Los Angeles — 2024-08-14

(1) 24­0879\nCity Administrative Officer report relative to the First Transportation­\nRelated Construction Projects Report for Fiscal Year 2024­25.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nGENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT\nITEM(S)\n(1) 24­0879\nCity Administrative Officer report relative to the First Transportation­\nRelated Construction Projects Report for Fiscal Year 2024­25.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nFinancial Policies Statement: Yes\nDebt Impact Statement: Yes

(10) 21­1188­S9\nCity Attorney report relative to a proposed Amendment to Contract No. C­\n144882 for legal services with Kendall Brill & Kelly, LLP related to the July\n11, 2021, sewage discharge incident at the Hyperion Water Reclamation\nPlant.\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Sections 54956.9(d)(1), (d)(2), and (e)(1); to confer\nwith its legal counsel to discuss the need for additional funding for\nan outside counsel contract related to Kendall Brill & Kelly, LLP's\nrepresentation of the City on a matter related to the sewage\ndischarge incident of July 11, 2021 at the Hyperion Water\nReclamation Plant.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(11) 24­0921\nan outside counsel contract related to Kendall Brill & Kelly, LLP's\nrepresentation of the City on a matter related to the sewage\ndischarge incident of July 11, 2021 at the Hyperion Water\nReclamation Plant.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(12) 14­0187­S1\nCity Attorney report and Ordinance relative to amending Chapter 62 of\nDivision 5 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code regarding the Ernani\nBernardi Scholarship Trust Fund, a scholarship fund to finance the\neducational costs for eligible students who attend higher education\ninstitutions.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(13) 17­0193­S8\nMotion (Blumenfield – Hutt) relative to the transfer of funds from multiple\nCity Departments and Bureaus to the Bureau of Engineering Special\nServices Fund for payment to ESRI for its special Geographic Information\nSystem software and maintenance support services.

(14) 23­0736\nMotion (Hernandez – Blumenfield) relative to City facilities that could stock\nand distribute Naloxone, and a report on City Departments that could\ncontract with service providers to provide Naloxone trainings for the public\nas part of their programming, and related matters.

(15) 23­0600­S9\nCity Attorney report and Ordinance relative to amending Sections 64.41.03\nof Article 4.1 Chapter VI of the Los Angeles Municipal Code, Chapter VI,\nArticle 4, Sections 64.00 and 64.30, and Article 4.1, Section 64.41.03, to\namend the quality surcharge fee, sewer service charge, and the sewage\nconveyance charge. ( R e f e r r e d t o E n e r g y a n d E n v i r o n m e n t\nand Budget, Finance and Innovation Committees)\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(16) 24­0846\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(2), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc. (This case arises from a\nbusiness tax payment.)

(17) 23­0907\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Community Power Collective, et al. v. City of Los Angeles,\net al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCP04289. (This case\nconcerns restrictions on sidewalk vending.)

(18) 24­0845\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Michelle Anderson v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 23STCV10355. (This is an employment case\nagainst the City of Los Angeles.)

(19) 23­1000\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\net al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCP04289. (This case\nconcerns restrictions on sidewalk vending.)\n(18) 24­0845\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Michelle Anderson v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 23STCV10355. (This is an employment case\nagainst the City of Los Angeles.)\n(19) 23­1000\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled In Re: Aqueous Film­Forming Foam Products Liability\nLitigation, Case Nos. 2:18­mn­02873; 2:24­cv­02321­RMG.

(2) 24­0275\nCity Administrative Officer reports relative to Prioritized Critical Hiring\nprocess updates.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nFinancial Policies Statement: Yes

(20) 24­0713\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Carmen Rodriguez v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV40386. (This matter arises from\na trip and fall incident that occurred on November 14, 2019 in the City of\nLos Angeles.)

(21) 24­0718\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled TJ Strickland v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 20STCV36350 . (This matter arises from an\nincident wherein Plaintiff was riding a motorized scooter and hit a pothole\non Vine Street in the City of Los Angeles.)

(22) 24­0714\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled David Beri, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV03744. (This matter arises from\na trip and fall incident which occurred on May 12,2021, on the sidewalk\nadjacent to 1613 South Beverly Drive, in the City of Los Angeles.)

(23) 24­0737\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Floyds 99 California, LLC adv. City of Los Angeles, Claim\nNo. C23­25727. (This matter arises from property damage to Claimant’s\nbarber shop, located at 7300 Melrose Avenue, in Los Angeles, which\nresulted from storm drain flooding issues.)

(24) 24­0734\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(2), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\n(23) 24­0737\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Floyds 99 California, LLC adv. City of Los Angeles, Claim\nNo. C23­25727. (This matter arises from property damage to Claimant’s\nbarber shop, located at 7300 Melrose Avenue, in Los Angeles, which\nresulted from storm drain flooding issues.)\n(24) 24­0734\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(2), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Elizabeth Temple / Las Tres Casitas, LLC adv. City of Los\nAngeles, Claim No. C22­20262. (The above­referenced claim is related to\na driveway construction of a private development at 798 Montecito Drive, in\nLos Angeles.)

(25) 24­0715\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Francisco Reyes v. John Holt, et al., Los Angeles Superior\nCourt Case No. 22STCV13857. (This matter arises from a November 4,\n2020, traffic accident on Lassen Avenue near its intersection with Winnetka\nAvenue, in the City of Los Angeles.)

(26) 24­0733\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(2), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Garrison Insurance and Property Casualty Co. v. City of\nLos Angeles, Claim No. C23­67043. (This matter arises from an\nautomobile collision that occurred on November 16, 2022, near the\nintersection of Olympic Drive and East Ocean Boulevard in Los Angeles.)

(27) 24­0716\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Bruno Mattar Lima v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV26150. (This matter arises from\nan incident involving members of the Los Angeles Police Department on\nJanuary 28,2021, in Los Angeles, California.)

(28) 24­0717\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled A Jamal Shakir, Jr. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV17510 . (This matter arises\nfrom an incident involving members of the Los Angeles Police Department\nthat occurred on May 29, 2020.)

(29) 24­0815\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\n(28) 24­0717\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled A Jamal Shakir, Jr. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV17510 . (This matter arises\nfrom an incident involving members of the Los Angeles Police Department\nthat occurred on May 29, 2020.)\n(29) 24­0815\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Austin Melrose/The Brass Lady LP adv. City of Los\nAngeles, Claim No. C24­02815. (This matter arises from a storm drain\nflooding issue resulting in property damage to Claimant’s restaurants\nlocated at 7461­7465 Melrose Avenue, in Los Angeles.)

(3) 22­1545­S20\nCity Administrative Officer report relative to the Homelessness Emergency\nAccount – General City Purposes Fund 17th Status report as of June 30,\n2024.\n(Referred to Housing and Homelessness and Budget, Finance and\nInnovation Committees)\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nFinancial Policies Statement: Yes\n(3) 22­1545­S20\nCity Administrative Officer report relative to the Homelessness Emergency\nAccount – General City Purposes Fund 17th Status report as of June 30,\n2024.\n(Referred to Housing and Homelessness and Budget, Finance and\nInnovation Committees)\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nFinancial Policies Statement: Yes

(30) 24­0816\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Shushan Nenejyan v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV10588. (This matter arises from\na trip and fall incident that occurred on April 8, 2019, on a pothole located\nat 6531 Van Nuys Boulevard, in the City of Los Angeles.)

(31) 24­0817\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Jesus Rangel v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 20STCV27702. (This matter arises from a trip\nand fall incident on September 18, 2019, which occurred near 1228 East\n56th Street, in the City of Los Angeles.)

(32) 24­0818\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Farmers Insurance Exchange v. City of Los Angeles,\nClaim No. C22­01615. (This matter arises from the June 30, 2021, incident\nin which the Los Angeles Police Department Bomb Squad detonated\nexplosive material.)

(33) 24­0844\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Farmers Insurance Exchange v. City of Los Angeles, et\nal., Claim No. C22­01617. (This matter arises from the June 30, 2021,\nincident in which the Los Angeles Police Department Bomb Squad\ndetonated explosive material.)

(34) 24­0819\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\n(33) 24­0844\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Farmers Insurance Exchange v. City of Los Angeles, et\nal., Claim No. C22­01617. (This matter arises from the June 30, 2021,\nincident in which the Los Angeles Police Department Bomb Squad\ndetonated explosive material.)\n(34) 24­0819\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled City of Los Angeles v. Ben Camacho, et al., Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 23STCP01060; Court of Appeal Case No.\nB331572 . (This case concerns a lawsuit that the City filed attempting to\nrecover records inadvertently produced pursuant to the California Public\nRecords Act.)

(35) 24­0820\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Heather Rolland v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 22STCV31933. (This matter arises from a March\n2019 incident wherein Plaintiff returned to work from disability leave, and\nclaims that the Los Angeles Police Department engaged in continuing\ndiscriminatory and retaliatory conduct.)

(36) 24­0821\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Richard Joaquin v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. BC597336; Court of Appeal Case Nos.\nB318124; B320524. (This matter arises from a Los Angeles Police\nDepartment sergeant’s allegations of violations of the Fair Employment\nand Housing Act in 2015 and 2017.)

(37) 24­0822\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Salvador Albert Corado, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et\nal., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 18STCV06549. (This matter\narises from an incident involving members of the Los Angeles Police\nDepartment on July 21, 2018, in Los Angeles, California.)

(38) 24­0823\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled James Thomas Simpson, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et\nal., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV27435. (This matter\narises from a vehicle versus pedestrian traffic collision which occurred on\nAugust 22, 2020, at the intersection of Pipeline Avenue and Chino Avenue,\nin Chino, California.)\narises from an incident involving members of the Los Angeles Police\nDepartment on July 21, 2018, in Los Angeles, California.)\n(38) 24­0823\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled James Thomas Simpson, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et\nal., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV27435. (This matter\narises from a vehicle versus pedestrian traffic collision which occurred on\nAugust 22, 2020, at the intersection of Pipeline Avenue and Chino Avenue,\nin Chino, California.)

(39) 24­0824\nThe Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled Paola French, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., United\nStates District Court Case No. CV20­00416­JGB­SP. (This matter arises\nfrom an off­duty officer­involved shooting incident that occurred in June\n2019 at a Costco store in Corona, California.)

(4) 14­0980­S1\nCD 11 City Administrative Officer report and Authorizing Resolution relative to the\nissuance and sale of City of Los Angeles Community Facilities District No.\n4 (Playa Vista ­ Phase 1) Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2024 in a\nprincipal amount not to exceed $40 million; and the execution of related\ndocuments and various actions.

(40) 24­0198\nCD 5 The Committee may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government\nCode Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to\nthe case entitled City of Los Angeles v. George E. Ainslie, et al., Los\nAngeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV09322. (This matter relates to\nan eminent domain action involving property located at 3165 Motor\nAvenue, Los Angeles, CA 90064 for construction of the Exposition Bike\nPath (Northvale Segment) Project.)\nSUPPORTING MATERIALS\nMaterials relating to items on the agenda are available on the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System found at\nhttps://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect by entering the Council File number (e.g., 00­0000) associated with the agenda item.\nPUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS\nMembers of the public who wish to speak on one or multiple items shall have an opportunity to speak up to one minute per item up\nto a total of two minutes for two or more agenda items. At regular meetings, members of the public shall also have an opportunity to\nspeak up to one minute for general public comment on any matter within the subject­matter jurisdiction of the Committee. The\nCommittee is not required to take general public comment at special meetings. The Committee may limit the total amount of time for\npublic comment on any specific agenda item, on all agenda­items collectively, and/or on general public comment, based on the\nanticipated time required to hear from public speakers on any given or all agenda items, on the availability of Committee members\nand the need to maintain quorum, and on any other relevant factor. The Committee shall not discuss or take action relative to any\ngeneral public comment except as explicitly permitted under the Brown Act.\nCOMMITTEE INFORMATION, ASSIGNMENTS, AND STRUCTURE\nhttps://clerk.lacity.gov/clerk­services/cps/council­committee­meetings/info­assignments­structure\nSPECIAL ACCOMMODATION\nRequests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with\nDisabilities Act, can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978­1075. For Telecommunications Relay Service for the\nhearing impaired, please see the information below.\nNOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES\ngeneral public comment except as explicitly permitted under the Brown Act.\nCOMMITTEE INFORMATION, ASSIGNMENTS, AND STRUCTURE\nhttps://clerk.lacity.gov/clerk­services/cps/council­committee­meetings/info­assignments­structure\nSPECIAL ACCOMMODATION\nRequests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with\nDisabilities Act, can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978­1075. For Telecommunications Relay Service for the\nhearing impaired, please see the information below.\nNOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES\nIf a member of the public is compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require them to register as a\nlobbyist and report this activity. More information can be found at Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. or at\nethics.lacity.org/lobbying. Further assistance can be found by contacting the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­1960 or\nethics.commission@lacity.org.\nEXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES\nA member of the public seeking to challenge a City action in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public\nhearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk prior to the public hearing in time\nreasonably to be considered by the Committee members. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City\nCouncil's final action on a matter will become a part of the administrative record.\nTELECOMMUNICATIONS RELAY SERVICE (TRS) COMMUNICATIONS\nIndividuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, and individuals with a speech disability, may be able to avail themselves of both for\npeer­to­peer and third­party telecommunications relay service (TRS) communications. Telecommunications Relay Service is a\ntelephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in\nall 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers ­\ngenerally telephone companies ­ are compensated for the costs of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no\ncost to the TRS user.\nWhat forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the equipment\navailable: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY­Based TRS; Speech­to­Speech Relay Service; Shared Non­English Language Relay\nService; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for detail\ndescriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications­relay­service­trs.\nDon't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the caller is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello, this is the relay\nservice…" when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who is deaf,\nhard­of­hearing, or has a speech disability.\nFor more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the\nFCC's Disability Rights Office website.

(5) 24­0600­S35\nCity Administrative Officer report and Authorizing Resolution relative to\nFiscal Year 2024­25 appropriations limit.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(6) 24­0202\nCity Administrative Officer report relative to actual cost information for\nGeneral Obligation Bonds, Series 2024­A (Taxable) (Social Bonds).\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nFinancial Policies Statement: Yes\nDebt Impact Statement: Yes

(7) 13­1465­S1\nCity Administrative Officer report relative to Annual Reserve Fund Loan\nReview.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(8) 24­0863\nMotion (Rodriguez – Blumenfield) relative to funding for the Citywide\nRecreational Vehicle Recycling Program.

(9) 21­0980\nLos Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) reports relative to recommendations\nfrom the LAFD’s Organizational and Training Assessment study conducted\nby Deloitte Consulting, LLP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(1) 24­0878 CD 11 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the quitclaim of the 20­foot wide easement for sanitary sewer purposes lying on 512 Rose Avenue ­ Right of Way No. 36000­2471 (Quitclaim). Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. FIND that the Quitclaim is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 pursuant to Article III, Class 5(4) of the City's Environmental Guidelines. 2. APPROVE the petitioner’s request for the quitclaim of the 20­foot wide easement for sanitary sewer purposes lying on 512 Rose Avenue, as shown on the Exhibit Map on the July 31, 2024 City Engineer report, attached to the Council file, subject to the following condition: That petitioner make satisfactory arrangement with the Real Estate Division of the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) with respect to the payment of the document recording fee. 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated June 17, 2024, authorizing the Quitclaim, which has been approved Wednesday - August 14, 2024 - PAGE 5 as to form and legality by the City Attorney. Avenue, as shown on the Exhibit Map on the July 31, 2024 City Engineer report, attached to the Council file, subject to the following condition: That petitioner make satisfactory arrangement with the Real Estate Division of the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) with respect to the payment of the document recording fee. 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated June 17, 2024, authorizing the Quitclaim, which has been approved as to form and legality by the City Attorney. 4. INSTRUCT the Real Estate Division of the BOE to record and deliver the necessary quitclaim deed or deeds to the persons legally entitled thereto. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that a fee of $7,075.91 was paid for processing this request pursuant to Section 7.40 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code.

(10) 24­0745 PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the execution of a Second Amendment to Contract No. C­ 138088 with Clay Reed dba Aaxis Construction for wooden, metal, and padlock barricade services. Recommendation for Council action: AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety, or designee, to execute a Second Amendment to the contract with Clay Reed dba Aaxis Construction for wooden, metal, and padlock barricade services (Contract No. C­138088), in substantial conformance with the draft contract, attached to the City Administrative Officer report dated June 6, 2024, which has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney as to form; the proposed amendment would extend the contract term for 12 months, increase the contract compensation amount by $900,000, revise the Cost of Work, and update the Standard Provisions for City Contracts; and, the proposed amendment would result in a maximum compensation amount of $1.8 million with a term of four years, from March 23, 2021 through March - 22, 2025. and Safety, or designee, to execute a Second Amendment to the contract with Clay Reed dba Aaxis Construction for wooden, metal, and padlock barricade services (Contract No. C­138088), in substantial conformance with the draft contract, attached to the City Administrative Officer report dated June 6, 2024, which has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney as to form; the proposed amendment would extend the contract term for 12 months, increase the contract compensation amount by $900,000, revise the Cost of Work, and update the Standard Provisions for City Contracts; and, the proposed amendment would result in a maximum compensation amount of $1.8 million with a term of four years, from March 23, 2021 through March 22, 2025. Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no impact to the General Fund. The proposed contract will be fully funded by the Repair and Demolition Fund (346). Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations of the report comply with the City’s Financial Policies in that the proposed contract will be funded by a special fund supported by dedicated funding sources and expenditures will be limited to the mandates of the funding source.

(11) 24­0890 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND HIRING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to transitioning sworn and civilian hiring from the Personnel Department to the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD). Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (McOsker – Lee – Blumenfield): INSTRUCT the Personnel Department and the LAPD to report to Council with a framework and analysis for transitioning sworn and civilian hiring from the Personnel Department to the LAPD. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(12) 24­0391 Wednesday - August 14,ON AD HOC COMMITTEE THE 2024 - 2028 OLYMPIC AND PAGEPARALYMPIC 15 GAMES REPORT relative to utilizing the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(13) 18­0356 CD 11 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and TRADE, TRAVEL AND TOURISM COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Third Amendment to Lease No. LAA­8758 with Denny's Inc. covering premises located at 5535 West Century Boulevard at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). Recommendations for Council action: Wednesday - August 14, 2024 - PAGE 16 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board of Airport Commissioners (13) 18­0356 CD 11 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and TRADE, TRAVEL AND TOURISM COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Third Amendment to Lease No. LAA­8758 with Denny's Inc. covering premises located at 5535 West Century Boulevard at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). Recommendations for Council action: 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board of Airport Commissioners (BOAC) that this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article III, Class 1(14) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines. 2. APPROVE the Third Amendment to Lease No. LAA­8758 with Denny's Inc. to extend the term by one year, with a one­year extension option, covering premises located at 5535 West Century Boulevard at LAX. 3. CONCUR with the BOAC’s action on April 4, 2024, by Resolution 27930, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA), or designee, to execute said Third Amendment to Lease No. LAA­8758 with Denny's Inc. Fiscal Impact Statement: The BOAC reports that there is no impact to the General Fund. The City Administrative Officer reports that approval of the proposed lease between the LAWA and Denny’s Inc., for property located at 5535 West Century Boulevard will result in annual rent revenue of at least $264,000 during the first year, and $528,000 over two years if the one­year extension option is exercised (excluding automatic annual adjustments to the Minimum Annual Guarantee). The lease revenue will be deposited into the LAWA Revenue Fund. The recommendations in the report comply with the LAWA’s adopted Financial Policies. Approval of the proposed lease agreement will have no impact on the City’s General Fund.

(14) 24­0872 CD 8 CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (HARRIS­DAWSON – McOSKER) relative to the sale of property located at 710 East 111th Place (APN 6071­022­ 902), pursuant to Government Code Section 54221(f)(l)(D), to Kedren Community Health, Inc. for use by the County of Los Angeles for patients served by the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health. (Government Operations Committee report to be submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an opportunity for public comment will be provided.)

(15) 24­0005­S98 CD 10 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 2631 South Mansfield Avenue (Case No. 724303), Assessor I.D. No. 5049­014­018, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP). Recommendation for Council action: APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated August 2, 2024, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 2631 South Mansfield Avenue (Case No. 724303), Assessor I.D. No. 5049­014­018, from the REAP. Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(16) 24­0005­S99 CD 10 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 833 South Mariposa Avenue (Case No. 804392), Assessor I.D. No. 5094­018­015, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP). Wednesday - August 14, 2024 - PAGE 18 Recommendation for Council action:

(17) 24­0005­S100 CD 11 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 8703 South Ramsgate Avenue (Case No. 788705), Assessor I.D. No. 4125­013­005, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP). Recommendation for Council action: APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated August 2, 2024, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 8703 South Ramsgate Avenue (Case No. 788705), Assessor I.D. No. 4125­013­005, from the REAP. Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(18) 11­0005­S403 CD 13 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 1119 North Sanborn Avenue (Case No. 554448), Assessor I.D. No. 5429­010­023, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP). Wednesday - August Recommendation 14, 2024 for Council - action: PAGE 19

(19) 24­0005­S102 CD 14 COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTIONS relative to removing the property at 4456 West College View Avenue (Case Nos. 344327 and 708715), Assessor I.D. No. 5473­031­038, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP). Recommendation for Council action: APPROVE the LAHD report recommendations dated August 2, 2024, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTIONS removing the property at 4456 West College View Avenue (Case Nos. 344327 and 708715), Assessor I.D. No. 5473­031­ 038, from the REAP. Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(2) 17­1375­S2 CD 12 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the quitclaim of the variable width easements for slope purposes lying on 11100 Mason Avenue ­ Right of Way No. 36000­2397 (Quitclaim). Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. FIND that the Quitclaim is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 pursuant to Article III, Class 5(4) of the City's Environmental Guidelines. 2. APPROVE the petitioner’s request for the quitclaim of the variable width easements for slope purposes lying on 11100 Mason Avenue, as shown on the Exhibit Map in the July 10, 2024 City Engineer report, attached to the Council file, subject to the following condition: That petitioner make satisfactory arrangement with the Real Estate Division of the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) with respect to the payment of the document recording fee. 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated July 9, 2024, authorizing the Quitclaim, which has been approved as to form and legality by the City Attorney. as shown on the Exhibit Map in the July 10, 2024 City Engineer report, attached to the Council file, subject to the following condition: That petitioner make satisfactory arrangement with the Real Estate Division of the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) with respect to the payment of the document recording fee. 4. INSTRUCT the Real Estate Division of the BOE to record and deliver the necessary quitclaim deed or deeds to the persons legally entitled thereto. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that a fee of $7,075.91 was paid for processing this request pursuant to Section 7.40 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code.

(20) 20­1304­S1 CD 13 MOTION (SOTO­MARTINEZ ­ YAROSLAVSKY) relative to approval for a Street Banner program for the period of August 7, 2024 ­ August 6, 2025, to encourage stakeholders to become involved in the Rampart Village Wednesday Neighborhood-Council August (RVNC) 14, 2024programs - and activities.PAGE 20 financial analysis of this report.

(21) 19­1150­S1 CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (McOSKER – BLUMENFIELD) relative to Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) 35 hiring hall practices, specific to exclusive and non­exclusive hiring arrangements between the contractor and Union. Recommendation for Council action: INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO) and the Personnel Department, to: a. Repport to the Personnel, Audits and Hiring Committee on the status of MOU No. 35 in connection with hiring hall practices, specific to exclusive and non­exclusive hiring arrangements between the contractor and the union and the frequency of the utilization of hiring halls for construction projects. b. Report on the feasibility of establishing exclusive arrangements with hiring halls for key skilled craft apprenticeship programs through the Targeted Local Hiring Program, including any necessary funding. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(22) 24­0649 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Linda Mabry v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCV20295. (This matter arises from a trip and fall incident that took place on June 14, 2018, on the sidewalk near East 85th Street and South Central Avenue, in the City of Los Angeles.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.)

(23) 24­0650 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Donald Jenkins, Jr. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV14034. (This matter arises from an April 19, 2020, scooter accident on the eastbound lane of West Harry Bridges Boulevard, in the Wilmington area.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.)

(24) 24­0651 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Edwin Joaquin Escamilla, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV05072. (This matter arises out of an automobile accident occurring on February 25, 2020, at the Wednesday intersection of -Van August Nuys14, 2024 - and Valerio Street, inPAGE Boulevard 22 Van Nuys.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.) (24) 24­0651 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Edwin Joaquin Escamilla, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV05072. (This matter arises out of an automobile accident occurring on February 25, 2020, at the intersection of Van Nuys Boulevard and Valerio Street, in Van Nuys.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.)

(25) 24­0652 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Regina Goff v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV00064. (This matter arises from an automobile collision that occurred on January 14, 2020, on Western Avenue north of Romaine Street, in the City of Los Angeles.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.)

(26) 24­0653 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Tonye Jennings v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCV42544. (This matter arises from an automobile collision that occurred on January 5, 2018, at the intersection of San Fernando Road and Pasadena Avenue, in Los Angeles.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.)

(27) 24­0654 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Lasalle Lofton, Jr. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV36560. (This matter arises from alleged discrimination and harassment on the basis of race that occurred between 2019­2021 within the Bureau of Sanitation, and retaliation for reporting the allegations to management.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.)

(28) 24­0655 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the Wednesday - AugustMacias case entitled Manuel v. -City of Los Angeles, et 14, 2024 al., Los PAGE 23 Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV42824. (This matter arises from a trip 2019­2021 within the Bureau of Sanitation, and retaliation for reporting the allegations to management.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.) (28) 24­0655 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Manuel Macias v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV42824. (This matter arises from a trip and fall accident that occurred on November 16, 2018, near a bus stop located at 437 West 1st Street, in the City of Los Angeles.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.)

(29) 24­0657 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled David Torres, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV11114 . (This matter arises from a September 19, 2021, incident involving a large tree branch falling onto Plaintiffs' vehicle on Magnolia Boulevard near Lemp Avenue, in the City of North Hollywood.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.)

(3) 24­0008­S13 CD 11 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT relative to prohibiting the parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over 7 feet in height, during the hours of 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., along certain street segments in Council District 11. Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Park – Padilla): RESOLVE to: 1. Prohibit, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 80.69.4 and California Vehicle Code Section 22507, the parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over 7 feet in height, during the hours of 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., along the following street segments: a. Both sides of La Tijera Boulevard between Loyola Boulevard and Lincoln Boulevard. b. Both sides of McLaughlin Avenue between Washington Boulevard and Venice Boulevard. c. North side, Runway Creek Road between Dawn and McConnell Avenue. the hours of 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., along the following street segments: a. Both sides of La Tijera Boulevard between Loyola Boulevard and Lincoln Boulevard. b. Both sides of McLaughlin Avenue between Washington Boulevard and Venice Boulevard. c. North side of Runway Road between Dawn Creek and McConnell Avenue. d. South side of Runway Road between Runway Lane and McConnell Avenue. e. East side of McConnell Avenue between Millennium Drive and Bluff Creek Drive. f. Both sides of Dawn Creek between Runway Road and Agustin Place. g. Both sides of Runway Road between Para Way and Dawn Creek. h. North side of Millennium Drive between Westlawn Avenue and Campus Center Drive. i. South side of Millennium Drive between Westlawn Avenue and Fielding Circle. j. Both sides of Westlawn Avenue between Millennium Drive and Jefferson Boulevard. k. West side of Dawn Creek between Bluff Creek Drive and Runway Road. l. Both sides of Millennium Drive between Veranda Way and McConnell Avenue. 2. Direct the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT), upon the adoption of the Resolution, to post signs giving notice of a “tow away, no parking” restriction for oversized vehicles, with the specific hours detailed, at the above locations. 3. Authorize the LADOT to make technical corrections or clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Resolution. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(30) 24­0659 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Crusader Insurance Company v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Claim No. C22­00564. (This matter arises from the June 30, 2021, incident in which the Los Angeles Police Department Bomb Squad detonated explosive material.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.)

(31) 24­0661 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Mary Lynn Ashby v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV20220. (This matter arises from a trip and fall accident that occurred on September 30, 2021, on the sidewalk abutting 5759 Troost Avenue, in North Hollywood, California.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.)

(32) 24­0662 Wednesday - August The Council may recess14, to 2024 Closed- Session, pursuant toPAGE 24 Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Mary Lynn Ashby v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV20220. (This matter arises from a trip and fall accident that occurred on September 30, 2021, on the sidewalk abutting 5759 Troost Avenue, in North Hollywood, California.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.) (32) 24­0662 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Stephanie Anushe Cortes v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV24977. (This matter arises from a trip and fall incident that occurred on April 30, 2021, near 722 San Julian Street, in the City of Los Angeles.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.)

(33) 24­0663 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Helodoro Lara v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV32870. (This matter arises from a vehicle collision that occurred on September 21, 2019, between a Los Angeles Police Department police officer and Plaintiff.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.)

(34) 24­0664 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Andrea Marsh v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCV43521. (This matter arises from a claim under the Fair Employment and Housing Act for: (1) Gender/Pregnancy Discrimination; (2) Sexual Harassment/Hostile Work Environment; and (3) Retaliation.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.)

(35) 24­0665 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Danielle Tumbleson v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV11386. (This matter arises from a claim under the Fair Employment and Housing Act for: (1) Gender Discrimination; (2) Sexual Harassment/Hostile Work Environment; and (3) Retaliation.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter Wednesday on June 26, 2024.) - August 14, 2024 - PAGE 25 (35) 24­0665 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Danielle Tumbleson v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV11386. (This matter arises from a claim under the Fair Employment and Housing Act for: (1) Gender Discrimination; (2) Sexual Harassment/Hostile Work Environment; and (3) Retaliation.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.)

(36) 24­0666 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Amir Medizadeh v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV06810. (This matter arises from a motorcycle accident that occurred on August 13, 2021, near 439 North Fairfax, in Los Angeles.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.)

(37) 24­0667 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Nancy Gossett v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV40431. (This matter arises from a trip and fall incident that occurred on August 9, 2021 in the City of Los Angeles, CA.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.)

(38) 24­0669 The Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Devere Jackson v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV30540. (This matter arises from a vehicle versus vehicle traffic collision on August 24, 2019, which occurred at the intersection of Rosecrans Avenue and Eadall Avenue, in unincorporated Los Angeles County.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered this matter on June 26, 2024.)

(4) 24­0008­S14 CD 3 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT relative to prohibiting the parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over 7 feet in height, during the hours of 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., along both sides of Topham Street between Lindley Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue in Council District 3. Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Blumenfield – Hutt): RESOLVE to: 1. Prohibit, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 80.69.4, the parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over 7 feet in height, during the hours of 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., along both sides of Topham Street between Lindley Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue. 2. Direct the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT), upon the adoption of the Resolution, to post signs giving notice of a “tow away, no parking” restriction for oversized vehicles, with the specific hours detailed, at the above locations. 3. Authorize the LADOT to make technical corrections or clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Resolution. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(5) 24­0008­S15 CD 14 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT relative to prohibiting the parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over 7 feet in height, during the hours of 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., along certain street segments in Council District 14. Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (de Leon – Lee): RESOLVE to: 1. Prohibit, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 80.69.4 and California Vehicle Code Section 22507, the parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over 7 feet in height, during the hours of 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., along both sides of Newton Street from Hooper Avenue to South Central Avenue. 2. Direct the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT), upon the adoption of the Resolution, to post signs giving notice of a “tow away, no parking” restriction for oversized vehicles, with the specific hours detailed, at the above locations. 3. Authorize the LADOT to make technical corrections or clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Resolution. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(6) 24­0008­S16 CD 3 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT relative to prohibiting the parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over 7 feet in height, during the hours of 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., along certain street Wednesday - August segments in Council 14, 2024 District 3. - PAGE 10 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(7) 23­0662 to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Resolution. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(8) 21­0956­S2 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT relative to clarifying that any and all vehicles that are stopped or parked in a peak hour travel lane or a “tow away no stopping any time” zone will be towed. Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (de Leon – Park – Lee): 1. INSTRUCT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation to tow away any and all vehicles that are stopped or parked in a peak hour travel lane or other area where a parked vehicle is creating an immediate public safety hazard. 2. CLARIFY that vehicles parked in these locations, as detailed above in Recommendation No. 1, are exempt from the City Administrative Officer’s (CAO) outreach strategy as detailed in Council File No. 22­ 1313. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(9) 24­1200­S31 CIVIL RIGHTS, EQUITY, IMMIGRATION, AGING AND DISABILITY Wednesday COMMITTEE -REPORT August 14, 2024to- the appointment of Alexandria relative PAGE 13Yellowhair to the Commission on Community and Family Services. Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(1) 23­0946\nCD 5 Bureau of Engineering report relative to the Temporary Closure of a\nwalkway southerly of Richland Avenue between Sepulveda Boulevard and\nBentley Avenue.

(2) 24­0849\nCD 15 City Engineer report relative to the name of the private driveways at\n(1) 23­0946\nCD 5 Bureau of Engineering report relative to the Temporary Closure of a\nwalkway southerly of Richland Avenue between Sepulveda Boulevard and\nBentley Avenue.

(3) 24­0887\nCD 11 Motion (Park – Yaroslavsky) relative to the cause of the sewer line rupture\nand subsequent sewage spill at 2700 South Cresta Place which occurred\non July 20, 2024.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(4) 24­0768\nCD 12 Motion (Lee – Blumenfield) relative to designating Plummer St., from Variel\nAve to DeSoto Ave, in Chatsworth as “Brother John Way."\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(5) 24­0769\nCD 10 Motion (Hutt – Park) and Resolution (Hutt – Blumenfield) relative to\ndesignating the intersection at W. Adams Boulevard and S. Gramercy\nPlace as “LA84 Foundation Square."\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(6) 24­0752\nCD 14 Motion (de León ­ Harris­Dawson) relative to designating Spring Street\nfrom East Cesar E. Chavez Avenue to 9th Streets in Downtown Los\nAngeles as “Biddy Mason Way."\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(7) 24­0079­S2\nMotion (de León, Park – Blumenfield) relative to requesting a draft\n(6) 24­0752\nCD 14 Motion (de León ­ Harris­Dawson) relative to designating Spring Street\nfrom East Cesar E. Chavez Avenue to 9th Streets in Downtown Los\nAngeles as “Biddy Mason Way."\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\n(7) 24­0079­S2\nMotion (de León, Park – Blumenfield) relative to requesting a draft\nordinance prohibiting the possession of telecommunications cable by any\nindividual or business except for telecommunications companies and their\napproved subcontractors and recyclers.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(8) 24­0079­S3\nMotion (de León, Park – Blumenfield) relative to developing specifications,\nrequirements, and solicit proposals for vendors for the branding, etching,\nand/or labeling of copper wire that is used in Bureau of Street Lighting\nsystems.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(9) 24­0036\nMotion (Hutt – Yaroslavsky, Lee) relative to the feasibility of using solar­\npowered lighting in streetlights throughout the City.\nCommunity Impact Statement: Yes\nFor:\nWestside Neighborhood Council\nSherman Oaks Neighborhood Council\nStudio City Neighborhood Council\nSUPPORTING MATERIALS\nMaterials relating to items on the agenda are available on the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System found at\nhttps://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect by entering the Council File number (e.g., 00­0000) associated with the agenda item.\nPUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS\nMembers of the public who wish to speak on one or multiple items shall have an opportunity to speak up to one minute per item up\nto a total of two minutes for two or more agenda items. At regular meetings, members of the public shall also have an opportunity to\nspeak up to one minute for general public comment on any matter within the subject­matter jurisdiction of the Committee. The\nCommittee is not required to take general public comment at special meetings. The Committee may limit the total amount of time for\npublic comment on any specific agenda item, on all agenda­items collectively, and/or on general public comment, based on the\nanticipated time required to hear from public speakers on any given or all agenda items, on the availability of Committee members\nand the need to maintain quorum, and on any other relevant factor. The Committee shall not discuss or take action relative to any\ngeneral public comment except as explicitly permitted under the Brown Act.\nCOMMITTEE INFORMATION, ASSIGNMENTS, AND STRUCTURE\nMaterials relating to items on the agenda are available on the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System found at\nhttps://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect by entering the Council File number (e.g., 00­0000) associated with the agenda item.\nPUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS\nMembers of the public who wish to speak on one or multiple items shall have an opportunity to speak up to one minute per item up\nto a total of two minutes for two or more agenda items. At regular meetings, members of the public shall also have an opportunity to\nspeak up to one minute for general public comment on any matter within the subject­matter jurisdiction of the Committee. The\nCommittee is not required to take general public comment at special meetings. The Committee may limit the total amount of time for\npublic comment on any specific agenda item, on all agenda­items collectively, and/or on general public comment, based on the\nanticipated time required to hear from public speakers on any given or all agenda items, on the availability of Committee members\nand the need to maintain quorum, and on any other relevant factor. The Committee shall not discuss or take action relative to any\ngeneral public comment except as explicitly permitted under the Brown Act.\nCOMMITTEE INFORMATION, ASSIGNMENTS, AND STRUCTURE\nhttps://clerk.lacity.gov/clerk­services/cps/council­committee­meetings/info­assignments­structure\nSPECIAL ACCOMMODATION\nRequests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with\nDisabilities Act, can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978­1064. For Telecommunications Relay Service for the\nhearing impaired, please see the information below.\nNOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES\nIf a member of the public is compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require them to register as a\nlobbyist and report this activity. More information can be found at Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. or at\nethics.lacity.org/lobbying. Further assistance can be found by contacting the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­1960 or\nethics.commission@lacity.org.\nEXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES\nA member of the public seeking to challenge a City action in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public\nhearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk prior to the public hearing in time\nreasonably to be considered by the Committee members. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City\nCouncil's final action on a matter will become a part of the administrative record.\nTELECOMMUNICATIONS RELAY SERVICE (TRS) COMMUNICATIONS\nIndividuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, and individuals with a speech disability, may be able to avail themselves of both for\npeer­to­peer and third­party telecommunications relay service (TRS) communications. Telecommunications Relay Service is a\ntelephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in\nall 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers ­\ngenerally telephone companies ­ are compensated for the costs of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no\ncost to the TRS user.\nWhat forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the equipment\navailable: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY­Based TRS; Speech­to­Speech Relay Service; Shared Non­English Language Relay\nService; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for detail\ndescriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications­relay­service­trs.\nDon't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the caller is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello, this is the relay\nservice…" when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who is deaf,\nhard­of­hearing, or has a speech disability.\nFor more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the\nFCC's Disability Rights Office website.