Los Angeles — 2024-09-13

(1)\nBPW­2024­0514\nCD 11\nFRIDAY, AUGUST 30, 2024\nPRESENTATION\nAGENDA ITEM(S)\nBUREAU OF STREET SERVICES\n(1)\nBPW­2024­0514\nCD 11\nFIRST AMENDMENT TO PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT (PSC) – MARIPOSA\nLANDSCAPES, INC.\nRecommending the Board:\n1. APPROVE and forward this report with transmittals to the Mayor pursuant to\nMayoral Executive Directive No. 3 (Villaraigosa Series) with the request that\nthe Board be authorized to execute the First Amendment to the\nPSC with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. to extend the term of the contract on a\nmonth­to­month basis for the maintenance and cleaning of the Venice\nCanals, Grand Canal, and Ballona Lagoon; and\n2. AUTHORIZE the President or two members of the Board to execute the First\nAmendment upon approval by the Mayor and City Council.\n(W.O. M0000131, C­139658)\nJOINT REPORT(S)

(2)\nBPW­2024­0513\nBOE + BCA\nCD ALL\nREVISED TASK ORDER SOLICITATION (TOS) NO. 104 AND NO. 106, UNDER\nCONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 5 – FSY ARCHITECTS, INC.\nRecommending the Board:\n1. AUTHORIZE the City Engineer to issue a revision of the task for TOS No.\n104 to FSY Architects, Inc. (FSY), increasing the budget authority from\n$821,260 to $833,432 for architectural/engineering services for the Vision\nTheatre ­ Manchester Junior Center Arts Project;\n2. AUTHORIZE the City Engineer to issue a revision of the task for TOS No.\n106 to FSY, increasing the budget authority from $946,000 to $1,133,828 to\nprovide architectural/engineering design and construction administration\nservices for the Project Phase Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5; and\n3. APPROVE the revised status of funding tables contained in this report.\n104 to FSY Architects, Inc. (FSY), increasing the budget authority from\n$821,260 to $833,432 for architectural/engineering services for the Vision\nTheatre ­ Manchester Junior Center Arts Project;\n2. AUTHORIZE the City Engineer to issue a revision of the task for TOS No.\n106 to FSY, increasing the budget authority from $946,000 to $1,133,828 to\nprovide architectural/engineering design and construction administration\nservices for the Project Phase Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5; and\n3. APPROVE the revised status of funding tables contained in this report.\nTable IV: Previously­Approved Funding Appropriation for TOS Nos. 104 and 106\nBudget\nFiscal Fund No./ Fund Appropriation Unit Approved Increase/\nYear Dept. No. Name No. Amount Decrease Total\nPY36 424/22 CDBG 22G418 $711,260 $0 $ 711,260\nPY38 424/22 CDBG 22J418 $110,000 $0 $ 110,000\nTOS No. 104 Total $ 821,260\n2007 424/22 CDBG 22A709 $296,000 $0 $ 296,000\n2015 298/50 MICLA 50PTVT $250,000 $0 $ 250,000\n2019 298/50 MICLA 50RTVT $200,000 $0 $ 200,000\n2019 298/50 MICLA 50RTSF $200,000 $0 $ 200,000\nTOS No. 106 Total $ 946,000\nTOS Nos. 104 and 106 TOTAL $1,767,260\nTable V: Revised Funding Appropriation for TOS Nos. 104 and 106\nBudget Fiscal\nYear Fund No. Fund Appropriation Unit Approved Increase/\nName No. Amount Decrease Total\nPY36 424/22 CDBG 22G418 $711,260 $0 $ 711,260\nPY38 424/22 CDBG 22J418 $110,000 $0 $ 110,000\n2007 424/22 CDBG 22A7091 $ 12,172 $0 $ 12,172\nTOS No. 104 Total $ 833,432\n2007 424/22 CDBG 22A7091 $283,828 $0 $ 283,828\n2018 298/50 MICLA 50PTVT $250,000 $0 $ 250,000\n2019 298/50 MICLA 50RTVT $200,000 $(20,000) $ 180,000\n2023 298/50 MICLA 50WPAA $200,000 $0 $ 200,000\n2019 682/50 BOE 50RVDJ2 $0 $220,000 $ 220,000\n(PHASE 5)\nTOS No. 106 Total $1,133,828\nTOS Nos. 104 and 106 Total $1,967,260\n1. Funding source associated with TOS Nos. 104 and 106.\n2. Funding source associated with Phase No. 5 added scope and additional contingency.\n(W.O. E170378D, C­106420)\nADMINISTRATIVE ITEM(S)\n2019 682/50 BOE 50RVDJ2 $0 $220,000 $ 220,000\n(PHASE 5)\nTOS No. 106 Total $1,133,828\nTOS Nos. 104 and 106 Total $1,967,260\n1. Funding source associated with TOS Nos. 104 and 106.\n2. Funding source associated with Phase No. 5 added scope and additional contingency.\n(W.O. E170378D, C­106420)\nADMINISTRATIVE ITEM(S)

(3)\nBPW­2024­0517\nCD ALL\nThe Mayor has approved and authorized the Board of Public Works, on behalf of the\nBureau of Street Lighting, to execute the Request for Authority to accept grant funding for\nthe National Aeronautics and Space Administration.\n(REF: BPW­2024­0401)\nORAL REPORT(S)

(4)\nBPW­2024­0515\nStatus Update on Major Upcoming Street Improvement Projects\n­ Bureau of Street Services

(5)\nBPW­2024­0516\nOffice of Forest Management Update\n­ Office of Forest Management

(6)\nBPW­2024­0499\nADVISEMENT #1\nSpecialized On­Call Maintenance Services Update\n­ Bureau of Sanitation\n(CONTINUED FROM WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2024)

(1) 24­0600­S35 BUDGET, FINANCE AND INNOVATION COMMITTEE REPORT relative to Fiscal Year (FY) 2024­25 appropriations limit. Recommendations for Council action: 1. PROVIDE the public, in accordance with Section 7910 of the Government Code, the opportunity to review the documentation attached to the City Administrative Officer (CAO) report dated July 30, 2024, attached to Council file No. 24­0600­S35, for at least 15 days before adopting an appropriations limit for FY 2024­25. 2. ADOPT the following factors to calculate the appropriations limit for FY 2024­25: a. Population Percent Change​ – City: 0.27 percent b. Nonresidential New Construction: 7.86 percent 3. ADOPT $8,655,270,027 as the appropriations limit for FY 2024­25. Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no fiscal impact in recommendations in the a. Population Percent Change​ – City: 0.27 percent b. Nonresidential New Construction: 7.86 percent

(2) 24­0885 CD 10 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to designating the intersection of Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard and Roxton Avenue as “Church of the Transfiguration Square." Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Hutt – Harris­ Dawson): 1. DESIGNATE the intersection of Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard and Roxton Avenue as “Church of the Transfiguration Square." 2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation to fabricate and install permanent ceremonial signs to this effect at this location, in consultation with Council District 10. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(3) 24­0947 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to protected bicycle lane maintenance. Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Soto­Martinez – Blumenfield – Raman): DIRECT the Bureau of Street Services, with support from the Los Angeles Department of Transportation and City Administrative Officer (CAO), to report on the following: a. Resources needed (equipment and staffing) per mile to sweep existing protected bicycle lanes every other week. b. An overview of existing practices for protected bicycle lane maintenance, including equipment inventory, equipment transportation needs, staffing needs, cost per mile of maintaining protected bicycle lanes using existing practices, and current protected bike lane maintenance funding mechanisms. c. Best practices review for protected bicycle lane maintenance including frequency, cost­benefits analysis of alternative equipment/methods, and additional factors that should be considered identified in this review. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(4) 24­0294 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the maintenance of current and future pedestrian bridge and tunnel projects. Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Blumenfield ­ Raman): 1. INSTRUCT the Bureau of Engineering (BOE), with the assistance of the Bureau of Street Services (BSS), Department of Recreation and Parks (RAP), Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT), and Bureau of Street Lighting (BSL), to report to Council with recommendations to determine which agencies will be responsible for maintenance of current and future pedestrian bridge and tunnel projects, including recommendations to incorporate maintenance needs in the planning and approval phases of future projects, as well as recommendations to incorporate agencies responsible for maintenance in the design of future projects. 2. INSTRUCT the BOE, with the assistance of the BSS, RAP, LADOT, and BSL, to report to Council on the current maintenance responsibilities for existing pedestrian bridges and tunnels, including ongoing funding needs for maintenance; and, to report to Council with recommendations to ensure consistent maintenance policies across all existing pedestrian bridges and tunnels. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(5) 24­0921 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY relative to a proposed Legal Services Agreement with Willkie Farr and Gallagher LLP to provide legal services related to Human Resources advice and litigation. The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) & (e)(3), to discuss the need for outside counsel to assist with Human Resources related advice and litigation. (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee report to be submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an opportunity for public comment will be provided.) (Please visit www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.)

(6) 24­0674 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY relative to proposed Legal Services Agreements with Burke, Williams and Sorenson, LLP, and 2024legal provide the case 8 entitled Vadnais Trenchless Service, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles for public comment will be provided.) (Please visit www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.)

(7) 24­1060 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY relative to the status of the General Fund Liability Account and request for additional funds. The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to discuss the status of the General Fund Liability Account and additional funding. (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee report to be submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an opportunity for public comment will be provided.) (Please visit www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.)

(8) 24­0007­S23 CD 13 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the installation of the name of Mario Lopez on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. Recommendation for Council action: APPROVE the installation of the name of Mario Lopez at 6930 Hollywood Boulevard. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that there is no General Fund impact. All costs are paid by the permittee.

(9) 24­1022 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled T.S., A Minor, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., United States District Court Case No. CV23­06334 FMO (SSCX) (This matter arises from an officer­involved shooting which occurred on January 2, 2023.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee will consider this matter on September 11, 2024.)

(1) 20­1200­S34\nMayor’s report relative to the reappointment of Mia Lehrer to the Board of\nWater and Power Commissioners.\nFinancial Disclosure Statement: Pending\nTIME LIMIT FILE ­ SEPTEMBER 28, 2024\n(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ SEPTEMBER 27, 2024)\nITEM(S)\n(1) 20­1200­S34\nMayor’s report relative to the reappointment of Mia Lehrer to the Board of\nWater and Power Commissioners.\nFinancial Disclosure Statement: Pending\nTIME LIMIT FILE ­ SEPTEMBER 28, 2024\n(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ SEPTEMBER 27, 2024)

(10) 21­0064\nBureau of Sanitation report relative to the Final Program Environmental\nImpact Report for the Comprehensive Plastics Reduction Program,\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Impact findings, and related matters.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nSUPPORTING MATERIALS\nMaterials relating to items on the agenda are available on the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System found at\nhttps://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect by entering the Council File number (e.g., 00­0000) associated with the agenda item.\nPUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS\nMembers of the public who wish to speak on one or multiple items shall have an opportunity to speak up to one minute per item up\nto a total of two minutes for two or more agenda items. At regular meetings, members of the public shall also have an opportunity to\nspeak up to one minute for general public comment on any matter within the subject­matter jurisdiction of the Committee. The\nCommittee is not required to take general public comment at special meetings. The Committee may limit the total amount of time for\npublic comment on any specific agenda item, on all agenda­items collectively, and/or on general public comment, based on the\nSUPPORTING MATERIALS\nMaterials relating to items on the agenda are available on the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System found at\nhttps://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect by entering the Council File number (e.g., 00­0000) associated with the agenda item.\nPUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS\nMembers of the public who wish to speak on one or multiple items shall have an opportunity to speak up to one minute per item up\nto a total of two minutes for two or more agenda items. At regular meetings, members of the public shall also have an opportunity to\nspeak up to one minute for general public comment on any matter within the subject­matter jurisdiction of the Committee. The\nCommittee is not required to take general public comment at special meetings. The Committee may limit the total amount of time for\npublic comment on any specific agenda item, on all agenda­items collectively, and/or on general public comment, based on the\nanticipated time required to hear from public speakers on any given or all agenda items, on the availability of Committee members\nand the need to maintain quorum, and on any other relevant factor. The Committee shall not discuss or take action relative to any\ngeneral public comment except as explicitly permitted under the Brown Act.\nCOMMITTEE INFORMATION, ASSIGNMENTS, AND STRUCTURE\nhttps://clerk.lacity.gov/clerk­services/cps/council­committee­meetings/info­assignments­structure\nSPECIAL ACCOMMODATION\nRequests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with\nDisabilities Act, can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978­1133. For Telecommunications Relay Service for the\nhearing impaired, please see the information below.\nNOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES\nIf a member of the public is compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require them to register as a\nlobbyist and report this activity. More information can be found at Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. or at\nethics.lacity.org/lobbying. Further assistance can be found by contacting the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­1960 or\nethics.commission@lacity.org.\nEXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES\nA member of the public seeking to challenge a City action in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public\nhearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk prior to the public hearing in time\nreasonably to be considered by the Committee members. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City\nCouncil's final action on a matter will become a part of the administrative record.\nTELECOMMUNICATIONS RELAY SERVICE (TRS) COMMUNICATIONS\nIndividuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, and individuals with a speech disability, may be able to avail themselves of both for\npeer­to­peer and third­party telecommunications relay service (TRS) communications. Telecommunications Relay Service is a\ntelephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in\nall 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers ­\ngenerally telephone companies ­ are compensated for the costs of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no\ncost to the TRS user.\nWhat forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the equipment\navailable: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY­Based TRS; Speech­to­Speech Relay Service; Shared Non­English Language Relay\nService; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for detail\ndescriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications­relay­service­trs.\nDon't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the caller is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello, this is the relay\nservice…" when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who is deaf,\nhard­of­hearing, or has a speech disability.\nFor more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the\nFCC's Disability Rights Office website.\nService; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for detail\ndescriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications­relay­service­trs.\nDon't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the caller is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello, this is the relay\nservice…" when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who is deaf,\nhard­of­hearing, or has a speech disability.\nFor more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the\nFCC's Disability Rights Office website.

(2) 24­0940\nBoard of Water and Power Commissioners report, City Attorney report and\nOrdinance relative to Board Resolution No. 025 015, which approves\nQuitclaim of Telephone Lines and Line of Poles Easement, Los Angeles\nDepartment of Water and Power (LADWP) File No. P­102026.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(3) 24­1007\nBoard of Water and Power Commissioners report relative to Board\nResolution No. 025 031, which approves amendment No. 1 to agreement\nNo. 47804 with URS Corporation Americas and agreement No. 47805 with\nKleinfelder West, Inc. for the Van Norman Complex Projects Geotechnical\nServices.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nTIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 27, 2024\n(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 25, 2024)

(4) 24­0937\nBoard of Water and Power Commissioners report, City Attorney report and\nOrdinance relative to Board Resolution No. 025 025, which approves\nNavajo Large Generator Interconnection Agreement AES ES Westwing,\nLLC; AES Westwing II ES, LLC; Arizona Public Service Company;\nLADWP; Nevada Power Company; Salt River Project Agricultural\nImprovement and Power District; Tucson Electric Power Company; and the\nUnited States of America, Department of the Interior, Bureau of\nReclamation for Q292, Contract No. 54548/DWP No. BP 22­012.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\n(4) 24­0937\nBoard of Water and Power Commissioners report, City Attorney report and\nOrdinance relative to Board Resolution No. 025 025, which approves\nNavajo Large Generator Interconnection Agreement AES ES Westwing,\nLLC; AES Westwing II ES, LLC; Arizona Public Service Company;\nLADWP; Nevada Power Company; Salt River Project Agricultural\nImprovement and Power District; Tucson Electric Power Company; and the\nUnited States of America, Department of the Interior, Bureau of\nReclamation for Q292, Contract No. 54548/DWP No. BP 22­012.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(5) 24­0889\nMotion (Yaroslavsky ­ McOsker) relative to directing the Bureau of\nSanitation to report on the status of the recyclables market; and related\nmatters.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(6) 24­0916\nMotion (McOsker – Yaroslavsky) relative to power outage incidents at the\nPort of Los Angeles that have occurred this year to date and the\nappropriate response.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\n(This item is referred to the Energy and Environment Committee\nand the Trade, Travel and Tourism Committee.)

(7) 20­1176\nCity Administrative Officer, City Attorney reports, and draft Ordinance,\nrelative to amendment No. 1 to he United States Environmental Protection\nAgency Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Program Loan\nAgreement for the Donald C. Tillman Advanced Water Purification Facility\nProject, and amending the Los Angeles Administrative Code to provide for\nthe issuance of a replacement subordinate bond ­ Wastewater System\nSubordinate Revenue bond, series 2021, Water Infrastructure Finance and\nInnovation Act Program and the creation of a construction fund to receive\nproceeds of the bond.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(8) 24­0456\nLos Angeles Department of Water and Power and Bureau of Sanitation\nSubordinate Revenue bond, series 2021, Water Infrastructure Finance and\nInnovation Act Program and the creation of a construction fund to receive\nproceeds of the bond.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\n(8) 24­0456\nLos Angeles Department of Water and Power and Bureau of Sanitation\nreports relative to strategies to address\nPolyfluoroalkyl/Perfluoroalkyl substance in the City.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nCommunity Impact Statement: Yes\nFor:\nPico Union Neighborhood Council\nPalms Neighborhood Council\nDel Rey Neighborhood Council

(9) 24­0931\nMotion (Lee ­ Yaroslavsky) relative to a request for the Bureau of Santation\nand City Attorney to present an ordinance prohibiting the distribution and\nsale of aftermarket single­use clone­compatible printer cartridges.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted