Los Angeles — 2026-03-11

(1)\n25-0410\nPUBLIC SAFETY and BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEES’\nREPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to\namending the Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) to update the\nSchedule of Charges for Emergency Services to increase Rates for\nAdvance Life Support and Mileage.\nRecommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\nPRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated\nDecember 30, 2025, amending Subsection (b) of Section 22.210.2 of\nArticle 4, Chapter 10 of the LAAC to update the Schedule of Charges\nfor Emergency Services to increase Rates for Advanced Life Support\nand Mileage.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither\nthe City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(10)\n26-0230\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the\nVolunteer Trust Fund No. 892 for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nNOTE and FILE the City Clerk report dated February 17, 2026,\nattached to the Council file, relative to the Volunteer Trust Fund No.\n892 for FY 2023-24.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.

(11)\n26-0216\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a conflict-\nof-interest waiver to retain the law firm of Segal McCambridge Singer\n& Mahoney (Segal McCambridge) for legal defense in the case entitled\nTran v. LADWP, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court (LASC) Case\nNumber 25SMCV05969.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAUTHORIZE the City Attorney to execute a conflict-of-interest waiver\nto retain the law firm of Segal McCambridge to defend both the City\nof Los Angeles and Department of Water and Power in the case\nentitled Tran v. LADWP, et al., LASC Case Number 25SMCV05969.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither\nthe City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(12)\n26-0215\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to requiring\ncompanies or entities competing in a City Request for Proposals (RFP)\nprocess, or entering into a City contract, to disclose if they are a\nplaintiff in litigation against the City.\nRecommendation for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Harris-\nDawson – Lee, et al.):\nREQUEST the City Attorney to draft an ordinance requiring\ncompanies or entities that are competing in a City RFP process, or\notherwise entering into a City contract, to disclose if they are a\nplaintiff in litigation against the City.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.

(13)\n22-0691-S6\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to Senate\nBill (SB) 165 annual reporting requirements for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-\n25 Communities Facilities District (CFD) No. 8 (Legends at Cascades)\nSpecial Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2022.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nNOTE and FILE the City Administrative Officer (CAO) report dated\nFebruary 10, 2026, attached to the Council file, relative to the SB 165\nannual reporting requirements for FY 2024-25 CFD No. 8 (Legends at\nCascades) Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2022, inasmuch as\nit is for informational purposes only and no further action is\nnecessary.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.\nFinancial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that consistent with\nthe City’s Financial Policies, all costs associated with CFD No. 8 are\npaid by the CFD via the special tax that is levied annually.

(14)\n22-0016-S8\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative\nto the Senate Bill (SB) 165 annual reporting requirements for Fiscal\nYear (FY) 2024-25 Communities Facilities District (CFD) No. 11 (Ponte\nVista) Special Tax Bonds, Series 2021.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nNOTE and FILE the City Administrative Officer (CAO) report dated\nFebruary 10, 2026, attached to the Council file, relative to the SB 165\nannual reporting requirements for FY 2024-25 CFD No. 11 (Ponte\nVista) Special Tax Bonds, Series 2021, inasmuch as said report is for\ninformational purposes only and no further action is necessary.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable\nFinancial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that consistent with\nthe City’s Financial Policies, all costs associated with CFD No. 11 are\npaid by the CFD via the special tax that is levied annually.

(15)\n25-0283\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to\nthe Investments Reports for the months ending January 31, 2025\nthrough June 30, 2025; August 31, 2025; and, December 31, 2025.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nNOTE and FILE the Office of Finance reports dated March 5, 2025;\nApril 2, 2025; May 2, 2025; May 30, 2025; July 1, 2025; July 22,\n2025; November 6, 2025; and, January 30, 2026; attached to the\nCouncil file, relative to the Investment Reports for the months ending\nJanuary 31, 2025 through June 30, 2025; August 31, 2025;\nand, December 31, 2025.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.

(16)\n26-0277\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the status\nof the current litigation involving the implementation of Assembly Bill\n(AB) 630 regarding the disposal of abandoned recreational vehicles\n(RVs).\nRecommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion\n(Rodriguez – Price):\n1. REQUEST the City Attorney to report on the status of the\ncurrent litigation involving AB 630 to Council in seven days.\n2. INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO) to report on\nthe existence or status of any RV disposal program operated by\nthe County of Los Angeles (County) under AB 630; whether the\nCounty’s program is available to or operates only in\nunincorporated areas or also in any of the other 87 cities in Los\nAngeles County; and, whether the City can participate in the\nCounty’s program.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the Chief Legislative\nAnalyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(17)\n26-0232\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to proposed\nlegal services agreements with various law firms for outside counsel\nassistance with police defense litigation.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. APPROVE contracts with Burke Williams & Sorensen,\nLLP; Colantuono Highsmith & Whatley, PC; Orbach Huff &\nHenderson, LLP; and, Reily & Jeffery; for a period of three\nyears, each in an initial amount of $25,000, for outside counsel\nassistance with police defense litigation.\n2. APPROVE a contract with Jones Mayer Law, in an amount of\n$150,000, for outside counsel assistance with police defense\nlitigation.\n3. APPROVE an appropriation of $150,000 for the existing\nContract No. C-204152 with Nathan & Kamionski LLP, and\nexpand the scope of that contract to include outside counsel\nassistance with police defense litigation.\n4. ACKNOWLEDGE that the total of $400,000 will be drawn from\nprior funds transferred to Fund No. 100/12, Account No.\n009301, Outside Counsel, specifically by way of the Fiscal Year\n2025-26 Second and Third (Mid-Year) Financial Status Reports.\n5. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to prepare\nController instructions for any necessary technical adjustments,\nsubject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer\n(CAO); and, AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement the\ninstructions.\n(The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Sections 54956.9(d)(1) and (d)(2), to confer\nwith its legal counsel relative to discuss the need for additional\noutside counsel assistance and funding.)\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither\nthe CAO nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial\nanalysis of this report.

(18)\n26-0308\nCD 4\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final\nmap of Parcel Map L.A. No. 2024-4449 located at 12750 West\nHortense Street, easterly of Goodland Avenue.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the final map of Parcel Map L.A. No. 2024-4449, located\nat 12750 West Hortense Street, easterly of Goodland Avenue and\naccompanying Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Contract\nwith security documents.\n(Bond No. C-147040)\nOwner: Matan Yahav, 12750 Hortense Street, LLC; Surveyor: Ofer\nShapira\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the\nsubdivider has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final\nparcel map pursuant to Section 19.02(B)(3) of the Los Angeles\nMunicipal Code. No additional City funds are needed.

(19)\n26-0002-S7\nRULES, ELECTIONS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS\nCOMMITTEE REPORT and RESOLUTION relative to establishing the\nCity’s position on including golf courses located within a Very High Fire\nSeverity Zone, in the "vacant site" definition of the Affordable Housing\nand High Road Jobs Act of 2022.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution\n(Blumenfield – Lee), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE\nMAYOR:\nRESOLVE to include in the City’s 2025-26 State Legislative Program\nSUPPORT for legislative and/or administrative action by the\nCalifornia Department of Housing and Community Development to\nclearly define "vacant site" under the Affordable Housing and High\nRoad Jobs Act of 2022 to include golf courses located within a Very\nHigh Fire Severity Zone.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Chief Legislative\nAnalyst. The City Administrative Officer has not completed a financial\nanalysis of this report.

(2)\n25-0761\nPUBLIC SAFETY and BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEES’\nREPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to\namending Sections 41.40, 44.04, 52.16 and 103.206 of the Los\nAngeles Municipal Code (LAMC) to revise Police Commission Service\nFees.\nRecommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\nPRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated\nJanuary 5, 2026, amending Sections 41.40, 44.04, 52.16 and\n103.206 of the LAMC to revise Police Commission Service Fees.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither\nthe City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(20)\n26-0002-S3\nRULES, ELECTIONS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS\nCOMMITTEE REPORT and RESOLUTION relative to establishing the\nCity’s position on Senate Bill (SB) 876 (Padilla), which would reform\nthe insurance claim process.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution\n(Rodriguez – Lee), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE\nMAYOR:\nRESOLVE to include in the City’s 2025-26 State Legislative Program\nSUPPORT for SB 876 (Padilla) relative to reforming the insurance\nclaim process by improving the timeliness of claim payments and\nstrengthening consumer protections, thereby safeguarding\nhomeowners from insurer roadblocks.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Chief Legislative\nAnalyst. The City Administrative Officer has not completed a financial\nanalysis of this report.

(21)\n26-0002-S4\nRULES, ELECTIONS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS\nCOMMITTEE REPORT and RESOLUTION relative to establishing the\nCity’s position on Senate Bill (SB) 878 (Perez), which would codify the\nregulations related to deadlines in State law for claims arising after\nJanuary 1, 2027.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution\n(Rodriguez – Park), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE\nMAYOR:\nRESOLVE to include in the City’s 2025-26 State Legislative Program\nSUPPORT for SB 878 (Perez), which would codify specified\nDepartment of Insurance regulations related to deadlines by which an\ninsurer is required to, among other things, respond to a notice of\nclaim, accept or deny a claim, in whole or in part, and upon\nacceptance of a claim in whole or in part, tender payment or\notherwise take action to perform its obligation, as specified.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Chief Legislative\nAnalyst. The City Administrative Officer has not completed a financial\nanalysis of this report.

(22)\n25-0002-S91\nRULES, ELECTIONS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS\nCOMMITTEE REPORT and RESOLUTION relative to establishing the\nCity’s position on any action by the United States Environmental\nProtection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers to redefine\n“Waters of the United States” which would eliminate Clean Water Act\nprotections.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Park –\nNazarian), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:\nRESOLVE to include in the City’s 2025-26 Federal Legislative\nProgram OPPOSITION to any action by the United States\nEnvironmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers to\nredefine “Waters of the United States” which would eliminate Clean\nWater Act protections for over 80 percent of the nation’s wetlands and\nnumerous streams.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Chief Legislative\nAnalyst. The City Administrative Officer has not completed a financial\nanalysis of this report.

(23)\n26-0002-S1\nRULES, ELECTIONS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS\nCOMMITTEE REPORT and RESOLUTION relative to establishing the\nCity’s position on Assembly Bill (AB) 1537, would prohibit secondary\nemployment for peace officers with any entity that assists with or\nengages in immigration enforcement.\nRecommendations for Council action, as initiated by Resolution\n(Soto-Martinez – Rodriguez), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. RESOLVE to include in the City’s 2025 State Legislative\nProgram SUPPORT for AB 1537 to prohibit peace officers from\nbeing employed by, serving as an independent contractor for, or\nvolunteering with the United States Department of Homeland\nSecurity (DHS) or its contractors or any other entity that assists\nwith or engages in immigration enforcement.\n2. INSTRUCT the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA) to prepare a\nrevised Resolution when this matter is before the City Council,\nto support AB 1537 (Bryan) and SEEK AMENDMENTS to clarify\nthat this legislation only applies to individuals directly engaged\nin immigration enforcement actions on behalf of the Department\nof Homeland Security.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the CLA. The City\nAdministrative Officer has not completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.

(24)\n25-1516\nPERSONNEL AND HIRING COMMITTEE REPORT and ORDINANCE\nFIRST CONSIDERATION relative to amending the Los Angeles\nAdministrative Code (LAAC) regarding the Los Angeles Deferred\nCompensation Plan and the receipt of employer contributions.\nA. PERSONNEL AND HIRING COMMITTEE REPORT and\nORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION\nRecommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE\nAPPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:\nPRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated\nFebruary 11, 2026 amending Chapter 14, Division 4 of the\nLAAC to authorize the receipt of employer contributions to the\nCity of Los Angeles Deferred Compensation Plan.\nB. COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY DATED\nFEBRUARY 27, 2026 and ORDINANCE FIRST\nCONSIDERATION\nRecommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE\nAPPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:\nPRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated\nFebruary 26, 2026 amending Chapter 14, Division 4 of the\nLAAC to authorize the receipt of employer contributions to the\nCity of Los Angeles Deferred Compensation Plan.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney.\nNeither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative\nAnalyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(25)\n26-0313\nMOTION (PARK - PRICE) relative to a contract between the City of\nLos Angeles and the United States Golf Association (USGA) to provide\nsupplemental City services for the 2026 U.S. Women’s Open\nChampionship.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO) and the Chief\nLegislative Analyst (CLA) to negotiate a contract between the\nCity and the USGA to provide supplemental City services for the\nUSWO Event, and that the USGA pay for full reimbursement of\nall provided supplemental City services, in accordance with Los\nAngeles Municipal Code Section 41.20.1( c) Events at Major\nSports and Entertainment Venues.\n2. AUTHORIZE the use of supplemental Police law enforcement\nservices to support the USGA during the USWO Event, with full\nreimbursement of Police law enforcement services, in\naccordance with California Government Code section 53069.8.\n3. AUTHORIZE the CAO to execute and administer the contract\nbetween the City and USGA for the above supplemental City\nservices, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form.

(26)\n26-0310\nMOTION (PARK - PRICE) relative to funding for services in connection\nwith the Council District 11 special recognition of Bulgarian National\nLiberation Day 2026 at City Hall on March 3, 2026, including the\nillumination of City Hall.\nRecommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\nTRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $438 from the Council's portion of\nthe Heritage Month Celebration and Special Events-Council line item\nin the General City Purposes Fund No. 100-56 to the General\nServices Fund 100-40, Account No. 1100 (Hiring Hall), for services in\nconnection with the Council District 11 special recognition of\nBulgarian National Liberation Day 2026 at City Hall on March 3, 2026,\nincluding the illumination of City Hall.

(27)\n26-0311\nMOTION (PRICE - HUTT) relative to funding for various services\nbenefitting Council District Nine (CD9).\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. TRANSFER $2,100,100 from Fund 100, Dept. 56 Acct. 000405\n(CD9 Unarmed Crisis Response) to the following:\na. $800,000 to CD9 Public Benefits Trust Fund No 48X for a\nCD9 Community Grants Program.\nb. $740,100 to Fund 100, Dept 56, Account 000A28 (CD9\nCouncil Projects) for community events.\nc. $200,000 to Bureau of Street Services, Fund No. 100-86,\nas follows: $180,000 to Account No. 001090 (Salaries\nOvertime); and $20,000 to Account No. 003040\n(Contractual Services) for supplemental tree care in CD9.\nd. $260,000 to Bureau of Street Lighting, Fund No. 100-84,\nas follows: $160,000 to Account No. 008780 (Street\nLighting Improvements and Supplies), $50,000 to Account\nNo. 001090 (Salaries - Overtime), Account No. 001010\n(Salaries - General), and $30,000 to Account No. 006020\n(Operating Supplies) for solar street lighting in CD9.\ne. $100,000 to Fund 100, Dept 56 Acct No. 000709 (CD9\nCommunity Services) for eviction defense services.\n2. DIRECT and AUTHORIZE the City Clerk to extend the term of\nthe City Contract C-139863 with Bet Tzedek, for eviction\ndefense services in CD9 for an extended period from June 30,\n2024 to December 1, 2026.\n3. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk, Bureau of Street Services, and\nBureau of Street Lighting to make any corrections, clarifications\nor revisions to the above fund transfer instructions, including\nany new instructions, in order to effectuate the intent of this\nMotion, and including any corrections and changes to fund or\naccount numbers; said corrections / clarifications / changes may\nbe made orally, electronically or by any other means.

(28)\n24-2000-S2\nMOTION (HARRIS-DAWSON - JURADO) relative to creating an Ad\nHoc Committee on Measure United to House Los Angeles (ULA).\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. RESOLVE to create an Ad Hoc Committee on ULA comprised of\nthree members to receive, review, and make recommendations\non all matters related to Measure ULA, including matters which\nare currently assigned to other Council committees in order to\ncentralize consideration of this matter into one Committee.\n2. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to re-refer all current pending files\nrelated to Measure ULA to the new Ad Hoc Committee.\n3. INSTRUCT the Ad Hoc Committee on Measure ULA to dissolve\nupon transmittal of the Committee's recommendations to the\nCouncil, no later than on April 30, 2026, unless extended by the\nCouncil.

(29)\n26-0314\nCD 5\nMOTION (YAROSLAVSKY - LEE) relative to a personal services\ncontract with Community Homelessness Expertise (CHE) LLC, for\nservices to the Fifth Council District.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. APPROVE the Personal Services Contract, attached to the\nMotion, with Community Homelessness Expertise (CHE) LLC\nfor providing services to the Fifth Council District as set forth\ntherein.\n2. AUTHORIZE the Councilmember, Fifth District, to execute this\ncontract on behalf of the City.\n3. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to encumber the necessary funds\nagainst the Contractual Services Account of the Council Fund\nfor Fiscal Year 2025-2026, and to reflect it as a charge against\nthe budget of the involved Council Office.

(3)\n25-0762\nPUBLIC SAFETY and BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEES’\nREPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to\namending Section 103.12 of Division 4, Article 3, Chapter X of the Los\nAngeles Municipal Code (LAMC) to revise the Business Permit Fee\nSchedule.\nRecommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\nPRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated\nJanuary 5, 2026, amending Section 103.12 of Division, Article 3,\nChapter X of the LAMC to revise the Business Permit Fee Schedule\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither\nthe City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(30)\n26-0323\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY relative to a\nproposed legal services agreement with Manatt Phelps & Phillips, LLP\nto provide legal services associated with the Charter-authority of the\nCity Attorney’s Office for the Charter Reform Commission.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. APPROVE a four-month contract with Manatt Phelps & Phillips,\nLLP to assist the Charter Reform Commission with the Charter-\nauthority of the City Attorney’s Office in an amount not to\nexceed of $30,000.\n2. TRANSFER $30,000 from Fund No. 100/56, Account No.\n000A38, City Charter Reform, to Fund No. 100/12, Account No.\n009301, Outside Counsel.\n3. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to prepare\nController instructions for any necessary technical adjustments,\nsubject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer\n(CAO); and, AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement the\ninstructions.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither\nthe CAO nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial\nanalysis of this report.\n(Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of the\nabove matter.)\nItems Called Special\nMotions for Posting and Referral\nCouncil Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings\nClosed Session

(31)\n26-0235\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Leidi Escalante v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 24VECV01522.\n(This matter arises from a May 7, 2023, trip and fall incident located\nnear 17015 Burbank Boulevard, in Encino.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on March 3, 2026.)

(32)\n26-0236\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Lawrence Freddie Lee v. City of\nLos Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.\n22STCV33025. (This matter arises from a fall incident on March 17,\n2022, near 8564 South Broadway, Los Angeles, California.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on March 3, 2026.)

(33)\n26-0237\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Gabriela Cardenas Garcia v. City\nof Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.\n22STCV29632. (This matter arises from a vehicle versus vehicle\ncollision on September 22, 2020, on North Figueroa Street near its\nintersection with West Avenue 28, in the City of Los Angeles.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on March 3, 2026.)

(34)\n26-0238\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Hoang Nguyen v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC696016,\n2nd Appellate District Case Nos. B321033 and B319657. (This matter\narises from violations of the California Fair Employment and Housing\nAct against the City and two individually named defendants.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on March 3, 2026.)

(35)\n26-0239\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Elmer Santos Vicente Son v. City\nof Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.\n23STCV17117. (This matter arises from a February 8, 2023, motor\nvehicle incident at the intersection of Beverly Boulevard and Alvarado\nStreet, in the City of Los Angeles.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on March 3, 2026.)

(36)\n26-0240\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Jhaun Mendoza v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 24STCV23078.\n(This matter arises from a traffic accident that occurred on January 1,\n2024, at the intersection of Vermont Avenue and Exposition Boulevard,\nin the City of Los Angeles.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on March 3, 2026.)

(37)\n26-0241\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Daniel Feldman v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV28659.\n(This matter arises from a trip and fall incident on December 10, 2022,\non the sidewalk located at 1206 North Beachwood Drive, in the City of\nLos Angeles.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on March 3 , 2026.)

(38)\n26-0242\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Amanda McCarthy v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV00069.\n(This matter arises from a trip and fall incident on September 28, 2022,\nat a driveway approach / public sidewalk, located at 6385 Hollywood\nBoulevard, in Los Angeles.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on March 3, 2026.)

(39)\n26-0243\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Connie Muniz, et al. v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV10623.\n(This matter arises from a trip and fall incident that occurred on April 2,\n2020, at 1704 Zonal Avenue, Los Angeles.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on March 3, 2026.)

(4)\n23-0840\nHOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to\nestablishing a process to assess and report on trends related to the\nconcentration of ownership and corporatization of the City’s housing\nstock that may negatively impact renters, limit small landlord\nownership opportunities, and limit first-time homebuyer opportunities.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nINSTRUCT the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD) to establish\nan ongoing process to assess and regularly report to Council on\ntrends related to size of ownership inventories, ownership\norganizational entity structures, and owner business models or\nbehaviors that may negatively impact renters, limit small landlord\nownership opportunities, and limit first-time homebuyer opportunities;\nand, INSTRUCT the LAHD to report to Council on the following\noptions contained in the LAHD report dated October 3, 2025,\nattached to Council file No. 23-0840, to expand the foundational\nanalysis of the report:\na. OPTION 1 - Explore the Potential Link between Rapid\nOwnership Growth, Owner Behavior, and Renter Displacement\nRisk: Identify the number of owners with rapidly increasing\ninventories beyond the largest included in this report and\nanalyze the extent to which their administrative records\ndemonstrate an increased risk of renter displacement under\ntheir ownership. LAHD data to be examined include, but are not\nlimited to Rent Stabilization Ordinance (RSO) complaints,\nTenant Anti-Harassment Ordinance (TAHO) complaints, code\ncomplaints, eviction filings, and tenant buy-out agreements.\nb. OPTION 2 - Property Flipping: Identify the number of actors in\nthe City whose primary business model is property flipping.\nExamine the most common renovations associated with\nflipping, how soon after purchase do the new owners typically\nflip the property, how much the flipped sales price increases\nover the acquisition price, whether existing tenants are likely to\nbe permanently displaced by renovations, and in which\nneighborhoods are most impacted by property flipping. Data to\nbe examined include First American sales data and Los Angeles\nDepartment of Building and Safety (LADBS) permit data.\nc. OPTION 3 - Acquisition of Properties from Distressed Small\nLandlords and Homeowners: Analyze the extent to which\ndistressed small landlords and homeowners who fall behind on\ntheir mortgage payments lose their properties to larger actors\nacquiring via short-sales or foreclosure. Data to be analyzed\ninclude but are not limited to the City’s Foreclosure Registry\nProgram, and First American sales and foreclosure data.\nd. OPTION 4 - Use of Organizational Entities by Small Landlords:\nTo better understand the extent to which organizational entity\nownership is associated with portfolio size, analyze the extent to\nwhich small landlords create organizational entities, such as\nlimited liability companies (LLCs) and trusts to hold their\nproperties (typically done via Quitclaim Deed transfers). Data to\nbe examined includes First American’s non-sale transfer data.\ne. OPTION 5 - Better Distinguish a Small Landlord from a “Large”\nLandlord: Before determining whether an owner is a “small”\nowner, expand the assessment of the size of a property owner’s\ninventory to include all of Los Angeles County, not just the City.\nA countywide understanding of an owner’s portfolio size will\ngive the City a better understanding of ownership size and how\nthey are changing. The distribution of housing ownership can\nthen be analyzed to identify the percentages of ownership at\ndifferent threshold levels, for example, how many landlords own\n10 or fewer units, 5 or fewer units, 2 or fewer units. Data to be\nexamined includes Rent Stabilization Ordinance (RSO) and\nJust Cause Ordinance (JCO) Registration Data, and Los\nAngeles County Assessor Data.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The LAHD reports that there is no impact to\nthe General Fund.

(40)\n26-0245\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Robert Bragg v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV37401.\n(This matter arises from a sidewalk trip and fall incident that occurred\non March 18, 2021, on the south sidewalk of Washington Boulevard\nnear Wilson Avenue, in Marina Del Rey.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on March 3, 2026.)

(41)\n26-0101\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled City of Los Angeles v. New\nApothecary, Inc., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.\n25STCP00095. (This matter arises from Business License Tax\nassessments.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on March 3, 2026.)

(42)\n26-0244\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Lena Assadourian v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23VECV04538.\n(This matter arises from a trip and fall incident on April 23, 2023, on an\nuneven portion of the sidewalk in front of 15485 Ventura Boulevard,\nSherman Oaks, California.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Closed Session on March 3, 2026.)

(43)\n26-0246\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Jennifer Ryan v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV02137.\n(This matter arises from a March 5, 2022 incident when Plaintiff tripped\nand fell on a portion of sidewalk located in front of 6081 Cashio Street\nin Los Angeles, California.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Closed Session on March 3, 2026.)\nAdjourning Motions\nCouncil Adjournment\nEXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES - If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those\nissues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City\nClerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on\na matter will become a part of the administrative record.\nCODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 - If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil\nProcedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code\nof Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which\nthe Council's action becomes final.\nMaterials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System,\nat lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00-0000).

(5)\n21-0643-S1\nPLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to reporting on the BuildLA project.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nRECEIVE AND FILE the Bureau of Engineering report dated\nFebruary 4, 2026, attached to the Council file, relative to reporting on\nthe BuildLA project.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable

(6)\n26-0073\nCD 14\nGOVERNMENT\nOPERATIONS\nand\nTRANSPORTATION\nCOMMITTEES’ REPORT relative to development of a City Asset\nMonetization Pilot Program in Council District (CD) 14.\nRecommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Jurado –\nHutt):\n1. INSTRUCT the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO), in\ncoordination with the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), General\nServices Department, Boards of Public Works, and relevant\ndepartments, to design a City Asset Monetization Pilot Program\nin CD 14 for a period of 24 months. The design report shall\ninclude the identification of rooftops of City-owned facilities for\nsolar energy generation and telecommunications infrastructure,\nCity-owned parking facilities for EV charging concessions and\nmobility hubs, and under-utilized City parcels, particularly near\ntransit, for ground leases and temporary or interim uses.\n2. INSTRUCT the CAO to report with the following:\na. Identification of inventory of pilot assets in CD 14 and\nrecommended monetization mechanisms by asset type.\nb. A detailed program proposal that includes revenue\nprojections and implementation costs, a legal review and\nprocurement pathway, a community engagement plan,\nand methods for participating departments to provide\nsemi-annual public reports on revenue generated, asset\nperformance, and reinvestment outcomes.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed\na financial analysis of this report.

(7)\n23-0038-S13\nHOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to\nthe transfer of the United to House LA (ULA) Income Support for Rent-\nBurdened At-Risk Seniors and Persons with Disabilities Program; and\nrelated matters.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. APPROVE Recommendation Nos. 2 through 12 contained in\nthe Joint Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD) and\nCommunity Investment for Families Department (CIFD) report\ndated February 12, 2026, attached to Council file No. 23-0038-\nS13.\n2. AMEND Recommendation No. 1 to read as follows:\nApprove the delegation of administration of the ULA Income\nSupport for Rent-Burdened At-Risk Seniors and Persons with\nDisabilities Program from the LAHD to the CIFD, including\nmanagement and distribution of associated House LA Fund\nAccounts for this program.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The LAHD reports that there is no impact to\nthe General Fund.

(8)\n26-0209\nCD 13\nHOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE REPORT and\nRESOLUTION relative to adopting the Tax Equity and Fiscal\nResponsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) Resolution and Minutes; and\nissuing a supplemental tax-exempt multifamily housing conduit\nrevenue note in an amount up to $29,739,488; and executing related\nfinancing documents for the Prisma Apartments Supportive Housing\nProject located at 6914 West De Longpre Avenue and 1350-1358\nNorth Orange Drive in Council District 13.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. NOTE and FILE the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD)\nreport dated February 11, 2026, attached to Council file No. 26-\n0209, relative to the issuance of supplemental tax-exempt\nmultifamily housing conduit revenue note for the Prisma\nApartments Supportive Housing Project (Project).\n2. ADOPT the August 19, 2025 TEFRA minutes for the Project\ncontained in the City Administrative Officer (CAO) report dated\nMarch 2, 2026, attached to Council file No. 26-0209.\n3. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION attached to the CAO\nreport dated March 2, 2026, attached to the Council file,\nauthorizing the issuance of up to $29,739,488 in supplemental\ntax-exempt multifamily housing conduit revenue note for the\nProject.\n4. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to\nnegotiate and execute the relevant financing documents for the\nProject, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no General\nFund impact as a result of the issuance of the supplemental tax-\nexempt multifamily housing revenue note (Note) for the Project. The\nCity is a conduit issuer and does not incur liability for the repayment of\nthe Note, which is a limited obligation payable solely from the\nrevenues of the Project, and the City is not, under any circumstances,\nobligated to make payments on the Note.\nFinancial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that recommendations\nin this report comply with the City’s Financial Policies in that the Note\nis a limited obligation payable solely from the revenues of the Project\nand the City is not, under any circumstances, obligated to make\npayments on the Note.\nDebt Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no debt impact\nas the Note is a conduit issuance debt and not a debt of the City.

(9)\n24-0069-S3\nHOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to\na proposed Second Amendment to Contract No. C-143134 between\nthe Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD) and GCAP Services,\nInc., for Prevailing Wage Compliance Services.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LAHD, or designee to:\na. Execute a Second Amended and Restated Agreement to\nCity Contract No. C-143134 with GCAP Services, Inc. for\nprevailing wage compliance services to increase the\ncompensation amount by $326,250 for a revised total\nmaximum allowable compensation of $1,526,250 and\nextend the contract term by 18 months through October\n31, 2027, in substantial conformance with the Agreement\ncontained in the City Administrative Officer (CAO) report\ndated February 18, 2026, attached to Council file No. 24-\n0069-S3, subject to the review and approval of the City\nAttorney as to form, funding availability, and compliance\nwith the City’s contracting requirements.\nb. Disencumber $150,000 in unexpended funds from City\nContract No. C-143497 with Ellana, Inc., and transfer\nfunding to City Contract No. C-143134 with GCAP\nServices, Inc.\nc. Prepare Controller instructions and any technical\nadjustments consistent with the Mayor and Council intent\non this matter, subject to the approval of the CAO.\n2. INSTRUCT the LAHD and the Bureau of Contract\nAdministration (BCA) to report back in 120 days with a transition\nplan for staff and programs related to consolidating Prevailing\nWage Monitoring staff to BCA.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that funding for the\nproposed Second Amended and Restated Agreement is provided in\nFund No. 100/43 Contractual Services account in Fiscal Year 2025-\n26. Funding for Fiscal Year 2026-27 is subject to approval by the\nMayor and Council through the annual budget process. The City’s\nfinancial obligation will be limited to funds appropriated for this\npurpose. There is no additional impact to the General Fund.\nFinancial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the\nrecommendations in this report comply with the City’s Financial\nPolicies in that current operations will be funded by current revenues.

(1)\n20-1041-S6\nDepartment of Transportation (DOT) report relative to the Third\nAmendment to the California Air Resources Board Sustainability\nTransportation Equity Project grant agreement.

(10)\n13-0586\nDOT report relative to the DOT’s protocols and data retention policies\nthat safeguard the privacy of motorists who receive a parking citation,\nand the privacy measures in place for future contracts with vendors.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(11)\n15-1138-S42\nCD 11\nDOT report relative to steps necessary to create a mobility hub on\nDOT Parking Lot No. 731, in Venice. (This item is referred to the\nHousing   and   Homelessness   Committee   and   Transportation\nCommittee.)\nCommunity Impact Statement: Yes\nAgainst: West Los Angeles Sawtelle Neighborhood Council

(2)\n24-1222\nDOT report relative to reducing signal delay to transit vehicles and\nreducing transit end-to-end travel times along at-grade Light Rail\nTransit lines and Bus Rapid Transit lines.

(3)\n25-0558\nCD 13\nDOT report relative to the feasibility of a bicycle lane camera\nenforcement pilot project along Hollywood Boulevard.\nCommunity Impact Statement: Yes.\nFor:\nEast Hollywood Neighborhood Council\nLos Feliz Neighborhood Council

(4)\n25-0600-S120\nCONTINUED FROM 12/10/25\nBudget Recommendation and DOT report relative to revenue-\ngenerating programs that are managed by the DOT and any\nopportunities to increase revenue.\nCommunity Impact Statement: Yes.\nFor: North Westwood Neighborhood Council

(5)\n26-0251\nMotion (McOsker – Jurado) relative to a fallen power pole that caused\na full closure of Interstate 110 near Gaffey Street in San Pedro, on\nFebruary 18, 2026.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted.

(6)\n26-0264\nMotion (Nazarian – Padilla) relative to requiring housing developers to\nprovide transit passes for tenants as a condition of utilizing housing\nincentives. (This   item   is   referred   to   the   Housing   and\nHomelessness Committee, Planning and Land Use Management\nCommittee, and Transportation Committee.)\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted.

(7)\n26-0303\nCD 2\nBoard of Transportation Commissioners report relative to a boundary\nexpansion for Preferential Parking District No. 55 in the Toluca Lake\narea of Council District Two.

(8)\n26-0008-S4\nCD 3\nResolution (Blumenfield – Padilla) relative to establishing oversize\nvehicle parking restrictions along certain street segments of Martha\nStreet, Winnetka Avenue, Mason Avenue, Hart Street, Sherman Way,\netc., in Council District Three.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted.

(9)\n26-0008-S5\nCD 12\nResolution (Lee – Padilla) relative to establishing oversize vehicle\nparking restrictions along certain street segments of Canby Avenue,\nDevonshire Street, and Hartland Street, in Council District Twelve.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted.