Los Angeles — 2026-02-25

(1)\n14-0160-S235\nCD 5\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 1001 North Beverly Glen Boulevard.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 1001 North\nBeverly Glen Boulevard. (Lien: $1,276.56)

(10)\n25-0160-S174\nCD 2\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 4615 North Lankershim Boulevard.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 4615 North\nLankershim Boulevard. (Lien: $1,276.56)

(11)\n25-0160-S175\nCD 11\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 5100 South Via Dolce, Apartment 206.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 5100 South Via\nDolce, Apartment 206. (Lien: $1,276.56)

(12)\n26-0160-S1\nCD 2\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 7928 North Coldwater Canyon Avenue.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 7928 North\nColdwater Canyon Avenue. (Lien: $1,276.56)

(13)\n26-0160-S2\nCD 2\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 13736 West Victory Boulevard, Unit C.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 13736 West\nVictory Boulevard, Unit C. (Lien: $514.42)

(14)\n26-0160-S3\nCD 14\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 2503 East Whittier Boulevard AKA 2501 East Whittier\nBoulevard.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 2503 East Whittier\nBoulevard AKA 2501 East Whittier Boulevard. (Lien: $4,233.39)

(15)\n26-0160-S4\nCD 12\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 23331 West Community Street.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 23331 West\nCommunity Street. (Lien: $1,276.56)

(16)\n26-0160-S5\nCD 6\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 14829 West Oxnard Street AKA 14833 West Oxnard Street.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 14829 West\nOxnard Street AKA 14833 West Oxnard Street. (Lien: $690.00)

(17)\n26-0160-S6\nCD 3\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 19550 West Vanowen Street.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 19550 West\nVanowen Street. (Lien: $1,276.56)

(18)\n26-0160-S7\nCD 14\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 1337 South Hope Street AKA 1347 South Hope Street.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 1337 South Hope\nStreet AKA 1347 South Hope Street. (Lien: $1,276.56)

(19)\n26-0160-S8\nCD 8\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 2530 West Florence Avenue AKA 2530-2534 West Florence\nAvenue.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 2530 West\nFlorence Avenue AKA 2530-2534 West Florence Avenue. (Lien:\n$998.84)

(2)\n25-0160-S9\nCD 7\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC), for the property\nlocated at 7035 West Flora Morgan Trail.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to the LAMC and/or\nLAAC, and CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 7035 West\nFlora Morgan Trail. (Lien: $1,276.56)

(20)\n26-0160-S9\nCD 12\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 17400 West Raymer Street.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 17400 West\nRaymer Street. (Lien: $1,276.56)\nItems for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(21)\n26-0087\nCD 15\nPLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to investigating any matters of reported nuisance activities at\nthe property located at 844 West Lomita Boulevard.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (McOsker -\nPark):\nINSTRUCT the Department of City Planning, with the assistance of\nthe Department of Building and Safety, Los Angeles Police\nDepartment, and Los Angeles Fire Department, and in consultation\nwith the City Attorney, to investigate any matters of reported nuisance\nactivities occurring onsite at the property located at 844 West Lomita\nBoulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90710; and thereafter, the Zoning\nAdministrator may initiate Administrative Nuisance Abatement\nProceedings per Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 12.27.1;\nChapter 1A Section 13B.6.2; and prepare the necessary reports and\nrecommendations, conduct the required public hearings, and thereby\nprotect the public peace, health, and safety of the community by\nimposing corrective conditions to address the reported nuisance\nactivities that are occurring onsite at the property.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.

(22)\n17-0981-S14\nCD 7\nCATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, NEGATIVE DECLARATION, and\nPLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE\nREPORT relative to activating a new streamlined permitting land use\nregulatory process, the Restaurant Beverage Program and Restaurant\nBeverage Program-Sensitive Use Zone, in Council District Seven.\nRecommendations for Council action, pursuant to Resolution\n(Rodriguez - Lee):\n1. Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California\nEnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section\n15301 (Class 1); previously adopted Negative Declaration,\nNo. ENV-2018-4661-ND, adopted on February 9, 2022,\nand Findings pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162\nthat no subsequent Environmental Impact Report.\n2. RESOLVE, that by adoption of the Resolution attached to\nthe Council file, inclusive of the Map (Exhibit A) and\nFindings (Exhibit B) attached to the Resolution, the\nCouncil hereby activates a new streamlined permitting\nland use regulatory process, the Restaurant Beverage\nProgram and Restaurant Beverage Program-Sensitive\nUse Zone, that shall be in force and full effect in the\ngeographical boundaries attached in Exhibit A.\n3. RESOLVE, that based on the Findings outlined in Exhibit\nB relative to the geographic boundaries found in Exhibit A\nmaps, the Restaurant Beverage Program and Restaurant\nBeverage Program-Sensitive Use Zone are in conformity\nwith public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and\ngood zoning practice.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis on\nthis report.

(23)\n26-0059\nCD 10\nPLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to investigating any matters of reported nuisance activities at\nthe properties located at 2126 West Adams Boulevard and 2125 West\n26th Place.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Hutt -\nHernandez):\nINSTRUCT the Department of City Planning, with the assistance of\nthe Department of Building and Safety and the Los Angeles Police\nDepartment, and in consultation with the City Attorney, to investigate\nany matters of reported nuisance activities occurring onsite at the\nproperties located at 2126 West Adams Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA\n90018 and 2125 West 26th Place, Los Angeles, CA 90018; and\nthereafter, the Zoning Administrator may initiate Administrative\nNuisance Abatement Proceedings per Los Angeles Municipal Code\nSection 12.27.1; Chapter 1A Section 13B.6.2; and prepare the\nnecessary reports and recommendations, conduct the required public\nhearings, and thereby protect the public peace, health, and safety of\nthe community by imposing corrective conditions to address the\nreported nuisance activities that are occurring onsite at the property.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this\nreport.

(24)\n26-0079\nCD 4\nCATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE\nMANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the inclusion of\nSunkist Growers, Inc. Headquarters Building, located at 14130 West\nRiverside Drive, in the list of Historic-Cultural Monuments.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. DETERMINE that the proposed designation is\ncategorically exempt from the California Environmental\nQuality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Article 19, Section 15308,\nClass 8 and Article 19, Section 15331, Class 31 of the\nState CEQA Guidelines.\n2. DETERMINE that the subject property conforms with the\ndefinition of a Monument pursuant to Section 22.171.7 of\nthe Los Angeles Administrative Code.\n3. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Cultural Heritage\nCommission (CHC) as the Findings of Council.\n4. APPROVE the recommendations of the CHC relative to\nthe inclusion of Sunkist Growers, Inc. Headquarters\nBuilding, located at 14130 West Riverside Drive, in the list\nof Historic-Cultural Monuments.\nOwner/Applicant: IMT Capital II Sherman Oaks LLC c/o David\nTedesco\nCase No. CHC-2025-5718-HCM\nEnvironmental No. ENV-2025-5719-CE\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the CHC. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(25)\n25-1217\nPLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to a proposed Ordinance amending Chapter IX of the Los\nAngeles Municipal Code (LAMC) to correct technical and clerical errors\nin Ordinance No. 188797.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. APPROVE the proposed Ordinance amending Chapter IX\nof the LAMC to correct technical and clerical errors in\nOrdinance No. 188797, which adopted portions of the\n2025 Edition of the California Building Standards Code\nand made local administrative, climatic, geological,\ntopographical, or environmental changes as specified,\nincluded in the Department of Building and Safety (DBS)\nreport dated January 22, 2026, attached to the Council\nfile.\n2. REQUEST the City Attorney to prepare and present the\ndraft Ordinance, including the environmental clearance.\n3. RECEIVE and FILE the two DBS reports dated December\n8, 2025.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the DBS. Neither the\nChief Legislative Analyst nor the City Administrative Officer has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(26)\n14-1174-S109\nCD 1\nCATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND\nJOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative appropriating up to $569,641\nplus all remaining interest in CRA/LA Excess Non-Housing Bond\nProceeds (EBP) from the Westlake Redevelopment Project Area\n(Taxable Series 2006-A and 2008-B) and up to $249,654 plus all\nremaining interest from the Pico Union 2 Redevelopment Project Area\n(Taxable Series 2003-A and 2008-B) for the Liechty School Safety\nProject.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. DETERMINE that the Liechty School Safety Project (Project),\nconsisting of new bike routes, pedestrian-scale lighting, leading\npedestrian interval signal timing, pedestrian-activated flashing\nbeacons, curb extensions, high-visibility crosswalks, Americans\nwith Disabilities Act (ADA) ramps, and speed humps, is\ncategorically exempt from the provisions of the California\nEnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA\nGuidelines and Section 15301. The Project is also exempt\nunder the City CEQA Guidelines Class 1(3), which exempts\nprojects involving the operation, repair, maintenance, or minor\nalteration of existing highways, streets, sidewalks, and gutters,\nwhere there is negligible or no expansion of use and no removal\nof scenic resources. City CEQA Guidelines Class 4(13) further\nexempts the creation of bicycle lanes on existing rights-of-way,\nwhile Class 1(15) exempts the installation of traffic signs,\nsignals, and pavement markings, including traffic channelization\nusing paint or raised markers. Lastly, Class 1(20) categorically\nexempts modernization of existing highways or streets through\nlocalized improvements such as the addition of auxiliary lanes\nfor turning. None of the exceptions listed in State CEQA\nGuidelines Section 15300.2 applies to this project.\n2. APPROVE up to $569,641 in taxable CRA/LA EBP plus all\nearned interest (Interest) available to Council District (CD) 1\nfrom the Westlake Redevelopment Project Area (Project Area)\nto be utilized for the Project.\n3. APPROVE up to $249,654 in taxable CRA/LA EBP plus Interest\navailable to Council District (CD) 1 from the Pico Union 2\nProject Area to be utilized for the Project.\n4. AUTHORIZE the Los Angeles Department of Transportation\n(DOT) to be the lead coordinating and implementing department\nfor activities related to the Project.\n5. AUTHORIZE the Economic and Workforce Development\nDepartment (EWDD) to be the fiscal agent for the EBP,\nconsistent with the Bond Expenditure Agreement (BEA) (C-\n125212) between the City and CRA/LA and the procedures of\nthe CRA/LA Bond Oversight Committee (BOC).\n6. AUTHORIZE the DOT to approve, negotiate, and execute\ncontracting documents and/or amendments as required with its\nduly procured contractor(s) to effectuate the Project and\nprevailing wage requirements.\n7. AUTHORIZE the Controller, subject to the availability of funds,\nto expend up to $569,641 plus Interest from the EBP Fund No.\n57D, Account Nos. 22L9ST and 22S9ST Westlake Taxable\nSeries 2006-A and 2008-B, for activities related to the Project\nupon presentation of proper documentation reviewed and\napproved by DOT, and satisfactory review and approval of\nEWDD in accordance with the terms and conditions of the BEA.\n8. AUTHORIZE the Controller, subject to the availability of funds,\nto expend up to $249,654 plus Interest from the EBP Fund No.\n57D, Account Nos. 22L9OT and 22S9OT Pico Union 2 Taxable\nSeries 2003-A and 2008-B, for activities related to the Project\nupon presentation of proper documentation reviewed and\napproved by DOT, and satisfactory review and approval of\nEWDD in accordance with the terms and conditions of the BEA.\n9. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, EWDD, or designee, to\nprepare Controller instructions and/or make technical\nadjustments that may be required and are consistent with this\naction, subject to the approval of the CAO, and authorize the\nController to implement these instructions.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The CRA/LA Bond Oversight Committee\nreports that there is no impact on the City’s General Fund from the\nproposed appropriation of EBP. The EBP Fund No. 57D is funded\nsolely from transfers of approximately $88.4 million in pre-2011 tax\nallocation bond proceeds from CRA/LA to the City (C.F. 14-1174, 14-\n1174-S36 and 14-1174-S78), and subsequent earned interest. Said\ntransfers have been deposited with the Office of the Controller.

(27)\n25-0996\nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT\nrelative to instructing the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), with the\nassistance of the Economic and Workforce Development Department\n(EWDD) and other relevant City departments, to report on the current\nCity programs that provide regular and emergency assistance to\nlegacy restaurants, and recommendations for additional programs that\ncould support legacy restaurants in financial crisis.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Rodriguez -\nPrice):\nINSTRUCT the CLA, with the assistance of the EWDD and other\nrelevant City departments, to report on the current City programs that\nprovide regular and emergency assistance to legacy restaurants, and\nrecommendations for additional programs that could support legacy\nrestaurants in financial crisis.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor\nthe CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(28)\n23-1022-S24\nCD 4\nSTATUTORY EXEMPTION and HOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS\nand GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEES’ REPORT relative\nto a lease agreement with the Weingart Center Association to operate\nthe A Bridge Home (ABH) site located at 3248 Riverside Drive in\nCouncil District Four (CD 4).\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. DETERMINE that the funding allocation, lease, change in\nservice provider, and continued use for a period of\napproximately one year of the Bridge Housing/low barrier\nnavigation center is statutorily exempt from California\nEnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Public Resources\nCode Section 21080.27.5, applicable low barrier navigation\ncenters and Government Code Section 8698.4(a)(4) governing\nhomeless shelter projects under a shelter crisis declaration.\nPlease refer to Notice of Exemption found in the Bureau of\nEngineering report dated August 21, 2025, attached to Council\nfile No. 19-0126-S3.\n2. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, General Services\nDepartment, or designee, to negotiate and execute a lease\nagreement with Weingart Center Association for the property\nlocated at 3210-3248 Riverside Drive in CD 4 to operate an\ninterim housing facility, under the terms and conditions\nsubstantially outlined in the revised Municipal Facilities\nCommittee (MFC) report dated January 9, 2026, attached to\nCouncil file No. 23-1022-S24.\n3. NOTE and FILE the MFC report dated December 17, 2025,\nattached to Council file No. 23-1022-S24.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The MFC reports that there is no anticipated\nimpact to the General Fund as a result of the recommendations in this\nreport. No funding is provided for leasing, since the site is owned by\nthe City and this is a no-cost agreement with the provider.

(29)\n23-1022-S25\nCD 13\nSTATUTORY EXEMPTION and HOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS\nand GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEES’ REPORT relative\nto a sublease agreement between with Hope the Mission to operate\nthe Tiny Home Village (THV) site located at 2301 West Third Street in\nCouncil District (CD) 13.\nRecommendations for Council action:\n1. DETERMINE that the funding allocation, lease, change in\nservice provider, and continued use for a period of\napproximately one year of the THV/low barrier navigation center\nlocated at 2301 West Third Street in CD 13 is statutorily exempt\nfrom California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Public\nResources Code Section 21080.27.5, applicable low barrier\nnavigation centers and Government Code Section 8698.4(a)(4)\ngoverning homeless shelter projects under a shelter crisis\ndeclaration. Please refer to Notice of Exemption found in the\nBureau of Engineering report dated June 13, 2025, attached to\nCouncil file No. 23-1022-S16.\n2. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, General Services\nDepartment, or designee, to negotiate and execute a sublease\nagreement with Hope the Mission to operate the THV interim\nhousing site located at 2301 West Third Street in CD 13, under\nthe terms and conditions substantially outlined in the Municipal\nFacilities Committee (MFC) report dated December 17, 2025,\nattached to Council file No. 23-1022-S25.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The MFC reports that there is no anticipated\nimpact to the General Fund as a result of the recommendations in this\nreport. On July 2, 2025, the Mayor concurred with the Council’s\napproval of the City Administrative Officer report, Council file No. 23-\n1022-S16, which programmed $102,000 of Homeless Housing,\nAssistance and Prevention Round 5 (HHAP-5) funds to support lease\ncosts of the site through June 30, 2026. No funding is provided for this\nsublease agreement, since this is a no-cost agreement with the\nprovider.

(3)\n25-0160-S167\nCD 3\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 18340 West Ventura Boulevard, Unit #231.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 18340 West\nVentura Boulevard, Unit #231. (Lien: $514.42)

(30)\n25-0030\nRESOLUTION (HARRIS-DAWSON - BLUMENFIELD) relative to the\nDeclaration of Local Emergency by the Mayor dated January 7, 2025,\nand Updated Declaration of Local Emergency by the Mayor dated\nJanuary 13, 2025, due to the windstorm and extreme fire weather\nsystem and devastating wildfires in the City of Los Angeles (City),\npursuant to Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) Section 8.27.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION, dated January 14, 2025,\nto:\n1. Resolve that a local emergency exists resulting from ongoing\nwindstorm and extreme fire weather system and the devastating\nwildfires in the City within the meaning of LAAC Section 8.21, et\nseq., as set forth in the Mayor’s January 13, 2025 Updated\nDeclaration of Local Emergency, which incorporated the\ndeclaration of emergency dated January 7, 2025, which the City\nCouncil hereby ratifies.\n2. Resolve that because the local emergency, which began on\nJanuary 7, 2025, continues to exist, there is a need to continue\nthe state of local emergency, which the City Council hereby\nratifies.\n3. Instruct and request all appropriate City departments (including\nproprietary departments), agencies, and personnel, in\naccordance with LAAC Code Section 8.21 et seq., to continue\nto perform all duties and responsibilities to represent the City in\nthis matter to respond to and abate the emergency and prevent\nfurther harm to the life, health, property, and safety, and receive,\nprocess; and, coordinate all inquiries and requirements\nnecessary to obtain whatever State and Federal assistance that\nmay become available to the City and/or to the citizens of the\nCity who may be affected by the emergency.\n4. Instruct the General Manager, Emergency Management\nDepartment, to advise the Mayor and City Council on the need\nto extend the state of local emergency, as appropriate.\n5. Resolve that, to the extent the public interest and necessity\ndemand the immediate expenditure of public funds to safeguard\nlife, health, or property in response to the local emergency and\nto support the emergency operations of the City and its\ndepartments (including its proprietary departments), agencies,\nand personnel (including mutual aid resources) in responding to\nthe declared local emergency, the competitive bidding\nrequirements enumerated in City Charter Section 371, and\nfurther codified in the LAAC, including LAAC Section 10.15 be\nsuspended until termination of the state of emergency and\nsolely with respect to purchases and contracts needed to\nrespond to the declared state of emergency.\n6. Direct and request City departments and agencies making\npurchases pursuant to the authority granted in paragraph five\n(5), above, to report every two weeks to the City Council\nregarding the purchases and contracts made during the prior\ntwo week period on the reasons justifying why such purchase or\ncontract was necessary to respond to the emergency, including\nwhy the emergency did not permit a delay resulting from a\ncompetitive solicitation for bids or proposals, and why\ncompetitive proposals or bidding was not reasonably practicable\nor compatible with the City’s interests.\n7. Request all City departments and agencies who have the\nauthority to investigate and/or enforce any/all forms of price\ngouging, fraud, and theft by deceit, as described in the\nCalifornia Penal Code, to do so to the fullest extent permissible\nunder federal, state, and local law.\n8. Instruct the City Clerk, unless and until Council directs\notherwise or discontinues the state of emergency, to timely\nagendize this matter so that Council may consider whether to\ncontinue the state of emergency.\n9. Instruct the City Clerk to forward copies of this Resolution\nto the Governor of the State of California, the Director of\nthe Office of Emergency Services of the State of California,\nthe Los Angeles County Office of Emergency Management,\nand the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors.

(31)\n25-1474\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the\nfeasibility and fiscal impact of raising the small business exemption\nthreshold, and business tax practices of other cities.\nRecommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Rodriguez -\nBlumenfield):\nINSTRUCT the Office of Finance, with the assistance from the City\nAdministrative Officer (CAO) and Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), to\nreport to Council on the following:\na. The feasibility and fiscal impact of raising the small business\nexemption threshold.\nb. The practices of other cities in regards to business tax.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed\na financial analysis of this report.

(32)\n26-0131\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a transfer\nof funds to address shortfalls in various Los Angeles Fire Department\nsworn and civilian salary accounts.\nRecommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Lee –\nYaroslavsky), SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:\n1. REQUEST the Controller to transfer a total of $5,000,000 from\nwithin Fund No. 100/38, LAFD, Account No. 001012, Salaries\nSworn, to Account No. 001030, Sworn Bonuses, in the amount\nof $2,500,000; Account No. 001090, Overtime General, in the\namount of $1,000,000; and, Account No. 001092, Overtime\nSworn, in the amount of $1,500,000, to cover projected deficits\nin these accounts.\n2. AUTHORIZE and INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer\n(CAO), and REQUEST the Controller, to take any necessary\nactions and make any technical corrections to the above\ninstructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Motion.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the Chief Legislative\nAnalyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

(33)\n25-1431\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to actual\ncost information for the Proposition HHH General Obligation Bonds,\nSeries 2026-A (Taxable) (Social Bonds), issued to fund Proposition\nHHH projects.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nNOTE and FILE the City Administrative Officer report dated February\n2, 2026, attached to the Council file, relative to the actual cost\ninformation for General Obligation Bonds issued to fund Proposition\nHHH projects, inasmuch as no further Council action is required at\nthis time.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable

(34)\n08-3292-S1\nCD 6\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the\nescheatment of idle funds in the Panorama City Business\nImprovement District (BID), Fund No. 51D.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nREQUEST the City Attorney to draft a Resolution authorizing the\nescheatment of the remaining funds from Panorama City BID,\nAccount No. 51D.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no\nimpact to the General Fund associated with the recommended action.

(35)\n21-1188-S12\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a\nproposed amendment to Contract No. C-144882 with Kendall Brill &\nKelly, LLP to increase the contract ceiling for legal services related to\nthe July 11, 2021 sewage discharge incident at the Hyperion Water\nReclamation Plant.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. APPROVE an amendment to Contract No. C-144882 with\nKendall Brill & Kelly, LLP to increase the contract ceiling by\n$180,000 for a total contract amount of $982,631, to be paid\nfrom Bureau of Sanitation special funds.\n2. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to prepare\nController instructions for any necessary technical adjustments,\nsubject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer (CAO);\nand, AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement the instructions.\n[The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) and (e)(2), to confer with\nits legal counsel to discuss the need for additional funding for\nrepresentation regarding exposure to litigation in the above-\nentitled matter.]\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither\nthe CAO nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial\nanalysis of this report.

(36)\n18-0916-S1\nCD 5\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a request\nfor payment of Court-ordered costs of suit, pursuant to the ruling in the\ncase entitled Friends of Westwanda Drive v. City of Los Angeles, et al.,\nLos Angeles Superior Court (LASC) Case No. 20STCP03490, for a\nproject located at 10034 Westwanda Drive.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney’s Office to expend $4,262.24,\nplus applicable interest, for the Court-ordered costs of suit\nassociated with the above-entitled matter.\n2. AUTHORIZE payment of the Court-ordered costs of suit in the\ntotal amount of $4,262.24, plus applicable interest, from the\nLiability Claims Fund No. 100/59, Account No. 009798,\nMiscellaneous Liability Payouts, pursuant to the ruling in the\ncase entitled Friends of Westwanda Drive v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., LASC Case No. 20STCP03490.\n3. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney to draw a demand from the\nLiability Claims Fund No. 100/59, Account No. 009798,\nMiscellaneous Liability Payouts, which shall be paid as follows:\nChannel Law Group LLP.\n4. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney to deliver the warrants payable\nto Channel Law Group LLP, Tax Identification Number 20-\n8149327, contemporaneous with receipt of a Notice of\nSatisfaction of the attorneys’ fee awarded against the City.\n5. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to make necessary\ntechnical adjustments, subject to the approval of the City\nAdministrative Officer (CAO); and, AUTHORIZE the Controller\nto implement the instructions.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither\nthe Chief Legislative Analyst nor the CAO has completed a financial\nanalysis of this report.

(37)\n26-0055\nARTS, PARKS, LIBRARIES, AND COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT and\nBUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEES’ REPORT relative to the\nKaiser Permanente Operation Splash Program grant application and\naward for 2026 and 2027 to support Department of Recreation and\nParks (RAP) aquatic programming.\nRecommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL\nOF THE MAYOR:\n1. AUTHORIZE the RAP to submit a two-year grant application to\nKaiser Permanente for the Operation Splash Program\nGrant (Grant) for 2026 and 2027 in the amount of $408,000.\n2. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, RAP, to accept the Grant\nfunds, if awarded, from Kaiser Permanente in support of\naquatics programming.\n3. DESIGNATE the General Manager, RAP, or designee, as the\nagent to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all Grant\ndocuments, including but not limited to applications,\nagreements, amendments, and payment requests, which may\nbe necessary for the acceptance and use of Grant funds.\n4. AUTHORIZE the Chief Accounting Employee, RAP, or\ndesignee, to:\na. Establish the necessary account and/or to appropriate\nfunding received within "Recreation and Parks Grant"\nFund No. 205 to accept the Grant funds in the amount of\n$408,000 for aquatics programming.\nb. Make any technical corrections as necessary to carry out\nthe intent of the Board of Recreation and Park\nCommissioners (Board) report dated January 15, 2026,\nattached to the Council file.\nFiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that acceptance of the\nKaiser Permanente Grant does not require the RAP to provide\nmatching funds; therefore, it would not impact the RAP’s General\nFund.

(38)\n26-1100-S5\nCONSIDERATION\nOF\nMOTION\n(HARRIS-DAWSON\n–\nYAROSLAVSKY) relative to adopting the order and letter designation\nrequests for the ballot measures to be placed on the June 2, 2026\nState of California Primary Election.\nRecommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Harris-\nDawson – Yaroslavsky):\n1. ADOPT the following order and letter designation request for\nthe single ballot measures to be placed on the June 2, 2026\nState of California Primary Election:\n1st Measure: APPLYING CANNABIS BUSINESS TAXES TO\nUNLICENSED CANNABIS BUSINESSES. PROPOSITION CB.\n2nd Measure: APPLYING TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX TO\nONLINE TRAVEL COMPANIES. PROPOSITION OT.\n3rd Measure: FUNDING FOR CITY SERVICES THROUGH\nMODIFICATIONS TO THE TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX.\nPROPOSITION TT.\n2. DIRECT the City Clerk to transmit the ballot order and letter\nrequest designation adopted by this Motion to the County\nRegistrar-Recorder without delay.\n3. AUTHORIZE the Council President to propose alternate letter\ndesignations to the County Registrar-Recorder in the event that\nthe requested designations are not available.

(39)\n07-0005-S644\nCD 14\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 3061 East Ganahl Street (Case No. 855141), Assessor I.D.\nNo. 5229-005-006, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated February 18,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 3061 East Ganahl Street\n(Case No. 855141), Assessor I.D. No. 5229-005-006, from the REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(4)\n25-0160-S168\nCD 6\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 14651 West Wyandotte Street.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 14651 West\nWyandotte Street. (Lien: $2,875.30)

(40)\n26-0005-S21\nCD 5\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 642 North Hayworth Avenue (Case No. 921312), Assessor\nI.D. No. 5527-017-020, from the Rent Escrow Account Program\n(REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated February 18,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 642 North Hayworth\nAvenue (Case No. 921312), Assessor I.D. No. 5527-017-020, from\nthe REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(41)\n26-0005-S22\nCD 2\nCOMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING\nDEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the\nproperty at 6047 North Woodman Avenue (Case No. 833725),\nAssessor I.D. No. 2239-024-003, from the Rent Escrow Account\nProgram (REAP).\nRecommendation for Council action:\nAPPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated February 18,\n2026, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying\nRESOLUTION removing the property at 6047 North Woodman\nAvenue (Case No. 833725), Assessor I.D. No. 2239-024-003, from\nthe REAP.\nFiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the\nCity Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has\ncompleted a financial analysis of this report.

(42)\n26-0176\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Movses Sisoyan v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25VECV02580.\n(This matter arises from a vehicle versus vehicle traffic accident on\nNovember 13, 2024, at the intersection of Hayvenhurst Avenue and\nNordhoff Street, in North Hills, California.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on February 17, 2026.)

(43)\n26-0177\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the cases entitled Richard Guzman, et al. v. City of\nLos Angeles, United States District Court (USDC) Case No. 2:23-cv-\n08689-FLA-Ex; and Margret Hill, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, USDC\nCase No. 2:24-cv-03484-FLA-Ex. (This matter arises from claims by\nformer employees of the Los Angeles Police Department that the City\nfailed to timely pay their banked compensatory time at the termination\nof their employment in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on February 17, 2026.)

(44)\n26-0178\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Maria Guadalupe Ramirez v. City\nof Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.\n23STCV18398. (This matter arises from a trip and fall incident that\noccurred on September 3, 2022, near 243 East 52nd Street, in the City\nof Los Angeles.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on February 17, 2026.)

(45)\n26-0179\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Yolanda White v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV06414.\n(This matter arises from a September 15, 2021, incident involving a trip\nand fall located at 3711 Beethoven Street, in the City of Los Angeles.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on February 17, 2026.)

(46)\n26-0180\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Hilda Combs v. City of Los\nAngeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV32710.\n(This matter arises from an incident on March 30, 2022, located at\nNorth Grand Avenue and Temple Street, where the incident occurred.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on February 17, 2026.)

(47)\n26-0036\nThe City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to\nGovernment Code Section 54956.9(d)(4), to confer with its legal\ncounsel relative to the case entitled Golden Entropy Inc. (This matter\narises from a Business License Tax assessment.)\n(The Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter\nin Open Session on February 17, 2026.)\nAdjourning Motions\nCouncil Adjournment\nEXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES - If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those\nissues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City\nClerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on\na matter will become a part of the administrative record.\nCODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 - If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil\nProcedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code\nof Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which\nthe Council's action becomes final.\nMaterials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System,\nat lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00-0000).

(5)\n25-0160-S169\nCD 3\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 7740 North Tampa Avenue.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 7740 North Tampa\nAvenue. (Lien: $3,807.72)

(6)\n25-0160-S170\nCD 7\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 13243 West Osborne Street.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 13243 West\nOsborne Street. (Lien: $1,304.26)

(7)\n25-0160-S171\nCD 3\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 19222 West Roscoe Boulevard.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 19222 West\nRoscoe Boulevard. (Lien: $1,276.56)

(8)\n25-0160-S172\nCD 15\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 10304 South Holmes Avenue.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 10304 South\nHolmes Avenue. (Lien: $2,956.11)

(9)\n25-0160-S173\nCD 2\nHEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and\nSafety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance\nabatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual\nInspection costs, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)\nand/or Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) for the property\nlocated at 5837 North Goodland Avenue.\nRecommendation for Council action:\nHEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed\nlien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code\nviolations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC\nand CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 5837 North\nGoodland Avenue. (Lien: $1,276.56)

(1)\n-----\nVerbal Report from the Bureau of Street Lighting on the status of the\nStreet Lighting Assessment, LED replacement, copper wire theft, and\nother programs.

(10)\n26-0199\nCD 1\nMotion (Hernandez – Rodriguez) relative to designating the\nintersection of Amador Street and Solano Avenue in Solano Canyon as\n“Alicia Vann Brown Square."

(11)\n26-0200\nCD 7\nMotion (Rodriguez – Padilla) relative to designating the intersection of\nPierce Street and San Fernando Road as “Ed and Carolyn Rose\nSquare."

(2)\n25-1350\nBureau of Street Lighting to report relative to converting streetlights to\nsolar-to-battery lighting and repurposing or leasing vacated electrical\nconduits for other uses, and related matters. (Scheduled pursuant to

(3)\n24-0041\nBureau of Engineering report relative to the use of Rapid Micro-\nTrenching in accordance with requirements established by the City\nEngineer and requiring a Street Damage Restoration Fee (SDRF)\npayment matching that of regular Micro-Trenching.\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(4)\n26-0205\nMotion (Yaroslavsky, Hernandez – Rodriguez, et al.) relative to adding\nfunds to the 2025-26 Municipal Improvement Corporation of Los\nAngeles (MICLA) Program for the surge installation of solar-powered\nstreetlights across the City, and related matters. (This item is referred\nto the Public Works Committee and Budget and Finance\nCommittee.)

(5)\n25-1510\nMotion (Rodriguez – Hernandez, Jurado, et al.) relative to the Bureau\nof Street Lighting’s response to outages, repair performance, funding,\nand utilitarian light program.

(6)\n26-0037\nMotion (Padilla - Lee) relative to expanding the design scope of the\nSepulveda Basin Pedestrian Safety and Access Improvements Project.

(7)\n26-0030\nMotion (Raman – Hernandez) relative to the current maintenance for\nstreets that are too steep for Bureau of Street Services (BSS) standard\nequipment and how BSS intends to maintain these streets.

(8)\n25-0214\nCD 4\nCity Engineer report relative to the vacation of a portion of the northerly\nside of the alley adjoining Lot 9 of Tract 13775 between Willis Avenue\nand Cedros Avenue (VAC- E1401461).\nFiscal Impact Statement: Yes

(9)\n26-0159\nCD 9\nMotion (Price - Hutt) relative to designating the intersection of 23rd\nStreet and Central Avenue as “Lincoln Theater Square."

(1)\n11-1225-S2\nCity Administrative Officer (CAO) report relative to a proposed Fifth\nAmendment to the contract with Ilium Associates, Inc., for transit\nmarketing, customer outreach, support services, and public right-of-\nway sign fabrication and installation services.

(10)\n26-0008-S3\nCD 10\nResolution (Hutt – Lee) relative to establishing oversize vehicle parking\nrestrictions along certain street segments of South Bronson Avenue,\nSouth Palm Grove Avenue, and South Victoria Avenue, in Council\nDistrict Ten.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted.

(11)\n23-0529\nBoard of Police Commissioners report and City Attorney report and\ndraft ordinance relative to prohibiting the renting, leasing, or selling of\nrecreational vehicles in the public right-of-way, and updating the fines\nand penalties. (This   item   was   referred   to   the   Public   Works\nCommittee and Transportation Committee.)

(12)\n23-1168\nDOT report relative to the Speed Safety System Pilot Program\nauthorized by Assembly Bill 645 (Freidman-Ting).

(13)\nDOT General Manager and staff verbal report relative to an update on\nthe status of the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games Transportation\nPlan.\nSUPPORTING MATERIALS\nMaterials relating to items on the agenda are available on the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System found at\nhttps://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect by entering the Council File number (e.g., 00-0000) associated with the agenda item.\nPUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS\nMembers of the public who wish to speak on one or multiple items shall have an opportunity to speak up to one minute per item up\nto a total of two minutes for two or more agenda items. At regular meetings, members of the public shall also have an opportunity to\nspeak up to one minute for general public comment on any matter within the subject-matter jurisdiction of the Committee. The\nCommittee is not required to take general public comment at special meetings. The Committee may limit the total amount of time for\npublic comment on any specific agenda item, on all agenda-items collectively, and/or on general public comment, based on the\nanticipated time required to hear from public speakers on any given or all agenda items, on the availability of Committee members\nand the need to maintain quorum, and on any other relevant factor. The Committee shall not discuss or take action relative to any\ngeneral public comment except as explicitly permitted under the Brown Act.\nCOMMITTEE INFORMATION, ASSIGNMENTS, AND STRUCTURE\nhttps://clerk.lacity.gov/clerk-services/cps/council-committee-meetings/info-assignments-structure\nSPECIAL ACCOMMODATION\nRequests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with\nDisabilities Act, can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978-1122. For Telecommunications Relay Service for the\nhearing impaired, please see the information below.\nNOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES\nIf a member of the public is compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require them to register as a\nlobbyist and report this activity. More information can be found at Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. or at\nethics.lacity.org/lobbying. Further assistance can be found by contacting the Ethics Commission at (213) 978-1960 or\nethics.commission@lacity.org.\nEXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES\nA member of the public seeking to challenge a City action in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public\nhearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk prior to the public hearing in time reasonably\nto be considered by the Committee members. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final\naction on a matter will become a part of the administrative record.\nTELECOMMUNICATIONS RELAY SERVICE (TRS) COMMUNICATIONS\nTelephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in\ntechnology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, and\nindividuals with a speech disability, may be able to avail themselves of both for peer-to-peer and third-party telecommunications\nrelay service (TRS) communications. Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or\nspeech disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and\nthe U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers - generally telephone companies - are compensated for the\ncosts of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user.\nWhat forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the equipment\navailable: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY-Based TRS; Speech-to-Speech Relay Service; Shared Non-English Language Relay\nService; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for\ndetail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs.\nDon't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the caller is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello, this is the\nrelay service…" when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who\nis deaf, hard-of-hearing, or has a speech disability.\nFor more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the\nFCC's Disability Rights Office website.

(2)\n24-0096-S1\nCAO report relative to a proposed First Amendment to the contract\nwith Sterndahl Enterprises, LLC, for pavement marking, striping, and\nsealing services.

(3)\n25-0583\nCity Attorney report and draft ordinance relative to fixing rates and\ncharges for private ambulance service in the City of Los Angeles.

(4)\n25-1427-S1\nMotion (Jurado - Harris-Dawson, Hernandez) relative to ongoing\nNational Transportation Safety Board and the National Highway Traffic\nSafety Administration investigations involving Waymo-operated\nautonomous vehicles. (This item is referred to the Transportation\nCommitee and Budget and Finance Committee.)\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted

(5)\n26-0063\nMotion (Lee – Padilla) relative to implementing a pilot program for E-\nCitations.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted.

(6)\n26-0073\nCD 14\nMotion (Jurado – Hutt) relative to a City Asset Monetization Pilot\nProgram in Council District 14. (This   item   is   referred   to   the\nGovernment   Operations   Committee   and   Transportation\nCommittee.)\nCommunity Impact Statement: Yes\nFor:\nLos Feliz Neighborhood Council

(7)\n26-0086\nCD 6\nMotion (Padilla – Blumenfield) relative to a comprehensive traffic study\nof the Woodman Corridor from Van Nuys Boulevard to Saticoy Street.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted.

(8)\n26-0144\nDepartment of Transportation (DOT) report relative to a request for\nauthority to issue a Request for Proposals for Facility Maintenance and\nSignposting Services.

(9)\n26-0008-S2\nCD 10\nResolution (Hutt – McOsker) relative to establishing oversize vehicle\nparking restrictions along a certain street segment of West 29th Street,\nin Council District Ten.\nCommunity Impact Statement: None submitted.