Los Angeles — 2023-10-24
City Planning Commission Central
#2
Item
2. NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL POSITION STATEMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS\nPresentations by Neighborhood Council representatives on any Neighborhood Council resolution, or\ncommunity impact statement filed with the City Clerk, which relates to any agenda item listed or being\nconsidered on this agenda. The Neighborhood Council representative shall provide the Board or\nCommission with a copy of the Neighborhood Council's resolution or community impact statement by email\nto apccentral@lacity.org. At the Chair’s discretion, presentations of Neighborhood Councils on any matter\nlisted on the agenda for this Commission meeting may be taken at the time the agenda item is taken for\nconsideration.
#4
Item
4. RECONSIDERATIONS\na. MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER – The Commission may make a motion to reconsider a Commission\nAction on any agenda items from its previous meeting, consistently with the Commission Rule 9.3,\nprovided the Commission retains jurisdiction over the matter.\nb. MERITS OF ANY ITEM THE COMMISSION HAS VOTED TO RECONSIDER – If a majority of the\nCommission has approved a motion to reconsider a Commission Action, the Commission may address\nthe merits of the original Commission Action.
#5
Item
5. ZA-2021-10704-CUB-1A Council District: 13 – Soto-Martinez\nCEQA: ENV-2021-10705-CE Last Day to Act: 10-24-23\nPlan Area: Hollywood Continued from: 03-28-23\nPUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED\nPROJECT SITE: 5243 – 5245 West Santa Monica Boulevard\nPROPOSED PROJECT:\nA Conditional Use to allow the sale and dispensing of a full line of alcoholic beverages for on-site\nconsumption and the sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption in conjunction with a proposed 11,120\nsquare-foot restaurant. The restaurant would operate from 6:30 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., Monday through\nThursday, and 6:30 a.m. to 1:00 a.m., Friday through Sunday, and have a seating capacity of 199 patrons\nuntil 5 p.m., and up to 376 patrons until closing time.\nAPPEAL:\nAn appeal of the October 7, 2022, Zoning Administrator’s determination which:\n1. Denied, pursuant to Section 12.24 W.1 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code, a Conditional Use to allow\nthe sale and dispensing of a full line of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption and ancillary sales\nof beer and wine for off-site consumption in conjunction with a proposed restaurant;\n2. Adopted the Findings; and\n3. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(5), that the California Environmental Quality Act\n(CEQA) does not apply to “projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves.”\n*If the Central Area Planning Commission elects to grant the appeal, either in whole or in part, and to\noverturn the Zoning Administrator’s determination, the Commission may also consider a Categorical\nExemption from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301, and may make a determination\nthat there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical exemption,\npursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2, applies.\nApplicant/Appellant: Petros Taglyan\nRepresentatives: Petros Taglyan, Lee Rabun\nStaff: Henry Chu, Associate Zoning Administrator\nCentral Los Angeles Area Planning Commission 3 October 24, 2023
#6
Item
6. ZA-2021-639-CUB-1A Council District: 10 – Hutt\nCEQA: ENV-2021-642-CE Last Day to Act: 10-24-23\nPlan Area: Wilshire Continued from: 07-25-23;\n09-12-23;\n09-26-23\nPUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED\nPROJECT SITE: 700 – 708 South Vermont Avenue; 3070 – 3086 West 7th Street\nPROPOSED PROJECT:\nThe sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption within an existing 1,799 square-foot convenience\nmarket. The convenience store’s operating hours are 24 hours daily, with the sale of beer and wine from\n6:00 a.m. – 2:00 a.m. daily.\nAPPEAL:\nAn appeal of the April 24, 2023, Zoning Administrator’s determination which:\n1. Denied, pursuant to Section 12.24 W.1 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code, a Conditional Use Permit\nto allow the sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption at an existing convenience store which\ncurrently operates 24 hours per day, seven days of the week;\n2. Adopted the Findings; and\n3. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(5), that the California Environmental Quality Act\n(CEQA) does not apply to “projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves.”\n*If the Central Area Planning Commission elects to grant the appeal, either in whole or in part, and to\noverturn the Zoning Administrator’s determination, the Commission may also consider a Categorical\nExemption from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301, and may make a determination\nthat there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical exemption,\npursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2, applies.\nApplicant: Margaret Lee, 700 LEEF LLC\nRepresentative: Sherrie Olson, PLRC\nAppellant: Christine Lee, 700 South Vermont Corp.\nStaff: Charles J. Rausch, Associate Zoning Administrator
#7
Item
7. APCC-2023-1163-SPE-SPP Council District: 13 – Soto-Martinez\nCEQA: ENV-2023-1165-CE Last Day to Act: 10-31-23\nPlan Area: Hollywood Continued from: 09-26-23\nPUBLIC HEARING – August 4, 2023\nPROJECT SITE: 6706 – 6712 West Hollywood Boulevard;\n1650 – 1654 North McCadden Place\nPROPOSED PROJECT:\nThe installation of an approximately 40 square-foot Digital Display sign located on the existing roof within\nthe interior courtyard of the Grauman's Egyptian Theater building. The sign face is approximately two feet,\nfive inches in height and 16 feet, three inches in width, and the sign is mounted to a metal frame which is\naffixed to the roof. The sign will be located 28 feet, seven inches above grade, as measured from the top\nof the sign face to grade, and 25 feet, four inches in height, as measured from the bottom of the sign frame\nto grade.\nCentral Los Angeles Area Planning Commission 4 October 24, 2023\nThe sign will face Hollywood Boulevard and will be set back approximately 142 feet from the front lot line.\nThe sign will be located on the roof that extends over the entrance to the theater and will be used to\nadvertise movies and movie times. It will be updated with different movie titles and times as movies are\nrotated in and out for exhibition. It will feature a color LED display, with red and white text atop a black\nbackground and will include the Netflix ‘N’ logo. No other images or graphics are proposed.\nREQUESTED ACTIONS:\n1. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Article 19, Section 15311, Class\n11, an Exemption from CEQA, and that there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that an\nexception to a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2 applies.\n2. Pursuant to Section 6.F of the Hollywood Signage Supplemental Use District (HSSUD) and Section\n11.5.7 C of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC), a Specific Plan Project Permit Compliance\nReview to permit the installation of a Digital Display sign in the HSSUD;\n3. Pursuant to Section 6.H of the Hollywood Signage Supplemental Use District (HSSUD) and LAMC\nSection 11.5.7 F, a Specific Plan Exception to permit the installation of a Digital Display sign in the\nform of a Roof Sign, in lieu of a Wall Sign or a Marquee Sign, as otherwise permitted by Section 7.C\nof the HSSUD;\n4. Pursuant to Section 6.H of the Hollywood Signage Supplemental Use District (HSSUD) and LAMC\nSection 11.5.7 F, a Specific Plan Exception to permit the installation of a Digital Display located 25\nfeet, four inches above grade, as measured vertically, in lieu of the 35 to 75 feet above grade as\notherwise required by Section 7.C.1 of the HSSUD; and\n5. Pursuant to Section 6.H of the Hollywood Signage Supplemental Use District (HSSUD) and LAMC\nSection 11.5.7 F, a Specific Plan Exception to permit a Solid Panel Roof Sign, as otherwise prohibited\nby Section 5.B of the HSSUD.\nApplicant: Tony Henrik Hambarchian, Netflix\nRepresentative: Scott Hampton, YESCO, LLC\nStaff: Dylan Lawrence, City Planning Associate\ndylan.lawrence@lacity.org\n(213) 978-1182
LA County Board
#1
Closed Session Items
(CS-1) CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS\n(Government Code Section 54957.6)\nAgency designated representatives: Fesia Davenport, Chief Executive\nOfficer and designated staff.\nEmployee Organization(s) for represented employees: All individual\nmember unions of the Coalition of County Unions, AFL CIO; Local 721,\nSEIU; All affiliated member unions of AFSCME Council 36; Association of\nDeputy District Attorneys; Los Angeles County Association of\nEnvironmental Health Specialists; and Los Angeles County Public\nDefenders.\nIn Open Session, this item was taken off calendar. (17-0363)
#1
Item
1. Hearing on the 2024 Hollywood Bowl Season Ticket Price Schedule\nHearing on adoption of a resolution to revise the 2024 Hollywood Bowl\nseason maximum and minimum ticket price schedule proposed by the Los\nAngeles Philharmonic Association (5); and find that the proposed action is\nexempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. (Department of\nParks and Recreation) (23-3785)\nAttachments: Board Letter\nPublic Comment/Correpondence
#2
Item
2. Hearing on Ordinance Granting a Proprietary Industrial Gas Pipeline\nFranchise to Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.\nHearing on ordinance for adoption granting a proprietary industrial gas\npipeline franchise to Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., a Delaware\ncorporation (Franchisee), to operate and maintain its industrial gas pipeline\nsystem in the same manner as that system existed and was operated at the\ntime of the operative date of this ordinance, for a period of five years,\nbeginning on November 23, 2023 and expiring on November 22, 2028, with\nthe base annual fee payable to the County by Franchisee to be determined\naccording to a formula contained in Section 2 of the ordinance, and the\nFranchisee will also pay a granting fee of $10,000. (Department of Public\nWorks) (23-3481)\nAttachments: Ordinance\nPublic Comment/Correspondence
#3
Item
3. Hearing on County Code, Title 7 - Business Licenses Amendment\nHearing on ordinance for adoption amending County Code, Title 7 -\nBusiness Licenses, by adding Ammunition Dealers to Chapter 7.46 - Gun\nDealers, to regulate both Gun and Ammunition Dealers in the\nunincorporated areas of Los Angeles County, requiring: Gun and\nAmmunition Dealers to apply for a Business License and annually renew a\nvalid license, security camera systems consistent with the California Penal\nCode, restricts minors’ presence where gun and ammunition are sold,\ndisplay signs warning of risks associated with guns, in accordance with the\nCalifornia Penal Code, approved firearm safety device upon delivery of any\ngun sold, leased, or transferred, Gun and Ammunition Dealers to secure\nand maintain on the business premises, a record of every gun and\nammunition purchaser’s thumbprint, maintenance of annual sales reports of\nguns and ammunition sold on the business premises for five years and\nmaintenance of inventory in real time, with the names of suspended and\nrevoked licenses to be publicly posted by the Treasurer and Tax Collector,\nand update various citations of State law; and amending Chapter 7.14 - Fee\nSchedule, to update fees for the reasonable regulatory costs for issuing the\nlicense and renewals and enforcing Chapter 7.46, the updated annual fees\nare $954 for an initial license application and $577 for an annual renewal.\n(Treasurer and Tax Collector) (23-3786)\nAttachments: Ordinance\nPublic Comment/Correspondence
#4
Item
4. Hearing on Project No. PRJ2023-000322-(3) for the Santa Monica\nMountains Habitat Impact Fee Update\nHearing on Project No. PRJ2023-000322-(3), Advance Planning Case No.\nRPPL2023000462-(3), and Plan Amendment No. RPPL2023000732-(3), to\nconsider the proposed update to the Habitat Impact Fee for the Santa\nMonica Mountains Local Coastal Program and Santa Monica Mountains\nNorth Area Community Standards District; amend County Code, Title 22 -\nPlanning and Zoning to update the Santa Monica Mountains Local\nImplementation Plan; and find that the Project is exempt from the California\nEnvironmental Quality Act. (On April 19, 2023, the Regional Planning\nCommission recommended approval of this Project.) (Department of\nRegional Planning) (23-3350)\nAttachments: Board Letter\nDepartmental Statement\nPublic Comment/Correspondence
#5
Item
5. Hearing on the Appeal of Project No. 03-250-(5) in the Unincorporated\nCommunity of Val Verde\nHearing on the appeal of Project No. 03-250-(5), Vesting Tentative Tract\nMap No. 060257-(5), Conditional Use Permit No. 03-250-(5), Oak Tree\nPermit No. 200700007-(5), and Highway Realignment P-289, and a Final\nEnvironmental Impact Report associated with Environmental Assessment\nNo. 03-250-(5), to authorize 247 lots, including 222 single-family\nresidences, with two publicly-accessible community parks, a multi-use trail\nsystem, 21,000 sq feet of neighborhood commercial uses, and a highway\nrealignment on 113 acres, including an offsite conservation area and offsite\nwater tank site, located at the intersection of Del Valle Road and Hunstock\nStreet in the Newhall Zoned District within the Castaic Community\nStandards District and applied for by Sterling Gateway LP (Hunt Williams).\n(Appeal from the Regional Planning Commission’s approval.) (Department\nof Regional Planning) (23-3788)\nAttachments: Board Letter\nPublic Comment/Correspondence
#6
Item
6. Hearing on Amendments to County Code, Titles 12, 21 and 22\nRelating to Fee Revisions\nHearing on proposed amendments to County Code, Title 12 -\nEnvironmental Protection, Title 21 - Subdivisions, and Title 22 - Planning\nand Zoning to revise and implement new fees charged by the Department\nof Regional Planning in connection with the review and processing of\ndevelopment projects; and find that the proposed ordinance is being\nadopted for the purpose of meeting operational expenses and is, therefore,\nexempt from the California Environmental Quality Act and the State\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (All Districts). (Department\nof Regional Planning) (23-3800)\nAttachments: Board Letter\nDepartmental Statement\nPublic Comment/Correspondence
#7
Item
7. Hearing on Project No. PRJ2023-003408-(All Districts) for the\nPathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing Grant Application\nHearing on Project No. PRJ2023-003408-(All Districts), Advance Planning\nProject No. RPPL2023004980-(All Districts), an application for the United\nStates Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Pathways to\nRemoving Obstacles to Housing (PRO Housing) Grant to fund the\npreparation and adoption of planning documents to increase the production\nand preservation of housing for unincorporated Los Angeles County; accept\nthe grant award; authorize the Director of Regional Planning to execute all\nnecessary documents to administer the grant; and find that the proposal is\nnot a project for which review is required under the California Environmental\nQuality Act (CEQA), in accordance with Section 15378(b)(4) of CEQA, and\nexempt from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), in accordance\nwith Section 58.34(a) (1) of NEPA. (Department of Regional Planning)\n(23-3816)\nAttachments: Board Letter\nDepartmental Statement\nPublic Comment/Correspondence\nII. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 8
LA Police Commission
#1
Order of Business
1. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF POLICE\n• Significant incidents and activities occurring from October 3, 2023 – October 24, 2023.\n• Crime Statistics\n• Department Personnel Strength
#3
Order of Business
3. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS\nThe Consent Agenda items are considered to be routine and non-controversial upon which documentation\nprovided to the Board is adequate to give sufficient information for approval without inquiry or discussion. It is\ndesignated to minimize the time required for the handling of routine matters in order to permit additional time to\nbe spent on more significant matters. The President can call for ayes and nays on the Consent Agenda as a whole\nand the vote will be treated as a separate vote on each item. These items may be moved to the Regular Agenda at\nthe order of the President or at the request of the other members of the Board.\nA. DEPARTMENT’S REPORT dated October 4, 2023, relative to the 2023 Bulletproof Vest\nPartnership Grant, as set forth. [BPC #23-203]\nRecommendation(s) for Board action:\nAPPROVE the Department’s report and TRANSMIT to the Mayor and City Council.
#4
Order of Business
4. REGULAR AGENDA ITEM\nA. DEPARTMENT’S REPORT dated October 4, 2023, relative to the Department’s response to\nthe City Controller’s Report on the Enforcement of Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 41.18,\nas set forth. [BPC #23-210]\nRecommendation(s) for Board action:\nAPPROVE the Department’s report and TRANSMIT to City Council.
#5
Order of Business
5. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS\nA. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINE/ DISMISSAL/ RELEASE/ PUBLIC EMPLOYEE\nPERFORMANCE EVALUATION. Officer-Involved Shooting (OIS) and In-Custody Death (ICD).\nGovernment Code Section 54957.\n1. OIS – Animal #056-22 One Detective III\nDate of Occurrence: 11/29/22 One Police Officer II\n2. ICD #002-23 Five Police Officer II\nDate of Occurrence: 1/3/23\nInvolved Party: K. Anderson\nB. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINE/ DISMISSAL/ RELEASE/ PUBLIC EMPLOYEE\nPERFORMANCE EVAULATION. Discussion and possible Board action relative to\ninvestigations Concerning Complaint File No. 22-002698, 22-002699, 22-003385, 23-000261 and\n23-000542.Government Code Section 54957.\n1. Chief of Police #22-002698\n2. Chief of Police #22-002699\n3. Chief of Police #22-003385\n4. Chief of Police #23-000261\n5. Chief of Police #23-000542
LADWP Board
#B
Order of Business
B. Opening remarks by the Commission President
#D
Order of Business
D. Report/Briefing by the General Manager and Chief Engineer\nReports also from Water, Power, and Administrative System Management\nconcerning current matters relating to Departmental operations.
#E
Order of Business
E. Introduction of Motions for Future Consideration
#F
Order of Business
F. Comments from Ratepayer Advocate on Agendized Items
#G
Order of Business
G. Discussion with Neighborhood Council Representatives\nDiscussion with Neighborhood Council representatives on any Neighborhood\nCouncil Resolution or Community Impact Statement filed with the City Clerk\nwhich relate to any agenda item listed or being considered on this agenda for the\nBoard of Water and Power Commissioners.
#H
Order of Business
H. Consideration of Items Recommended for Approval\nThe Board will consider items recommended for approval. Items on which there\nare speaker cards or which a Commissioner has requested pulled for discussion\nwill generally be considered after the Management Reports and Filed Items.
#I
Order of Business
I. Management Reports
#J
Order of Business
J. Filed Items
#L
Order of Business
L. Items for Approval
#1
Order of Business I
1. Presentation regarding update on LADWP’s Biodiversity Efforts
#2
Order of Business I
2. Presentation regarding an update on Chatsworth Nature Preserve
#3
Order of Business I
3. Presentation regarding an update on Security Services\n5
#1
Order of Business J
1. Report on Payment of Fines and Penalties for Environmental Violations\n– April Through June 2023, and Cumulative Payments for\nQuarters 1 – 2, 2023.
#2
Order of Business J
2. LADWP Spending Through the Southern California Public Power Authority
#3
Order of Business J
3. Renewable Portfolio Standard and Clean Energy Resources Planning\nMonthly Report – July 2023
#4
Order of Business J
4. Water System Monthly Report – August - September 2023
#1
Order of Business L
1. Recommended by Office of the Chief Information Technology Officer\nApproval of Amendment No. 7 to Agreement No. 47789 for Software\nMaintenance and Support with TTEC Digital, LLC. The Amendment will\nextend the term by three years and increase the amount by $4,000,000 for a\nnew not to exceed amount of $26,898,350.\nDetermine item is exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section\n15060(c)(3).\nCity Council approval is required.
#2
Order of Business L
2. Recommended by Financial Services Organization\nApproval of Payment of Premium for Corporate Property Insurance\nPolicy January 1, 2024, to January 1, 2025.\nDetermine item is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3).
#3
Order of Business L
3. Recommended by Financial Services Organization\nApproval of Authorization to Issue up to $450.44 Million of Power System\nRevenue Bonds Under Resolution Nos. 5041 and 5042.\nDetermine item is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3).
#4
Order of Business L
4. Recommended by Office of the General Manager and Chief Engineer\nApproval of Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions for\nPurchase of Real Property Located in West Hills, California 91307, LADWP\nReal Estate File No. W-101835.\nDetermine item is in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15070-15075.\n6
#5
Order of Business L
5. Recommended by Power System\nApproval of Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 106 for Vegetation\nManagement Services for Power Line Clearance with Tree Service Kings,\nInc. The Contract will extend the term by one year with two one-year renewal\noptions and a new not to exceed amount of $162,381,922.\nDetermine item is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3).
#6
Order of Business L
6. Recommended by Power System\nApproval of 2023 Power System Integrated Resource Plan for Submission to\nthe California Energy Commission.\nDetermine item is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3).
#1
Order of Business M
1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION\n(Section 54956.9(d)(1) of the California Government Code)\nIn re: Aqueous Film Forming Foams Product Liability Litigation, United\nStates District Court, District of South Carolina - Charleston Division, MDL\nNo. 2:18-mn-2873-RMG, Case No. 2:23-cv-03147-RMG.
#2
Order of Business M
2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION\n(Section 54956.9(d)(1) of the California Government Code)\nIn re: Aqueous Film Forming Foams Product Liability Litigation, United\nStates District Court, District of South Carolina - Charleston Division, MDL\nNo. 2:18-mn-2873, Case No. 2:23-cv-03230.
#3
Order of Business M
3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION\n(Section 54956.9(d)(1) of the California Government Code)\nJulia Brown v. Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Los Angeles\nSuperior Court Case No. 20STCV46304.
#4
Order of Business M
4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION\n(Section 54956.9(d)(1) of the California Government Code)\nWilderman v. Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Smith, Colvin,\nContreras, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV45139.\n7
#5
Order of Business M
5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION\n(Section 54956.9(d)(1) of the California Government Code)\nAntwon Jones v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court\nCase No. BC577267 (and designated related cases).
#6
Order of Business M
6. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION\n(Section 54956.9(d)(2) of the California Government Code)\nDiscussion regarding significant exposure to litigation (1 case).\nThe Board shall publicly report any action taken in closed session and the vote or\nabstention of every member present thereon, in accordance with Section 54957.1 of the\nCalifornia Government Code.
Public Safety Committee
#1
Item
(1)\nVerbal presentation from Los Angeles Fire Department Chief, Kristin Crowley, and Los Angeles Fire Commission President, Hurley-Hayes.
#10
Item
(10)\n22-0282\nBoard of Police Commissioners and City Administrative Officer reports relative to budget modifications for the 2021 Connect and Protect - Law Enforcement Behavioral Health Response Program grant, and related matters.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nReport from City Administrative Officer dated 10-19-23.pdf\nBoard of Police Commissioners dated 9-22-23.pdf\nReport from Public Safety Committee 8-3-22\nCouncil Action - Mayor Concurrence dated 8-30-22\nReport from Board of Police Commissioners dated 3-01-22.pdf\nReport from City Administrative Officer dated 7-27-22\nCommunication(s) from Public_03-11-2022
#11
Item
(11)\n20-1178-S3\nCD 15\nBoard of Fire Commissioners report relative to the redeployment of the Therapeutic Van Pilot Program serving the Harbor Area to a more operationally advantageous facility.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nReport from Board of Fire Commissioners dated 10-17-23\nCouncil Action dated 9-08-23\nReport from Public Safety Committee_8-22-23\nMotion (McOsker - Hernandez) dated 6-23-23.pdf\nSpeaker Card(s)_08-22-2023\nSpeaker Card(s)_09-06-2023
#12
Item
(12)\n23-0404\nBoard of Fire Commissioners report relative to current procedures to remove Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances from firefighting protective gear, and related matters.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nReport from Board of Fire Commissioners dated 9-19-23.pdf\nCouncil Action dated 6-09-23\nReport from Public Safety Committee 5-23-23\nCommunity Impact Statement submitted by Bel Air-Beverly Crest Neighborhood Council_05-04-2023\nMotion (Rodriguez - Lee) dated 4-11-23.pdf\nSpeaker Card(s)_05-23-2023\nSpeaker Card(s)_06-07-2023
#13
Item
(13)\n22-0979-S1\nCity Administrative Officer report relative to a status update on the development of an Alternative Response Framework.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\n(Referred to Personnel, Audits, and Hiring Committee; and Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee)\nReport from City Administrative Officer dated 10-19-23.pdf
#14
Item
(14)\n23-1118\nCity Administrative Officer report relative to the California Budget Act of 2022 grant award for the Use-of-Force and De-escalation Training Pilot Program, and proposed Agreement with Performa Labs, Inc. to provide use-of-force, de-escalation, and communications training to sworn officers.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nReport from City Administrative Officer dated 8-03-23
#15
Item
(15)\n23-1106\nMotion (Rodriguez – Padilla) relative to the necessary steps to conduct a Nexus / Feasibility Study to determine if there is a relationship between new development and increased fire, and related matters.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nMotion (Rodriguez - Padilla) dated 10-06-23
#16
Item
(16)\n23-0600-S33\nMotion (Raman – Yaroslavsky) relative to the funding for a Crisis and Incident Response through Community-Led Engagement (CIRCLE) team in the South San Fernando Valley across the Ventura Boulevard commercial corridor.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\n(Referred to Housing and Homelessness Committee; and Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee)\nMotion (Raman - Yaroslavsky) dated 5-18-23
#17
Item
(17)\n23-0735\nCD 15\nMotion (McOsker – Park – Hernandez) relative to the allocation of $13.5 million from the Unappropriated Balance to the Unarmed Crisis Response line item in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56, Account No. TBD, for a new CIRCLE Team in the Harbor Area in Council District 15.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\n(Referred to Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee)\nMotion ( McOsker - Park - Hernandez) dated 6-28-23.pdf
#18
Item
(18)\n23-0752\nCD 11\nMotion (Park – McOsker) relative to the $1.5 million from the Unarmed Crisis Response line item in the Unappropriated Balance for the expansion of CIRCLE in Council District 11.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\n(Referred to Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee)\nMotion (Park - McOsker) dated 7-05-23.pdf
#19
Item
(19)\n23-0956\nMotion (Rodriguez – Padilla) relative to consolidating the City’s unarmed crisis response programs.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted.\n(Referred to Budget, Finance, and Innovation Committee)\nMotion (Rodriguez - Padilla) dated 9-08-23
#2
Item
(2)\n21-0980\nLos Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) report relative to recommendations from the LAFD’s Organizational and Training Assessment study conducted by Deloitte Consulting, LLP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nReport from Fire Department dated 9-19-23\nCommunication from Los Angeles Fire Department submitted 6-13-22 - Presentation\nCommunication from Los Angeles Fire Department submitted 6-01-22\nReport from Los Angeles Fire Department dated 5-13-22.pdf\nCouncil Action - 9-21-21\nPublic Safety Committee Report 9-15-21\nMotion (Martinez - Rodriguez - Raman) dated 9-01-21.pdf
#20
Item
(20)\n23-1160\nMotion (Rodriguez – Blumenfield) relative to the plan to expand the CIRCLE program to new geographic areas of the City, and related matters.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nMotion (Rodriguez - Blumenfield) dated 10-20-23
#3
Item
(3)\n23-0489\nLos Angeles Fire Department’s (LAFD) report relative to the current inventory of medical supplies, pharmaceuticals, etc.; and mitigation measures the LAFD may need to take to prevent shortages; and related matters.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nReport from Fire Department dated 9-19-23\nReport from Public Safety Committee 5-23-23\nCouncil Action dated 6-09-23\nMotion (Rodriguez - Blumenfield) dated 5-10-23\nSpeaker Card(s)_05-23-2023
#4
Item
(4)\n23-0600-S107\nLos Angeles Fire Department report relative to building and maintenance challenges and costs associated with making repairs.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nReport from Fire Department dated 10-05-23.pdf
#5
Item
(5)\n23-0255\nPersonnel Department and Board of Police Commissioners reports relative to Communications Division staffing levels, call load, and recruitment.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nReport from Personnel Department dated 9-27-23\nReport from Board of Police Commissioners dated 9-07-23.pdf\nCouncil Action dated 6-14-23\nReport from Public Safety Committee 5-23-23\nMotion (McOsker - Lee) dated 3-03-23.pdf\nSpeaker Card(s)_05-23-2023\nSpeaker Card(s)_06-13-2023
#6
Item
(6)\n23-1119\nBoard of Police Commissioners report relative to accepting a donation of private service road repaving at the Los Angeles Police Academy, Elysian Park, from California Paving and Grading.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nReport from Board of Police Commissioners dated 8-28-23
#7
Item
(7)\n23-1120\nBoard of Police Commissioners report relative to accepting a donation of replacement gym equipment for the Los Angeles Police Department, Air Support Division, from the Los Angeles Police Foundation.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nReport from Board of Police Commissioners dated 8-28-23
#8
Item
(8)\n23-0626-S1\nBoard of Police Commissioners report relative to approval of the Supplemental Police Account Second Quarterly Report (April through June 2023).\nFiscal Impact Statement: No\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nReport from Board of Police Commissioners dated 10-06-23.pdf
#9
Item
(9)\n23-1117\nBoard of Police Commissioners report relative to accepting a donation of replacement gym equipment for the Los Angeles Police Department, Air Support Division (ASD), from the Los Angeles Police Foundation.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted\nReport from Board of Police Commissioners dated 10-06-23.pdf