Los Angeles — 2023-08-10

10. Recommend Approval of the Application of MedQuest Medical Transport, Inc. for\nOne Unrestricted Non-Ambulatory Passenger Vehicle Permit

11. Recommend Approval of Application of TransitCare dba Transitcare Medical\nTransportation for Three Unrestricted Non-Ambulatory Passenger Vehicle\nPermits\nACTION ITEM

12. Create an Ad Hoc Committee to review the Department’s application process\nand change in the procedure

13. Recommended Disciplinary Action Against DNPA Transportation dba Care Tech\nTransportation (ID #2646) Concerning the July 5, 2023 Violation of Los Angeles\nMunicipal Code (LAMC) Section 71.03(B) – Unpermitted Driver

14. Appeal of Empire Transportation (Co. ID #2546) Regarding the Company’s June\n27, 2023, Violation of Los Angeles Municipal Code § 71.02(A) – Unpermitted\nVehicle and 71.03(B) – Unpermitted Driver

15. Appeal of Secure Med Tranz, Company ID #2676 Regarding the Company’s\nJune 28, 2023, Violation of Los Angeles Municipal Code § 71.02(A) –\nUnpermitted Vehicle and § 71.04.1 – Unpermitted Non-Ambulatory Attendant\nEXECUTIVE SESSION

16. Appeal of Daniel Raymond Ware Concerning the Department’s June 15, 2023,\nDenial of His Application for a New Private Ambulance Driver Permit, Pursuant to\nBoard Order 600, Rule D1

17. Appeal of Christian Ian Williams Concerning the Department’s June 22, 2023,\nCancellation of His Motor Bus Driver Permit #626985, Pursuant to Los Angeles\nMunicipal Code § 71.06 – Falsification of Application\nBOARD OF TRANSPORTATION\nCOMMISSIONERS AGENDA -3- August 10, 2023

18. Appeal of Owen Brown Concerning the Department’s June 23, 2023,\nCancellation of His Motor Bus Driver Permit (626946), Pursuant to Los Angeles\nMunicipal Code 71.06 – Department of Transportation (DOT) Transit

19. Appeal of Roy Rivas Concerning the Department’s June 23, 2023, Cancellation\nof His Motor Bus Driver Permit #626922, Pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal\nCode § 71.06 – Falsification of Application - Department of Transportation (DOT)\nTransit

20. Appeal of Mario Andres Nivea Concerning the Department’s June 23, 2023,\nCancellation of His Motor Bus Driver Permit (#62694), Pursuant to Los Angeles\nMunicipal Code § 71.06 – Department of Transportation (DOT) Transit

4. Commission Business\na. Election of President\nb. Election of Vice President

5. Communications

7. Temporary Conversion of Municipal Parking Lot No. 707 to a Modular Interim\nHousing Facility\nCONSENT ITEM

8. Recommend Approval of the Application of Ride on Time, LLC for Three\nUnrestricted Non-Ambulatory Passenger Vehicle Permits

9. Recommend Approval of the Application of Pro Ride Inc for Three Unrestricted\nNon-Ambulatory Passenger Vehicle Permits

2. NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL POSITION STATEMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS\nPresentations by Neighborhood Council representatives on any Neighborhood Council resolution, or\ncommunity impact statement filed with the City Clerk, which relates to any agenda item listed or being\nconsidered on this agenda. The Neighborhood Council representative shall provide the Board or\nCommission with a copy of the Neighborhood Council's resolution or community impact statement by email\nto cpc@lacity.org. At the Chair’s discretion, presentations of Neighborhood Councils on any matter listed\non the agenda for this Commission meeting may be taken at the time the agenda item is taken for\nconsideration.

4. RECONSIDERATIONS\na. MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER – The Commission may make a motion to reconsider a Commission\nAction on any agenda items from its previous meeting, consistently with the Commission Rule 9.3,\nprovided the Commission retains jurisdiction over the matter.\nb. MERITS OF ANY ITEM THE COMMISSION HAS VOTED TO RECONSIDER – If a majority of the\nCommission has approved a motion to reconsider a Commission Action, the Commission may address\nthe merits of the original Commission Action.

5. CONSENT CALENDAR (5a)\nConsent Calendar items are considered to be not controversial and will be treated as one agenda item.\nThe Consent Calendar will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items\nunless the item is removed from the Consent Calendar, in which event the item will be considered as time\nallows on the regular agenda.\n5a. CPC-2023-397-DB-SPR-HCA Council District: 8 – Harris-Dawson\nCEQA: ENV-2023-398-CE Last Day to Act: 08-27-23\nPlan Area: South Los Angeles\nPUBLIC HEARING – Completed June 13, 2023\nPROJECT SITE: 1724 West Adams Boulevard (1722 – 1734 West Adams Boulevard)\nPROPOSED PROJECT:\nDemolition of a single-story, multi-tenant commercial building, and the construction, use, and maintenance\nof a new five-story residential building, 60 feet in height, containing a total of 90 dwelling units with 10 units\nreserved for Very Low Income Households. The proposed development will contain approximately 73,603\nsquare feet of floor area, equating to a total Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of approximately 3:1. The Project will\nprovide a total of 7,380 square feet of open space composed of private balconies, a courtyard, terraces, a\nrecreation room, and a gym. The Project will have one subterranean level that will contain a total of 51\nvehicle parking stalls, and will provide a total of 76 bicycle parking stalls.\nREQUESTED ACTIONS:\n1. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15332 (Class 32), an Exemption from CEQA, and that there is\nno substantial evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA\nGuidelines, Section 15300.2 applies;\n2. Pursuant to Section 12.22 A.25 of the the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC), a Density Bonus for\na Housing Development containing a total of 90 dwelling units, of which 10 units, or 15 percent of the\nbase density, will be set aside for Very Low Income Households), along with the following On- and\nOff-Menu Incentives:\na. An On-Menu Incentive to permit up to a maximum 20 percent reduction in the required amount of\nopen space;\nb. An Off-Menu Incentive to permit a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 3:1, in lieu of the otherwise\npermitted FAR of 1.5:1; and\nc. An Off-Menu Incentive to permit a 15-foot increase in building height to 60 feet, in lieu of the\notherwise permitted 45 feet; and\n3. Pursuant to LAMC Section 16.05, a Site Plan Review for the construction of a new residential\ndevelopment resulting in a net increase of 50 or more dwelling units.\nApplicant: Amir Ohebsion, FAC Abrams Boulevard, LLC\nRepresentative: Dana Sayles, three6ixty\nStaff: Trevor Martin, City Planning Associate\ntrevor.martin@lacity.org\n(213) 978-1341\nCity Planning Commission 3 August 10, 2023

6. CPC-2022-8256-CU-DB-PHP-HCA Council District: 11 – Park\nCEQA: ENV-2022-8256-CE Last Day to Act: 08-10-23\nPlan Area: Palms – Mar Vista – Del Rey\nPUBLIC HEARING – Completed March 14, 2023\nPROJECT SITE: 12118 – 12134 West Pacific Avenue\nPROPOSED PROJECT:\nConstruction, use, and maintenance of a new six-story, 67-foot in height, approximately 94,579 square-\nfoot apartment building containing 74 units, including 11 units set aside for Very Low Income households.\nThe Project proposes to provide 122 on-site vehicular parking spaces and 64 bicycle parking spaces within\none at-grade level and one subterranean level.\nREQUESTED ACTIONS:\n1. Pursuant CEQA Guidelines, Section 15332, Class 32, an Exemption from CEQA, and that there is no\nsubstantial evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA\nGuidelines, Section 15300.2 applies;\n2. Pursuant to Section 12.22 A.25 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC), a Density Bonus for a\nHousing Development with a total of 74 units, of which 11 units, or 25 percent of the base density, will\nbe set aside for Very Low Income households, along with the following On-Menu Incentives and\nWaiver of Development Standard:\na. An On-Menu Incentive to allow a 20 percent reduced front yard setback of 12 feet in lieu of the\n15 feet otherwise required;\nb. An On-Menu Incentive to allow a 20 percent reduced (east) side yard setback of seven feet, three-\ninches in lieu of the nine feet otherwise required;\nc. An On-Menu Incentive to allow a 35 percent increase in Floor Area Ratio (FAR) up to 4.05:1 in\nlieu of the 3:1 otherwise required; and\nd. A Waiver of Development Standard to permit an increase in building height up to 67 feet in lieu\nof the 45 feet otherwise required and to allow increased height for portions of a building in a\nHousing Development project that are within 50 feet of an R1 zoned lot; and\n3. Pursuant to LAMC Section 12.24 U.26, a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Density Bonus for a\nhousing development project in which the density increase is greater than otherwise permitted by\nLAMC Section 12.22 A.25.\nApplicant: Robert Green, DMTV, LLC\nRepresentative: Matthew Hayden, Hayden Planning\nStaff: Esther Ahn, City Planner\nesther.ahn@lacity.org\n(213) 978-1486

7. VTT-83478-1A Council District: 13 – Soto-Martinez\nCEQA: ENV-2021-7332-MND Last Day to Act: 08-21-23\nPlan Area: Hollywood\nRelated Case: CPC-2021-7331-ZC-HD-VCU-MCUP-SPR\nPUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED\nPROJECT SITE: 5601 – 5673 West Santa Monica Boulevard;\n5612 – 5666 West Virginia Avenue; 1110 – 1118 North Wilton Place\nPROPOSED PROJECT:\nDemolition of an existing commercial building and the construction of a new 510,621-square-foot\nproduction studio and creative office campus with a maximum building height of six stories and 93 feet,\nincluding 109,957 square feet of production studios and related support space, 388,286 square feet of\ncreative office space, and 12,378 square feet of restaurant space, with 981 vehicular parking spaces on-\nsite within two levels of subterranean parking. The Project includes the merger of an existing 11,373-\nsquare-foot public alley that runs through the project site, a subdivision resulting in a ground lot and eight\nair space lots, and a waiver for all dedication and street widening requirements, in the Hollywood\nCommunity Plan.\nAPPEAL:\nAn appeal of the June 23, 2023, Advisory Agency’s determination which:\n1. Found, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074(b), after consideration of the whole of the\nadministrative record, including the Mitigated Negative Declaration, No. ENV-2021-7332-MND, as\ncirculated on May 3, 2023 (“Mitigated Negative Declaration”), and all comments received, with the\nimposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a\nsignificant effect on the environment; Found, the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the\nindependent judgment and analysis of the City; Found, the mitigation measures have been made\nenforceable conditions on the project; and Adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the\nMitigation Monitoring Program prepared for the Mitigated Negative Declaration;\n2. Approved, pursuant to Sections 17.03 and 17.15 of the Los Angele Municipal Code, a Vesting\nTentative Tract Map No. 83478 (map date-stamped October 29, 2021) located 5601 – 5673 West\nSanta Monica Boulevard, 5612 – 5666 West Virginia Avenue and 1110 – 1118 North Wilton Place, for\na merger of an existing public alley that runs through the property and subdivision resulting in a ground\nlot and seven air lots and to waive all dedication and street widening requirements along Wilton Place,\nSanta Monica Boulevard, in the Hollywood Community Plan; and\n3. Adopted the Conditions of Approval and Findings.\nApplicant/ Santa Monica Boulevard Owner, LLC\nAppellant: Representative: Kyndra Casper, DLA Piper LLC\nStaff: Michelle Carter, City Planner\nmichelle.carter@lacity.org\n(213) 978-1262

8. CPC-2021-7331-ZC-HD-VCU-MCUP-SPR Council District: 13 – Soto-Martinez\nCEQA: ENV-2021-7332-MND Last Day to Act: 08-21-23\nPlan Area: Hollywood\nRelated Case: VTT-83478-1A\nPUBLIC HEARING – Completed May 3, 2023\nPROJECT SITE: 5601 – 5673 West Santa Monica Boulevard;\n5612 – 5666 West Virginia Avenue; 1110 – 1118 North Wilton Place\nPROPOSED PROJECT:\nDemolition of an existing commercial building and the construction of a new 510,621-square-foot\nproduction studio and creative office campus with a maximum building height of six stories and 93 feet,\nincluding 109,957 square feet of production studios and related support space, 388,286 square feet of\ncreative office space, and 12,378 square feet of restaurant space, with 981 vehicular parking spaces on-\nsite within two levels of subterranean parking.\nREQUESTED ACTIONS:\n1. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074(b), the whole of the administrative record, including the\nMitigated Negative Declaration No. ENV-2021-7332-MND (Mitigated Negative Declaration) and all\ncomments received;\n2. Pursuant to Section 12.32 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC), a Zone and Height District\nChange from R4-1VL and C4-1VL to C4-2D;\n3. Pursuant to LAMC Section 12.24 U.14, a Vesting Conditional Use Permit for a Major Development\nProject to allow the construction of over 100,000 square feet of non-residential uses in the C4 Zone;\n4. Pursuant to LAMC Section 12.24 W.1, a Main Conditional Use Permit to allow:\na. The sale and dispensing of a full line of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption within a\nground floor restaurant at the corner of St. Andrews Place and Santa Monica Boulevard with\n6,031 square feet of indoor space and 3,291 square feet of outdoor space, and 166 indoor seats\nand 185 outdoor seats, with hours of operation from 7:30 am to 11:00 pm, daily;\nb. The sale and dispensing of a full line of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption within a\nground floor restaurant at the corner of Wilton Place and Santa Monica Boulevard with 2,468\nsquare feet of indoor space and 800 square feet of outdoor space, and 61 indoor seats and 54\noutdoor seats, with hours of operation from 7:30 am to 11:00 pm, daily;\nc. The sale and dispensing of beer and wine on the third floor tenant amenity space with 2,083\nsquare feet of indoor area and 1,150 square feet of outdoor area, with 87 indoor seats and 72\noutdoor seats, with hours of operation from 7:30 am to 9:00 pm, daily; and\nd. The sale and dispensing of alcoholic beverages throughout the Project site's office towers, office\nbungalows, production studios, and outdoor terrace, to allow alcoholic beverages to be served\nduring special events; and\n5. Pursuant to LAMC Section 16.05, a Site Plan Review to allow the construction of 551,258 square feet\nof development containing production studios, office, retail and accessory related uses with on-site\nassociated parking.\nApplicant: Santa Monica Boulevard Owner, LLC\nRepresentative:Kyndra Casper, DLA Piper LLC\nStaff: Michelle Carter, City Planner\nmichelle.carter@lacity.org\n(213) 978-1262

1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS\n(Government Code Section 54956.8)\nProvide instructions to its real estate negotiators with respect to Permit 750 with\nSA Recycling:\nProperty: 901 New Dock Street, San Pedro\nCity Negotiators: Mike DiBernardo and Marisa Katnich\nTenant Negotiator: Terry Adams\nNegotiating Parties: City and SA Recycling\nUnder Negotiation: Price and Terms

1. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - APPROVAL OF AN ADDENDUM TO THE\nCHASSIS DEPOT AND REPAIR FACILITIES AT BERTH 206-209 FINAL INITIAL\nSTUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION (LOS ANGELES HARBOR DEPARTMENT\nAPPLICATION FOR PORT PERMIT NO. 221021-178; STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO.\n2019049132)\nSummary: Staff requests Staff requests consideration of the Addendum to the Chassis Depot\nand Repair Facilities at Berths 206-209 Final Initial Study/Negative Declaration to include the\nContainer Freight Station Building Demolition and Lot Conversion Project, and approval of the\nProject. The Addendum modifies the project description by including the complete demolition of\nthe CFS Warehouse and reuse of the site for chassis depot and repair operations with container\nand chassis storage. No significant environmental impacts are expected from these project\nmodifications.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that, in accordance with the provisions of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15164, the revised Project will\nnot result in any significant environmental effects or substantially more severe effects than\npreviously analyzed in the adopted Final Initial Study/Negative Declaration for the Chassis Depot\nand Repair Facilities at Berths 206-209; (2) consider the Addendum to the previously adopted\nFinal Initial Study/Negative Declaration for the Chassis Depot and Repair Facilities at Berths\n206-209; (3) authorize the Environmental Management Division to file a Notice of Determination\nwith the Los Angeles County Clerk and the State Clearinghouse; (4) approve the Project\nAddendum; and (5) adopt Resolution No. __________________ .\nConstruction & Maintenance

10. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - APPROVAL OF FOURTH AMENDMENT TO\nPACIFIC HARBOR LINE OPERATING AGREEMENT\nSummary: Staff requests approval of the Fourth Amendment to Operating Agreement No. 1989\nbetween the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department and Pacific Harbor Line, Inc., which will\nextend the term of the Agreement from December 31, 2024, to December 31, 2025. Pacific\nHarbor Line is a shortline railroad that is the current Port of Los Angeles-Port of Long Beach\ncomplex rail operator. The PRO provides rail services for POLA terminals, which also includes\ninterchanging trains with the BNSF Railway and Union Pacific Railroad. The Harbor Department\nand the POLB each have an operating agreement with PHL. Staff of both ports are currently\ndeveloping a joint request for proposals for selecting the next PRO in advance of the expiring\nagreements with PHL. The proposed Amendment will enable staff to complete the RFP process\nprior to the amended expiration date of the Agreement. There are no financial impacts to the\nHarbor Department as PHL will continue to pay rent.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City\nCEQA Guidelines; (2) approve the Fourth Amendment to Agreement No. 1989 with PHL to\nextend the term from its current expiration of December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025; (3)\ndirect the Board Secretary to transmit the Resolution and Fourth Amendment to the City Council\nfor approval pursuant to Section 373 of the City Charter and Section 10.5 of the City\nAdministrative Code; and (4) adopt Resolution No. __________________ .\nInformation Technology

11. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO\nAGREEMENT NO. 22-9854 NITI SYSTEMS CONSULTANTS, INC. FOR SYSTEM\nINTEGRATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE ENTERPRISE RESOURCE\nPLANNING (ERP) CLOUD MIGRATION PROJECT\nSummary: Staff requests approval of a First Amendment to the existing City of Los Angeles\nHarbor Department Agreement No. 22-9854 with NITI Systems Consultants, Inc. for the Oracle\nEnterprise Resource Planning Cloud migration project. The ERP Cloud migration project\nschedule has been extended for an additional twelve months and the system will go-live on July\n1, 2024. The proposed Amendment will increase the not-to-exceed amount by $9,240,332, from\n$12,884,438, to the total not-to-exceed agreement amount of $22,124,770. The three-year term\nof the agreement remains unchanged. The Harbor Department will continue to be financially\nresponsible for the payment of expenses incurred under the Agreement.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City\nCEQA Guidelines; (2) find that in accordance with the Los Angeles City Charter Section 1022,\nthe services required can be performed more feasibly by an outside contractor than by City\nemployees; (3) approve the First Amendment to Agreement No. 22-9854 with NITI Systems\nConsultants, Inc. for system integration and support services for an additional amount of\n$9,240,332 with a total not-to-exceed $22,124,770; (4) direct the Board Secretary to transmit the\nFirst Amendment to Agreement No 22-9854 to the Los Angeles City Council for approval\npursuant to Section 373 of the Charter of the City of Los Angeles and Section 10.5 of the Los\nAngeles Administrative Code; (5) authorize the Executive Director to execute and the Board\nSecretary to attest to said Amendment for and on behalf of the Board; and (6) adopt Resolution\nNo. __________________ .\nInformation Technology

12. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO\nAGREEMENT NO. 22-9855 WITH CHERRYROAD TECHNOLOGIES INC. FOR AS-\nNEEDED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STAFF AUGMENTATION SERVICES FOR\nTHE ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING (ERP) CLOUD MIGRATION PROJECT\nSummary: Staff requests approval of the First Amendment to Agreement No. 22-9855 between\nthe City of Los Angeles Harbor Department and CherryRoad Technologies Inc. to provide\ntemporary Information Technology staff augmentation and backfill services to support the Harbor\nDepartment’s Oracle Enterprise Resource Planning Cloud migration project. The ERP Cloud\nproject schedule has been extended for an additional twelve months and the system will go live\non July 1, 2024. The proposed First Amendment will increase the not-to-exceed amount by\n$792,086, to a total not-to-exceed amount of $2,804,986. The three-year term of the agreement\nremains unchanged. The Harbor Department will continue to be financially responsible for the\npayment of expenses incurred under the Agreement.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City\nCEQA Guidelines; (2) find that in accordance with the Los Angeles City Charter Section 1022,\nthe services required can be performed more feasibly by an outside contractor than by City\nemployees; (3) approve the First Amendment to Agreement No. 22-9855 with CherryRoad\nTechnologies Inc. to provide as-needed temporary Information Technology (IT) staff\naugmentation and backfill services for an additional amount of $792,086 with a total not-to-\nexceed agreement amount of $2,804,986 and no change to the three-year agreement term; (4)\ndirect the Board Secretary to transmit the First Amendment to Agreement No. 22-9855 to the\nLos Angeles City Council for approval pursuant to Section 373 of the Charter of the City of Los\nAngeles and Section 10.5 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code; (5) authorize the Executive\nDirector to execute and the Board Secretary to attest to said Amendment for and on behalf of\nthe Board; and (6) adopt Resolution No. __________________ .\nAccounting

13. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - FIRST AMENDMENT TO SERVICE AGREEMENT\nNO. 21-9843 BETWEEN BYRD PROFESSIONAL RESOURCES LLP dba BYRD\nGROUP AND THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR DEPARTMENT FOR STAFFING\nAS-NEEDED BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYSTS SERVICES\nSummary: Staff requests approval of the First Amendment to Agreement No. 21-9843 with Byrd\nProfessional Resources LLP, a professional staffing services headquartered in John’s Creek\nGeorgia, to provide experienced Business Systems Analysts to assist the City of Los Angeles\nHarbor Department in upgrading its on-premise Oracle EBS ERP System to the Oracle ERP\nCloud. This item is associated with items 7 and 8, Amendment to Agreement No. 22-9855 with\nCherryroad Technologies, Inc. and Amendment to Agreement No. 22-9854 Niti Systems\nConsultants, Inc., of this agenda. The proposed First Amendment will exercise the option to\nrenew the term of the Agreement for one year, for a total term not to exceed three years and\nadditional funding of $1,940,400, not-to-exceed the amount of $6,081,200. The proposed\nAmendment is required at this time because the upgrade project schedule has been extended\nfor an additional year. The Harbor Department will continue to be financially responsible for the\npayment of expenditures incurred under the Agreement.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City\nCEQA Guidelines; (2) find that in accordance with the Los Angeles City Charter Section 1022, it\nis more feasible for outside consultants to perform this work than City employees; (3) approve\nthe Amendment to the Agreement No. 21-9843 with Byrd Professional Resources LLP to\nexercise the option to renew the term of the Agreement for one year, for a total term not to\nexceed three years and additional funding of $1,940,400 not-to-exceed the amount of\n$6,081,200; (4) authorize the Executive Director or designee and the Board Secretary to attest\nto the Amendment; and (5) adopt Resolution No. __________________ .\nPort Police

14. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING\nFORMALIZING THE TERMS UNDER WHICH INSTRUCTORS ARE PROVIDED TO\nTHE REGIONAL MARITIME LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING CENTER BETWEEN\nTHE LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE CITY OF LONG BEACH, THE\nCOUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, THE COUNTY OF ORANGE\nSHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SHERIFF’S\nDEPARTMENT, THE SAN DIEGO HARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND THE LOS\nANGELES HARBOR DEPARTMENT\nSummary: Staff requests approval of various Memoranda of Understanding between the Los\nAngeles Police Department, the City of Long Beach, the County of Los Angeles Sheriff’s\nDepartment, the Orange County Sheriff’s Department, the San Diego Harbor Police Department,\nthe San Bernardino Sheriff’s Department, and the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department.\nThese partner agency MOUs, if approved by the Board, will establish the various duties and\nresponsibilities of the Partner Agencies, and those of the City to administer training at the\nRegional Maritime Law Enforcement Training Center (RMLETC).\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II, Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles\nCity CEQA Guidelines; (2) approve the MOUs between the RMLETC partner agencies and the\nCity regarding the duties and responsibilities of those agencies that provide instructors to the\nRMLETC; (3) authorize the Executive Director to execute, and the Board Secretary to attest to,\nthe proposed Memoranda of Understanding for and on behalf of the Board; and (4) adopt\nResolution No. __________________ .

2. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 39995 TO BEACON\nSALES ACQUISITION, INC. DBA BEACON BUILDING PRODUCTS FOR PURCHASE\nOF ROOFING MATERIALS\nSummary: Staff requests approval of Contract No. 39995 with Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc.\ndba Beacon Building Products, headquartered in Herndon, Virginia, with a local office presence\nin Pico Rivera, California, for the purchase of roofing materials for the historical transit shed\nlocated at Berth 155A. The amount of this contract shall not exceed $258,872. The Harbor\nDepartment will be financially responsible for the payment of expenses incurred under the\nproposed contract.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively and categorically exempt from the\nrequirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of\nthe Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines and Section 15331 of the State CEQA Guidelines; (2)\napprove Contract No. 39995 with Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc. dba Beacon Building Products\nfor the purchase of roofing materials in the amount of $258,872; (3) authorize the Executive\nDirector to execute and the Board Secretary to attest to Contract No. 39995 for and on behalf of\nthe Board; and (4) adopt Resolution No. __________________ .\nConstruction & Maintenance

3. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 40002 WITH LA\nROOFING MATERIALS FOR THE PURCHASE OF ROOFING MATERIALS,\nSEALANTS, AND RELATED PRODUCTS\nSummary: Staff requests approval of Contract No. 40002 with LA Roofing Materials of Los\nAngeles, California for the purchase of roofing materials, sealants and related products and\nservices. The proposed Contract term is one year with two one-year renewal options.\nCompensation under the proposed Contract will be $500,000 for the initial year, and $1,500,000\nin aggregate if both one-year options are exercised. The City of Los Angeles Harbor Department\nwill be financially responsible for the payment of expenditures incurred under the proposed\nContract.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively and categorically exempt from the\nrequirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f)\nand Article III Class 1(1) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines and Section 15331 of the\nState CEQA Guidelines; (2) find that in accordance with City of Los Angeles Administrative Code\nDivision 10, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 10.15 (a)(8), the Harbor Department may enter into the\nagreement with LA Roofing Materials based on a cooperative arrangement with City of Los\nAngeles (Department of General Services) to utilize Contract No. ARC 200000000093; (3) find\nthat in accordance with Los Angeles City Charter Section 1022, work under the subject contract\ncan be performed more feasibly by independent contractors than by City employees; (4) approve\nContract No. 40002 with LA Roofing Materials for a term of one year with two one-year renewal\noptions with an annual compensation amount not to exceed $500,000 in the first year; not to\nexceed $500,000 in the first renewal option year; not to exceed $500,000 in the second renewal\noption year; for a total compensation amount not to exceed $1,500,000 if the renewal options\nare exercised; and authorize said expenditures; (5) authorize the Executive Director to execute\nContract No. 40002; and (6) adopt Resolution No. __________________ .\nInformation Technology

4. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO\nAGREEMENT NO. 21-9826 WITH SIERRA CYBERNETICS, INC. FOR ON-CALL\nINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES\nSummary: Staff requests approval of a First Amendment to City of Los Angeles Harbor\nDepartment Agreement No. 21-9826 with Sierra Cybernetics, Inc. for Information Technology\nservices on an on-call, as-needed basis which may include support for on-going IT operations,\nincluding the helpdesk, end user support, data center, servers, storage, network, cyber security,\nsoftware applications, databases, telephones, cellular services, data circuits, physical security\nsystems, and related IT services. The proposed Amendment will increase the not-to-exceed\nagreement amount by $970,000, from $1,500,000 currently to $2,470,000 as proposed. The\nthree-year agreement term will remain unchanged. The Harbor Department will continue to be\nfinancially responsible for the payment of expenses incurred under the Agreement.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City\nCEQA Guidelines; (2) find that in accordance with the Los Angeles City Charter Section 1022,\nthe services required can be performed more feasibly by an outside contractor than by City\nemployees; (3) approve the First Amendment to Agreement No. 21-9826 with Sierra Cybernetics\nInc. to provide on-call, as-needed Information Technology services for an additional amount of\n$970,000 with a new total not-to-exceed agreement amount of $2,470,000 and no change to the\nthree-year agreement term; (4) authorize the Executive Director to execute and the Board\nSecretary to attest to said Amendment for and on behalf of the Board; and (5) adopt Resolution\nNo. __________________ .\nExecutive Office

5. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - APPOINTING REGULAR MEMBER AND\nALTERNATE MEMBER TO THE INTERMODAL CONTAINER TRANSFER FACILITY\n(ICTF) JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (JPA) GOVERNING BOARD\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) adopt subject Resolution No.__________.\nExecutive Office

6. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - APPOINTING COMMISSIONER I. LEE WILLIAMS\nAS THE ALTERNATE MEMBER TO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE ALAMEDA\nCORRIDOR TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) adopt subject Resolution No.__________.\nRegular Items (7 – 14)\nEnvironmental Management

7. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT WITH YUSEN\nTERMINALS LLC. TO IMPLEMENT A ZERO EMISSION YARD TRACTOR\nDEMONSTRATION PROJECT\nSummary: Staff requests approval of an agreement with Yusen Terminals, LLC. to implement a\nzero-emission yard tractor demonstration project. The Project requires YTI to demonstrate two\nzero-emission yard tractors at the terminal property for three years in order to satisfy an\nenvironmental requirement contained in Permit No. 692 identified as “Lease Measure AQ-4:\nZero or Near-Zero Emissions Demonstration Project.” The Agreement sets out the respective\ncosts and responsibilities between the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department and YTI. YTI is\nrequired to lease the demonstration equipment from its selected vendor and conduct the\ndemonstration with periodic reports to the Harbor Department. The Harbor Department is\nrequired to install electrical charging infrastructure, reimburse YTI for the equipment lease\npayments and other related costs, and provide administrative oversight for the Project. The\nHarbor Department will be financially responsible for all costs of the Project specified in the\nAgreement, including equipment lease costs, infrastructure equipment installation, and\nmaintenance costs for a total estimated cost of $1,500,000.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(i), of the Los Angeles City\nCEQA Guidelines; (2) approve the Agreement between the City of Los Angeles Harbor\nDepartment and Yusen Terminals, LLC.; (3) direct the Board Secretary to transmit the\nAgreement to the City Council for approval pursuant to Charter Section 373; (4) authorize the\nExecutive Director to execute and the Board Secretary to attest to said Agreement upon approval\nby City Council; and (5) adopt Resolution No. __________________ .\nConstruction

8. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO\nCOOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 07-5257 BETWEEN THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES\nHARBOR DEPARTMENT AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF\nTRANSPORTATION TO MANAGE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE STATE ROUTE\n47(SR-47)/VINCENT THOMAS BRIDGE AND FRONT STREET/HARBOR BOULEVARD\nINTERCHANGE RECONFIGURATION PROJECT\nSummary: Staff requests approval of First Amendment to Cooperative Agreement No. 07-5257\nbetween the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department and the State of California Department of\nTransportation during construction of the SR-47/Vincent Thomas Bridge and Front Street/Harbor\nBoulevard Interchange Reconfiguration Project. Cooperative Agreement No. 07-5257 defines\nthe respective roles and responsibilities of each agency during the construction phase of the\nProject. This First Amendment will replace Funding Summary No. 1 with Funding Summary No.\n2 to reflect latest grant amounts and overall project construction cost total. The Agreement will\nterminate after construction is completed and a Closure Statement is signed by all parties. The\nestimated cost for the construction phase of the Project is $92,975,000.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is exempt from the requirements of the California\nEnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City CEQA\nGuidelines; (2) approve the First Amendment to Caltrans Cooperative Agreement No. 07-5257\nbetween the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department and the State of California Department of\nTransportation; (3) authorize the Executive Director to execute and the Board Secretary to attest\nto said Amendment for and on behalf of the Board; (4) authorize the Executive Director to\nexecute any future Amendments to account for revised project schedules, and/or increase\nproject costs, for and on behalf of the Board, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to\nform and legality; and (5) adopt Resolution No. __________________ .\nCargo & Industrial Real Estate

9. RESOLUTION NO. ____________ - APPROVE REVOCABLE PERMIT NO. 23-11\nBETWEEN THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR DEPARTMENT AND THE CITY OF\nLOS ANGELES GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT\nSummary: Staff requests approval of successor Revocable Permit No. 23-11 with the City of Los\nAngeles General Services Department for premises located at 826 Eubank Avenue in\nWilmington. Under RP 23-11, GSD will continue to operate a transitional accommodation facility\nfor unhoused individuals for a term not to exceed 42 months. RP 23-11 will serve as the\nsuccessor to the existing revocable permit with GSD for this site, which expires on August 31,\n2023. Compensation to the Harbor Department will continue to be $125 per year, based upon\nthe California State Lands Commission’s minimum rent regulations for a public agency pursuant\nto California Code of Regulations section 2003(b)(7) and (e)(4). Total rent over the 42-month\nterm will be $437.50.\nRecommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has\ndetermined that the proposed action is categorically exempt from the requirements of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article III Class 1(14) of the Los Angeles\nCity CEQA Guidelines; (2) find that entering into Revocable Permit No. 23-11 is in the best\ninterest of the City of Los Angeles despite certain exceptions to the City of Los Angeles Harbor\nDepartment’s Leasing Policy, Section VIII Rates, Fees and Charges; (3) find that there is no\nimmediate need for a public trust-compliant use at 826 Eubank Ave. in Wilmington and the\nproposed use will not substantially interfere with public trust needs and values for the limited\nterm of the proposed use; (4) find that the use as a temporary accommodations facility is a\ntemporary, interim use; (5) find that the temporary accommodations facility provides an important\npublic benefit; (6) approve Revocable Permit No. 23-11 with the City of Los Angeles General\nServices Department; (7) authorize the Executive Director to execute and the Board Secretary\nto attest to the Revocable Permit No. 23-11; and (8) adopt Resolution No. __________________\n.\nGoods Movement

B. Executive Director Remarks

C. Comment from the Public on Non-Agenda Items

D. Report from the Neighborhood Council Representatives – An opportunity for\nNeighborhood Council representatives to provide remarks on Neighborhood Council\nResolutions or Community Impact Statements filed with the City Clerk which relate to any\nagenda item listed or being considered on this agenda for the Board of Harbor\nCommissioners.

E. Reports of the Commissioners

F. Board Committee Reports\nNone

H. Presentation\n1. AltaSea Update – Terry Tamminen, CEO AltaSea at the Port of Los Angeles\n2. Technology Demonstration Projects – Chris Cannon, Director of Environmental Management

I. Level I Coastal Development Permit\nNone

J. Board Reports of the Executive Director\nConsent Items (1 – 6)\nEnvironmental Management

K. Closed Session