter Commission to explore and report to Council on\nthe feasibility of incorporating a disclosure requirement, as\nwell as any related prohibitions, into the City Charter, with\nthe goal of strengthening safeguards for youth and\nensuring that NC spaces remain safe and secure.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.

(63)\n26-0002-S2\nRULES, ELECTIONS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS\nCOMMITTEE REPORT and RESOLUTION relative to establishing the\nCity’s position on any legislative and/or administrative action that\ndesignates the Los Angeles Cleantech Incubator (LACI) as the\nimplementation partner for the California Climate Innovation Fund\n(CCIF).\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution\n(Yaroslavsky – Jurado), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF\nTHE MAYOR:\nRESOLVE to:\na. Include in the City’s 2025-26 State Legislative Program\nSUPPORT for legislative and/or administrative action that\ndesignates the LACI as the implementation partner for the $85\nmillion CCIF.\nb. Support a framework where the Governor’s Office of Business\nand Economic Development (GO-Biz) distributes these funds to\nLACI to support statewide climate-tech innovation, a statewide\ncleantech debt fund, and regional workforce training programs\nthat align with the state’s ambitious greenhouse gas reduction\ntargets.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Chief Legislative\nAnalyst. The City Administrative Officer has not completed a financial\nanalysis of this report.

(64)\n25-0002-S90\nRULES, ELECTIONS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS\nCOMMITTEE REPORT and RESOLUTION relative to establishing the\nCity’s position on H.R. 3874 (Friedman)/S. 1870 (Schiff), the Rim of the\nValley Corridor Preservation Act.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Raman\n– Rodriguez, et al.), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE\nMAYOR:\nRESOLVE to include in the City’s 2025-26 Federal Legislative\nProgram SUPPORT for H.R. 3874 (Friedman)/S. 1870 (Schiff), the\nRim of the Valley Corridor Preservation Act, which would adjust the\nboundary of the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area to\ninclude the Rim of the Valley Corridor.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Chief Legislative\nAnalyst. The City Administrative Officer has not completed a financial\nanalysis of this report.

(65)\n15-0989-S60\nRULES, ELECTIONS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS\nCOMMITTEE REPORT relative to establishing Brisbane, Australia as\nan Olympic Friendship City.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Harris-\nDawson – Yaroslavsky):\nINSTRUCT the Council’s Rules, Elections, and Intergovernmental\nRelations Committee to initiate the process to consider and ultimately\nadopt Brisbane, Australia as an Olympic Friendship City.\nFiscal Impact Statement:\nNeither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative\nAnalyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(66)\n26-0129\nRULES, ELECTIONS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS\nCOMMITTEE REPORT relative to preparing for a complete and\naccurate count for the 2030 Decennial Census.\nRecommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Soto-\nMartinez – Rodriguez):\n1. INSTRUCT the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), with the\nassistance of the City Administrative Officer (CAO), City\nAttorney, and Mayor, to coordinate the City’s preparations for\nthe 2030 Decennial Census.\n2. INSTRUCT the Planning Department, Information Technology\nAgency, Housing Department, Police Department, Fire\nDepartment, City Clerk, Economic Workforce and Development\nDepartment, Department of Building and Safety, Bureau of\nEngineering, Department of Water and Power, and Department\nof Neighborhood Empowerment, to identify a departmental point\nperson on Census 2030 issues and to develop a work program\nto address technical matters related to the 2030 Decennial\nCensus, including funding requirements.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed\na financial analysis of this report.

(67)\n25-0002-S72\nRULES, ELECTIONS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS\nCOMMITTEE REPORT relative to establishing the City’s position on\nAssembly Bill (AB) 492 (Valencia), which would require written\nnotification when a license is issued by the Department of Health Care\nServices to a residential alcohol or other drug recovery or treatment\nfacility.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Padilla –\nLee) and SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:\nRESOLVE to include in the City’s 2025-26 State Legislative Program\nSUPPORT for AB 492 (Valencia) which would require the Department\nof Health Care Services to provide written notification to a city or\ncounty concurrently whenever it issues a license to a residential\nalcohol or other drug recovery or treatment facility including the name\nand mailing address of the licensee and the location of the facility.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Chief Legislative\nAnalyst. The City Administrative Officer has not completed a financial\nanalysis of this report.

(68)\n25-0002-S35\nRULES, ELECTIONS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS\nCOMMITTEE REPORT and RESOLUTION relative to establishing the\nCity’s position on implementing an alternative methodology for\ndetermining the subsidy reimbursement rates for child care providers.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Soto-\nMartinez – Hernandez), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF\nTHE MAYOR:\nRESOLVE to include in the City’s 2025-26 State Legislative Program,\nsponsorship and SUPPORT for any legislative and/or administrative\naction that would ensure the development, funding, and\nimplementation of the alternative methodology to update child care\nsubsidy reimbursement rates in California.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None provided by the Chief Legislative\nAnalyst. The City Administrative Officer has not completed a financial\nanalysis of this report.

(69)\n24-0002-S15\nRULES, ELECTIONS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS\nCOMMITTEE REPORT and RESOLUTION relative to establishing the\nCity’s position on Assembly Bill (AB) 535 (Schiavo), which would\nrestore legal protections for victims and witnesses in the criminal\njustice system, at all stages of the process.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution\n(Blumenfield – McOsker), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF\nTHE MAYOR:\nRESOLVE to include in the City’s 2024-2025 State Legislative\nProgram SUPPORT for AB 535 (Schiavo) which would restore legal\nprotections for victims and witnesses, and protect the necessary role\nof crime victims and witnesses in the criminal justice system at all\nstages of the process, not just at the discrete moment during which\nan offender anticipates the filing of criminal charges.\nFiscal Impact Statement:\nNone submitted by the Chief Legislative Analyst. The City\nAdministrative Officer has not completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.

(7)\n26-0050\nGENERAL EXEMPTION, ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT\nCOMMITTEE REPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION\nrelative to quitclaiming a portion of a public power utility easement,\nlocated in the County of Los Angeles, California, identified as Tract\nMap 11729 to 8333 Airport, L.P. a California Limited Partnership.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. DETERMINE that this item is exempt pursuant to California\nEnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061(b)\n(3). General Exemptions apply in situations where it can be\nseen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in\nquestion may have a significant effect on the environment.\nTherefore, the quitclaim of a Department of Water and Power\n(DWP) public utility easement is not an action subject to CEQA.\n2. APPROVE the DWP proposed Resolution authorizing a\nQuitclaim Deed to abandon and quitclaim a portion of a public\npower utility easement, located in the County of Los Angeles,\nCalifornia, identified as Tract Map 11729 recorded in Book 256,\nPartnership.\n3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated\nJanuary 20, 2026, authorizing the quitclaim of public power\nfacility easement by LADWP to 8333 Airport, L.P., a California\nlimited partnership.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer reports that\nthere is no impact to the General Fund. DWP’s Power Revenue Fund\nwill receive $6,420 in one-time revenue as the processing fee to\nquitclaim the easement has been paid by the property owner of\nrecord. The proposed request complies with DWP’s approved\nFinancial Policies.

(70)\n25-0002-S14\nRULES, ELECTIONS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS\nCOMMITTEE REPORT and RESOLUTION relative to establishing the\nCity’s position on Senate Bill (SB) 239 (Arreguin) that would amend the\nRalph M. Brown Act to authorize the use of teleconferencing for\nsubsidiary, purely advisory bodies.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution\n(Blumenfield, Jurado – Hernandez), SUBJECT TO THE\nCONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:\nRESOLVE to include in the City’s 2025-26 State Legislative Program\nSUPPORT for SB 239 (Arreguin) that would amend the Ralph M.\nBrown Act to authorize the Los Angeles City Council and other\nlegislative bodies to permit subsidiary, purely advisory bodies to meet\nby teleconference, subject to provisions for public participation.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None provided by the Chief Legislative\nAnalyst. The City Administrative Officer has not completed a financial\nanalysis of this report.

(71)\n26-0046\nRULES, ELECTIONS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS\nCOMMITTEE REPORT relative to the proposed alternatives described\nin the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Sepulveda Transit\nCorridor Project.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Raman,\nNazarian – Rodriguez):\nRESOLVE to SUPPORT the selection of ‘Modified Alternative 5’ as\nthe Locally Preferred Alternative by the Metro Board of Directors,\nincluding the proposed phasing plan with an Initial Operating\nSegment from the Metro G Line to the Metro D Line, while reiterating\nstrong support for completing the entire project.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.

(8)\n21-1108-S4\nCDs 1, 10, 13\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT\nAND ORDINANCE OF INTENTION FIRST CONSIDERATION relative\nto the reconfirmation of the Wilshire Center, Merchant-Based,\nBusiness Improvement District (BID) and Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Annual\nPlanning Report (APR).\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. FIND that:\na. The assessments imposed by the Wilshire Center BID for\nthe 2026 FY provide services that directly benefit each of\nthe businesses which pay the assessments.\nb. The services funded by the assessment are provided only\nto each of the assessed businesses within the boundaries\nof the BID.\nc. The assessment imposed does not exceed the\nreasonable cost of conferring the benefits.\nd. The proposed improvements and activities are completely\nseparate from the day-to-day operations of the City of Los\nAngeles.\ne. The assessments for the proposed business-based\nDistrict are not taxes and that the BID qualifies for\nexemption from Proposition 26 under exemption 1 of\nArticle XIII C §1(e)(1).\nf. The services to be provided by the Owners' Association,\nthe Wilshire Center Business Improvement Corporation,\nare in the nature of professional, expert, technical or other\nspecial services, that the services are of a temporary and\noccasional character, and that the use of competitive\nbidding would be impractical, not advantageous,\nundesirable or where the common law otherwise excuses\ncompliance with competitive bidding requirements.\n2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE OF\nINTENTION, dated December 5, 2025, confirming the Wilshire\nCenter BID Annual Report and levying an annual assessment\nfor the Wilshire Center Business Improvement District’s thirty-\nfirst operating year, January 1, 2026 to December 31, 2026.\n3. DIRECT the City Clerk to schedule, prepare, publish, and mail\nthe public hearing notice, as required by the provisions of\nSection 36500 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways\nCode.\n4. INSTRUCT the City Clerk, subject to approval by the City\nAttorney as to form and legality, to prepare an enabling\nOrdinance levying the special assessment for the Wilshire\nCenter BID’s twenty-third operating period beginning January 1,\n2026 to December 31, 2026.\n5. APPROVE the Wilshire Center Business Improvement\nCorporation a California non-profit mutual benefit corporation, to\nadminister the proposed services of the Wilshire Center\nBusiness Improvement District pursuant to Section 36500 et\nseq. of the California Streets and Highways Code and City\nregulations.\n6. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk, subject to City Attorney approval, to\nprepare, execute, and administer a contract between the City\nand the Wilshire Center Business Improvement Corporation to\nadminister the Wilshire Center BID, if the Ordinance\nreconfirming the BID is adopted.\n7. APPOINT the Advisory Board listed in the 2026 Annual Report\nattached to the Council file.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that this is a\nmerchant-based BID and there are no assessments for City-owned\nproperties within the BID, therefore, there is no impact on the General\nFund.

(9)\n13-1724-S1\nCDs 4, 13\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT\nAND ORDINANCE OF INTENTION FIRST CONSIDERATION relative\nto the reconfirmation of the Los Feliz Village, Merchant-Based,\nBusiness Improvement District (BID) and Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Annual\nPlanning Report (APR).\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. FIND that:\na. The assessments imposed by the Los Feliz Village BID for\nthe 2026 FY provide services that directly benefit each of\nthe businesses which pay the assessments.\nb. The services funded by the assessment are provided only\nto each of the assessed businesses within the boundaries\nof the BID.\nc. The assessment imposed does not exceed the\nreasonable cost of conferring the benefits.\nd. The proposed improvements and activities are completely\nseparate from the day-to-day operations of the City of Los\nAngeles.\ne. The assessments for the proposed business-based\nDistrict are not taxes and that the BID qualifies for\nexemption from Proposition 26 under exemption 1 of\nArticle XIII C §1(e)(1).\nf. The services to be provided by the Owners' Association,\nare in the nature of professional, expert, technical or other\nspecial services, that the services are of a temporary and\noccasional character, and that the use of competitive\nbidding would be impractical, not advantageous,\nundesirable or where the common law otherwise excuses\ncompliance with competitive bidding requirements.\n2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE OF\nINTENTION, dated January 13, 2026, confirming the Los Feliz\nVillage BID Annual Report and levying an annual assessment\nfor the Los Feliz Village Business Improvement District’s twenty-\nfifth operating year, January 1, 2026 to December 31, 2026.\n3. DIRECT the City Clerk to schedule, prepare, publish, and mail\nthe public hearing notice, as required by the provisions of\nSection 36500 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways\nCode.\n4. INSTRUCT the City Clerk, subject to approval by the City\nAttorney as to form and legality, to prepare an enabling\nOrdinance levying the special assessment for the Los Feliz\nVillage BID’s twenty-third operating period beginning January 1,\n2026 to December 31, 2026.\n5. APPROVE the Los Feliz Village Business Improvement\nCorporation a California non-profit mutual benefit corporation, to\nadminister the proposed services of the Los Feliz Village\nBusiness Improvement District pursuant to Section 36500 et\nseq. of the California Streets and Highways Code and City\nregulations.\n6. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk, subject to City Attorney approval, to\nprepare, execute, and administer a contract between the City\nand the Los Feliz Village Business Improvement Corporation to\nadminister the Los Feliz Village BID, if the Ordinance\nreconfirming the BID is adopted.\n7. APPOINT the Advisory Board listed in the 2026 Annual Report\nattached to the Council file.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that this is a\nmerchant-based BID and there are no assessments for City-owned\nproperties within the BID, therefore, there is no impact on the General\nFund.

(1)\n12-0139\nCDs 1, 8,\n& 9\nCity Clerk report relative to the Fiscal Year 2026 Annual Planning\nReport for the Figueroa Corridor, Property-Based, Business\nImprovement District.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(10)\n25-1498\nMotion (Nazarian – Blumenfield) relative to instructing the City\nAttorney, with assistance from FilmLA, the Board of Public Works, the\nLos Angeles Police Department, the Los Angeles Fire Department, and\nthe Los Angeles Department of Transportation, to prepare and present\nwithin 60 days an ordinance establishing a free Micro-Shoot Permit,\nrequired for any public-space filming activity.

(11)\n25-1499\nMotion (Nazarian – Lee) relative to waiving Los Angeles Fire\nDeparttment (LAFD) “spot check” fees, a report on LAFD’s ability to\nrecover associated costs; and, reports on a strategy for proactive\nenforcement and public education initiative regarding Los Angeles\nMunicipal Code Section 41.20 and lawful filming, establishment of a\ncitywide Motion Picture Officer staffing matrix, implementation of a\ncivilian Film Safety Officer classification; and, related matters. (This\nitem   is   referred   to   the   Economic   Development   and   Jobs\nCommittee and Budget and Finance Committee.)

(12)\n25-1500\nMotion (Nazarian - McOsker) relative to requesting the City Controller\nto conduct an independent audit of the City’s complete film permitting\necosystem, including but not limited to, departmental operations,\nFilmLA Contract performance and operations, public transparency\nstructural and legislative barriers, and instructing various departments\nto prepare an Annual Keep Hollywood Home Implementation report;\nand related matters.

(13)\n25-1501\nMotion (Nazarian – Park) relative to instructing various offices and\ndepartments, and FilmLA, with support from all Countywide Councils of\nGovernments, to develop and launch a Citywide Film Location Fan\nTour within 90 days, a “Made in LA” Film Branding Initiative, including,\nan annual “Made in LA Film Week” celebrating the City’s film\nlegacy, and instructing various departments, and FilmLA, to publish a\ncomprehensive Film Business Directory, within 90 days; and related\nmatters.

(14)\n25-1502\nMotion (Nazarian – Raman) relative to instructing all departments with\nresponsibilities under Executive Directive 11 — including the Los\nAngeles Police Department, Los Angeles Fire Department, Department\nofTransportation, Department of Recreation and Parks. Bureau of\nStreet Services. Bureau of Engineering, Department of Water and\nPower, Port of Los Angeles, and FilmLA — to report back within 45\ndays on their implementation of ED 11; and related matters.

(15)\n25-1503\nMotion (Nazarian – Padilla) reative to instructing the Los Angeles\nDepartment of Water and Power (LADWP), Department of Building\nand Safety (LADBS), Department of City Planning (DCP). Los Angeles\nFire Department (LAFD), and the Board of Public Works (BPW), with\nsupport from the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), to develop and\npresent within 60 days a Citywide Soundstage Certification and Fast-\nTrack Infrastructure Program; and related matters.

(16)\n25-1508\nMotion (Nazarian – Hutt) relative to making all non-specialized City-\nowned parking lots, yards, staging areas, and civic properties available\nto film and television productions for a nominal fee.\n(Referred   to   the   Energy   and   Environment,   Government\nOperations,   Public   Works,   Transportation,   and   Economic\nDevelopment and Jobs Committees)

(17)\n25-1509-S1\nMotion (Nazarian - Harris-Dawson) relative to instructing the\nDepartment of Recreation and Parks (RAP), Los Angeles Police\nDepartment (LAPD), Department of Transportation (LADOT), Los\nAngeles Fire Department (LAFD), Board of Public Works (BPW)\nBureau of Street Services (BSS), with assistance from FilmLA, and\nany other relevant departments involved in the film permitting process,\nto report within 90 days on a unified Citywide Filming Conditions\nFramework; and related matters.

(18)\n25-1512\nMotion (Nazarian - McOsker) relative to instructing the Economic and\nWorkforce Development Department (EWDD) and FilmLA, with\nsupport from all overlapping Los Angeles County Councils of\nGovernment, to develop and negotiate regional Memoranda of\nUnderstanding (MOUs) with neighboring film jurisdictions within 180\ndays; and related matters.

(2)\n13-0705\nCD 5\nCity Clerk report relative to the Fiscal Year 2026 Annual Planning\nReport for the Melrose Property, Property-Based, Business\nImprovement District.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(3)\n14-0101-S1\nCD 1, CD 10\nCity Clerk report relative to the Fiscal Year 2026 Annual Planning\nReport for the Byzantine Latino Quarter - Pico, Property-Based,\nBusiness Improvement District.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(4)\n22-0058\nCD 13\nCity Clerk report relative to the Fiscal Year 2026 Annual Planning\nReport for the Larchmont Village Property, Property-Based, Business\nImprovement District.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(5)\n22-0310\nCD 9, CD 14\nCity Clerk report relative to the Fiscal Year 2026 Annual Planning\nReport for the Greater South Park, Property-Based, Business\nImprovement District.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(6)\n24-0415\nCD 1, CD 14\nCity Clerk report relative to the Fiscal Year 2026 Annual Planning\nReport for the Highland Park, Property-Based, Business Improvement\nDistrict.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(7)\n24-0477\nCD 2\nCity Clerk report relative to the Fiscal Year 2026 Annual Planning\nReport for the North Hollywood Transit, Property-Based, Business\nImprovement District.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(8)\n25-0006-S38\nCD 11\nEconomic and Workforce Development Department reports, dated\nJune 16, 2025 and January 27, 2026, and Substitute Motion (Park –\nLee) dated December 9, 2025, relative to the feasibility of creating a\nClimate Resilience District for the directly impacted and adjacent areas\nof the Pacific Palisades Fire; and identifying funding for a feasibility\nstudy. (This   item   is   referred   to   the  Ad   Hoc   Committee   for   LA\nRecovery,   Budget   and   Finance   Committee,   and   Economic\nDevelopment and Jobs Committee.)\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(9)\n25-1402\nCity Administrative Officer report and Joint Report from Economic and\nWorkforce Development Department and Workforce Development\nBoard relative to modifications to the Program Year 2025-26 Workforce\nDevelopment Board Annual Plan, Carry-in/Savings from Program Year\n2024-25; and related matters.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nFinancial Policies Statement: Yes

(1)\n23-1022-S27\nCONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 11, 2026\nCity Administrative Officer report relative to Fiscal Year 2025-26 Third\nHomelessness Funding Report. (This   item   is   referred   to   the\nHousing   and   Homelessness   Committee   and   the   Budget   and\nFinance Committee.)\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nFinancial Policies Statement: Yes