Los Angeles — 2026-01-20

(1)\n25-0600-S129\nCity Administrative Officer report relative to funding options and\npositions to support Los Angeles Police Department sworn\nhiring. (This item is referred to the Budget and Finance Committee\nand Personnel and Hiring Committee.)\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nFinancial Policies Statement: Yes

(10)\n25-0762\nCity Attorney report and draft Ordinance relative to amending Section\n103.12 of Division, Article 3, Chapter X of the Los Angeles Municipal\nCode (LAMC) to revise the Business Permit Fee Schedule. (This item\nis referred to the Public Safety Committee and the Budget and\nFinance Committee. The Public Safety Committee approved the\nitem on January 14, 2026.)\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(11)\n25-0600-S77\nAdopted Budget Recommendation and Department on Disability report\nrelative to a Special Study on the feasibility of establishing a fee-for-\nservice program to support Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)\nrequirements to ensure that physical improvements, mobile\naccessibility and electronic services are reimbursed by other City\ndepartments, including proprietary departments. (Pursuant to Council\naction of July 30, 2025; Council file No. 25-0006-S32)\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(12)\n25-1457\nDepartment of Transportation report relative to the submission of\ngrant applications and acceptance of grant funding from the Los\nAngeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Open and Slow\nStreets Program for Cycles 6 and 7. (This item is referred to the\nTransportation Committee and Budget and Finance Committee.\nThe Transportation Committee approved the item on December\n10, 2025.)\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(13)\n13-1465-S1\nCity Administrative Officer report relative to the Annual Reserve Fund\nLoan Review.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(14)\n25-0416\nJoint Department of Transportation, Bureau of Engineering, and\nBureau of Contract Administration report relative to funding awarded\nby the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority from\nCycle 2 of the Metro Active Transport, Transit and First/Last Mile\nProgram; and, request for additional staffing resources. (This item is\nreferred to the Transportation Committee, Personnel and Hiring\nCommittee,   and   Budget   and   Finance   Committee.   The\nTransportation Committee approved the item on December 10,\n2025.)\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(15)\n25-1416\nThe Committee shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(4), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Downtown Natural Caregivers, Inc.\n(This matter arises from Business License Tax assessments.)

(16)\n21-1188-S11\nCity Attorney report relative to a Fourth Amendment to Contract No. C-\n139762 with Summa LLP to extend the contract term for the provision\nof legal services with regard to the July 11, 2021 flooding incident at\nthe Hyperion Water Reclamation Plant, for the cases\nentitled Mecklenburg v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior\nCourt (LASC) Case No. 21STCV28114; Abdelnur v. City of Los\nAngeles, LASC Case No. 22STCV00153; and, Konig v. City of Los\nAngeles, LASC Case No. 22STCV00970.\n[The   Committee   may   recess   to   Closed   Session,   pursuant   to\nGovernment   Code   Section   54956.9(d)(1),   (d)(2),   and   (e)(1);   to\nconfer or discuss with, or receive advice from, its legal counsel\nregarding pending litigation and significant exposure to litigation\n(one potential case). (This matter arises from the need to update\nand extend the term of the outside counsel contract with Summa\nLLP relating to the Hyperion Water Reclamation Plant incident\nand proceedings resulting therefrom, Contract No. 139762.)]\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(17)\n25-1519\nThe Committee shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Charles F. Wing v. City of Los\nAngeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 24VECV00512. (This\nmatter arises from a trip and fall on February 6, 2023, on the sidewalk\nof Kentland Avenue, near its intersection with Leadwell Street.)

(18)\n25-1506\nThe Committee shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Victor Manuel Yepez Collazo v.\nCounty of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.\n24STCV24674. (This matter arises from a trip and fall incident on\nFebruary 27, 2024, on the sidewalk located at Olive Street and 11th\nStreet, Los Angeles.)

(19)\n25-1520\nThe Committee shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Maria Del Carmen Elias v. City of\nLos Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV08475.\n(This matter arises from a fall incident on May 10, 2022 incident, near\n1136 East 41st Street, in Los Angeles, California.)

(2)\n25-0006-S57\nCity Administrative Officer reports, dated May 7, 2025, October 2, 2025\nand January 16, 2026; City Attorney report and draft Ordinance,\nAmending Motion 23C (Rodriguez - Yaroslavsky), and Amending\nMotion 23D (Park - Nazarian), relative to adding Section 98.0419.1 to\nthe Los Angeles Municipal Code to waive fees imposed in connection\nwith permits to repair or rebuild buildings or structures damaged or\ndestroyed by the January 2025 Wildfires; and feasibility of waiving plan\ncheck and permit fees associated with reconstruction of private\nproperty damaged in the January 2025 Wildfires. [This matter was\nreferred to the Budget and Finance Committee, including Amending\nMotion 23C (Rodriguez – Yaroslavsky) and Amending Motion 23D\n(Park – Nazarian), for further consideration when it was considered by\nCity Council on December 2, 2025.]\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nFinancial Policies Statement: Yes

(20)\n25-1521\nThe Committee shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Steven Nelson v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23LBCV02033.\n(This matter arises from a November 2, 2022, sidewalk trip and fall\nincident near 24907 Broad Avenue, in Los Angeles.)

(21)\n25-1522\nThe Committee shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Sonia Pier-Weisman v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23VECV05473.\n(This matter arises from an August 18, 2023, sidewalk and curb trip\nand fall incident located at the southeast corner of Noble Avenue and\nDickens Street, in the Sherman Oaks area.)

(22)\n25-1523\nThe Committee shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Dinora Escobar v. City of Los\nAngeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV19695. (This\nmatter arises from a trip and fall incident on December 24, 2019, over\na raised slab of concrete located at 11409 Blucher Avenue, Granada\nHills, California.)

(23)\n25-1524\nThe Committee shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Vonda Washington v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV35045.\n(This matter arises from a trip and fall incident on November 10, 2021,\nat 6027 8th Avenue, in the City of Los Angeles.)

(24)\n25-0616\nThe Committee shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Diane Rios aka Dyan Rios v. City\nof Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.\n22STCV10015. (This matter arises from a trip and fall incident on\nAugust 6, 2021, on the sidewalk at 1429 and 1420 Ivar Avenue, in the\nCity of Los Angeles.)

(25)\n25-1525\nThe Committee shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Rebeca Candelaria Ramirez v.\nJesus Miranda, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.\n20STCV06176. (This matter arises from a vehicle versus vehicle traffic\ncollision on August 13, 2019, at 1st Street West of Highland Avenue.)

(26)\n25-1526\nThe Committee shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled David Israel Velasquez v. Jonathan\nRafael Viramontes, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.\n23STCV19844. (This matter arises from a vehicle versus vehicle traffic\ncollision on December 31, 2021, at Avenue 26 and Barranca Street.)

(27)\n25-1527\nThe Committee shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Grace Benites Lopez v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 24CMCV01055.\n(This matter arises from a vehicle versus vehicle incident on July 20,\n2022, at Central Avenue and 88th Place.)

(28)\n25-1528\nThe Committee shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled D.E., a Minor, et al. v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV25856.\n(This matter arises from an officer-involved shooting on December 26,\n2021 incident at 2960 West Broadway in the City of Los Angeles,\nCalifornia 90031.)

(29)\n25-1529\nThe Committee shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Dawn Swarm v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23SMCV00544.\n(This matter arises from a trip and fall incident on February 12, 2022,\non an uneven portion of the sidewalk in front of 3851 Minerva Avenue,\nLos Angeles, California.)

(3)\n25-1489\nCity Attorney report relative to an update on affirmative litigation\nchallenging actions of the federal government.\n[The   Committee   may   recess   to   Closed   Session,   pursuant   to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to pending litigation in the cases entitled King\nCounty et al. v. Turner et al. (No. 2:25-cv-814-BJR, W.D. Wash.);\nCounty of Santa Clara, et al. v. Noem, et al. (No. 3:25-cv-08330-\nWHO,   N.D.   Cal.);   City   and   County   of   San   Francisco,   et   al.   v.\nTrump,   et   al. (No.   3:25-cv-1350-WHO,   N.D.   Cal.);   and,   Pedro\nVasquez Perdomo et al. v. Noem et al. (No. 2:25-cv-05605-MEMF,\nC.D. Cal.).]\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(30)\n25-1530\nThe Committee shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Payman Heravi v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV35233.\n(This matter arises from a trip and fall incident on December 27, 2019,\nat 19927 Ventura Boulevard, in Woodland Hills, California.)

(31)\n25-1531\nThe Committee shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Emely Lorena Santizo v. City of\nLos Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.\n23STCV12242. (This matter arises from a vehicle versus vehicle traffic\non August 3, 2022, at the intersection of Gage Avenue and Normandie\nAvenue.)

(32)\n25-1430\nCD 8\nThe Committee shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to a revised settlement offer for the case\nentitled Strategic Actions for a Just Economy v City of Los Angeles et\nal., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCP00702. (This lawsuit\nseeks a writ of mandate related to the City’s approval of a Conditional\nUse Permit and Site Plan Review for the proposed hotel project\nlocated at 3685 South Vermont Avenue, Los Angeles, California\n90007.) (This   item   is   referred   to   the   Budget   and   Finance\nCommittee and Planning and Land Use Management Committee.\nThe Planning and Land Use Management Committee considered\nthe matter in Closed Session on December 9, 2025.)

(33)\n25-0855\nThe Committee shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section No. 54956.9(a), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Arturo Aceves Jimenez v. City of\nLos Angeles, County of Los Angeles, et al., United States District Court\nCase No. 2:21-cv-07117. (The   Budget   and   Finance   Committee\ncontinued the item to a date to be determined on August 19,\n2025.)\nSUPPORTING MATERIALS\nMaterials relating to items on the agenda are available on the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System found at\nhttps://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect by entering the Council File number (e.g., 00-0000) associated with the agenda item.\nPUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS\nMembers of the public who wish to speak on one or multiple items shall have an opportunity to speak up to one minute per item up\nto a total of two minutes for two or more agenda items. At regular meetings, members of the public shall also have an opportunity to\nspeak up to one minute for general public comment on any matter within the subject-matter jurisdiction of the Committee. The\nCommittee is not required to take general public comment at special meetings. The Committee may limit the total amount of time for\npublic comment on any specific agenda item, on all agenda-items collectively, and/or on general public comment, based on the\nanticipated time required to hear from public speakers on any given or all agenda items, on the availability of Committee members\nand the need to maintain quorum, and on any other relevant factor. The Committee shall not discuss or take action relative to any\ngeneral public comment except as explicitly permitted under the Brown Act.\nCOMMITTEE INFORMATION, ASSIGNMENTS, AND STRUCTURE\nhttps://clerk.lacity.gov/clerk-services/cps/council-committee-meetings/info-assignments-structure\nSPECIAL ACCOMMODATION\nRequests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with\nDisabilities Act, can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978-1133. For Telecommunications Relay Service for the\nhearing impaired, please see the information below.\nNOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES\nIf a member of the public is compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require them to register as a\nlobbyist and report this activity. More information can be found at Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. or at\nethics.lacity.org/lobbying. Further assistance can be found by contacting the Ethics Commission at (213) 978-1960 or\nethics.commission@lacity.org.\nEXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES\nA member of the public seeking to challenge a City action in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public\nhearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk prior to the public hearing in time reasonably\nto be considered by the Committee members. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final\naction on a matter will become a part of the administrative record.\nTELECOMMUNICATIONS RELAY SERVICE (TRS) COMMUNICATIONS\nTelephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in\ntechnology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, and\nindividuals with a speech disability, may be able to avail themselves of both for peer-to-peer and third-party telecommunications\nrelay service (TRS) communications. Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or\nspeech disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and\nthe U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers - generally telephone companies - are compensated for the\ncosts of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user.\nWhat forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the equipment\navailable: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY-Based TRS; Speech-to-Speech Relay Service; Shared Non-English Language Relay\nService; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for\ndetail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs.\nDon't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the caller is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello, this is the\nrelay service…" when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who\nis deaf, hard-of-hearing, or has a speech disability.\nFor more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the\nFCC's Disability Rights Office website.

(4)\n25-0029\nOffice of Finance and City Administrative Officer reports relative to\npotential ballot measures, revenue options to protect and invest in City\nservices, and proposals for the June and November 2026 elections to\nincrease General Fund Tax revenue.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nFinancial Policies Statement: Yes

(5)\n25-0412\nCollections Board of Review report and findings relative to the removal\nof delinquent accounts receivables submitted by the Los Angeles\nHousing Department for the quarter ending December 31, 2024.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(6)\n25-0410\nCity Attorney report and draft Ordinance relative to amending the Los\nAngeles Administrative Code to update the schedule of charges for\nemergency ambulance service fees by increasing the rates for\nadvanced life support and mileage. (This item is referred to the\nPublic Safety Committee and Budget and Finance Committee. The\nPublic Safety Committee approved the item on January 14, 2026.)\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(7)\n25-1548\nDepartment of Building and Safety report relative to a request for\npermit and linkage fee refund from 409 NORTH LLC – Refund Claim\nNo. 179247.\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(8)\n26-0016\nCity Admininistrative Officer report and Authorizing Resolution relative\nto the issuance and sale of Municipal Improvement Corporation of Los\nAngeles (MICLA) Lease Revenue Bonds (Bonds), Series 2026-A\n(Capital Equipment and Real Property), in a principal amount of $255\nmillion, and execution of related bond documents; and, City Attorney\nreport, draft Ordinance approving the lease and leaseback of real\nproperty between the CIty and MICLA to pay principal of and interest\non the Bonds, and draft Ordinance for the creation of a special fund to\nrecord certain accounting transactions related to the Bonds.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nFinancial Policies Statement: Yes\nDebt Impact Statement: Yes

(9)\n25-0761\nCity Attorney report and draft Ordinance relative to amending Sections\n41.40, 44.04, 52.16 and 103.206 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code\n(LAMC) to revise Police Commission Service Fees. (This item is\nreferred   to   the   Public   Safety   Committee   and   the   Budget   and\nFinance Committee. The Public Safety Committee approved the\nitem on January 14, 2026.)\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(1)\n25-0160-S93\nCD 10\nCONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTEST, APPEALS\nOR OBJECTIONS to the Department of Building and Safety report and\nconfirmation of lien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-\ncompliance of code violations/Annual Inspection costs for the property\nlocated at 6080 West Alcott Street.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to a\nproposed lien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance\nof code violations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to the Los\nAngeles Municipal Code and/or Los Angeles Administrative Code,\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 6080 West Alcott\nStreet. (Lien: $1,276.56)\n(Continued from Council meeting of December 2, 2025)

(10)\n25-0900-S43\nCD 4\nCONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and\nORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement\nand maintenance of the Chandler Boulevard and Calhoun Avenue\nStreet Lighting District.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:​\n1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.\n2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying\nthe assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above\nlighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the\nLos Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code\nSection 53753 (Proposition 218).​\n(Continued from Council meeting of December 12, 2025)

(11)\n25-0900-S44\nCD 13\nCONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and\nORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement\nand maintenance of the Andrita Street and Estara Avenue No.1 Street\nLighting District.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:​\n1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.\n2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying\nthe assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above\nlighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the\nLos Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code\nSection 53753 (Proposition 218).​\n(Continued from Council meeting of December 12, 2025)

(12)\n25-0900-S45\nCD 9\nCONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and\nORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement\nand maintenance of the Vermont Avenue and 43rd Street Lighting\nDistrict.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:​\n1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.\n2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying\nthe assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above\nlighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the\nLos Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code\nSection 53753 (Proposition 218).\n(Continued from Council meeting of December 12, 2025)

(13)\n25-0160-S127\nCD 9\nCONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTEST, APPEALS\nOR OBJECTIONS to Building and Safety Department report and\nconfirmation of lien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-\ncompliance of code violations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to Los\nAngeles Municipal Code (LAMC) and/or Los Angeles Administrative\nCode (LAAC) for the property located at 836 East 47th Street.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 836 East 47th\nStreet. (Lien: $1,276.56)\n(Continued from Council meeting of January 14, 2026)

(14)\n25-0160-S144\nCD 12\nCONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTEST, APPEALS\nOR OBJECTIONS to Building and Safety Department report and\nconfirmation of lien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-\ncompliance of code violations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to Los\nAngeles Municipal Code (LAMC) and/or Los Angeles Administrative\nCode (LAAC) for the property located at 6731 North Franrivers\nAvenue.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 6731 North\nFranrivers Avenue. (Lien: $3,042.70)\n(Continued from Council meeting of January 14, 2026)

(15)\n25-0160-S130\nCD 3\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 23528 West Collins Street.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 23528 West\nCollins Street. (Lien: $1,276.56)

(16)\n25-0160-S136\nCD 5\nCONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTEST, APPEALS\nOR OBJECTIONS to Building and Safety Department report and\nconfirmation of lien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-\ncompliance of code violations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to Los\nAngeles Municipal Code (LAMC) and/or Los Angeles Administrative\nCode (LAAC) for the property located at 2568 South Military Avenue.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 2568 South\nMilitary Avenue. (Lien: $9,234.68)\n(Continued from Council meeting of January 14, 2026)\nItems for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(17)\n25-1340\nPUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to designating the\nintersection at Crenshaw Boulevard and 54th Street as “James "Jim"\nMcBeth Square."\nRecommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Harris-\nDawson - Hutt):\n1. DESIGNATE the intersection at Crenshaw Boulevard and 54th\nStreet as “James "Jim" McBeth Square."\n2. DIRECT the Department of Transportation to erect permanent\nceremonial signs to this effect at this location.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.

(18)\n23-1134-S2\nHOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to\nrequesting the City Attorney to draft an ordinance updating Subsection\nD of Section 151.06, Article 1, Chapter XV of the Los Angeles\nMunicipal Code (LAMC).\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Soto-\nMartinez - Jurado):\nREQUEST the City Attorney to prepare and present an ordinance,\nwith an urgency clause, updating Subsection D of Section 151.06,\nArticle 1, Chapter XV of the LAMC as follows:\nAny annual rent increase not previously noticed and served during\nthe period beginning June 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026, that goes\ninto effect on or after the effective date of this subsection shall comply\nwith this subsection. Any such rent increase shall not exceed three\npercent and shall not include any additional increase based on the\nlandlord’s payment of utilities.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.

(19)\n25-1411\nCD 14\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final\nmap of Tract No. 74309, located at 1800 East 7th Street, easterly of\nDecatur Street.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the final map of Tract No. 74309, located at 1800 East\n7th Street, easterly of Decatur Street and accompanying Subdivision\nImprovement Agreement and Contract with security documents.\nOwner: Elm Tree Investments, LP; Surveyor: Harvey Goodman\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the\nsubdivider has paid a fee of $14,300.00 for the processing of this final\ntract map pursuant to Section 19.02(A)(2) of the Los Angeles\nMunicipal Code. No additional City funds are needed.

(2)\n25-0900-S35\nCD 1\nCONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and\nORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement\nand maintenance of the Mesnager Street and Spring Street Lighting\nDistrict.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:​\n1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.\n2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying\nthe assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above\nlighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the\nLos Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code\nSection 53753 (Proposition 218).​\n(Continued from Council meeting of December 12, 2025)

(20)\n26-0018\nMOTION (LEE for BLUMENFIELD - HERNANDEZ) relative to funding\nfor the renovation of the Madrid Theatre in Council District 3.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. TRANSFER $2,483,329 to and from the accounts and in the\namounts as listed in the Motion, attached to the Council file.\n2. AUTHORIZE the Controller to appropriate $2,483,329 to the\nGeneral Services Department (GSD) - Construction Forces\nDivision accounts upon approval of the Mayor.\n3. AUTHORIZE the Bureau of Engineering and GSD to make any\ncorrections, clarifications, or revisions to the above fund transfer\ninstructions, including any new instructions, in order to\neffectuate the intent of this Motion, and including any\ncorrections and changes to fund or account numbers; said\ncorrections /clarifications/changes may be made orally,\nelectronically or by any other means.

(21)\n10-0010-S42\nMOTION (PRICE - LEE) relative to reinstating the reward offer in the\nunsolved murder of Aaron Shannon and injury to two others for an\nadditional six months.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\nREAFFIRM Council’s findings and REINSTATE the reward offer\nrelative to the unsolved murder of Aaron Shannon and injury to two\nothers (Council action of November 2, 2010, Council file No. 10-0010-\nS42) for an additional period of six months from the publication of the\noffer of reward by the Office of the City Clerk; and, further, that the\nsum of $75,000 shall be the aggregate maximum sum of any\npayment or payments of a City reward in this instance.

(22)\n24-1474\nCD 14\nMOTION (JURADO - PRICE) relative to amending the prior Council\naction of March 3, 2025, Council file No. 24-1474, regarding a Sign\nDistrict for properties located in Council District 14.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAMEND the prior Council action of March 5, 2025 regarding the\nmatter of the Planning and Land Use Management Committee Report\nto initiate a Sign District, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code\nSection 8.2.3 of Chapter lA, for the properties located at 911-915,\n925, 927, and 933-939 South Figueroa Street; 845 West Olympic\nBoulevard; 932-36, 940-942 ½, and 944 South Francisco Street; 941\nCottage Place; 816-822 West James M. Wood Boulevard to ADOPT\nthe following additional recommendations:\na. Include, in addition, the parcels located at 808 West\nJames M. Wood Boulevard and 875 South Figueroa\nStreet to the Sign District.

(23)\n21-0152-S4\nMOTION (McOSKER - JURADO) relative to a street banner campaign\nto beautify the areas near the Port of Los Angeles, as well as to\npromote the "Just Say Hello" public service announcement in\ncoordination with the Civil, Human Rights, and Equity Department.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. APPROVE, in accordance with Los Angeles Municipal Code\nSection 62.132, the Street Banner program coordinated by the\nHarbor Department as a City of Los Angeles Non-Event Street\nBanner Program for the period of January 1, 2026 through\nNovember 30, 2026.\n2. APPROVE the content of the street banner design, attached to\nthe Motion.

(24)\n26-0019\nCD 1\nMOTION (HERNANDEZ - HUTT) relative to funding for the “Chinatown\nMobile Laundry Truck” program in Council District 1.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Los Angeles Housing\nDepartment (LAHD), to amend and restate the Los Angeles\nHomeless Services Authority FY 2025-26 General Funds\nHomeless Shelter Services Professional Services Agreement to\nadd $250,000 for the “Chinatown Mobile Laundry Truck”\nprogram in Council District 1 from July 1, 2025 through June 30,\n2026 (Contract No. C-202650).\n2. TRANSFER $250,000 from the Council District (CD) 1 Public\nBenefits Trust Fund Account No. 2025/889/14/14A0025 to the\nLAHD Fund No. 10A/43, Account No. (TBD), CD 1 Laundry\nTruck Program.\n3. AUTHORIZE the Chief Legislative Analyst to make technical\nadjustments that may be required and are consistent with this\naction; and, AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement these\ninstructions.

(25)\n26-0011-S1\nCD 14\nMOTION (JURADO - HERNANDEZ) relative to reimbursement to the\nBureau of Street Lighting for street lighting upgrades completed for the\nHuntington Drive Sidewalk Improvements Project.\nRecommendations for Council Action, SUBJECT TO THE\nAPPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:\n1. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $75,000 of the Council District\n14 portion of the Council Discretionary Street Furniture Fund\nNo. 43D/50 to the Street Lighting Maintenance Assessment\nFund No. 347/50, Revenue Source Code 530100\n(Reimbursement from Other Funds) for reimbursement of street\nlighting upgrades that the Bureau of Street Lighting has\ncompleted for the Huntington Drive Sidewalk Improvements\nProject.\n2. AUTHORIZE the Bureau of Street Lighting to make any\ncorrections, clarifications or revisions to the above fund transfer\ninstructions, including any new instructions, in order to\neffectuate the intent of this Motion, and including any\ncorrections and changes to fund or account numbers; said\ncorrections / clarifications / changes may be made orally,\nelectronically or by any other means.

(26)\n26-0011-S2\nMOTION (RAMAN - SOTO-MARTINEZ) relative to funding a Task\nOrder Solicitation (TOS) for Planning and Concept Design with Cost\nEstimates Services for the Los Feliz Boulevard Parkway Cycletrack\nPlanning and Design Scope.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $325,000 from Transportation\nGrants Fund No. 655-94, Account No. 94YT6A (Griffith Park\nActive Transportation, Safety & Facility Infrastructure Project),\nAND $75,000 from the Council District 4 portion of the Council\nStreet Furniture Fund No. 43D/50 (Total $400,000) to Bureau of\nEngineering Fund 682/50, Account 50YVLE (Griffith Park ATP)\nfor fully funding a Task Order Solicitation (TOS) for Planning\nand Concept Design with Cost Estimates Services for the Los\nFeliz Boulevard Parkway Cycletrack Planning and Design\nScope.\n2. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $375,645 from Transportation\nGrants Fund No. 655-94, Account No. 94Y T6A (Griffith Park\nActive Transportation, Safety & Facility Infrastructure Project) to\nDepartment of Recreation and Parks Fund No. 205/88, Account\nno. 88YMLS (Griffith Park Active Transp, Safety, & Facility Infra\nProj) for fully funding the active transportation and traffic safety\nimprovements of the Griffith Park Safety and Active\n'.Transportation Improvement Project - Phase III (PRJ21772).\n3. AUTHORIZE the Department of Transportation to make any\ncorrections, clarifications or revisions to the above fund transfer\ninstructions, including any new instructions, in order to\neffectuate the intent of this Motion, and including any\ncorrections and changes to fund or account numbers; said\ncorrections/clarifications/changes may be made orally,\nelectronically or by any other means.

(27)\n26-0023\nMOTION (PRICE - SOTO-MARTINEZ) relative to a Supplemental City\nServices Agreement with the Los Angeles Clippers, LLC for the 2026\nNBA All-Star Fan Experience Event.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO) and Chief\nLegislative Analyst to negotiate a contract between the City and\nthe Clippers to provide supplemental City services for the NBA\nAll-Star Fan Experience Event, and that the Clippers pay for full\nreimbursement of all provided supplemental City services, in\naccordance with Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 41.20.1\n(c) Events at Major Sports and Entertainment Venues.\n2. AUTHORIZE the Council the use of supplemental Police law\nenforcement services to support the Clippers during the NBA\nAll-Star Fan Experience Event, with full reimbursement of Police\nlaw enforcement services, in accordance with California\nGovernment Code section 53069.8.\n3. AUTHORIZE the CAO to execute and administer the contract\nbetween the City and Clippers for the above supplemental City\nservices, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form\nand legality.

(28)\n26-0026\nMOTION (PARK - RODRIGUEZ) relative to funding for services in\nconnection with Council District 11 observance of the Palisades Fire\nOne Year Remembrance, including the illumination of City Hall on\nJanuary 7, 2026.\nRecommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\nTRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $438 from the Council’s portion of\nthe Heritage Month Celebration and Special Events-Council line item\nin the General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56, to the General\nServices Fund No. 100/40, Account No. 1100 (Hiring Hall), for\nservices in connection with the Council District 11 observance of the\nPalisades Fire One Year Remembrance on January 7, 2026,\nincluding the illumination of City Hall.

(29)\n26-0011-S3\nCD 10\nMOTION (HUTT - RODRIGUEZ) relative to funding for maintenance\nalong the median of La Cienega Boulevard in Council District Ten (CD\n10).\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $9,600 in the Council District\n10 portion of the Council Discretionary Street Furniture Fund\nNo. 43D/50 to the Street Services Fund No. 100/86, Account\nNo. 1090 (Salaries - Overtime) for maintenance along the\nmedian of La Cienega Boulevard in Council District 10.\n2. AUTHORIZE the Bureau of Street Services to make any\ncorrections, clarifications or revisions to the above fund transfer\ninstructions, including any new instructions, in order to\neffectuate the intent of this Motion, and including any\ncorrections and changes to fund or account numbers; said\ncorrections / clarifications / changes may be made orally,\nelectronically or by any other means.

(3)\n25-0900-S36\nCD 15\nCONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and\nORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement\nand maintenance of the Gaffey Street and Westmont Drive Street\nLighting District.​\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:​\n1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.\n2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying\nthe assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above\nlighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the\nLos Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code\nSection 53753 (Proposition 218).​\n(Continued from Council meeting of December 12, 2025)

(30)\n26-0027\nMOTION (PRICE - HUTT) relative to funding any aspect of Black\nHistory Month Celebration.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. UTILIZE $50,000 in the Council's portion of the Heritage Month\nCelebration & Special Events line item in the General City\nPurposes Fund No. 100/56 to fund any aspect of Black History\nMonth Celebration.\n2. DIRECT the City Clerk to prepare and process the necessary\ndocuments and/or payment in the above purpose, directly with\nthe vendor/service provider, or any other appropriate agency or\norganization, in the above amount, for the above purpose,\nsubject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form, if\nneeded; and that the City Clerk be authorized to execute any\nsuch documents on behalf of the City.\n3. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk to make any technical correction or\nclarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the\nintent of this Motion.

(31)\n26-0038\nMOTION (JURADO - YAROSLAVSKY) relative to authorizing the\nDepartment of Neighborhood Empowerment (DONE) to use City Hall\nfor the annual Neighborhood Council Budget Day.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAUTHORIZE the DONE to use the City Hall Rotunda, City Hall\nForecourt, John Ferraro Council Chamber, and 10th Floor of City Hall\non Saturday, June 27, 2026, from 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., with the\nunderstanding that all costs incurred by the Department of General\nServices (GSD) associated with this event will be reimbursed to the\nGSD by the DONE.

(32)\n25-0006-S87\nCONSIDERATION OF MOTION (PARK – HUTT) relative to requesting\nreports on the cost, funding sources, and legal strategies to complete\ndebris reomoval on all properties within the perimeter of the Pacific\nPalisades Fire that were abated and have not completed the\nabatement.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer, in coordination with\nthe Department of Building and Safety (DBS), to report to\nCouncil within 30 days on the estimated cost to complete debris\nremoval on properties that were abated pursuant to Los\nAngeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 91.8907, as well as\npossible funding sources, including but not limited to the Repair\nand Demolition Fund, Citywide Nuisance Abatement Fund and\nthe Enterprise Trust Fund, in order to front fund this work.\n2. INSTRUCT the DBS and REQUEST the City Attorney to\nevaluate all potential legal strategies, including criminal\nprosecution, to address all properties within the perimeter of the\nPalisades Fire that were abated pursuant to LAMC 91.8907 and\nhave not completed the abatement of the documented\nhazardous conditions.

(33)\n25-0866\nRULES, ELECTIONS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS\nCOMMITTEE REPORT relative to amending the Los Angeles\nAdministrative Code (LAAC) to require the disclosure of all ex parte\ncommunications between Charter Reform Commissioners and elected\nofficials.\nRecommendation for Council action, as initiated by Motion\n(Rodriguez – Padilla):\nREQUEST the City Attorney to:\na. Prepare and present an ordinance that requires members of the\nCharter Reform Commission to disclose all ex parte\ncommunications between Commissioners and elected officials\nand their staff, similar to the ex parte communications provision\noutlined in LAAC Section 2.22.\nb. Prepare a policy that addresses the implications of not\ncompleting the disclosure form or completing it incorrectly,\nentities that may prosecute misdemeanors for violations of the\nLos Angeles Municipal Code in relation to disclosure of ex parte\ncommunications, the prospective application, and the provision\nof administrative relief for Charter Reform Commissioners.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.

(34)\n17-0653-S1\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY and ORDINANCE\nFIRST CONSIDERATION relative to amending Sections 104.03 and\n104.06 of Article 4, Chapter X of the Los Angeles Municipal Code\n(LAMC) to regulate Commercial Cannabis Activity.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. RELY on Negative Declaration No. ENV-2017-2261-ND,\nadopted on November 28, 2018, to approve the project. Find,\npursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)\nGuidelines Section 15162(b), there are no substantial changes\nto the project, substantial changes to the circumstances or new\ninformation that will require the preparation of an Environmental\nImpact Report. Based on the whole of the administrative record,\nthe ordinance is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections\n15301 (categorical exemption for existing facilities) and 15303\n(categorical exemption for new construction or conversion of\nsmall structures), and that none of the exceptions under\n15300.2 apply. Reliance on a categorical exemption is\nappropriate when substantial evidence in the record supports a\nproject falls within the categorical exemption and the City\ndetermines that none of the exceptions in CEQA Guidelines\nSection 15300.2 applies.\n2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated\nDecember 9, 2025 amending Sections 104.03 and 104.06 of\nArticle 4, Chapter X of the LAMC to regulate Commercial\nCannabis Activity.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney.\nNeither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative\nAnalyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(35)\n26-0034\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD OF POLICE\nCOMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to a donation of three\nreplacement LENCO armored specialty vehicles for the Metropolitan\nDivision.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nACCEPT the donation of three replacement LENCO armored\nspecialty vehicles from the Los Angeles Police Foundation, valued at\n$1,749,527, for the benefit of the Metropolitan Division of the Los\nAngeles Police Department; and, THANK the donor for this generous\ndonation.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Board. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.\n(Public Safety Committee waived consideration of the above\nmatter)

(4)\n25-0900-S37\nCD 14\nCONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and\nORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement\nand maintenance of the Harriet Steet and 25th Street Lighting District.​\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:​\n1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.\n2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying\nthe assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above\nlighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the\nLos Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code\nSection 53753 (Proposition 218).​\n(Continued from Council meeting of December 12, 2025)

(5)\n25-0900-S38\nCD 13\nCONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and\nORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement\nand maintenance of the Normandie Avenue and Romaine Street\nLighting District.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:​\n1. FIND that a majority protest exists in the Street Lighting\nMaintenance Assessment District and therefore the assessment\ncannot be enacted.\n2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE\nabandoning all proceedings relating to the above lighting\ndistrict, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the Los\nAngeles Administrative Code and Government Code Section\n53753 (Proposition 218).\n3. INSTRUCT the Director, Bureau of Street Lighting, to ensure\nthat the streetlights are not installed or are removed from\nservice if previously installed.\n(Continued from Council meeting of December 12, 2025)

(6)\n25-0900-S39\nCD 6\nCONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and\nORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement\nand maintenance of the Van Nuys Boulevard and Titus Street Lighting\nDistrict.​\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n​\n1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.\n2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying\nthe assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above\nlighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the\nLos Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code\nSection 53753 (Proposition 218).\n(Continued from Council meeting of December 12, 2025)

(7)\n25-0900-S40\nCD 1\nCONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and\nORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement\nand maintenance of the Liechty and Esperanza Schools Lighting\nDistrict.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:​\n1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.\n2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying\nthe assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above\nlighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the\nLos Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code\nSection 53753 (Proposition 218).​\n(Continued from Council meeting of December 12, 2025)

(8)\n25-0900-S41\nCD 3\nCONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and\nORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement\nand maintenance of the Topeka Drive and Ringling Street Lighting\nDistrict.​\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:​\n1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.\n2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying\nthe assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above\nlighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the\nLos Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code\nSection 53753 (Proposition 218).\n(Continued from Council meeting of December 12, 2025)

(9)\n25-0900-S42\nCD 5\nCONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and\nORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement\nand maintenance of the Sunset Boulevard and Carolwood Drive Street\nLighting District.​\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:​\n1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.\n2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying\nthe assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above\nlighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the\nLos Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code\nSection 53753 (Proposition 218).​\n(Continued from Council meeting of December 12, 2025)

(1)\n-----\nVerbal update from the Department of Water and Power on the 2026\npriorities and goals for the department.

(2)\n25-1427\nMotion (Jurado – Soto-Martinez) relative to cooperation from\nautonomous vehicle (AV) operators on vehicle operations data, and\nadherence to local hire and workforce investment commitments. (This\nitem is referred to the Energy and Environment Committee, Public\nSafety Committee, Trade, Travel and Tourism Committee, and\nTransportation Committee. On January 14, 2026, the Public Safety\nCommittee approved this item.)

(3)\n25-1408\nBoard of Water and Power Commissioners and City Attorney reports,\nand Ordinance relative to the transfer of money from the Power\nRevenue Fund to the City Reserve Fund during Fiscal Year 2025-26.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(4)\n25-1378\nCD 2\nGeneral Exemption, Board of Water and Power Commissioners and\nCity Attorney reports, and Ordinance relative to a Quitclaim of public\nwater facility easement by Department of Water and Power to Etai\nHarari and Moriah Harari, husband and wife as community property.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(5)\n25-0437\nCity Attorney report and Ordinance relative to use the progressive\ndesign-build project delivery method and the competitive sealed\nproposal selection process for the Hyperion Water Reclamation Plant\nPhase 1A Recycled Water Foundational Infrastructure Project. (This\nitem is referred to the Energy and Environment Committee and\nPublic Works Committee.)\nFiscal Impact Statement: No

(6)\n13-1526-S5\nCity Administrative Officer report relative to budget adjustments and\nfunding considerations for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Proposition O\nProgram.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes\nFinancial Policies Statement: Yes

(7)\n06-2072-S3\nBoard of Water and Power Commissioners report relative to the Third\nAmendment to the agreement with URS Corporation Americas for the\nNorth Haiwee Dam Seismic Improvement Project.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes