Temple City — 2023-02-21

A. SCHOOL DISTRICT/CITY STANDING COMMITTEE\n(Councilmember Man and Councilmember Chavez) – Formed 1/3/2012

B. AUDIT STANDING COMMITTEE\n(Councilmember Chavez and Councilmember Yu) – Formed 7/15/2014

C. FACILITIES, PUBLIC WORKS, AND INFRASTRUCTURE STANDING\nCOMMITTEE\n(Councilmember Yu and Councilmember Man) – Formed 4/4/2017

D. PRIMROSE PARK ART ELEMENT AD HOC\n(Councilmember Vizcarra and Councilmember Yu) – Formed 5/19/20

E. CITY BASED HOMELESS PLAN STANDING COMMITTEE\n(Councilmember Vizcarra and Mayor Sternquist) – Formed 3/16/21

F. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF CITY PROPERTY AT 9050 LAS TUNAS DRIVE\n(Mayor Pro Tem Man and Mayor Sternquist) – Formed 5/17/22

A. COUNCILMEMBER CHAVEZ

B. COUNCILMEMBER VIZCARRA

C. COUNCILMEMBER YU

D. MAYOR PRO TEM MAN

E. MAYOR STERNQUIST

A. INTRODUCTION OF CAMELLIA ROYAL COURT

A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES\nThe City Council is requested to review and approve:\n1. The Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting of February 7, 2023; and\n2. The Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of February 7, 2023.\nRecommendation:\n1. Approve the Minutes of the City Council Meetings; and\n2. Find that approval of the City Council Minutes is not a “Project” as defined\nunder Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State\nGuidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no\nenvironmental review is required.

B. TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION ACTIONS\nThe City Council is requested to receive and file:\n1. The actions of the Regular Transportation and Public Safety Commission\nMeeting of January 11, 2023; and\n2. The actions of the Regular Transportation and Public Safety Commission\nMeeting of February 8, 2023.\nRecommendation:\n1. Receive and file the Transportation and Public Safety Commission Actions;\nand\n2. Find that approval of the Commission Actions is not a “Project” as defined\nunder Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State\nGuidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no\nenvironmental review is required.

C. AUDIT REPORTS FOR PROPOSITION A, PROPOSITION C, MEASURE R,\nMEASURE M AND TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 FOR\nFISCAL YEAR (FY) 2021-2022\nCity Council is requested to receive and file the FY 2021-22 audit reports.\nRecommendation:\n1. The City Council is requested to receive and file FY 2021-22 Proposition A,\nProposition C, Measure R, Measure M, and Transportation Development Act\nArticle 3 Audit Reports; and\n2. Find that approval of the audit reports is not a “Project” as defined under\nSection 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines;\ntherefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental\nreview is required.

D. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 23-5657 AMENDING THE CITY’S RECORDS\nRETENTION SCHEDULE\nCity Council is requested to adopt the resolution amending the City’s records\nretention schedule. Having an updated record retention schedule is crucial and can\nhelp reduce current and future records storage costs, eliminate duplication of\nrecords, increase efficiency and take advantage of current technology and changes\nin law.\nRecommendation:\n1. Adopt Resolution No. 23-5657 (Attachment “A”) adopting the City’s amended\nRecords Retention Schedule (Exhibit 1); and\n2. Find that approval of the City’s Records Retention Schedule is not a “Project”\nas defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act\nState Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3),\nno environmental review is required.

E. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 23-5656 PROCLAIMING TERMINATION OF A\nLOCAL EMERGENCY\nCity Council is requested to consider termination of a local emergency as the\nspread and effects of COVID-19 has significantly decreased, and no longer\nconstitutes conditions of extreme peril. The City is effectively able to control\nservices, personnel, equipment and facilities. As such, conditions warrant the\ntermination of the local emergency.\nRecommendation:\nThe City Council is requested to:\n1. Adopt Resolution No. 23-5656 (Attachment “A”), proclaiming the termination of\na local emergency; and\n2. Find that adoption of Resolution No. 23-5656, proclaiming the termination of a\nlocal emergency is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the\nCalifornia Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to\nState Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3), no environmental review is required.

F. VISA CARD REPORT\nThe City Council is requested to receive and file the Visa Card Report.\nRecommendation:\n1. Receive and file; and\n2. Find that receiving and filing the Visa Card Report is exempt from review\nunder the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section\n15061(b)(3).

G. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 23-5658 APPROVING PAYMENT OF BILLS\nFOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23\nThe City Council is requested to adopt Resolution No. 23-5658 authorizing the\npayment of bills.\nRecommendation:\n1. Adopt Resolution No. 23-5658; and\n2. Find that adoption of the resolution authorizing the payment of bills is not a\n“Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental\nQuality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section\n15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

H. UPDATE ON CITY’S CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION LIMIT FOR 2023-2024\nThe City’s campaign contribution limit is automatically adjusted according to the\nConsumer Price Index in January of every odd year. City Council is requested to\nreceive and file an update on the adjustment of the City’s Campaign Contribution\nLimit for 2023-2024.\nRecommendation:\nCity Council is requested to:\n1. Receive and file the update on the City’s Campaign Contribution Limit for\n2023-2024; and\n2. Find that receiving and filing the update on the City’s Campaign Contribution\nLimit is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California\nEnvironmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State\nGuidelines Section 15060(c)(3), no environmental review is required.

A. INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 23-1069, SERIES\nC CODE AMENDMENTS OF TITLE 9 (ZONING REGULATIONS), CHAPTER 1\n(ZONING CODE) AND AN AMENDMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE\nELEMENT TO CLARIFY MIXED-USE AND RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES\nThe City Council is requested to hold a public hearing regarding the proposed\namendments to Series C Code Amendments of Title 9 (Zoning Regulations),\nChapter 1 (Zoning Code).\nPresenter: Community Development Director and\nAssociate Planner\nRecommendation:\n1. Conduct the public hearing;\n2. Find that the project is exempt from further environmental review pursuant to\nSections 15061(b)(3) and 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act\n(CEQA) Guidelines;\n3. Introduce for first reading by title only and waive further reading of Ordinance\nNo. 23-1069 (Attachment “A”), Series C Code Amendments of Title 9 (Zoning\nRegulations), Chapter 1 (Zoning Code);\n4. Schedule the second reading of Ordinance No. 23-1069 for March 7, 2023;\nand\n5. Schedule the adoption of Resolution No. 23-5653 (Attachment “B”),\nAmendments to the General Plan Land Use Element to Clarify Mixed-Use and\nResidential Densities (Attachment “C”), for March 7, 2023.